How does the British honours system work?
The release of the King's Birthday Honours provides an opportunity to celebrate individual outstanding achievements and contributions to British society.
But who decides how honours are handed out, and what exactly do they recognise?
Here the PA news agency takes a look at the inner workings of the honours system:
– What are honours for?
Honours as part of orders of chivalry have been given by monarchs since the Middle Ages.
In recent times, the British honours system has recognised people who have 'made achievements in public life' and 'committed themselves to serving and helping Britain'.
It acknowledges long-term volunteers, innovators, entrepreneurs, individuals displaying 'moral courage', those making a difference in their community or field of work or people improving life for others less able to help themselves.
Honours are given to people involved in a range of fields, including sport, health, science and technology, education, business, and the arts and media.
Gallantry awards recognising bravery can also be given to members of the armed forces and the emergency services, as well as civilians.
– How are people nominated for honours?
Any member of the public or an official body can nominate someone for an honour.
UK nationals and citizens of 15 Commonwealth 'realms' of which the King is head of state are eligible for nomination.
People living or working overseas, whose achievements were made in another country or in the UK and have a significant international element, can be nominated too.
Nominations are submitted to the Cabinet Office's Honours and Appointments Secretariat, which oversees the honours system.
Non-British or Commonwealth country citizens can also considered for 'honorary' awards.
– Who approves nominations?
Consideration of nominations can take 12 to 18 months.
The suitability of nominees submitted to the Honours and Appointments Secretariat is established through 'merit' and 'probity and propriety' checks.
This vetting process, to avoid bringing the system into 'disrepute', can involve the input of Government departments, regulatory bodies, professional organisations, HM Revenue and Customs and the Acro Criminal Records Office.
A group of 10 independent honours committees, each covering a specialist subject area such as sport or health, consider nominations.
The recommendations of these groups of independent experts and senior civil servants are passed on to the Prime Minister and, ultimately, the King for approval.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) oversees the Diplomatic Service and Overseas List.
– When are honours announced?
Twice a year – at new year and in June on the King's official birthday.
The lists are published in the official newspaper of the Crown, The Gazette.
Once all recipients have been decided and checked, the Central Chancery of the Orders of Knighthood at St James's Palace arranges investitures for the presentation of medals.
These ceremonies, held about 30 times a year at Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and, occasionally, the Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh, and are hosted by senior royals.
– What are the types of honours?
Lists typically comprise knights and dames, appointments to the Order of the British Empire and gallantry awards.
The most senior ranks of the Order of the British Empire are Knight or Dame Grand Cross (GBE) and Knight or Dame Commander (KBE or DBE).
These ranks permit the use of the title 'Sir' for men and 'Dame' for women, with the honour given to those who have made major contributions in any field, usually at a national level.
The order's ranks, after knighthood or damehood, are Commander (CBE), Officer (OBE) and Member (MBE).
Other honours include:
– Companion of Honour (CH) – The honour recognises significant contributions to the arts, science, medicine or government over a long period of time. It is limited to just 65 people at any one time.
– British Empire Medal (BEM) – Evolved from a medal associated with the creation of the Order of the British Empire, the BEM honours local community service that has made a significant difference.
Honour recipients are appointed to one of the orders of chivalry made up of different ranks, with most appointments made to the Order of the British Empire.
Others include the Royal Victorian Order (RVO), to which the King personally appoints people for services to the British sovereign.
The Order of the Bath is for senior civil servants and military officers, while the Order of St Michael and St George recognises service in a foreign country, or in relation to foreign and Commonwealth affairs.
