Donald Trump's iPhone lock screen sparks viral reactions online: ‘His narcissism on full display'
Donald Trump is once again at the center of an online frenzy after a photo showed him holding his iPhone — with a lock screen image of himself. The picture, reportedly taken last Friday as Trump exited Air Force One in Pittsburgh, shows the U.S. president displaying his phone with an unmistakable image: himself, in a signature finger-pointing pose from July 2019.
This isn't the first time Trump has been caught with the self-referential lock screen. The same image appeared in 2023 while he was golfing, and resurfaced again in 2024 in a photo taken aboard Air Force One.
And, social media users didn't miss the chance to react — with ridicule, satire, and commentary ranging from humorous to scathing.
One user commented: 'A photo of himself – his narcissism on full display!!'
Another user described it bluntly: 'Trump's lock screen is himself, staring down himself, like a wet wax statue caught in a staring contest with its own ego. No grandkids, no dog, no golf swing — just orange gloom.'
A widely shared reaction read: 'Is that not one of the most narcissistic, self-absorbed things you've ever seen? Not his family, not his kids, but himself.'
One user mocked: 'Trump actually has his own image as his phone's screen saver. What a narcissistic pathetic loser. Says so much.'
Another remarked sarcastically: 'Of course it's a picture of himself, it's the one thing @realDonaldTrump loves more than anything else in the world.'
In a more humorous tone, one commenter imagined the photo's message: 'Trump's lockscreen photo says 'Leave my phone alone''
A Trump supporter countered the mockery, saying: 'Not that odd; Trump has a picture of the greatest president of our lifetime as his phone Lock Screen. You should have that pic on your Lock Screen as well.'
Yet another take summed up the moment with biting sarcasm: 'Donald Trump's Phone Lock Screen Is Once Again Going Viral Because It's Exactly What Everyone Expected It To Be.'
One eagle-eyed user noticed a different detail: 'Don't like the time it shows: 9:11.' — drawing attention to a potentially sensitive timestamp visible in the image.
Trump has not responded to the buzz, but the photo has once again proven that even the smallest detail about the President can ignite widespread online conversation — especially when it's literally a reflection of himself.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
A new paradigm in Russia-Ukraine war
On Sunday, Ukraine executed one of the most extraordinary asymmetric operations in modern military history. Using domestically built first-person-view (FPV) drones deployed from deep inside Russian territory, Kyiv launched a coordinated assault against several military airbases as far as eastern Siberia, the border with Mongolia, and the Arctic. Known as Operation Spiderweb, the attacks destroyed or severely damaged as many as 20 strategic aircraft, including nuclear-capable bombers and early-warning planes; Kyiv claims the true toll could reach 41. Only two days later, on Tuesday, the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) struck again – this time detonating underwater explosives and damaging the Kerch Bridge, the critical rail and road artery connecting Russia to occupied Crimea. The combined message from Kyiv could not have been clearer: We may be far smaller and — on paper at least — weaker, but we can strike hard and reach far into Russia. Using drones produced indigenously for less than the cost of an iPhone, Ukraine took out strategic bombers worth upward of $100 million each — many of which are nearly impossible to replace due to sanctions and Russia's degraded industrial base. At a 300,000-to-one return on investment, this is the kind of asymmetric operation that can upend the rules of modern warfare. Just as significant as the material damage is what the attacks revealed: That a small but determined and innovative nation can deploy cheap, scalable, and decentralised tech to challenge a much larger, conventionally superior foe – and even degrade elements of a nuclear superpower's second-strike capacity. The lessons will reverberate globally, from Taipei to Islamabad. Perhaps the biggest impact of Ukraine's battlefield coup may be to challenge the core strategic presumption that has guided Vladimir Putin's thinking for over three years — that time is on his side. Since the invasion began, Putin has bet on outlasting Ukraine — grinding down its defences, draining Western support, and waiting for the political winds in Washington and Europe to shift. That assumption has underpinned his refusal to negotiate seriously. But the success of Ukraine's drone and sabotage operations challenges that theory of victory. It shows that Ukraine is not simply holding the line or surviving a war of attrition; it is shifting the battlefield and expanding the costs of continued war for Russia in ways the Kremlin has not anticipated. That shift matters, especially in the diplomatic context. The timing of the drone campaign — just 24 hours before a direct round of talks between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul — was hardly coincidental. Kyiv's actions were designed to signal that Ukraine is not negotiating from a position of weakness and won't be coerced into a bad deal. Though the Istanbul meeting itself was predictably fruitless — lasting just over an hour and reinforcing the irreconcilability of the two sides' positions— the fact that the Kremlin showed up fresh off such a high-profile embarrassment suggests it may be starting to realise that Ukraine has cards to play and continuing the war carries risks for Russia. This may not be enough to bring Russia to the negotiating table in good faith, but it could make it