More than 400 actors and industry figures sign open letter backing trans rights
More than 400 actors and film industry professionals have signed an open letter pledging 'solidarity' with the trans, non-binary and intersex communities who have been affected by the recent supreme court ruling. Eddie Redmayne, Katie Leung, Nicola Coughlan, Charlotte Ritchie and Paapa Essiedu are among those to have signed the letter addressing the film and television industry as well as cultural bodies. Bella Ramsey, James Norton, Joe Alwyn, Himesh Patel, Harris Dickinson and the director Ken Loach are also signatories. In mid-April, supreme court judges unanimously ruled the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. This means a gender recognition certificate (GRC) does not change a person's legal sex for the purposes of the Equality Act. The ruling has been interpreted to mean that trans women can be excluded from women-only spaces like toilets and changing rooms. The open letter said: 'We believe the ruling undermines the lived reality and threatens the safety of trans, non-binary, and intersex people living in the UK.'
It added the film and television community had previously come together in response to the Me Too and Black Lives Matter movements by 'reflecting' upon working practices and 'uplifting' a broad spectrum of voices.
'We must now urgently work to ensure that our trans, non-binary, and intersex colleagues, collaborators and audiences are protected from discrimination and harassment in all areas of the industry – whether on set, in a production office, or at a cinema.' The letter continued: 'Film and television are powerful tools for empathy and education, and we believe passionately in the ability of the screen to change hearts and minds. This is our opportunity to be on the right side of history.' On Wednesday, the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said it is 'absolutely unacceptable' to question the validity of the supreme court ruling that the term 'woman' is defined by biological sex. Giving evidence to the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Mahmood said: 'They obviously provided the legal clarity in their legal decision, which is exactly their job. 'I think it's disappointing since then that some individuals have sought to question the validity of the supreme court or cast aspersions, which is absolutely unacceptable. 'I think they've done their job and I think they've sought to do it in a way that recognises that we're talking about a balance of rights, but sought to give confidence to a minority community that they still have protections.' Some trans rights groups have raised concerns about the practical implications of the ruling.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Liberty loses bid to bring legal action against equalities body
Human rights group Liberty has lost a bid to bring legal action against the equalities watchdog over its consultation in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling on gender. The UK's highest court ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex, after a challenge against the Scottish Government by campaign group For Women Scotland. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is consulting on proposed amendments to part of its guidance, after interim guidance was published last month related to trans people's use of certain spaces including toilets and participation in sports following the judgment. The commission increased the length of time for feedback from an original proposal of two weeks to six weeks, but campaign group Liberty said that it should be at least 12 weeks, claiming the current period would be 'wholly insufficient' and unlawful. Liberty made a bid to bring a legal challenge over the length of the consultation, but in a decision on Friday afternoon Mr Justice Swift said it was not arguable. In his ruling, Mr Justice Swift said: 'There is no 12-week rule. The requirements of fairness are measured in specifics and context is important.' 'I am not satisfied that it is arguable that the six-week consultation period that the EHRC has chosen to use is unfair,' he added. At the hearing on Friday, Sarah Hannett KC, for Liberty, said in written submissions that the Supreme Court's decision 'has altered the landscape radically and suddenly' and potentially changes the way trans people access single-sex spaces and services. The barrister said this included some businesses preventing trans women from using female toilets and trans men from using male toilets, as well as British Transport Police updating its policy on strip searches, which have caused 'understandable distress to trans people'. Ms Hannett said a six-week consultation period would be unlawful because the EHRC has not given 'sufficient time' for consultees to give 'intelligent consideration and an intelligent response'. She told the London court: 'There is a desire amongst the bigger trans organisations to assist the smaller trans organisations in responding… That is something that is going to take some time.' Later in her written submissions, the barrister described the trans community as 'particularly vulnerable and currently subject to intense scrutiny and frequent harassment'. Ms Hannett added: 'There is evidence of distrust of both consultation processes and the commission within the community.' Lawyers for the EHRC said the legal challenge should not go ahead and that six weeks was 'adequate'. James Goudie KC, for the commission, told the hearing there is 'no magic at all in 12 weeks'. He said in written submissions: 'Guidance consistent with the Supreme Court's decision has become urgently needed. The law as declared by the Supreme Court is not to come in at some future point. 