Take up of heat pumps ‘may be boosted if households shown running cost savings'
Many households may switch to a heat pump if they had a better idea of how much money it could save them over the longer-term in running costs, a report indicates.
Banking and finance industry body UK Finance, which released the findings, said a blend of targeted policy measures is needed to encourage homeowners, landlords, and housing associations to retrofit their properties with 'green' technology.
Its Unlocking Demand for Green Home Finance report used YouGov research to show the attitudes of UK consumers specifically towards heat pump technology.
It said the UK needs to install around 1.5 million heat pumps per year by 2035 to meet its carbon reduction goals.
The research indicated that 54% of people felt the main barrier discouraging them from getting a heat pump was the up-front cost.
But 44% said they would switch if they were provided with a clear idea of the savings in running costs.
The report set out various recommendations, including establishing a government-led body or group to drive collaboration; launching a public awareness campaign with independent guidance; and providing grants, subsidies, and a coordinated plan to train sufficient tradespeople.
Clear long-term expectations should also be set, so that households and firms can make preparations and energy efficiency metrics should also be updated, UK Finance said.
Ian Bhullar, director of sustainability policy at UK Finance said: 'To meet our ambitious targets on greening the UK's housing stock we need to drive demand and convince the public of the benefits.
'Lenders are committed to playing their part and through the Government's Warm Homes Plan we have the opportunity to really make a difference.
'Increasing demand for green home improvements will bring significant benefits, stimulate job creation, drive innovation, and reinforce the UK's energy security in an increasingly volatile global market.'
More than 4,200 UK adults took part in the research in December 2024, among whom nearly 4,000 did not have a heat pump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
YouGov survey finds just 28% back Trump in feud. Musk fared even worse at 8%.
The bickering between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man captivated the political world on June 5, but a poll suggests the rest of the country is over the melodrama. A poll taken by YouGov asking respondents who they sided in the feud this week between President Donald Trump electric car and space guru Elon Musk found 52% saying neither. Just 28% picked the president, and a meager 8% backed Musk. Musk's support was even less than the "I don't know" response — 11%. Fewer than half, 41%, said they would back Trump's threat to cancel government contracts held by Musk's companies, with even fewer, 21%, saying they opposed such retaliation. Big Beautiful Bill fight deepens: Trump threatens Musk over federal contracts, subsidies Asked if they believed Trump and Musk will reconcile and work together again, 28% said yes and 31% replied no – 41% Moreover, just 35% said they thought the United States would be better served by the two men working together while 31% replied the national interest was better served with the two engaged in conflict. Another 35% said they were not sure. YouGov surveyed 3,812 adults in the poll after a day's worth of sharp salvos and bitter insults on social media. Antonio Fins is a politics and business editor at The Palm Beach Post, part of the USA TODAY Florida Network. You can reach him at afins@ Help support our journalism. Subscribe today. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: YouGov poll on Donald Trump and Elon Musk feud
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Britain's biggest steelmaker warns it faces Trump tariffs hit
The Indian owner of the Port Talbot steelworks has warned that a carve-out from Donald Trump's tariffs is 'critical' to its business. Tata Steel's UK operations are at risk of falling foul of American import tariffs even if a pending agreement between London and Washington is formalised, because of a reliance on steel made in India and elsewhere. This is because of American demands that UK steel products can only be exempt from tariffs if they used metal that was 'melted and poured' domestically. Ministers are trying to secure an exemption for Tata, which is Britain's largest steel producer, but the business otherwise faces being hit by Mr Trump's 50pc tariffs on foreign steel. The company closed the last blast furnaces at Port Talbot, south Wales, last year and is currently in the process of building an electric arc furnace at the site, which will recycle domestically-sourced scrap metal. In the meantime, Tata has resorted to importing steel melted in India and Europe for processing into products that are then shipped onwards to America. The temporary measures mean the company risks running afoul of Mr Trump's 50pc tariffs on foreign steel, which are currently scheduled to be imposed on the UK from July 9. British steel products already face tariffs of 25pc, like