New Mexico lawmakers push for anonymity in Safe Haven Baby Box cases
SANTA FE, N.M. (KRQE) – Safe haven boxes give parents who can't care for their newborns a place to surrender them and now lawmakers are hoping to pass legislation to clarify procedures and protect the parent's anonymity.
Story continues below
Investigation: Disguised cannabis illegally peddled at New Mexico convenience stores
Don't Miss: Infant surrendered at Belen baby box officially adopted
Jobs: Fired Veterans Affairs worker in New Mexico describes shock of losing job
There are at least seven Safe Haven Baby Boxes in New Mexico and more are in the works. Two bipartisan bills want to create clearer guidelines on what information is collected when a baby is surrendered.
'It's all about safety, it's all about making sure that we know exactly what's going on and to make sure that child is protected from the moment they're dropped off,' said Sen. Michael Padilla, (D-Albuquerque) Majority Whip.
Safe Haven Baby Boxes are an option for parents of newborns who are unable to care for the child, while also promising confidentiality, but confusion surfaced over the years after the New Mexico Children, Youth, and Families Department said they're required to investigate these cases and get information on the parents. Now, lawmakers are proposing bipartisan legislation to clarify these procedures.
Sen. Padilla is the lead sponsor for a SB 360 aimed at making changes to the Safe Haven for Infants Act. It sets guidelines for CYFD to protect parent confidentiality while also gathering the necessary infant medical history.
'We need to know whatever information we can find out about the child because they may be in need of some serious healthcare and we just don't know that unless we can interact with that individual, if that's even possible,' said Sen. Padilla.
It also includes rules for determining if a child belongs to an Indian tribe. Meanwhile, Sen. David Gallegos (R-Eunice) has his own bipartisan bill, SB 499, which includes similar language but says it provides more protections for the parent.
'What we want to do is change the statute to give CYFD the indicator that they don't have to search and find the mother. Right now, the way they read the statute, they're obligated. we don't want that,' said Sen. Gallegos.
Both lawmakers and CYFD are collaborating to get these bills passed, calling it urgent.
'We've always worked across the aisle trying to get this done, we have not succeeded. And this needs to be fast-tracked, we're running out of time and the mothers in New Mexico, they're having to make decisions, deserve the very best from this state,' said Senator Gallegos.
Both bipartisan bills were considered in their first committee hearing on Wednesday. SB 360 was withdrawn by Senator Padilla after debate, saying he would work on it and bring it back next year. Meanwhile SB 499 was tabled 6-4.
On Monday, the City of Belen had its own success story after an infant surrendered to its Safe Haven Baby Box became the first to be adopted through the program in the state's history.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 hours ago
- The Hill
Paul ‘not for censuring' Padilla: ‘I think that's crazy'
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said he would be against censuring Sen. Alex Padilla after the California Democrat tried to approach and question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference, which led to federal agents forcibly removing and handcuffing him. 'No, no, no. I'm not for censuring him. I think that's crazy. I'm not for that at all,' Paul told NBC's Kristen Welker on Sunday's 'Meet The Press.' The Thursday altercation sparked varying reactions on Capitol Hill, with Democrats condemning federal agents for what they said was an unjust and unnecessary reaction, and Republicans arguing Padilla's conduct was inappropriate. The White House said Padilla 'stormed' the press conference and 'lunged' at Noem, while Democrats argued the senator was within his rights to question the Homeland Secretary secretary and was 'manhandled' by law enforcement. Paul said he believed the altercation could have ended 'without the handcuffs,' but said Padilla 'rushed the stage,' adding he didn't think the federal agents recognized the California senator. 'The other side to it is, can you rush a stage?' Paul said. 'Can you rush into a press conference? And I think they honestly didn't recognize him.' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Thursday said he thought Padilla should be censured for his actions. 'I think that that behavior at a minimum rises to the level of a censure,' Johnson told reporters. 'I think there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that that is not what we're going to do, that's not what we're going to act.' The Los Angeles press conference Noem held on Thursday came amid widespread protests against the Trump administration's deportation efforts and in reaction to President Trump's mobilizing of the National Guard and Marines to protect federal property and personnel.
