Getting to Know Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) Plans
Medicare primarily operates a fee-for-service (FFS) payment system. This means that healthcare professionals and facilities bill Medicare for each service they provide, with itemized costs appearing on bills.
Original Medicare consists of Part A, which covers inpatient hospital care, and Part B, which covers outpatient medical services.
Medicare operates an FFS payment model in which healthcare facilities, doctors, and other healthcare professionals are reimbursed for each service they provide to Medicare beneficiaries.
How Medicare FFS works
When you receive treatment or services from a hospital, clinic, doctor, or other healthcare professional who is participating in Medicare, Medicare will typically bill them directly. Medicare will bill individually for each item or service the facility or healthcare professional provides.
Billing example
consultation ……… $100
lab work ………. $57
gauze ……… $12
bandage ………. $22
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services provides numerous educational and support programs to help healthcare professionals understand and follow Medicare FFS policies.
All about Medicare
When you turn 65 years old, you'll be entitled to Medicare coverage. You may be eligible for Medicare before turning 65 if you have specific medical conditions.
If you've worked and paid the relevant taxes for at least 40 quarters (about 10 years), you will not need to pay for Medicare Part A. If you have not, you'll pay a Part A premium, which differs depending on your work history.
Most people are required to pay for Part B. To avoid late enrollment penalties, it is often a good idea to enroll in Part B when you first become eligible.
»Learn more: When to Enroll in Medicare
While Original Medicare parts A and B cover many inpatient and outpatient services, they do not cover everything. If you need coverage for take-home medications, you must enroll in a stand-alone Part D prescription drug plan.
Private insurers administer these plans on Medicare's behalf, so coverage varies by insurance provider and location. However, according to Medicare rules, many of the most commonly prescribed drugs and drug classes must be covered.
Alternatively, you might choose to enroll in a Medicare Advantage (Part C) plan. These plans are also administered by private insurers. They combine the benefits of Part A and Part B and often include prescription drug coverage. Some plans include additional benefits, such as fitness, vision, and dental.
Medicare Advantage plans have monthly premiums that begin at $0, but you will typically still have to pay Medicare directly for your Part B premium.
If you have Original Medicare, you can choose to enroll in an additional Medigap plan, which is Medicare supplement insurance. These plans cover many of the out-of-pocket costs associated with Original Medicare and might also include additional benefits. Private insurers offer Medigap plans, although the coverage is standardized by plan type.
A benefit period starts on the day you are admitted to a hospital as an inpatient, and it ends when you have not received any inpatient hospital care for 60 consecutive days.
Lifetime reserve days are extra days that Medicare will cover when you're admitted to a hospital for 90 days or more. You have a total of 60 reserve days to use over your lifetime. For every lifetime reserve day you use, Medicare will pay all eligible costs except for the daily coinsurance.
Frequently asked questions
Here are some common questions and answers about Medicare FFS plans.
What is Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS)?
Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) is the payment model in which healthcare providers are reimbursed for each service delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.
Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) is the payment model in which healthcare providers are reimbursed for each service delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.
How does Medicare FFS differ from Medicare Advantage?
Medicare is a government-run program, while Medicare Advantage plans are administered by private insurance companies.
Medicare FFS allows you to see any provider that accepts Medicare, whereas Medicare Advantage plans may require you to use providers within a specific network.
Medicare is a government-run program, while Medicare Advantage plans are administered by private insurance companies.
Medicare FFS allows you to see any provider that accepts Medicare, whereas Medicare Advantage plans may require you to use providers within a specific network.
What are Medicare FFS companion guides?
Medicare FFS companion guides are resources for Medicare-participating healthcare professionals and facilities.
The guides provide specific billing and communication guidance that can help streamline interactions between healthcare providers and Medicare.
Medicare FFS companion guides are resources for Medicare-participating healthcare professionals and facilities.
The guides provide specific billing and communication guidance that can help streamline interactions between healthcare providers and Medicare.
Can I get additional coverage with Medicare?
Yes, many Medicare beneficiaries get supplemental Medigap coverage to fill gaps in Original Medicare benefits.
Takeaway
Medicare typically runs a fee-for-service (FFS) billing system, which means that healthcare facilities, clinics, doctors, and other healthcare professionals bill for each service or item they provide.
You become eligible for Medicare when you turn 65 years old. You can become eligible before age 65 if you have certain medical conditions.
Out-of-pocket costs apply to most Medicare plans, but help is available for those with low income and few resources.
