
Chris Selley: Why would B.C. pay more for ferries just to spite Donald Trump?
British Columbia's transportation minister claimed Friday that buying new ferries from European shipyards would have cost roughly $1.2 billion more than buying them from a Chinese government-owned shipyard in Weihai, Shandong province, which is a city roughly the size of Montreal that I had never heard of until this week. China knows how to build cities. They burst into existence from nothing, like popcorn. China also knows how to build ships, and highways, and high-speed rail, and just about anything else you would care to name, better and more efficiently than the Canadian public service can realistically comprehend.
Article content
Article content
The four ships B.C. Ferries is fixing to replace, of 1960s and 1970s vintage, were built at Seaspan in North Vancouver (which is an active shipyard), at the Victoria Machinery Depot (which is no longer an active shipyard), and at the Burrard Dry Dock (which is also defunct). Canada's shipyards, for better or worse — certainly for expensive! — are very busy building things for the navy.
Article content
Article content
Article content
B.C. Ferries has plenty of experience with foreign-built vessels. Its current fleet includes ships built in Romania, Poland, Germany and Greece. Other than the Baynes Sound cable ferry on Vancouver Island — which is not especially popular — the Crown corporation's newest Canadian-built boat went into service in 1997. So 'foreign' obviously isn't the problem.
Article content
But China is China, and that's legitimately another thing. China is not a Canadian ally. They try to screw with our democracy, and most other democracies by the sounds of it. And right now we are in a profoundly protectionist moment: Across the political spectrum, mostly because of President Donald Trump, 'buy Canadian' is the only philosophy really on offer.
Article content
Article content
But does that make sense? We should pay over the odds for ferries … because of Trump? There wasn't half of all this foofaraw when Marine Atlantic on the East Coast bought its newest ferry from Weihai. Since last year it has safely been shepherding Canadians between Nova Scotia and Newfoundland, without a whisper of controversy in the Rest of Canada.
Article content
Article content
But this is 2025. So on Tuesday during question period in Ottawa, Conservative MP Jeff Kibble assailed the government for allowing this purchase go forward, as opposed to handing the contract to a 'proven Canadian shipbuilder such as Seaspan.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CTV News
9 hours ago
- CTV News
‘Count me as skeptical': Eby open to conversations with Smith on pipelines, doubtful private proponent will come forward
Premier David Eby speaks to reporters from his office following the throne speech at the legislature in Victoria, Tuesday, Feb. 18, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chad Hipolito As the federal government passes its contentious bill to streamline approvals of so-called nation-building projects, B.C. Premier David Eby says he's doubtful he can be convinced of the need to build a new pipeline through his province. The Liberals' Bill C-5 — dubbed the Building Canada Act — passed 306 to 31 on Friday, just minutes before the House rose for the summer break. The bill — aimed at giving government sweeping new powers to approve major projects of national interest — is now headed for the Senate, where it's expected to pass. Amid opposition to the bill, Prime Minister Mark Carney has promised that he won't impose a project on a province that doesn't want it, and that all projects will require consensus to go ahead. The condition prompted Alberta Premier Danielle Smith to say during an interview on CTV Question Period earlier this month that she would 'convince' Eby to support building a pipeline to transport oil from her province, through his, to tidewater. Eby has said he won't support a new pipeline built with any public dollars, arguing the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX) is already in place. In an interview on CTV Question Period airing Sunday, Eby told host Vassy Kapelos the priority should be getting TMX operating at capacity before greenlighting new projects. 'There's no fight here,' Eby said, of the potential standoff between the two premiers. 'The concern that I have is a matter of priorities.' '(TMX) is owned by Canadians. It's not operating at capacity,' Eby also said. 'There's 200,000 additional barrels of capacity in that pipeline. Let's start there.' The B.C. premier added he doesn't think a new pipeline should be subsidized by government, arguing there are other energy projects being proposed by private companies, which should be prioritized. When pressed by Kapelos on the positive impact of TMX on Canada's GDP, and whether the two are mutually exclusive — if the government can at once create an environment through Bill C-5 to encourage private investment in major projects so they don't need to be federally funded, while other energy projects Eby listed also move ahead — Eby pointed to his signing of an agreement with the Prairie and other Western provinces for a 'port-to-port' energy corridor. 'If Premier Smith is able to come up with this (pipeline) project, that's what the corridor will be for,' he said. 'Count me as skeptical, and count me as opposed to the idea of tens of billions of dollars of additional federal subsidy when we have a pipeline that is not currently at capacity in our province operating right now,' he added, when asked by Kapelos whether he can be convinced by Smith that a new pipeline project could have merit. The B.C. premier said he would prefer to focus on projects that can be delivered on 'in the here and now.' He also said that if Smith can conceive of a pipeline project that doesn't require 'significant federal subsidy,' then 'more power to her.' 'If the premier of Alberta is able to deliver it, then let's have that conversation,' he said. 'But I don't see that.'


