Report accuses former Ann Richards principal, executive director of violating school policy
The Brief
New documents acquired by FOX 7 detail the investigation into leadership at the Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders.
Austin ISD determined multiple staff members displayed a "consistent pattern of coordinated exclusion."
Principal Nicole Griffith resigned suddenly in March.
AUSTIN, Texas - More details surrounding the sudden resignation of the principal of the Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders have emerged.
FOX 7 Austin has received an investigative report from Austin ISD's Office of Professional Standards on what potentially led to Principal Nicole Griffith's resignation through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
In the report, investigators recommended to AISD that Griffith and Dr. Stacie Holiday, an executive director at Austin ISD, be terminated for violating district policy and state and federal law.
The documents detail actions taken by multiple staff members that the district determined excluded a student who was attempting to re-enroll in the school after being withdrawn.
A third staff member was recommended to receive a written warning for her own violations.
The backstory
Nicole Griffith had been the principal at the Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders from 2022 until late March when the district notified families in an email that she had resigned from Austin ISD.
The school did not explain why this decision was made with fewer than two months left in the school year.
Griffith's employment with the district extends nearly two decades, including her most recent role as principal at McCallum High School before she started working at the Ann Richards School.
Griffith's father later said at an open meeting that she had rescinded her resignation.
Currently, Dr. Catheryn Mitchell is the interim principal and, according to the district, the search for a permanent replacement will begin later this spring.
What we know
FOX 7 Austin has received a report of an investigation into a situation involving a student at the Ann Richards School through a FOIA request. The report was redacted to protect the identity of the student in accordance with the Texas Government Code and FERPA.
The investigation "sought to determine whether any Austin ISD employees engaged in conduct that violated district policy" in relation to the enrollment status of the student, says the report.
The report details interviews with multiple school and district staff, including Griffith, an assistant superintendent, directors and coordinators with student enrollment and special education, and staff with Austin ISD PD.
The report says that the investigation revealed "a series of missed opportunities" that allowed "a vulnerable student to fall through the cracks."
What they're saying
The investigation report found multiple failures regarding the student's withdrawal and delayed re-enrollment, specifically citing inadequate communication with the student's parent, lack of formal or informal written notification of the withdrawal, lack of disability consideration, failure to follow truancy and district procedures, and communication and transparency concerns.
Specific violations outlined in the report fell under district policy, but also the Texas Education Code, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Free Appropriate Public Education or FAPE, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
The report also says administrators "explicitly characterized the student and parent as potential safety threats," even discussing a potential criminal trespass warning on the student.
Holiday is accused of explicitly blocking the student's re-enrollment, telling Griffith, "You will not enroll the student," as well as pushing a "violent narrative" about the student to Austin ISD police and allowing others to treat the student's return as trespassing despite the student being issued a schedule and being told to return to campus.
Griffith is accused of approving the student's withdrawal without ensuring the required procedures were followed, including no formal notice to the parent and no special education referral. She is also accused of not challenging directives from Holiday even when they "contradicted district policy or equitable access expectations" or informing the parent when AISD police was involved.
The third employee named in the report was recommended for a written warning on the basis that she did not make a "good faith effort" to notify the parent of the withdrawal or other issues, did not take steps to clarify the student's enrollment status and did not challenge narratives framing the student as a "safety concern".
Investigators say she is being given a formal warning because she did not direct any "exclusionary actions or mislead others" but her inaction contributed to the student's withdrawal and delayed re-enrollment.
What we don't know
The status of Griffith's employment with the school is currently unknown as she rescinded her resignation, and she is still listed as principal on the school's website.
The status of Holiday's employment is also currently unknown.