The Royal Red Cross (RRC), King's Police Medal (KPM), King's Fire Service Medal (KFSM) and King's Ambulance Service Medal (KAM) respectively recognise the services of nurses, police, firefighters and ambulance service workers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How the fate of endangered swifts has become a political battleground
As thorny issues go, the plight of the humble swift may seem an unlikely controversy to split political thinking. But, a proposed new law to make including a single 'swift brick' – a block with a cavity for a bird's nest – compulsory for all new homes is now at the heart of a pitched Westminster battle. Reform UK is hoping the environmental cause celebre for the 50 million-year-old species – backed by unlikely allies Jeremy Clarkson and Chris Packham – will help garner them support within the countryside's traditional Tory heartlands. Richard Tice recently posed holding a sign calling for the bricks to be used to help endangered cavity-nesting birds, such as swifts, house martins, sparrows and starlings. The Reform deputy leader, who was once a housing developer, used social media to declare his support for the scheme and asked: 'why won't the Government act?' He wrote: 'The Conservatives rejected swift bricks in government, and now Labour is backtracking despite supporting them in opposition. 'Swifts – one of Britain's most iconic birds – are in steep decline, along with other cavity-nesting species. All they need is a brick with a hole. It's simple, low-cost, and essential.' The party's five MPs are now backing an amendment to the Government's planning Bill in a bid to make the £35 bricks compulsory. The amendment, tabled by Barry Gardiner, the Labour rebel, and backed by the Green party, Liberal Democrats and some Tory MPs, was revised to incorporate the bricks into building regulations, said to be the only way to ensure developers fit them to new dwellings. Although Labour supported the swift brick amendment when it was tabled in Conservative government legislation which failed in 2023, it has now reversed its position. Instead of legislation, Matthew Pennycook, the Housing Minister, wants guidelines to encourage, rather than compel, developers to fit the bricks. Hannah Bourne-Taylor, a 38-year-old former model and now environmentalist who has campaigned tirelessly on the issue – as well as walk nearly naked to Whitehall to promote the cause – believes her campaign has split the Right. She said: 'The swift bricks issue has become an unlikely political battleground. It is now a dividing line between Reform, who have declared their unequivocal support, and the Conservatives, who repeatedly failed while in Government to introduce a law to make them mandatory. 'The Tories are traditionally the party of the countryside. It remains to be seen whether they will pass it through the House of Lords where they have a majority. 'If they don't, the Tories will have killed off this amendment and have turned their backs on an issue that should be their domain. 'As for any fears Sir Keir Starmer may have that this scheme could scupper their plans to 'build baby build'; it seems remarkable that a brick used to do just that – build – could be seen to block developments.' The issue is to be debated in the Commons again during the report stage of the planning and infrastructure bill. The Conservatives failed to respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'We've always been clear that our ambition to get Britain building and deliver the 1.5 million homes should create a win-win for nature recovery and development. 'Swift bricks are a simple and effective way to prevent the decline of an important bird species, without impacting building delivery ambitions.'
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Hate crime probe into ex-Labour MP dropped in two-tier policing row
A fresh two-tier policing row has erupted after a force failed to bring charges against a former Labour MP who said Israel has forfeited any right to exist. Chris Williamson was hugely criticised when he made the comment on X, formerly Twitter, just days after Hamas launched its October 7 attack in 2023. Mr Williamson told his 149,000 followers on X: 'The people of the world now know that Israel has forfeited the right to exist and that resistance to the genocidal Zionist entity is the only option. Yet our political leaders still collaborate with this vile regime. So make them pay at the ballot box.' The former Jeremy Corbyn ally became the subject of a hate crime probe after Derbyshire Police received multiple reports about his comments. Around 18 months later, the force said no action would be taken. The decision has sparked fresh allegations of 'two-tier policing', a term used to describe the potential for different standards of policing based on an individual's background or politics. It contrasts with several other cases that have seen individuals who have made comments on social media calling for violence or destruction face arrest, charges and jail time. Last month, a Jewish protester was arrested and charged by the Metropolitan Police after briefly holding a placard satirising a Hezbollah terrorist leader. Allison Pearson, a columnist at The Telegraph, was questioned by police at home last year following a post on X following pro-Palestine demonstrations. Julian Foulkes, a retired special constable, was wrongly cautioned by Kent Police over a social media post warning about the threat of anti-Semitism in Britain. There is also mounting anger over the case of Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months for saying hotels housing migrants should be set on fire. Mr Williamson was criticised after refusing to condemn the attacks when he appeared on Radio 4's Today programme after The Workers Party of Britain, of which he is deputy leader, won the Rochdale by-election with George Galloway, the former MP. During his BBC interview, Mr Williamson said: 'You can't expect to live in a situation where people have been oppressed for 75 years and not expect a reaction.' He also claimed that most of those slaughtered on October 7 had been killed by Israeli forces. But the police said they had now completed their enquiries and that no action would be taken. A spokesman for Derbyshire Police said: 'Derbyshire Constabulary recorded a non-crime hate incident in October 2023 after receiving reports about a tweet regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict. 