CBC
20 hours ago
- CBC
B.C. minister defends progress on building more schools in Surrey
B.C.'s infrastructure minister has defended her government's progress on building more schools in Surrey, even as two more schools in the city will shift to a staggered schedule to deal with overcrowding. Fraser Heights and Sullivan Heights secondary schools will shift to having class times adjusted to start earlier, and end later, in order to squeeze a fifth block of classes into the daily schedule. That means eight schools in B.C.'s largest school district will have staggered schedules in total, as the Surrey School District's long-running overcrowding problems continue to lead to parent frustration. District officials have defended the practice of extending days and say staff have been able to manage the workload, while the minister responsible for building more infrastructure has said around $1 billion has been spent on new schools and school additions in Surrey since 2017. WATCH | Parents outraged over staggered school days: Staggered school times at Surrey, B.C., schools terrible for staff, parents say 3 days ago Duration 10:33 Fraser Heights and Sullivan Heights secondary schools in Surrey are expected to stagger start times so that school space is available for them in the fall. Cindy Dalglish says the staggered schedule at her child's school, Salish Secondary, is very disruptive for working parents. Sally Huang, who is the PAC president at Fraser Heights, called the changes terrible and horrifying. Parents, however, say that officials aren't moving fast enough to deal with a problem that has festered for years, and students' futures are getting caught in the crossfire. "The inconsistency is completely disruptive and the inequity, and lack of awareness of the inequity, is astounding," said Cindy Dalglish, whose daughter studies at Salish Secondary School, which was on staggered start times last year. "These decisions are not student centred at all." Dalglish said the inconsistency in school starting times means that parents have to juggle work responsibilities to get their kids to school and extracurriculars and study schedules are thrown in flux daily. "We already have, you know, a high level of curriculum coming into them," the parent said. "She is one of those go-getter kids that has really hard, hard classes .... they're cramming more into these [classes] this time." Sally Huang, the president of the Fraser Heights Secondary parent advisory committee, said that the staggered start times were also hard on staff, even as she acknowledged staggered start times were preferable to online learning. "The Surrey students' population growth is not new news," she said. "It has been steadily growing [over] the years, especially since COVID and a lot of young families, we heard, moved here looking for affordable housing. "So why hasn't the government kept up with that reality? Why hasn't there been a timely capital investment in new schools and classrooms?" Year-round schooling being considered Terry Allen, the vice-chair of the Surrey Board of Education, defended the staggered start times, and commended staff for dealing with the added workload. Allen said the feedback the school board has received has been positive, and he was disappointed to learn that parents weren't satisfied with their kids' learning experience. "The reality is, though, that there's really no other choice," Allen said of the extended school days. "We don't have enough schools in Surrey, and if we don't find some way of creating more space in the schools we have, it can only get worse and certainly not better." WATCH | Terry Allen defends staggered start times: 2 more Surrey, B.C., schools to have staggered start times 4 days ago Duration 9:01 Amid a funding crunch in B.C.'s biggest school district, Fraser Heights and Sullivan Heights secondary schools in Surrey are expected to stagger start times so that school space is available for them. Terry Allen, vice-chair of the Surrey Board of Education, said the issue of school space will only get worse if the province doesn't step up with more funding. Allen said that year-round schooling was being given serious thought at the Surrey school board, and that if they failed to receive new schools, everything was on the table. "Parents will have a problem with it, and I don't blame them," he said. "Simply because the provincial government is not providing new schools, and new expansions to existing schools." Minister says billions being spent B.C. Infrastructure Minister Bowinn Ma said she sympathized with parents in Surrey, and that the school board was being creative in dealing with the overcrowding people. She said the provincial NDP government has invested $6 billion, including $1 billion in Surrey, into new schools and additions since 2017. "Recognizing that the situation that Surrey is dealing with is not ideal, there is hope on the horizon because investments are underway to bring literally thousands of new seats into the Surrey School District," she said. In response to questions about why the government had not moved faster to deal with the overcrowding issue — given the NDP has been in power since 2017 — Ma said the previous Liberal government had not built a single school in the four preceding years. She categorized the money being spent now as a "massive increase in investment" since then, and said that if population growth had stayed consistent, Surrey would actually be seeing an excess of student seats. "But the population also went through this massive increase," the minister said. "So student population increased by 11,500 in that time. This is an unprecedented population increase, we have not seen these kinds of rates of increase in B.C. before." Ma said that a recently-passed infrastructure bill will help the government streamline projects and get them built faster.


Toronto Star
a day ago
- Toronto Star
Beijing official overseeing Hong Kong warns of persisting national security threats
HONG KONG (AP) — A top Beijing official overseeing Hong Kong affairs on Saturday warned of persisting threats in the city as a China-imposed national security law approaches its fifth anniversary, while seeking to allay concerns about the law's impact on the financial hub's openness. Speaking at a forum about the law, attended also by the city leader John Lee and other officials. Xia Baolong, the director of China's Hong Kong and Macao Work Office, said various forms of soft resistance continue to emerge in new forms and external forces have never ceased their intervention in Hong Kong.