The information on this website may assist you in making personal decisions about insurance, but it is not intended to provide advice regarding the purchase or use of any insurance or insurance products. Healthline Media does not transact the business of insurance in any manner and is not licensed as an insurance company or producer in any U.S. jurisdiction. Healthline Media does not recommend or endorse any third parties that may transact the business of insurance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
a day ago
- Chicago Tribune
‘Having Medicaid keeps me alive': Illinois residents anxiously watch as Congress considers Medicaid cuts
Across Illinois, millions of people are anxiously awaiting the next move on a bill that would cut hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicaid across the country. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' would slash the program, which provides health care coverage to people with low incomes, in order to help pay for tax cuts and border and national security. President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans say the bill would cut waste, fraud and abuse from Medicaid, providing coverage only to those who truly need it. But Democrats, health care leaders and patients say it would devastate those who rely on the program, and the hospitals that serve all patients. Across Illinois, 3.4 million people are on Medicaid — about one-fourth of the state's population. Depending on which proposals are adopted, Illinois could lose billions of dollars — a loss that could force the state to make difficult decisions about who gets coverage and what kind of coverage they get. Though the bill was still in flux as of Friday afternoon, multiple proposals in recent weeks have included work requirements for some people who receive Medicaid, changes to rules surrounding so-called provider taxes, and have threatened coverage for more than 770,000 Illinois residents who receive Medicaid as part of the Affordable Care Act's expansion of the program. 'No state, including Illinois, can backfill cuts in federal funding for Medicaid,' said the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, in response to Tribune questions. 'Cuts in federal funding will lead to reduced services and enrollment, putting the full range of Medicaid services at risk.' The Tribune spoke with three Illinois residents on Medicaid about what the cuts could mean to their lives. It's difficult to survive on $1,077 a month. That's how much Kristina Lewis receives in monthly Social Security disability payments. She gets disability payments from the federal government because she can't work due to mental health issues, heart failure and Type 1 diabetes, she said. The 64-year-old Alsip woman, however, has been able to stretch her small income, largely because she receives rental assistance from a local charity and because Medicare and Medicaid pay for her health care needs. She's one of nearly 400,000 people in Illinois who receive both Medicare and Medicaid because of disability, low income and/or age, according to KFF, a nonprofit organization focused on health policy. She's scared of what might happen if Medicaid, a state and federally funded program, is cut. She's on five different medications for heart failure alone. 'They do those cuts and I don't know how people like me on certain medications, how we're supposed to survive and live,' Lewis said. 'I know I'm not the only person out there that's terrified of what's going to happen.' House and Senate versions of the bill have included provisions that could make it more difficult for people who are enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid to keep their Medicaid coverage, according to KFF. Lewis is also one of millions of people in Illinois who may end up dealing with the fallout of Illinois receiving fewer federal dollars overall, if certain proposals become law. Both the House and Senate have proposed changes that could limit the amount of money Illinois and many other states collect in so-called provider taxes, which help boost the amount of money states receive from the federal government for Medicaid. Proponents of provider taxes say they're a necessary way of funding Medicaid, while critics say provider taxes are a way for states to inflate how much money they receive from the federal government. Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas recently called provider taxes a 'Medicaid money laundering scam.' Though the concept of provider taxes may seem obscure and bureaucratic, in Illinois, they account for about $11 billion a year spent on Medicaid — about 25% of the state's spending for medical services, according to the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services. Senate Republicans' proposal to reduce provider taxes suffered a major setback Thursday, after the Senate parliamentarian shot it down, saying it didn't follow procedural rules, according to The Associated Press. It was not yet clear Friday afternoon if changes to provider taxes would still be part of the final bill. Limiting provider taxes is a 'backdoor' way of cutting federal Medicaid funding for Illinois, said Kathy Waligora, a spokesperson for EverThrive Illinois, a nonprofit advocacy organization working to achieve reproductive justice. 'The provider tax is absolutely going to shrink the size of the Medicaid program in Illinois,' Waligora said of proposed cuts. 'Exactly what benefits are cut, what provider rates are cut, what eligibility will be cut remains to be seen, but it will be across Medicaid.' Lewis is worried about any kind of reduction to her Medicaid benefits. She said she first got on Medicaid about 10 to 15 years ago when she was living in a nursing home because of health issues. Eventually, her health improved to the point where she could live independently. She worries that if her health issues again become unmanageable, she might have to one day return to living in a nursing home. 'I would really, really struggle,' she said of if her Medicaid benefits were cut. 