'Enquiries then began to establish if a crime had been committed. 'During the course of these enquiries, which included consultations with the Crown Prosecution Service, officers found that the evidential threshold for a crime to have been committed was not met. 'The incident was subsequently filed with no further action and all relevant parties were informed.' Peter Bleksley, the former Met detective, said: 'This is two-tier policing, plain and simple. One rule for one, one rule for another. 'There is no consistency with these cases and that creates bigger issues for policing as a whole. 'It's a very worrying time.' A Jewish man in Derby, who did not want to be identified, said he was 'appalled' at the comments. He said: 'Police need to make their minds up on what action and direction they are taking.' Mr Williamson, 68, was the former Labour MP for Derby North and the shadow local government minister from 2010 to 2013. He was suspended from Labour in 2019 after he claimed the party had been 'too apologetic' in response to allegations of anti-Semitism. Labour's National Executive Committee blocked Mr Williamson from standing as a Labour candidate in the 2019 general election. He resigned from the Labour Party and stood as an Independent, losing the seat. In July 2023, he joined the Workers Party of Britain.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Grooming gang review to link illegal immigration with child abuse
The grooming gang review is expected to link illegal immigration with the exploitation of British girls. The Home Office will publish Baroness Louise Casey's review into the sexual abuse of girls and young women by gangs next week. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, announced the three-month national audit in January to establish the current scale of grooming gangs across the country, explore the 'societal and cultural drivers' and look into the ethnicity of the gangs. A link between undocumented arrivals to the UK and grooming gangs will be made in the review, sparking fears in the Home Office it could trigger civil unrest, a source familiar with the report told The Sun. Meanwhile, Sir Keir Starmer is expected to be told that white British victims were ' institutionally ignored for fear of racism ', The Times has said. The new report will also recommend the Prime Minister launches a new national inquiry to explore the issue of the perpetrators' race and allegations of a cover-up. Recommendations have also been made regarding the licensing of taxis, as many of those who were later found to have abused girls were cab drivers. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has previously resisted calls for a national inquiry from the Conservatives, Reform UK and some Labour MPs. The Tories have added an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill to require ministers to start 'a national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs' within three months. Police forces and prosecutors have historically failed to take action against groomers, some of whom are of British-Pakistani origin, amid fears they would be branded racist or Islamophobic. While head of the Crown Prosecution Service, Sir Keir admitted in 2012 that in 'a number of cases presented to us' there was 'an issue of ethnicity that has to be understood and addressed', saying that prosecutors must not 'shy away from that'. The Home Office has not denied the inclusion of illegal migration in the report. A government spokesman also refused to deny the report would be linking the grooming scandal with illegal immigration. They said: 'Nothing is more important than protecting vulnerable children, and we are determined to crack down on vile grooming gangs once and for all. 'That's why we ordered a rapid national audit to uncover the true scale of this horrific abuse. 'This report – alongside our response – will be published shortly.' 'No excuse left' for Starmer Responding to reports that Baroness Casey will advise the Government to launch a national inquiry into grooming gangs, Kemi Badenoch said: 'If Baroness Casey is now calling for a national inquiry into grooming gangs, it proves what I've been saying all year: only a full statutory inquiry will expose the truth, bring justice for survivors, and stop this evil from happening again. 'Yet every time we've called for action, Keir Starmer has said no. He's put process over justice, legal caution over moral clarity. If Casey joins survivors and the Conservatives in demanding an inquiry, the Prime Minister will have no excuse left. 'Starmer must stop being a lawyer and start being a leader.' Group-based grooming, which is classed by police as a form of child sexual exploitation, accounted for 717 offences reported to police in 2023 and 572 in the first nine months of 2024. Grooming represents 17 per cent of group-based child sexual offences, with the biggest threats to children being abuse within the family or by other children. Group-based child sexual abuse accounted for 4,228 offences, or 3.7 per cent of all 115,489 child sexual abuse and exploitation crimes in 2023, including online. It comes as seven men were convicted on Friday of sexually exploiting two white teenage girls in Rochdale, Lancashire. They preyed on the vulnerabilities of victims who had 'deeply troubled home lives' to groom them as 'sex slaves' from the age of 13 on various dates between 2001 and 2006, Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court heard. The men, aged between 41 and 67, plied the girls with drugs, alcohol and cigarettes before expecting them to have sex 'whenever and wherever' the defendants and other men wanted in flats, cars, car parks, alleyways and disused warehouses. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, called for the case to push Sir Keir into announcing a new national statutory inquiry 'to get to the truth'. He told The Telegraph: 'I will push this to a vote in Parliament next Wednesday. But so far Labour has refused to have one, which simply continues the cover-up. If they vote against a proper inquiry next week, it will be a day of shame for Labour.'
