Still no trial decided for 2021 N.L. election challenge amid slow-moving lawsuit
Whymarrh Whitby alleges his right to vote was denied in the 2021 provincial election. He and former NDP leader Allison Coffin are still in court over it. (Patrick Butler/Radio-Canada)
A slow-paced lawsuit alleging problems with the province's 2021 "pandemic election" finally saw some movement Thursday morning, but the case is now at risk of being tossed altogether.
Lawyers for Elections N.L. and John Abbott argued it's too late for a three-year-old controverted election application to go to trial, given the next general election is just months away at most.
The lengthy lawsuit began when St. John's man Whymarrh Whitby alleged that issues during the last provincial election — including issues about special ballets — resulted in his right to vote being denied.
Three candidates — former provincial NDP leader Allison Coffin and PC candidates Jim Lester and Sheila Fitzgerald — have been calling for a new byelection in their respective ridings since.
Whitby, Coffin and Lester were all at Supreme Court in St. John's for Thursday's hearing.
Whitby's lawsuit against Elections N.L. and former chief electoral officer Bruce Chaulk is co-signed by Coffin, who lost her St. John's East-Quidi Vidi seat to current Liberal MHA John Abbott.
The pair is represented by Will Hiscock, who said Thursday that he is prepared to go to trial.
"We have the numbers to make this not a purely academic challenge, but a real and material challenge," Hiscock told Justice Garrett Handrigan.
From left, Elections N.L. lawyer Andrew Fitzgerald; John Samms, lawyer for John Abbott; and Will Hiscock, who is representing Whymarrh Whitby and Allison Coffin. (Patrick Butler/Radio-Canada)
Most of the morning hinged on one section of the House of Assembly Act, which Elections N.L. lawyer Andrew Fitzgerald interpreted as saying a byelection cannot occur within six months of a general election.
Hiscock, however, argued the act stated that there is simply no obligation to hold a byelection in that period, and said irregularities caused significant challenges during the previous provincial election.
Trial readiness
In his readiness argument, Hiscock said he is prepared for trial, with at least 60 individuals in the St. John's East-Quidi Vidi riding who allegedly ran into irregularities in the election that prevented them from voting.
That number is high enough to beat the magic number test in this case, which is a formula the Supreme Court uses to determine whether an election should be annulled.
John Samms, the lawyer for John Abbott, argued that he and his client had no role in delaying the lawsuit, and that the plaintiffs have not taken any chances to speed up the process — proving, he argued, they are not ready to go to trial.
Samms wants the matter to be "fully evaporated" by April 14 of this year — the presumed "drop dead" date for this matter.
"Barring another pandemic, we will never see another election like this again," he said, arguing that a trial would be too expensive, lengthy and unnecessary.
The lawsuit is not meant to replace one sitting member of the House of Assembly with another, Hiscock said, but rather to void the 2021 election altogether.
According to Handrigan, the lawsuit is at the eleventh hour.
"But we're not at the twelfth," Hiscock replied as those sitting in the courtroom laughed.
Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Sign up for our daily headlines newsletter here. Click here to visit our landing page
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Why some Canadians are alarmed by Mark Carney's pledge to act with urgency
Canadians elected Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberal government based on its pledge to act with urgency and fix things — the country's economy, its security and its standing on the world stage. But with the unveiling of a bill to supercharge the economy and early efforts to improve the country's adversarial relations with India and China, there's growing concern that Carney's plans to boost Canada could involve unsavoury trade offs. Ask Indigenous leaders who were left out of 'nation-building' meetings or were given just a week to comment on legislation that will fast track infrastructure projects reasonably expected to pass through their treaty-protected territories. Ask Sikh-Canadian leaders who have seen their members targeted for death or violence, allegedly on orders from Indian government agents. Last Friday, they listened as Carney defended his G7 invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as one that 'makes sense' based on India's economic power, population and key role in international 'supply chains.' Ask foreign aid organizations, perhaps, if Canada commits to radically increasing defence spending along with NATO allies at a leaders' summit planned for later this month. Carney is not alone in his apparent willingness to step on toes if it means he can move further and faster in responding to the sense of emergency at hand. It's part of a global movement with governments invoking looming threats and emerging risks to push through all sorts of questionable — and sometimes contestable — priorities. The most blatant example is the one that has sparked the economic emergency in Canada. U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on imports have been pushed through not with legislation that can be studied, debated and voted upon, but through presidential executive orders invoking real or imagined national emergencies at the Canada-U. S. border. They are premised upon risks from America-bound migrants, fentanyl, steel and cars and, despite initial court rulings that tranches of the tariffs are illegal under U.S. law, they remain in effect. Likewise, the generalized panic that Russia's three-years-and-counting war against Ukraine has instilled in Europe. There is legitimate reason to worry about the longer-term intentions of Russian President Vladimir Putin, a leader who has been unwilling to agree to a ceasefire despite sanctions, despite diplomatic isolation, despite the more recent appeals, threats and exhortations of the Trump administration. But preparations for a potentially wider conflict on the European continent now have German officials talking about rehabilitating long-abandoned bunkers, Poland vowing to build up 'the strongest army in the region,' and Swedish households receiving an alarming 32-page pamphlet from their government entitled: 'In case of crisis or war.' 