'My biggest fear is to end up in another nursing home. You lose your independence.' If she did have to live in a nursing home again, Medicaid may end up footing the substantial bill. In Illinois, Medicaid pays for about 68% of all nursing home care, according to the state Department of Healthcare and Family Services. Cornelia Simms, 60, of Auburn Gresham, fears work requirements could make it difficult for her to stay on Medicaid — even though she has a job. Under the bill, childless, able-bodied adults ages 19 to 64 would be required to spend at least 80 hours a month working, doing community service or going to school, in order to stay on Medicaid. Simms already works about 80 hours a month as a home health care aide — a profession she got into after spending years caring for her ailing mother. She discovered that she enjoys helping elderly people and stuck with it after her mom passed away. About 70% of Illinois residents on Medicaid already work, according to KFF. But Simms worries about the paperwork, and the potential problems it could create if she's subject to work requirements. The bill would require states to verify at least twice a year that Medicaid beneficiaries are meeting work requirements. Simms is concerned about being asked to prove that she's eligible twice a year, especially because she said she prefers to verify her eligibility in person, which can require time away from work. It can be tough for her to take days off from work because the person she cares for relies on her help, Simms said. 'I'm mainly her sole person to take her to the hospital, grocery stores and do all those things with her,' Simms said. 'If I have to take off work to see about my Medicaid then she will be lacking the daily things that she needs.' The extra paperwork can also create administrative complications. Once, Simms said she forgot to submit paperwork to verify her continued eligibility for Medicaid. Simms lost her coverage, and it took more than six months to get it back, she said. During that time, she canceled doctor appointments and generally tried not to get medical care. 'I tried not to catch a cold,' Simms said. 'I just prayed and held out.' In Illinois, anywhere from 270,000 to 500,000 people on Medicaid may end up losing coverage for administrative reasons, if work requirements proposed by House Republicans went into effect, according to the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services. 'What we see in other states where there are work requirements is that having the hoops to jump through, the red tape and the administrative burden keep people from accessing and enrolling in health care,' said Anusha Thotakura, executive director of Citizen Action/Illinois, a public interest coalition that's been working with partners across the state to hold events and drive action to fight Medicaid cuts. 'Many eligible people who are working will still lose access if these requirements are put into place,' Thotakura said. Without Medicaid, Simms said it would be difficult for her to afford health care. She's in the process now of getting about $4,000 worth of dental work, most of which is being paid for by Medicaid, she said. 'No person, unless you've got some money, can afford it, not on a 9-5 (job), not the lower class or middle class,' Simms said of health care. 'It's impossible.' Isaiah Rogers was up in a tree, wielding a chain saw when his vision began to blur. He didn't know what was wrong with him, but he knew he couldn't continue his work trimming trees. Dizzy and in pain, Rogers went home, rested and popped ibuprofen. Eventually, Rogers' son convinced him to go to the hospital. There, he was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes and told that if he had waited a couple of more days to seek care, he might have died. The hospital helped sign Rogers up for Medicaid, he said. Since that scare several years ago, Rogers has faithfully been going to his doctor appointments and taking insulin and other medications, he said. He has not been able to return to his job trimming trees, and has been working small side jobs. He and his son have been staying with a friend to help them get by. The 61-year-old West Pullman man relies on Medicaid to pay for his doctors' visits and the medications that 'keep me above water.' Rogers is now worried about losing that lifeline. A recent version of the bill proposed work requirements not only for childless able-bodied Medicaid recipients, but also for adults with children older than 14. Rogers' son is 12. The single father is concerned that there might come a point when he would be subject to the proposed requirement to work 80 hours a week or lose his Medicaid coverage. Between his health issues and caring for his son, as well as his lack of a high school diploma, Rogers doesn't think it would be possible for him get a job working 80 hours a month. Rogers drops his son off and picks him up from school each day, taking city buses with him to and from the school. He doesn't envision letting his son take the buses himself. 'At 14, no, not in Chicago,' Rogers said of his son taking the bus alone. 'People who don't ride the bus and don't live in our 'hood, they don't know what's going on. I'm not going to subject my son to that danger.' He knows the dangers all too well. Rogers was incarcerated when he was younger, saying he was once a 'destroyer' of his community. He's since tried to turn his life around, working with Community Organizing and Family Issues to create positive change. But his life now, as he knows it, depends on having Medicaid. He's confident he'll lose Medicaid if he's required to work 80 hours a month. He worries that if he loses Medicaid, he'll no longer be able to afford insulin and his other medications, and he may slip into a diabetic coma or suffer a stroke. 'Having Medicaid keeps me alive,' Rogers said. 'It keeps me going, with the consistent doctors appointments, with the different types of medications. 'Having Medicaid helps me stay healthy to let me take care of my son,' Rogers said.