more open to limited agreements. To be sure, a permanent peace settlement remains as distant as ever. Kyiv continues to push for an unconditional ceasefire that Russia rejects out of hand. In Istanbul, Moscow proposed two equally unacceptable alternatives: Either Kyiv retreats from Russian-claimed territories or accepts limits on its ability to rearm, including a halt to Western military aid. But the right kind of pressure from the US, coordinated with European allies, could now stand a better chance of extracting a first-phase deal — whether that's a 30-day ceasefire, a humanitarian corridor, or a prisoner swap — that could then potentially turn into something bigger and more durable. At the same time, Ukraine's gains increase the tail risks of dangerous escalation. Russia's deterrent posture has been eroded. Putin's red lines – on Nato enlargement, Western weapons use, attacks inside Russia – have been crossed repeatedly without serious consequence. That makes him look weak but also increases the risk that he will feel compelled to escalate the conflict more dramatically to restore his credibility at home and abroad. Russia's immediate response to the recent attacks will be more of the same: heavier indiscriminate bombing of Ukrainian cities and infrastructure. But a darker possibility is that, boxed in and humiliated, Putin might consider a tactical nuclear strike. The threshold for such an extreme step is high — not least because China, Russia's most important global partner, strongly opposes nuclear use. That scenario remains unlikely, but less so than before June 1. And Putin is emboldened by the belief that the West — particularly Donald Trump's US — fears direct military confrontation more than anything. If he assesses that Russia's position in the war is becoming untenable or its conventional deterrence is crumbling, his calculus could change. Ukraine has just reminded the Kremlin — and the world — that it can shape events, not just react to them. This doesn't put it on a path to victory or bring the war to an end. But by showing that it has leverage and that Moscow has more to lose than it thought, Ukraine has altered the strategic equation and opened a narrow window for diplomacy — even if the endgame remains as elusive as ever. The alternative is a deeper and more unpredictable conflict that grows more dangerous the longer it drags on. Ian Bremmer is the founder and board president of Eurasia Group Foundation. The views expressed.
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
Joe Biden slams Donald Trump, denies losing mental control, asserts, 'I made the decisions'
Former President Joe Biden firmly rejected claims questioning his control over the presidency, doubling down on his use of an autopen—a mechanical device that replicates a person's signature—to sign pardons, executive orders, and legislation. 'I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' Biden said in a statement, according to Fox News. He further accused President Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans of using these allegations as a distraction from legislative efforts they oppose. Biden said, 'This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations,' Trump orders investigation into Biden's actions President Donald Trump escalated his criticism of Biden by directing his administration to investigate Biden's actions, alleging aides concealed Biden's cognitive decline and casting doubt on the legitimacy of his autopen use. Trump's memo described the situation as 'one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history,' alleging, 'The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts.' Trump appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House counsel David Warrington to lead the inquiry. Autopen use long established and constitutionally valid Despite Trump's accusations, the Justice Department, under both Democratic and Republican administrations, has recognised autopen use for decades. The president's pardon power is absolute and enshrined in the US Constitution. No evidence has been presented showing Biden was unaware of actions signed on his behalf. Congressional Republicans demand answers House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has intensified the investigation, demanding interviews with five former senior Biden aides. Comer alleges a 'cover-up' regarding Biden's mental state and who was truly in control. 'These five former senior advisors were eyewitnesses to President Biden's condition and operations within the Biden White House,' Comer said. 'They must appear before the House Oversight Committee and provide truthful answers about President Biden's cognitive state and who was calling the shots.' Requested witnesses include White House senior advisers Mike Donilon and Anita Dunn, former Chief of Staff Ron Klain, former Deputy Chief of Staff Bruce Reed, and former counselor Steve Ricchetti. Comer also called for Biden's physician Kevin O'Connor and several former aides to testify. Comer warned that subpoenas would be issued if voluntary cooperation is not granted: 'I think that people will start coming in the next two weeks… we'll release the transcribed interviews, so it'll be very transparent.' Democrats dismiss probe as political theater Democrats have dismissed the GOP investigation as a distraction with no basis in fact. 'Chairman Comer had his big shot in the last Congress to impeach Joe Biden and it was, of course, a spectacular flop,' said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), ranking member of the oversight committee. 'And now he's just living off of a spent dream. It's over. And he should give up the whole thing.' GOP claims focus on final executive actions Republicans have zeroed in on Biden's final executive orders and pardons, suggesting they may be invalid due to his alleged incapacity. Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) said, 'The American people didn't elect a bureaucracy to run the country. I think that the American people deserve to know the truth and they want to know the truth of what happened.' Controversy fueled by book allegations The inquiry has been partly fueled by the book Original Sin by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson, which alleges that Biden's cognitive state limited his control, saying, 'Five people were running the country, and Joe Biden was at best a senior member of the board.' Biden's family and allies have strongly rejected the book's claims. Naomi Biden, the former president's granddaughter, called it 'political fairy smut for the permanent, professional chattering class.' Target: Family pardons, death row commutations The investigation centres on preemptive pardons Biden issued to five family members—including siblings James Biden, Frank Biden, and Valerie Biden Owens, along with their spouses—and clemency that spared 37 federal inmates from the death penalty. Biden had defended the family pardons, stating they were intended 'to protect them from future politically motivated investigations.' Hunter Biden, the president's son, who had pleaded guilty to tax violations and was convicted on firearms-related charges, was also pardoned by Biden on December 1. In the final hours of his presidency, Joe Biden issued pre-emptive pardons to several key personalities, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, retired General Mark Milley, and members of the House committee that investigated the January 6 Capitol attack. Background: Biden's declining health questions Concerns over Biden's mental acuity arose after a poor debate performance against Trump in the run up to 2024 election, where he appeared confused and misspoke several times. This performance led to his withdrawal from the presidential race and replacement by Kamala Harris, who ultimately lost the general election to Trump. Also Read | Trump and Xi speak amid stalled tariff negotiations: Chinese media
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Ridiculous and false': Joe Biden refutes autopen misuse allegations as Trump orders probe into 'conspiracy'
Former US President Joe Biden defended himself on Wednesday amid allegations of autopen misuse, asserting his full control of White House operations during his presidency. The now-president Donald Trump initiated an inquiry into Biden's administration, claiming that senior officials employed autopen signatures to mask the former president's mental deterioration. Refuting the claims, Biden released a statement asserting, "I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false." "This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations," he continued. This comes as Trump, on Wednesday, directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate top Biden officials, suggesting they possibly collaborated to mislead the public about his cognitive state and exercised presidential authority via autopen. An autopen functions as a mechanical apparatus that produces genuine-looking signatures through the physical control of writing tools. These devices differ from traditional stamps and digital signature printing methods, as they work with diverse writing implements ranging from ballpoint pens to permanent markers, according to product details of commercially available autopens, as Fox News reported. Notably, The Justice Department has accepted the practice of using autopen for signing both legislation and pardons across various presidential administrations. The presidential pardon power, as explicitly outlined in the Constitution, is absolute, and Trump's assertions regarding Biden's knowledge of specific actions remain unsubstantiated without any supporting evidence. Also read: What is Autopen? Signature device used by Biden to sign pardons; Trump orders inquiry In a Wednesday memo, Trump emphasised that presidential signatures carry substantial authority and responsibility. These signatures transform proposals into laws, enable governmental appointments, establish or remove national policies, and grant prisoner releases. "In recent months, it has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden's aides abused the power of Presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline and assert Article II authority," Trump wrote. "This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history. The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts," he added. "Given clear indications that President Biden lacked the capacity to exercise his Presidential authority, if his advisors secretly used the mechanical signature pen to conceal this incapacity, while taking radical executive actions all in his name, that would constitute an unconstitutional wielding of the power of the Presidency, a circumstance that would have implications for the legality and validity of numerous executive actions undertaken in Biden's name," Trump further said. House Republicans, under Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer's leadership, commenced an investigation last month to assess whether Biden, experiencing declining health in his presidency's final months, was mentally capable of authorising autopen usage. Comer indicated last week he would consider requiring Biden to appear before the House for questioning if needed. Trump has made similar accusations in the past as well. In March, Trump argued that any preemptive pardons signed by President Biden using an autopen for House select committee members who conducted the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack investigation would be deemed "void" and "vacant."
