Investigation uncovers shocking details about brutal black market targeting rare species: 'It is a terrible thing to do'
The illegal hunting of gorillas and the illicit trade of their body parts are drawing higher prices in Nigeria, according to a recent Mongabay investigation, which focused on the Cross River gorilla.
What's happening?
Locals have spoken of a massive increase in the prices of these body parts in recent years.
In a 2019 Mongabay video, a trafficker said that in the 1980s, they would purchase parts for around $3 to $5. In the video, he said traders were buying a head, feet, and hands from hunters for around $49, then selling them to end users for $98, with the potential for prices to go higher.
Identifying the use of the body parts in traditional medicine and spiritual practices as a prime driver of the illicit market for the animals, thought to be full of powerful properties, Mongabay issued a new report this past February, saying that prices had risen even more. The traders with whom the outlet spoke for its most recent investigation shared that "a gorilla head goes from 300,000 to 1 million naira ($200 to $670), a drastic rise from five years ago."
Traditional healing and spirituality have contributed to the illegal hunting of gorillas, but that's not the only danger the animals face. For example, the International Union for Conservation of Nature has described habitat loss and the resulting lack of access to natural resources, loss of genetic diversity due to small populations, disease, and becoming caught in traps meant to capture other animals as additional threats to the Cross River gorilla.
Meanwhile, the shrinking of ape populations has caused prices to surge. Fewer products on the market create a mismatch between supply and demand, causing inflated scarcity pricing. Fewer gorillas in the wild also mean longer, more costly trips for hunters, adding to the price tag.
But not all hunters are enthusiastic about their roles in killing the animals. In fact, for many families, the killing of gorillas is a significant cultural taboo.
"I had to kill it [the gorilla] because of money. It is a terrible thing to do," former hunter Benjamin Dauda told Mongabay.
Why is this concerning?
In a follow-up this April, Mongabay noted the IUCN estimate that around three Cross River gorillas are killed every year, "a devastating rate for a species with fewer than 300 individuals left in the wild."
Its cousin, the western lowland gorilla, saw its numbers demolished by repeated Ebola outbreaks. Both subspecies are critically endangered. As their populations continue to decline, inbreeding may weaken their bodies and communities.
What's being done?
Law enforcement has not been effective enough in stopping the hunting and trading of gorillas, while in some communities, the cultural stigma seems to act as a deterrent.
"When a hunter kills a gorilla, our people are not happy about it," Dauda said. "They would see you as an abomination."
Mongabay's reporting didn't fully address potential stigmas around consulting with spiritualists who use gorilla body parts, and it's not clear that morés would be enough to protect the animals anyhow. The taboos that are in the cultural "air supply" have existed for some time, and poaching still persists, largely because profits act as an incentive for hunters.
Higher prices could only inflame the situation. But investment in community-oriented, pro-environment employment opportunities might help encourage job seekers to leave hunting behind to support vulnerable wildlife and local ecosystems.
In 2024, the Cross River Gorilla Initiative announced the rare sighting of two mature males using trail cameras in an effort the Wilder Institute described as "[aiming] to bridge the gap between conservation efforts and community engagement" and "[equipping] Nigerian graduate students with the skills and knowledge necessary to lead future conservation efforts."
Meanwhile, younger practitioners of traditional medicine are often steering toward "more readily available" alternatives to gorilla body parts, according to Mongabay's February report, using body parts from different animals instead.
"Traditional medicine is changing," Uzondu Agwu told Mongabay. "Native doctors are beginning to develop cheaper medicines that don't depend on expensive animal parts like apes."