The Hill
8 hours ago
- The Hill
Schiff: Seeing Padilla ‘mistreated' amid LA protests ‘just atrocious'
Sen. Adam Schiff on Sunday called the handcuffing of fellow California Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla 'atrocious' after Padilla was forcibly removed for interrupting Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference in Los Angeles. 'To see him mistreated that way and tackled to the ground and shackled that way and in the midst of what we're seeing more broadly in Los Angeles is just atrocious,' Schiff told NBC's Kristen Welker on 'Meet The Press.' 'And I think all of us that work with him reacted with that kind of revulsion.' Schiff defended Padilla, saying he had 'every right' to attend Noem's press conference and ask a question. He also pointed out that Padilla had been escorted into the room and had identified himself before the incident. 'He tried to ask the secretary a question, a secretary who clearly doesn't want to answer questions about the lawless acts of the Department of Homeland Security that we are seeing in Los Angeles,' Schiff said. 'So he had every right to do so. That's part of his oversight responsibilities.' 'For those of us that know Alex, and you would be hard pressed to find a more beloved senator on either side of the aisle, respected by members on both sides of the aisle, you know, for his intellect, for his demeanor. This is not some rabble-rouser,' Schiff added. Video on Thursday shows Padilla being forced to the ground and then handcuffed after interrupting Noem's press conference, with the lawmaker identifying himself by name and title and saying he wished to ask a question. Trump administration officials said Secret Service agents responded as trained — removing an unknown figure as he pushed his way toward the front of a press conference. In a Thursday post on the social platform X, Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said, 'Senator Padilla chose disrespectful political theatre and interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem.' Padilla showed up to the presser after days of protests sparked by immigration raids in the Los Angeles-area. The Trump administration deployed the Marines and the National Guard to LA last week, arguing troops are needed to safeguard personnel and buildings amid the demonstrations. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), L.A. Mayor Karen Bass (D) and other Democrats have slammed the move. A federal appeals court panel on Thursday temporarily lifted a judge's order ruling Trump's deployment of the National Guard was illegal, allowing troops to continue helping with immigration raids in the city. The ruling came only hours after U.S District Judge Charles Breyer ordered Trump to return control of the troops to Newsom by Friday afternoon.
American Press
9 hours ago
- American Press
Trump vetoed Israeli plan to kill Iran's supreme leader, US official says
President-Donald Trump. (Associated Press Archives) President Donald Trump rejected a plan presented by Israel to the U.S. to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to a U.S. official familiar with the matter. The Israelis informed the Trump administration in recent days that they had developed a credible plan to kill Khamenei. After being briefed on the plan, the White House made clear to Israeli officials that Trump was opposed to the Israelis making the move, according to the official who was not authorized to comment on the sensitive matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity. The Trump administration is desperate to keep Israel's military operation aimed at decapitating Iran's nuclear program from exploding into an even more expansive conflict and saw the plan to kill Khamenei as a move that would enflame the conflict and potentially destabilize the region. Asked about the plan during an interview on Fox News Channel's 'Special Report with Bret Baier,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not directly address whether the White House rejected the plan. 'But I can tell you, I think that we do what we need to do, we'll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States,' Netanyahu said. Netanyahu spokesperson Omer Dostri later called reports about the Israeli plan to kill Khamenei 'fake.' Netanyahu in the Fox interview also said regime change 'could certainly be the result' of the conflict 'because the Iranian regime is very weak.' Trump's rejection of the proposal was first reported by Reuters. Meanwhile, Trump on Sunday issued a stark warning to Iran against retaliating on U.S. targets in the Middle East while also predicting Israel and Iran would 'soon' make a deal to end their escalating conflict. Trump in an early morning social media posting said the United States 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran' as Israel and Iran traded missile attacks for the third straight day. Iran, however, has said that it would hold the U.S.—which has provided Israel with much of its deep arsenal of weaponry—for its backing of Israel. 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before,' Trump said. Hours later Trump took to social media again to predict 'Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal.' The U.S. president said he has a track record for de-escalating conflicts, and that he would get Israel and Iran to cease hostilities 'just like I got India and Pakistan to make' after the two countries' recent cross-border confrontation. India struck targets inside Pakistan after militants in April massacred 26 tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir. Pakistan has denied any links to the attackers. Following India's strikes in Pakistan, the two sides exchanged heavy fire along their de facto borders, followed by missile and drone strikes into each other's territories, mainly targeting military installations and airbases. It was the most serious confrontation in decades between the countries. Trump on Sunday repeated his claim, disputed by India, that the two sides agreed to a ceasefire after he had offered to help both nations with trade if they agreed to de-escalate. Trump also pointed to efforts by his administration during his first term to mediate disputes between Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia. 'Likewise, we will have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran!' Trump said. 'Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that's OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!' Trump is set to travel later Sunday to Canada for Group of Seven leaders summit where the Mideast crisis will loom large over his talks with the leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan and the European Union. There's a divide in Trump world about how far the president should go in backing Israel. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson are among the prominent backers of Trump who have argued voters backed Trump because he would not involve the nation in foreign conflicts. GOP Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul praised Trump for having shown restraint and said he hoped the president's 'instincts will prevail.' 'So, I think it's going to be very hard to come out of this and have a negotiated settlement,' Paul said in an appearance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' 'I see more war and more carnage. And it's not the U.S.'s job to be involved in this war.' In an interview aired on CBS' 'Face the Nation' GOP South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham said he preferred diplomatic efforts, but if diplomacy doesn't work Trump should 'go all in' on destroying Iran's nuclear program. 'If that means providing bombs, provide bombs,' he said. 'If that means flying with Israel, fly with Israel.'
