California Assembly advances bill to toughen penalties for soliciting sex from older teens
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Assembly on Thursday approved harsher penalties for soliciting sex from 16- and 17-year-olds, with an exception for cases where there is an age difference of three years or less between both parties.
It's an updated version of legislation that recently threw Democrats into political turmoil, causing Gov. Gavin Newsom to break with legislative leaders and Republicans to accuse Democrats of protecting people who prey on teens.
Young people ages 16 or 17 were not included in bipartisan legislation on sex trafficking signed by Newsom last year. The law, which took effect this year, allows prosecutors to charge those who solicit and buy sex from minors 15 or younger with a felony. It left in place an existing law that limits the penalty for soliciting older teens to a misdemeanor.
Some moderate Democrats, siding with Republicans, wanted to see harsher punishments to protect more children, while others say the original measure could be misused by parents upset about interracial or LGBTQ+ relationships to target older teens involved in consensual relationships.
Democrats earlier this month r ejected a provision that would have allowed prosecutors to charge people accused of soliciting of older teens with a felony. Assemblymember Nick Schultz, the chair of the public safety committee, said at the time he wanted to gather more feedback.
Following fierce and swift backlash, the legislation was amended to toughen the penalties for soliciting older teens, but only when the solicitors are more than three years older.
'I don't view this as a win for a particular party. I view this as a win for all Californians,' Schultz said after the vote.
The bill also would create a new victim support fund, make it a crime for those who loiter to buy sex and increase penalties for hotels and businesses that are complicit in sex trafficking.
Sacramento District Attorney Thien Ho, who helped craft the legislation, said the bill creates a new tool for law enforcement to go after predators. California already has laws in place that make it a felony to contact a person under 18 to engage in sexual activity in California, sexting a minor and engaging in sex with a minor if the age gap between the parties is more than three years.
'There is a difference between a 55-year-old man who was soliciting sex from a 16-year-old versus an 18-year-old soliciting,' Ho said. 'That's what was done here in a very nuanced and measured way.'
Republicans said the Thursday vote is a victory for children in California.
'It has always been for me about good policy and about justice,' Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher said before the vote. 'I'm glad that today we come together and we can push through this bill, which was a righteous bill from the beginning to protect 16- and 17-year-olds.'
The bill now heads to the Senate. Democrats in the Senate last year rejected a similar effort to increase penalties for soliciting older teens.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
New York police arrest 'social media prankster' who dumped food on himself at local businesses
CENTEREACH, N.Y. — Police in the suburbs of New York City have arrested who they described as a ' social media prankster' over viral videos in which he dumps heaps of food on his head and runs away, leaving others to clean up his mess. Kyle Vazquez, 21, was arrested in Centereach, on Long Island, on Monday. He was charged on eight counts, including six counts related to recording people without their consent and two counts of criminal tampering, police said.
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
How can countries protect themselves from fallout due to Trump's tarrifs? Economic expert weighs in
CNN's Zain Asher speaks with Álvaro Pereira, the chief economist and G20 finance deputy of the OECD, about their 2025 economic growth forecast for America.
San Francisco Chronicle
27 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
DA to pursue death penalty for Half Moon Bay mass shooting suspect
San Mateo County prosecutors announced Tuesday they are seeking the death penalty against Chunli Zhao, who is charged with murdering seven people during a mass shooting in Half Moon Bay in January 2023. The decision to seek the death penalty, which was announced by San Mateo County District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe during a court hearing, comes even as California has a moratorium on executions. Zhao, 68, is accused of fatally shooting seven people and severely injuring another in what prosecutors described as a fit of workplace rage that became the deadliest mass shooting in San Mateo County's history. Zhao has pleaded not guilty to the charges — seven counts of murder and one count of attempted murder — and denied all allegations. Zhao waived his right to a speedy jury trial, Wagstaffe said previously. Authorities said Zhao, a farmworker, walked into his workplace, the California Terra Garden, and opened fire just after 2 p.m. on Jan. 23, 2023, leaving four people dead and another person with life-threatening injuries. Zhao then drove to Concord Farms, authorities said, where he shot and killed three other people, all of whom were also farmworkers. Law enforcement said that after the shootings, Zhao drove to the San Mateo County sheriff's substation in Half Moon Bay, where he was taken into custody. Wagstaffe's decision to seek the death penalty against Zhao comes after months of debate over whether to pursue capital punishment, the Mercury News reported. Zhao's trial has not yet been scheduled. Even those sentenced to die in California, however, are not executed. Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a moratorium on death penalty executions upon taking office in 2019 then dismantled the execution chamber at San Quentin. Many of the Democrats most likely to succeed him in 2026 also oppose the death penalty. At the same time, death penalty sentences have fallen in the state. As of January, juries in California have sentenced 20 convicted murderers to death in the past six years, an average of 3.3 per year, according to a report from the Death Penalty Policy Project. From 1995 through 2000, there were 223 death sentences in the state, or 37.3 per year. California voters, in past elections, have decided against getting rid of the death penalty permanently. In 2012 and 2016, majorities of 52% and 53% rejected ballot measures to reduce the maximum sentence to life in prison without parole.