Axios
a day ago
- Axios
Traditional Medicare to add prior authorizations
Medicare is requiring more pre-treatment approvals in its fee-for-service program in a bid to root out unnecessary care, federal regulators announced Friday. The big picture: Traditional Medicare historically hasn't required prior authorizations to access most drugs or services, a major perk for enrollees. Prior authorization in privately-run Medicare Advantage plans has become a hot-button issue, with Congress and federal regulators working to rein in the practice. Federal inspectors found in 2022 that prior authorization in MA prevented some seniors from getting medically necessary care. Major health insurers this week made a voluntary pledge to streamline and improve the prior authorization process across all health insurance markets. State of play: Medicare's innovation center announced that it will solicit applications from companies to run the prior authorization program. Medicare is looking for companies with experience using AI and other tools to manage pre-approvals for other payers, and with clinicians who can conduct medical reviews to check coverage determinations. The program will start Jan. 1, 2026 and run through the end of 2031. It will only apply to providers and patients in New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona and Washington. The change will apply to 17 items and services, including skin substitutes, deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's Disease, impotence treatment and arthroscopy for knee osteoarthritis. CMS selected the services based on previous reports and evidence of fraud, waste and abuse, as well as what's already subject to prior authorization in Medicare Advantage. Overuse of skin substitutes to help heal wounds has especially come under fire in recent years. Medicare spent more than $10 billion on the products in 2024 — more than double what was spent the year before, according to the New York Times. CMS noted that it may make other services subject to the prior authorization program in future years. Providers in the geographic areas can choose whether or not they want to submit an authorization request before delivering a service. But if they decide not to, they'll be subject to post-claim review and risk not getting paid for a service that was already delivered. "In general, this model will require the same information and clinical documentation that is already required to support Medicare FFS payment but earlier in the process, namely, prior to the service being furnished," the notice reads. Zoom in: The companies hired to manage the program will be paid based on how much they saved the government by stopping payments for unnecessary services. "Under the model, we will work to avoid any adverse impact on beneficiaries or providers/suppliers," CMS wrote in the notice.
a day ago
Idaho doctor, patients sue over new law halting public benefits to immigrants in US unlawfully
BOISE, Idaho -- An Idaho doctor and four residents are challenging a new state law that halts some of the few public benefits available to people living in the U.S. unlawfully, including a program that provides access to life-saving HIV and AIDS medication for low income patients. The ACLU of Idaho filed the federal lawsuit Thursday night on behalf of Dr. Abby Davids and four people with HIV who are not named because they are immigrants without lawful permanent residency. The complaint says the new law is vague, contradicts federal law and makes it impossible for health care providers to determine exactly what kind of immigration status is excluded and how to verify that status for patients. They want a judge to grant them class-action status, expanding any ruling to other impacted people. Dozens of patients treated by one Boise-area clinic stand to lose access to HIV and AIDS medication under the law, according to the complaint, including several cared for by Davids. 'Withdrawing HIV treatment from her patients will not only have devastating consequences on their health, it raises the public health risk of increased HIV transmission,' the ACLU wrote in the lawsuit. 'When her patients are undetectable, they cannot transmit the virus. Without HIV treatment, however, they cannot maintain an undetectable viral level and therefore are able to transmit the virus to others.' The new Idaho law takes effect July 1, and appears to be the first limiting public health benefits since President Donald Trump ordered federal agencies to enhance eligibility verification and ensure that public benefits aren't going to ineligible immigrants. The law requires people to verify that they are legal U.S. residents to receive public benefits like communicable disease testing, vaccinations, prenatal and postnatal care for women, crisis counseling, some food assistance for children and even access to food banks or soup kitchens that rely on public funding. Federal law generally prohibits immigrants in the U.S. illegally from receiving taxpayer-funded benefits like Medicare, Medicaid, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and Social Security. But there are some exceptions for things like emergency medical care and other emergency or public health services. Idaho's law still allows for emergency medical services. But in a June 18 letter to health care providers, Idaho Division of Public Health administrator Elke Shaw-Tulloch said HIV is a long-term condition and not an emergency — so people must verify their lawful presence in order to get benefits through the federal Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program. The HIV patients challenging the new law include a married couple from Columbia with pending asylum applications, a man who was brought to the U.S. when he was just 4 years old and has Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals status until next year, and a man from Mexico who has been living and working in Idaho since 2020. One of the patients said she and her husband were diagnosed with HIV in 2019 and immediately started antiretroviral therapy, receiving the medications at no cost through the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program. The medication has lowered the viral load in her body enough that it is now undetectable, she wrote in a court filing, ensuring that she won't transmit the virus to others. 'My medication protected my daughter while I was pregnant because it prevented me from transmitting HIV to her during pregnancy,' she wrote. The treatment allows her to be with her child, watching her grow, she said. Davids has been trying for weeks to get clarity from the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare about exactly what kind of verification her patients will have to show, and exactly which kinds of immigration status are considered 'lawful.' But the state has yet to provide clear direction, according to the complaint. 'I am really scared about what this means for many of our patients. Their lives will now be in jeopardy,' Davids wrote in a May 30 email to the Department of Health and Welfare.
