Ukraine did not give Trump advance notice before obliterating Russian ‘doomsday' nuclear bombers: reports
Ukraine did not give the Trump administration advance notice of its drone strikes deep in Russian territory Sunday that wiped out dozens of nuclear 'doomsday' bombers and other aircraft, according to reports.
The daring Ukrainian operation had been in the works for more than a year and entailed a covert operation to smuggle a slew of drones into Russia, but the White House was not given a heads-up that the planned attack was coming, CBS and Axios said, citing sources.
The White House did not respond to a Post request for comment Sunday.
Advertisement
The sneak attack came as Ukrainian negotiators are set to meet with their Russian counterparts in Istanbul on Monday to present their latest offer during peace talks.
Trump — who spent his Sunday morning hitting the tees at his Sterling, Va., club with golf ace Bryson DeChambeau — has repeatedly publicly chafed with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Their shaky relationship includes their infamous Feb. 28 Oval Office blow-up and the president's occasional social-media posts in which he's blamed the US's traditional ally for the war.
Advertisement
3 Footage showed Ukraine's daring drone strike on the Kremlin's aircraft deep in Russian territory.
Ukraine's Security Service
3 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been urging allies to ratchet up the pressure on Russia.
Getty Images
Among the insults hurled during the pair's Feb. 28 public clash was Trump's claim that Ukraine has 'no cards' to play in its campaign to stave off Russian invaders.
Some observers have speculated that Ukrainian trust in Washington has waned under the Trump administration amid the public flare-ups.
Advertisement
In Sunday's attack by Ukraine, at least 41 of the Kremlin's heavy bombers at four different locations in Russia — thousands of miles inside the country — were hit, the Kyiv Independent reported.
The struck aircraft included TU-95 'Bear' nuclear bombers — considered Russia's doomsday deterrent — A-50 'Mainstay' command-and-control jets and TU-22 'Backfire' fast-attack strike bombers, according to multiple reports.
The surprise attack comes against the backdrop of Russia brutally pummeling Ukrainian cities such as Kyiv in recent weeks, slaughtering civilians.
Some of Russia's barbarism toward civilians has prompted outrage from Trump, who recently suggested that the country's strongman, Vladimir Putin, has 'gone absolutely CRAZY' and that he was 'playing with fire' by not acting as if he wanted peace negotiations.
Advertisement
Russia's stepped-up drone bombardments on Ukraine have come while Trump has attempted to broker a peace deal between the two warring countries. Ukraine has agreed to Trump's proposed terms for a ceasefire, but Russia hasn't.
3 President Trump has been eager to broker peace between the two warring countries.
AP
Still, Trump has continued to publicly place some of the blame for the bloody war on Zelensky's shoulders in addition to Putin's.
'This isn't my war. This is Biden's war, Zelensky his war and Putin's war. This isn't Trump's war,' the president told reporters last week.
Bipartisan calls have grown inside Congress to ramp up sanctions on Russia and even consider giving Kyiv more firepower to fend off the invaders.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who has met with Zelensky alongside Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), said the Senate will 'start moving' to tighten the screws on Moscow and consider a sanctions package when the upper chamber reconvenes this week.
Trump has expressed reluctance to amplify the sanctions on Russia during the sensitive negotiations over the war.
Advertisement
Congress has approved over $175 billion in aid to Ukraine since the war broke out in February 2022, according to a Congressional Research Service study published in January. Much of that money includes humanitarian and economic aid to the war-torn country.
The State Department estimates that the US has marshaled $66.9 billion in military aid to Ukraine since Russia's deadly invasion began over three years ago, according to a March fact sheet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
6 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump, DOJ threaten Calif. with legal action, fines after trans athlete's win
Days after a 16-year-old transgender athlete placed first in two events at the California state track-and-field championship, the Trump administration is threatening legal action and 'large scale' fines over the state's policy allowing trans athletes to compete in high school sports. In a letter addressed to the state's public school districts, Harmeet Dhillon, who heads the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, said on Monday that the California Interscholastic Federation violates the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause with its bylaw stating that all students 'should have the opportunity to participate in CIF activities in a manner that is consistent with their gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on a student's records.' The letter directed school districts to certify in writing by June 9 that they wouldn't follow the bylaw.
The Verge
8 minutes ago
- The Verge
On Sunday, Ukraine's security agency
Ukraine used open source software to carry out its drone strikes. released footage of the strikes targeting Russian airfields, which show the country's use of ArduPilot, as reported earlier by 404Media. The open-source software was developed nearly 20 years ago for Arduino systems before evolving into advanced autopilot software for multicopters, traditional helicopters, and other vehicles, according to its website. 'Not in a million years would I have predicted this outcome,' Jason Short, one of the software's co-creators, said in a post on X. 'I just wanted to make flying robots.'