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Researchers stunned by grotesque discovery captured in street photos: 'You have to see it to believe it'
Hunters in Lebanon are killing millions of migrating birds as they fly over the country and posting images of their hunts on social media platforms, Mongabay reported. A research project analyzed thousands of social media photos shared between 2011 and 2023, documenting around 30,000 killed birds across more than 200 species. The research, which was published in Oryx, found that almost 94% of these hunted birds belonged to species protected by law. "The scale of it is intense. ... You have to see it to believe it," said Andre Raine, science director at Archipelago Research and Conservation. "You can go to mountaintops ... and it's just littered with snowdrifts of feathers of raptors, where you're wading through, sometimes up to your knees, in dead birds." Many hunters openly pose with their kills online without fear of consequences. Birds such as European honey buzzards, white storks, and even endangered species including Egyptian vultures are targeted as they migrate between Europe and Africa. This hunting crisis threatens bird populations far beyond Lebanon's borders. When these birds are killed during migration, it undermines conservation efforts that European countries have invested millions of dollars in. The issue affects you even if you live far from Lebanon. Many birds help control pest populations and maintain healthy ecosystems across multiple continents. Their loss disrupts nature's balance and could impact everything from agriculture to forest health in your region. Michel Sawan, president of the Lebanese Association for Migratory Birds, points to weak enforcement as a major problem. "If anyone commits an environmental crime such as breaking the law of hunting, the fine is $5; if you want to buy 25 gunshots, they are $9," he explained. With penalties this small, hunters have little reason to change their behavior. The carnage is often driven by social media fame rather than food needs. Hunters display dead birds as "digital trophies" to gain likes and views, turning conservation violations into a form of online entertainment. Conservation organizations are fighting back through education and direct action. Groups such as the Committee Against Bird Slaughter conduct bird protection camps in Lebanon, working to prevent hunting in critical areas during migration seasons. Should the U.S. invest in building more wildlife overpasses? Absolutely Depends on how we do it Depends on where we do it Nope Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. If you care about protecting these birds, you can help by supporting international conservation groups focused on migratory species protection. Organizations working in Lebanon need resources to continue their monitoring and enforcement assistance efforts. You can also use your social media presence for good by reporting photos and videos showing illegal hunting when you see them online. Though platforms have been slow to respond, increased pressure from users could help change actions around displaying wildlife crimes. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
With its shoot-first style, Trump team often shoots itself in the foot
A telling moment early in President Donald Trump's second term foreshadowed how the administration is often now operating. Appearing at a Cabinet meeting in late February, Elon Musk said the Department of Government Efficiency had 'accidentally canceled' Ebola prevention programs. 'We will make mistakes. We won't be perfect. But when we make a mistake, we'll fix it very quickly,' Musk said. 'So we restored the Ebola prevention immediately. And there was no interruption.' It wasn't the first time Musk – who has since left the government – had acknowledged he and his team would make mistakes. But it was especially striking given the subject matter. Ebola prevention is literally a matter of life and death, but Musk mentioned it off-hand as if it were just some anecdote about DOGE's growing pains. (Musk's claim that there was 'no interruption' has also been called into question.) In the months since, though, that attitude has become emblematic of the Trump administration's approach to the country's business. Over and over again, it has employed shoot-first mentality with its public pronouncements and actions. Sometimes, that has meant it shot itself in the foot. And sometimes it has wound up contradicting itself. Four examples in recent days drive this home. One of them involves Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Last week, Noem claimed on X that an undocumented immigrant had 'threatened to assassinate President Trump.' The Department of Homeland Security even put out a news release naming the man. Except the claim quickly fell apart. CNN's Whitney Wild and Holmes Lybrand soon reported that authorities believed the immigrant had been set up – and that they had been investigating that possibility even before Noem's social media post. Now Wisconsin state prosecutors have charged another man, who they say admitted to orchestrating the ruse. And a DHS official conceded Wednesday that the man whom Noem and DHS accused is no longer under investigation for the purported threat. (A judge earlier in the day had delayed immigration proceedings.) Despite extensive coverage, neither Noem's post nor the DHS news release were removed or retracted as of Wednesday. Another example Wednesday involved a Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico returning to the US, his legal team told CNN – in what appears to be the first instance of the administration bringing back a migrant as a result of a judge's order. The situation stems from the administration's hasty deportation efforts, which have led to questions about whether the wrong people were deported. In at least three cases, judges have ruled that's exactly what happened, including two in which the migrants were sent to a brutal El Salvador prison. The administration has resisted returning the latter two migrants. A third example involves a somewhat similar case to the Noem example. Interim US attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba last month announced charges against Newark Democratic Mayor Ras Baraka for his actions at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility. Habba said Baraka had 'committed trespass' and 'has willingly chosen to disregard the law. That will not stand in this state. He has been taken into custody. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.' But Habba later announced the charges against Baraka would be dropped 'for the sake of moving forward,' while announcing new charges against a Democratic congresswoman from the Garden State. A magistrate judge issued a strong rebuke, calling the original charge against Baraka a 'a worrisome misstep by your office' and suggested Habba might have been motivated by 'political agendas.' 'An arrest, particularly of a public figure, is not a preliminary investigative tool,' the judge said, calling it 'a severe action, carrying significant reputational and personal consequences.' And Baraka, who's running in next week's gubernatorial primary, is now seizing on that alleged damage to his reputation. On Tuesday he filed suit against Habba, accusing her of false arrest, malicious prosecution and defamation. The other recent example regards the Covid-19 vaccine. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. last week made a major announcement. He said – also on X – that 'the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from @CDCgov recommended immunization schedule.' But just two days later, when the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance, the vaccine was not, in fact, removed from the childhood schedule. It instead was listed under a slightly different designation – recommended based on 'shared clinical decision-making.' In other words, children would still be able to get the shot after consulting with a health care provider. HHS claimed this was not a contradiction, and said on X that the vaccine 'is not recommended for healthy children.' But on the CDC's website, the vaccine is still coded as a 'Recommended vaccination based on shared clinical decision-making.' These are only the most recent examples of statements and actions that have struggled with age: The DOGE effort has involved laying off or firing lots of people, some of whom the administration then sought to rehire because they needed them, and some of whom courts have instructed the administration to keep or rehire because of legal questions. Trump and a number of top administration officials last month leapt to accuse former FBI Director James Comey of threatening to assassinate Trump by posting an Instagram image of shells that spelled out '86 47.' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Comey should be jailed. Despite the rhetoric, there is little sign of impending charges against Comey. Comey said he doesn't expect to be charged. And even if Comey had been referring to assassination – which it's not at all clear he was – it's quite possible that speech was First Amendment-protected. Trump has justified his rapid deportations of Venezuelan migrants by arguing that they are members of a gang, Tren de Aragua, that is acting 'directly and at the direction … of the [Nicolás] Maduro regime in Venezuela.' But The New York Times has reported that a US intelligence report undermined that claim. And plenty of reporting suggests the administration has worked to obscure that fact. (ODNI declined to comment to the Times.) Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed he didn't share 'war plans' while discussing strikes in Yemen on the unclassified Signal app with other top administration officials – right before The Atlantic published the texts showing detailed plans for the strikes. The White House offered a lengthy series of conflicting signals about whether it viewed Trump's tariffs as a negotiating tool, before ultimately pushing for a bunch of deals. So what does this all reveal? Some of it is just a reflection of a president with a demonstrated disregard for the truth (see: 30,000-plus false and misleading statements in his first term) and rhetorical consistency. Under Trump's bare-knuckle brand of politics, you can say pretty much anything or level any wild accusation and then, when that doesn't pan out, you just move on to the next provocation. It also seems to be a reflection of the kinds of people he's picked to lead the government. Many of these people don't have anywhere near the kinds of experience of those who usually hold their positions; among their chief qualifications was loyalty to Trump and willingness to do his bidding. But also, these are people whose credibility matters, and their words have consequences. Law enforcement generally isn't supposed to accuse people of things it doesn't intend to prove in court, because those people can be impugned by the mere allegations. It's quite likely that people who would consider the Covid-19 vaccine for their children are confused by the conflicting signals from HHS. Statements about tariff plans – and their staying power – have real-world impacts when it comes to long-term planning for American businesses. If you're a business, do you actually try to move manufacturing to the United States (assuming the tariffs will stay) or just wait things out (hoping they go away)? And talking about massaging US intelligence to fit a political narrative is, as recent history makes clear, an extremely fraught enterprise. But all indications are that this fast-and-loose style is going nowhere.
New York Post
5 days ago
- New York Post
Smuggler with bag full of venomous viper snakes stopped by India customs
A checked bag filled with creatures from your nightmares was stopped by international customs in Mumbai over the weekend, leading to an arrest. Mumbai Customs officers said they seized a checked bag on Sunday from a passenger arriving from Thailand. Advertisement A closer inspection of the bag revealed three spider-tailed horned viper snakes, five Asian leaf turtles, and 44 Indonesian pit viper snakes. Photos show the smuggled reptiles after the discovery, including a tray full of turtles and a bucket of venomous blue and green snakes. According to Australian Geographic, pit vipers can be found in blue and green on the Lesser Sunda Islands of Indonesia. Blue pit vipers are some of the rarest of their species, according to the outlet. Advertisement This isn't the first – or last – walk on the wild side for customs officers in India. 4 Mumbai Customs officers said they seized a checked bag on Sunday from a passenger arriving from Thailand. Mumbai Customs-III 4 A spider-tailed horned viper was seized. Mumbai Customs-III 4 Photos show the smuggled reptiles after the discovery, including a tray full of turtles and a bucket of venomous blue and green snakes. Mumbai Customs-III Advertisement 4 Blue pit vipers are some of the rarest of their species, according to the outlet. Mumbai Customs-III Photos of most seizures by Mumbai customs show mostly drugs and gold, but in February, officers also stopped the smuggling of five Siamang Gibbons. The monkeys are an endangered species, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