those from much of the rest of the world, but the trade deal in principle struck by Mr Trump and Sir Keir Starmer would see the tax rate fall to zero. However, despite four weeks of talks, the deal has yet to be implemented. When Mr Trump imposed 50pc steel tariffs on the rest of the world, he gave Britain a reprieve until July 9 – and negotiators are now racing to conclude something before then. Even this poses a problem for Tata, as the deal's framework stipulates that steel products sent from the UK to the US must use steel that was 'melted and poured' domestically to qualify for tariff relief. The Government is seeking to obtain a temporary carve-out for Tata and has reportedly said it is confident of success, but the warning from Tata signalled nervousness within the company on Friday. It is understood that being hit by 50pc tariffs would force Tata to either try to pass some costs on to customers or absorb them itself. If it could not absorb them, production cuts may have to be considered. Rajesh Nair, the chief executive of Tata Steel UK, said: 'Tata Steel UK will need to import steel substrate until Electric Arc Furnace steelmaking is operational in Port Talbot from late 2027 onwards. 'It is therefore critical for our business that melted and poured in the UK is not a requirement to access the steel quotas in any future trade deal. 'Even though we are not currently melting steel in the UK, we remain the largest steel producer in the country and our mills continue to transform imported steel coil and slab into high-value, specialist products which are not available from US producers and are therefore essential to our US customers. 'We urge the Government to secure a deal as soon as possible, and we would be happy to provide the US government with any needed assurances on the provenance and processing of the steel we supply.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Britain ‘faces up to £30bn of tax rises' to hit Nato defence target
Britain faces tax rises of up to £30bn in the autumn Budget to fund greater defence spending, economists have warned. Analysts said higher taxes looked inevitable as without them Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, would struggle to meet promises to increase defence spending while still meeting her self-imposed fiscal rules. Sir Keir has pledged that the UK will spend 3pc of GDP on defence by the next parliament and Nato is expected to demand even higher commitments later this year. Michael Saunders, of consultancy Oxford Economics, said the Prime Minister was likely to ramp up spending gradually over this parliament to make the 3pc and above target easier to meet in future. Mr Saunders said: 'To establish a more credible path to defence spending 'considerably north of 3pc' next decade, the Government may decide in the autumn Budget that it needs to add some extra spending within the five-year OBR forecast horizon. It's not hard to see pressures for extra fiscal tightening of £15bn to £30bn.' Nato is expected to require members to lift defence spending to 3.5 pc of GDP in the coming years. The military alliance is likely to set a new increased target at its June summit, piling additional costs on to the Chancellor. Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, recently said: 'We know that the 2pc pledge – agreed way back in 2014 – just doesn't cut it any more. So in 2025, we are finalising a plan to dramatically increase defence spending across the Alliance.' The demand for additional defence spending comes as Ms Reeves is already under pressure as a result of the recent about-turn on winter fuel payments for pensions and adverse moves in financial markets. Labour pledged not to increase income tax, National Insurance or VAT in its election manifesto last year. However, Mr Saunders and other economists warned that the Chancellor might have to break one or more of these promises as spending commitments mounted. Mr Saunders said: 'The need to raise revenues may require the Government to revisit its manifesto commitments, which seemed to rule out increases in most major taxes.' Earlier this week, the Chancellor repeatedly refused to rule out further tax rises. 'I'm not going to say that I'm not going to take any tax measures in the next four years,' she told an audience of business leaders at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) annual dinner. It follows record increases of £40bn in last year's autumn Budget. Ms Reeves has promised not to repeat a raid on this scale. The Chancellor left herself a margin of £9.9bn to meet her fiscal rules, a wafer-thin buffer that forced her to rip up spending plans in the spring to repair her budget. Ms Reeves also has to grapple with mounting costs from the Government's pledge to restore winter fuel payments and review the two-child benefit cap. There are also concerns that a downgrade to the UK's economic growth by the OBR and increased government borrowing costs caused by rising gilt yields could wipe out Ms Reeves's narrow fiscal headroom. The Treasury was contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