Newsweek
8 minutes ago
- Newsweek
'Russia's Pearl Harbor' Fuels Fears Over Chinese Cargo Ships at US Ports
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Sunday's Ukrainian drone ambush on a Russian airbase more than 3,000 miles from the front lines has intensified a growing debate among U.S. military analysts over the plausibility of a similar attack launched from Chinese merchant vessels docked at American ports. The scenario has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers and security analysts alike following confirmation that COSCO Shipping—China's state-owned shipping giant—operates across key U.S. ports, despite being designated by the Department of Defense as a Chinese military company. At issue is whether drones or cruise missiles could be hidden in shipping containers aboard these vessels, activated remotely or after offloading, and used in a preemptive strike. "This is a very plausible form of attack in the U.S.," said Bryan Clark, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former U.S. Navy officer. "But the attack would need to overcome several challenges," he told Newsweek. "The drones need to get out of the container, and that's hard to control aboard a ship. A more feasible approach would be to deploy the drones from a container once it's offloaded and moved on a truck." In this image taken from video released June 1, 2025, by a source in the Ukrainian Security Service shows a Ukrainian drone striking Russian planes deep in Russia's territory. In this image taken from video released June 1, 2025, by a source in the Ukrainian Security Service shows a Ukrainian drone striking Russian planes deep in Russia's territory. AP Retired Navy commander Thomas Shugart, now a fellow at the Center for a New American Security, has voiced a more urgent warning. "It is becoming borderline-insane that we routinely allow ships owned and operated by DoD-designated Chinese military companies to sit in our ports with thousands of containers onboard and under their control," Shugart said in a conversation with Newsweek. Shugart said the concept isn't speculative—it mirrors Chinese military writings. "Their Science of Campaigns is full of references to 'sudden' and 'surprise' strikes," he said, referring to a core text that Chinese military officers are expected to study. "They explicitly discuss hitting first, especially against what they call the 'powerful entity,' which is clearly a reference to the United States." The concerns are not just theoretical. In January, members of the House Committee on Homeland Security asked the U.S. Coast Guard for a classified briefing, citing COSCO's access to "major U.S. ports" and warning of risks including "espionage, cyber intrusions, sabotage, and supply chain disruptions," according to a letter sent in January. Vulnerabilities Can Be Exploited Zak Kallenborn, a researcher of drone and asymmetric warfare, acknowledged the technical possibility but questioned the timing. "A similar Chinese drone attack is definitely plausible and worth worrying about," he told Newsweek. "However, a Chinese attack is unlikely to come completely out of the blue. If China were to do this, we'd likely already be at war." Shipping containers, including those from COSCO, a Chinese state-owned shipping and logistics company await transportation on a rail line at the Port of Long Beach on July 12, 2018 in Long Beach, California. Shipping containers, including those from COSCO, a Chinese state-owned shipping and logistics company await transportation on a rail line at the Port of Long Beach on July 12, 2018 in Long Beach, California. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images Still, the lessons from Ukraine's recent drone strike on Russian airfields linger heavily in the minds of U.S. analysts and war planners grappling with the warp-speed progress of battlefield technological advancements like drone warfare. The operation on Sunday exposed how even hardened military targets can be neutralized by low-cost drones—deep inside a nuclear-armed adversary's territory where an enemy's conventional air power would be difficult to penetrate. For some of these experts, it raised uncomfortable parallels to U.S. vulnerabilities. Shugart said the U.S. shouldn't assume distance offers safety. "We've hardened some overseas air bases," he said. "But we still park billion-dollar aircraft in the open on our own soil. That's a risk." According to a March report from the Atlantic Council, China has developed and demonstrated containerized missile and drone platforms that can be covertly transported aboard commercial vessels. The report warned these systems could enable Beijing to establish "a covert way to establish anti-access/area denial nodes near major maritime choke points." A Regulatory Blindspot Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb demonstrated how swarms of inexpensive, off-the-shelf drones—slightly modified to carry explosives and smuggled in wooden containers to be deployed remotely—can inflict billions of dollars in damage on strategic military assets, including long-range bombers. The contrast has fueled criticism of more traditional defense approaches, such as President Donald Trump's proposed "Golden Dome" missile shield, which analysts say may be poorly matched to emerging low-cost threats. What if I told you that as I type this there was a vessel, associated with the Chinese PLA, that *could* be equipped with many dozens of anti-ship cruise missiles—and was parked less than 4 miles from the bulk of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet. Well guess what: it's happening—for real. — Tom Shugart (@tshugart3) August 22, 2024 The regulatory environment surrounding drones is also a major factor in the growing risk, experts say. "We don't have a drone transportation and logistics system," military theorist John Robb wrote on X. "The FAA strangled it in the crib a decade ago. If the FCC had regulated the internet the way we've handled drones, we'd still be using AOL." Robb advocates for a national drone framework with built-in security measures: "Monitoring, kill switches, no-fly zones, hardware and software rules, maintenance requirements, and corporate certification." In Congress, lawmakers continue to press the Coast Guard to ensure more stringent vetting of foreign vessels, crew members and cargo. "The vetting process must be consistent and comprehensive across all U.S. ports," the Homeland Security Committee wrote in its January request. The committee also raised concerns about Chinese political officers allegedly embedded aboard COSCO vessels, which it argued underscores direct Chinese Communist Party influence over ostensibly commercial operations. For analysts like Clark, the technology is only part of the equation. The more pressing concern is readiness. "If China believes it can use relatively small drones to cause major damage, and we've done nothing to detect or deter it, that's a vulnerability we can't afford to ignore," he said.