The Source
Information in this report comes from records provided through a Freedom of Information Act request by FOX 7 Austin and previous reporting by FOX 7 Austin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard does not have document demanded in FOIA lawsuit, attorney says
Attorneys for former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard say they will file an affidavit explaining she does not have records required as part of an ongoing lawsuit. Henyard was required to appear in court Friday at the Daley Center in Chicago to produce documents requested last year by the nonprofit Edgar County Watchdogs that are public via the Freedom of Information Act. Cook County Judge Kate Moreland filed an order holding her in contempt May 23 for repeated violations of court orders. Though Henyard was called to testify, Henyard's attorney, Beau Brindley, told Moreland she would not take the stand due to an ongoing federal investigation into possible misconduct during her tenure as Dolton's mayor. Brindley confirmed after the hearing he is representing Henyard in the federal investigation. 'She does not have these documents,' Brindley said. 'The one document they're asking for, she doesn't remember what it is. She doesn't possess it.' The Edgar County Watchdogs sued Dolton in February 2024 after failing to receive documents requested the month prior. The lawsuit claims the groups made two separate requests Jan. 5, 2024, neither of which received a response from Henyard's office. Attorneys for the Edgar County Watchdogs said Friday the village helped fulfill the first request, copies of all credit card statements since Oct. 1, 2023. However, they still not received copy of a document Henyard showed at a January public meeting while stating trustees canceled the credit card, stating the document was proof. 'We don't believe that someone can just burn a piece of paper or get rid of … the document, and the Watchdogs aren't going to stop until they get it,' attorney Edward Coach Winehouse said after the hearing. Judge Moreland affirmed Friday that Henyard would be fined $1,000 per day as of May 30 until she produced the records responsive to the group's request or filed the affidavit. Brindley said the affidavit would be filed by Monday. After the hearing, Brindley told the Daily Southtown the case represents a 'pretty unfair focus on Mayor Henyard, who has been out of office for awhile now.' 'This is about one piece of paper at a board meeting that she had like a year ago, and they seem to suggest that she's going to still have it,' Brindley said. 'She doesn't even know what it is, and the fact that they've gone to all this trouble and a contempt hearing and everything else is just silly.' Edgar County Watchdogs claim in the lawsuit the only response to their Jan. 5 FOIA requests came from Village Clerk Alison Key, informing them the village administrator at the time, Keith Freeman, instructed staff not to reply to requests that she entered. 'Hopefully, you will get what you are requesting,' Key wrote the day the request was received. Henyard's tenure as mayor, which ended last month, showed a pattern of ignored or denied public records requests. The Daily Southtown reported last year the Illinois attorney general's office received more than 50 related complaints between January 2021 and April 2024 regarding ignored or denied FOIA requests. The attorney general's office also received more than 30 similar complaints from Thornton Township from January 2022 and August 2024, when Henyard was supervisor. The Daily Southtown sought records from Dolton in May 2023, and followed up again in August of that year. While the Freedom of Information Act requests were acknowledged as received, there was no response. In May 2024, lawyers for the Daily Southtown sent a letter to Dolton officials, including Henyard, outlining the lack of response and requesting the village adhere to the law and turn over records. It too was ignored. In February 2024, the attorney general's office issued a binding opinion ordering Dolton to produce records requested by WGN. The village did not, and WGN eventually won a court ruling demanding the documents be turned over. ostevens@
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
What's Happening Inside This ICE Facility in Texas Should Shock Your Conscience
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Last month 31 men at Bluebonnet Detention Center in Anson, Texas, positioned their bodies in the shape of the letters 'SOS,' a cry for help, as journalists flew overhead. Much has been written about the state of deportations under the Trump administration and the flouting of the Supreme Court's orders, as well as the court's temporary blocking of removals of Venezuelan migrants to a notorious prison complex in El Salvador. However, less has been said about how human rights violations are pervasive at detention centers all over the United States, including Bluebonnet. Nearly nine years after its construction to house state prisoners, Bluebonnet Detention Center, operated by the Management and Training Corporation, signed a $145 million contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement in 2019 to house a maximum of 1,000 detainees on any given day. Located approximately 200 miles west of Dallas-Fort Worth, Bluebonnet provides a strategic site for discreet detention, nestled in a remote area yet accessible for transport to the airport. Despite its newer status with ICE, Bluebonnet had one of the largest COVID-19 outbreaks among ICE detention centers in the U.S. in 2021, and the American Civil Liberties Union listed the facility among 38 recommended for shut down because of its dangerous operations. It is no surprise that Bluebonnet's detention conditions continue the practices of gross human rights violations that plague the entirety of ICE operations. The conditions inside ICE detention centers are so untenable that people are self-deporting to avoid being detained. This is not an accident. ICE's poor conditions are adapted tactics of the 'Prevention Through Deterrence' policy implemented in 1994 that makes it more difficult for immigrants to fight their deportation orders. This is exactly what the Trump administration desires. At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, Bluebonnet