'To all residents of Sweden: we live in uncertain times,' the booklet begins ominously. It goes on to cover everything from securing one's home to digital safety to instructions on how to stop bleeding to advice about handling pets and talking to children. This is the political and emotional backdrop against which Canada and other NATO member states later this month are expected to back an agreement to steeply increase in their national defence budgets, moving to five per cent of GDP from two per cent. If agreed to, it will result in many billions of dollars going to weapons, tanks, planes and soldiers' salaries. But before those purchases can go ahead, there will be many difficult choices made about how to come up with the funds. Governments always talk about finding budget efficiencies for unexpected priorities, though saving is not a specialty for which politicians are well suited. Even Donald Trump and Elon Musk came up spectacularly short of their savings pledges through the Department of Government Efficiency. More frequently, governments end up robbing Peter in order to pay Paul, as the saying goes — cutting spending in on domain to increase it in another. That is exactly what the United Kingdom did with blunt effect when it announced earlier this year that it would slash foreign aid spending drastically in order to increase the defence budget. 'Few countries have articulated such a direct, one-to-one trade off before between those two areas of public spending,' noted a report from ODI Global , a think tank, that criticized the British government for thinking of defence and foreign-aid spending as an either-or choice. Similar potential trade offs are cause for concern in Canada. Will the urgency to build oil pipelines and assert the country as an 'energy superpower' in new markets come at the cost of Canada's fight against global warming? Carney's reputation as a climate-change warrior is well-established, but his use of the oil-and-gas industry's ' marketing speak ' at a recent meeting first ministers' meeting with provincial premiers has some worried about the economy taking priority over the environment. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, the national association representing Canadian Inuit, wasn't even invited to the first ministers' meeting, which concluded with a statement about the need to 'unlock the North's economic potential.' 'It is troubling that in 2025, the Government of Canada is so comfortable with empty rhetoric in place of rightful participation,' the Inuit association said in a news release . The legislation to get Carney's economic fast-track transformation under way — one that the Liberal government wants to pass into law by Canada Day — was decried by the Assembly of First Nations, which had just seven days to provide any concerns about the bill, APTN News reported . There are those who will defend a go-fast approach to governing in extraordinary times. They will warn that there is a greater risk in being sunk by the status quo — the never-ending consultations, the delays, red-tape entanglements. 'The advantage of a wartime mentality lies in the sense of urgency it introduces, and the readiness it encourages to push aside unnecessary bureaucratic barriers,' wrote Lawrence Freedman, an emeritus professor of War Studies at King's College London, in a piece about Russia, Ukraine and Europe. It's a line that can be applied as equally to Ottawa as to Moscow, Kyiv, Paris, Brussels or London. But one person's bureaucratic barrier is the next person's guard rail — a measure ensuring confidence, protecting against damaging errors, saving lives. Moving at high speeds, it can be difficult to spot the difference.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mexican President Sheinbaum seeking meeting with Trump at G7
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum says she hopes to have a pull-aside conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump when the two North American leaders travel to Alberta next week for the G7 summit. Her trip north comes as both Canada and Mexico grapple with Trump's persistent tariffs and economic threats, which have also stressed the Canada-Mexico relationship; Ontario Premier Doug Ford has suggested Canada go it alone with the U.S. on trade. Mexico is not part of the G7, but other leaders are often invited for discussions around the global leader summit. Last month, Sheinbaum confirmed she was invited but wasn't sure if she'd attend. "I have decided that I will attend the G7," Sheinbaum said in a statement Monday. "The foreign affairs minister is working on setting up bilateral meetings — it is likely that we will have one with Trump." Prime Minister Mark Carney's office has signalled he is hoping to reach a deal around tariffs and trade around the G7 meetings, taking place in Kananaskis, Alta., from June 15 to 17. The prime minister has also said he wants to make progress on bilateral issues with the U.S. before talks take place on the trilateral Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). A review of that deal is officially slated to start in 2026, although Mexican officials have suggested they expect a review to start earlier than that.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says
TORONTO — Canada will meet NATO's military spending guideline by early next year and diversify defense spending away from the United States, which he says no longer plays a predominant role on the world stage, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday. Carney said Canada will achieve NATO's spending target of 2% of gross domestic product five years earlier than it had previously planned.
