Activists Halt Coal For 30+ Hours
Four climate activists remain suspended in coal cable cars more than 30 hours after their bold action began, continuing to blockade coal from leaving Bathurst Resources' Stockton Mine. The protest has successfully stopped all coal transport out of Stockton Mine, halting Bathurst's ability to export coal and drawing attention to the company's massive expansion plans.
'We've been here for two sunrises now because this mine is a line in the sand,' said Adam Currie, one of the activists suspended in a coal cart.
Currie said the protest had taken on additional significance following the news of Pope Francis's passing.
'Pope Francis was one of the strongest global voices on climate justice. His groundbreaking encyclical Laudato si' called on all of us, especially young people, to act boldly in defence of our common home,' said Currie, rangatahi climate activist. 'So yes, we'll stay in this cold, grimy, and wet coal bucket, because someone has to. Bathurst wants to unleash 53 million tonnes of climate pollution - that's more than New Zealand emits in a whole year. We can't allow that future.'
The occupation follows a five-day protest camp of over 70 people, including tamariki and kaumātua, on the Denniston Plateau, the site of Bathurst's proposed coal expansion.
Campaigners say Bathurst's plan would devastate a landscape rich with life, including great spotted kiwi, green geckos, and ancient sandstone ecosystems, and have committed to escalating action if the plan isn't scrapped.
'This is only the beginning,' said Currie. 'We've had whānau, churchgoers, students, grandparents — all standing together. Once the pristine Denniston plateau is mined, it's gone forever. People are tired of being shut out while foreign corporations backed by banks like ANZ push us deeper into climate breakdown. We're not standing for it any longer. In fact we're sitting. In a coal bucket. Shutting down the biggest coal mine in NZ.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Business Review
06-06-2025
- National Business Review
Banking class action lawyer complains to Ombudsman over OIA delay
The lawyer representing plaintiffs in a class action against ANZ and ASB has complained to the Ombudsman over the Government's delay in releasing information about retrospective legislation to protect the banks. The complaint follows Official Information Act requests for details of bank lobbying
Otago Daily Times
30-05-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Night in custody result of an error
An unfortunate typo left a Dunedin protester in a police cell for the night before he was cleared of wrongdoing by a judge. Adam Currie, of climate advocacy group 350 Aotearoa, was held in custody overnight following his arrest for apparently breaching bail at a peaceful protest in central Dunedin, on Wednesday. In April, Mr Currie and 10 others were charged with wilful trespass after about 70 protesters camped on the West Coast's Denniston Plateau for five days in opposition to mining company Bathurst Resources seeking fast-track approval to expand its operation. He and five other protesters climbed into cable cars used to transport coal at Stockton Mine. Mr Currie said it had been a "real shock" to be arrested on Wednesday and it was the first time he had been held by police overnight. Climate activist Adam Currie (centre left) leaves the Dunedin District Court with supporters yesterday. Photo: Gerard O'Brien He said when he appeared in Dunedin District Court on Thursday morning, a clerk confirmed there had been a typo when his bail conditions were set in April. "It was meant to say 'you will not engage in unlawful protest', but then there was a typo by the registrar, and so it said 'you will not engage in lawful protest'." The judge found "clearly that bail condition was unlawful", Mr Currie said. "The Dunedin District Court judge confirmed that banning me from lawful protest was inconsistent with the Bill of Rights. "But the judge said he would not take further action against the registrar who set this condition due to judicial immunity." Mr Currie said he would much rather be talking about Bathurst Resources' fast-track application and the damage it posed to the climate, nature and human health than his arrest. Mr Currie (far left) during Wednesday's protest outside ANZ's Dunedin central branch. Photo: Peter McIntosh "It's about people versus Bathurst, not about us and the police." "But, yes, absolutely, the police should not be arresting me for lawful protest, and absolutely, I do not enjoy being in a jail overnight." Mr Currie said climate activists had been protesting for years and noticed an "increasing crackdown on public protest". He said those arrested in April planned to contest the c charges "due to it being public land". Following the protest on Wednesday, a police spokeswoman said a 25-year-old man was taken into custody for breaching bail and would appear in court on Thursday. There were no other issues at the protest, she said.
1News
29-05-2025
- 1News
National accused of putting needs of banks before everyday Kiwis
The National Party is being accused of putting the needs of banks before everyday Kiwis after introducing legislation that could mean two big Australian-owned lenders avoid paying millions of dollars in refunds. One customer said the amendment to lending laws would allow the banks to get off "scot-free" while the minister in charge said it simply allowed the courts to have more discretion in settling disputes. The Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act (CCCFA) passed its first reading in Parliament last week and included a retrospective amendment relating to consequences for historical disclosure breaches by lenders. An investigation by the Commerce Commission had found two banks did not disclose the necessary information regarding customer loans. It meant the banks were potentially liable to refund millions of dollars in fees and interest. 'We should just be able to trust our bank' ADVERTISEMENT Lawyer Scott Russell, acting on behalf of those taking the class action, said the omission regarded "core business" for the banks. 'It's simple stuff. It's disclosure rules that allow ordinary New Zealanders to understand their financial position,' Russell said. Anthony Simons, a small business owner, was among the 170,000 customers who' took legal action against ANZ and ASB banks. 'We're just a hardworking Kiwi family trying to pay off our mortgage, struggling sometimes, and we should just be able to trust our bank that they're going to do the right thing in disclosing the right information,' Simons said. But, after four years battling through the courts, the Government last week passed the first reading of the legislation which changed the rules — retrospectively. Banks entitled to 'judicial fairness' – Minister The Minister for Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Scott Simpson, said the bill before Parliament did not affect the class action. ADVERTISEMENT 'What it does is it gives the courts the ability to use their discretion about what will be a fair and equitable outcome to the case,' he said. 'Banks, no matter what you may or may not think of them, are surely entitled to the same judicial fairness as any other entity or person.' A Cabinet paper by the minister released last month highlighted the class action against the banks, adding that "addressing these concerns through retrospective legislation is likely to attract criticism". 'Well, there will be criticism because it is retrospective and retrospective legislation is unusual but not completely unknown in our political system,' Simpson said. Russell claimed it was unfair. 'We've taken it right through to the Supreme Court and, right where we're getting to crunch time, the banks have contacted their mates in the National Party who have agreed to potentially wipe these refunds. It's hundreds of millions of dollars,' he said. Possible changes 'don't take any rights away from consumers' – banks ADVERTISEMENT ANZ and ASB Bank said the proposed amendments to the bill would not halt the current class action – or future cases. In a statement to 1News, ANZ said the proposed amendments "will not stop the current class action progressing, nor will it prevent potential future cases". "They will simply confirm that when considering these cases, the court has discretion to decide what a fair outcome should be. This change does not remove the rights and protections of consumers.' ASB Bank, meanwhile, told 1News that the potential changes "don't take any rights away from consumers, and will not prevent the current court case, or any future cases, from proceeding". "They simply clarify a confusing piece of legislation and confirm that the court has jurisdiction to decide on an outcome that is fair and reasonable.' Simpson added that, currently, for cases that occurred between 2015 and 2019, the courts could only hand down one penalty. 'And that is a full refund of all interest and all fees, no matter how small or minor the error or omission was,' he said. ADVERTISEMENT But Russell said penalties "are clear under the legislation". "All of a sudden, those penalties are being wiped out and replaced with something that's not clear which is what is a reasonable penalty.' While all three coalition parties supported the bill at its first reading, NZ First had concerns about the retrospective aspect and wanted to hear more official advice and public feedback before deciding if it would back the bill entirely. The issue would now be considered by a Parliamentary select committee.