was inspected at least seven times by ICE's Office of Detention Oversight and by Nakamoto Group, a private independent company that has since lost its contract with the federal government. Notably, inspections by Nakamoto Group relied heavily on telemonitoring and planned visits, asking detention facilities before monitoring them for a list of preapproved detained individuals to interview. This raised many ethical issues that were reported by the ACLU. Even despite offering this advance opportunity for detention officials to clean up their acts before inspection, our data (which we obtained via the Freedom of Information Act) shows Nakamoto still found dangerous environments at Bluebonnet. All Bluebonnet detention inspections occurring between 2020 and 2024 documented recurring concerns regarding medical treatment, extended isolation, detainee reports of sexual violence, recorded instances of force, and problematic approaches to suicide prevention and interventions. Although 45 percent of detainee statements in Bluebonnet inspections reported issues with medical care, facility detention inspectors rarely found detainees trustworthy about their complaints. For example, in 2021, Bluebonnet detainees stated that medication requests were rarely followed up on, while another detainee who had received medical attention was placed in solitary confinement that had unsanitary conditions without explanation. The inspectors in each case failed to believe detainees because they were unable to verify their claims. In our analysis of Bluebonnet inspections, we discovered dangerous practices that placed detainee well-being at risk. During February 2021, the Office of Detention Oversight found that Bluebonnet staff did not follow proper procedures to calculate use-of-force incidents and video documentation of incidents was not properly assessed by ICE. That same document also revealed hunger strikes and issues with medical care that captured a troubling environment at Bluebonnet for detainees. The most recent Bluebonnet inspections also harbor a similar sense of turmoil. In 2024, the Office of Detention Oversight revealed that detainees were exhibiting suicidal behavior because of long wait times and delays at Bluebonnet. These ruminations on suicide due to the escalating deportation procedures and extended court delays are not unplanned, but rather an indicator of how ICE operates as a whole. For those in the know, violence is as synonymous with ICE as the Big Mac is with McDonald's. ICE provides financial backing and branding to correctional institutions—we would call them franchises—that are notoriously dangerous to incarcerated individuals. These prisons and jails lack motivation for reform because ICE rarely withdraws funds or ends contracts. Make no mistake, the SOS is not an isolated event but a symptom of a greater problem. Right now, Cuban detainees at Krome detention center in the Miami-Dade area in Florida are protesting under similar conditions to those at the Bluebonnet ICE facility. Across these ICE detention centers, detainees are resisting prolonged detention, inadequate food, a lack of medical care, and recurring abuse. The violence experienced in these facilities is slow violence, and slow violence leads to 'undue process.' For example, at Bluebonnet, people's limited access to correspondence and other mail has inhibited their ability to correspond with their families and legal teams to defend themselves. Slow violence is intentional, diminishing individuals' ability to defend themselves and receive legal due process. It results—predictably and intentionally—in undue process and self-deportation. Notably, the level of violence in ICE detention facilities is higher than in jails or prisons. U.S. citizens who commit crimes and are convicted of them are protected by law from experiencing violence during their incarceration. That is not to say that violence doesn't still occur in prisons, but that there are constitutional protections to guard against it. These same protections do not seem to exist for individuals in immigrant detention. Our collective level of outrage does not match the gross human rights violations happening daily to immigrant detainees—persons who have not been convicted of a crime but who are in the process of being removed from the country. While we pretend that we are protecting the sanctity of America, we are undermining our core values by denigrating 'the huddled masses' that have come to our shores seeking freedom. Instead, we place them in peril in our ICE detention centers. We know this is the America that some have fought hard to create. Is this the America that we will accept?
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard due in court Friday
CHICAGO — Tiffany Henyard's era as Dolton mayor and Thornton Township supervisor is over, but her legal cases continue. A Cook County judge ordered Henyard to appear in court to answer claims that during her time in office, she failed to follow state transparency laws and turn over spending and other records. She fired back that she was simply 'the face of the village' and not its record keeper. The Friday hearing is in connection to a lawsuit filed by the Edgar County Watchdogs, Inc. The organization sued the Village of Dolton after Henyard's administration ignored Freedom Of Information Act requests last January. Prior to Friday's appearance, Henyard was found in contempt of court. We expect to learn Friday whether there will be any punishment for that. Over the last several years, Henyard has been at the center of controversy and an ongoing FBI investigation for questionable spending, and claims that she used her government power to retaliate against people she perceived as opponents. Brawl involving Tiffany Henyard leads to 2 lawsuits WGN Investigates has documented first class trips for Henyard and her allies costing taxpayers more than a $100,000. This spring, Dolton and Thornton Township residents voted Henyard out of office. While under the spotlight, Henyard has not been charged with a crime. Friday's hearing is also expected to look into a lawsuit against the Village of Dolton, Henyard and the village's board of fire and police commissioners. The hearing is expected to begin at 2 p.m. Friday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