'It applies now, and has been applying for some time.' The barrister later said that misinformation had been spreading about the judgment, adding that it was 'stoking what was already an often heated and divisive debate about gender in society'. He continued: 'The longer it takes for EHRC to issue final guidance in the form of the code, the greater the opportunity for misinformation and disinformation to take hold, to the detriment of persons with different protected characteristics.' Mr Goudie also said that there was a previous 12-week consultation on the guidance at large starting in October 2024.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Blake Lively Accuses Baldoni of Hypocrisy Over Support for Women
Blake Lively has slammed It Ends With Us co-star and director Justin Baldoni, criticizing the latter's shift in approach to women's advocacy as legal tensions escalate between the two. The Gossip Girl alum alleges that Baldoni is undermining the voices of women's advocacy groups that have supported her. Blake Lively has taken a firm stand against Justin Baldoni. She has accused him of abandoning the values he once claimed to uphold. Through a statement issued on June 5, her representative took aim at Baldoni's legal strategy. They accused Baldoni of targeting women's rights groups that have publicly backed Lively in her legal fight against him. The spokesperson said, '19 leading survivors and organizations devoted to women's rights, children's rights, and domestic violence have now signed onto four separate amicus briefs.' They added, 'All are united in opposing Justin Baldoni's attempt to dismantle a law designed to protect women who speak up — simply to protect himself.' (via US Weekly) New briefs from Child USA and Sanctuary for Families have been added to the list. They join major groups like the National Organization for Women, Women's Justice NOW, and the National Network to End Domestic Violence. The spokesperson also added, 'Rather than defend his case on the facts, Baldoni is now contradicting years of his own public persona — abandoning the message of his #MeToo YouTube's, podcasts, TED Talks, and interviews, where he once upon a time urged men 'to listen to the women in your life.' Moreover, Lively's representatives argue that Baldoni's attempt to challenge these filings is a move aimed at suppressing support for survivors. This latest development follows a key ruling earlier in the week. On June 2, Judge Lewis Liman determined that Blake Lively's emotional distress claims would not proceed. This comes after her legal team moved to withdraw them. The judge also denied Justin Baldoni's request to obtain her private therapy and medical records. He noted that they were no longer relevant in light of the withdrawn claims. Originally reported by Disheeta Maheshwari on ComingSoon. The post Blake Lively Accuses Baldoni of Hypocrisy Over Support for Women appeared first on Mandatory.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive Harvey Weinstein interview: 'I acted immorally,' he tells Rosanna Scotto
The Brief Harvey Weinstein spoke exclusively to Rosanna Scotto over the phone from Bellevue Hospital, discussing his decision not to testify in his retrial, his feelings of regret, and much more. Weinstein did not testify in his retrial or previous trials, including his 2020 Manhattan trial where he was sentenced to 23 years, a conviction later overturned. Rosanna's full interview with Harvey Weinstein will air starting at 7 a.m. on Good Day New York on Friday NEW YORK - Convicted sex offender and former Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein spoke exclusively to Good Day New York's Rosanna Scotto as he anxiously awaits a verdict in his New York sex crimes retrial. In this exclusive interview, Weinstein spoke to Rosanna over the phone from Manhattan's Bellevue Hospital, where he's been held through the trial. They discuss his decision not to testify, the notion that he is the poster boy for the #MeToo movement, what he has to say to his A-List accusers and much more. The backstory He did not testify in his defense in this retrial - or in his 2020 trial in Manhattan, where he was sentenced to 23 years in prison for sex crimes. New York's highest court overturned his conviction last year, a stunning reversal of a landmark #MeToo case. He also did not take the stand in his sex assault trial in Los Angeles, where he was found guilty in 2022. That verdict still stands. What they're saying During their interview, Weinstein admitted that he is nervous as the jury deliberates. When asked if he had any regrets, here's what he had to say. "I have regrets that I - from my family - through this, that I put my wife through this, that I acted immorally. I put so many friends through this and hurt people … that were close to me, by the way, by actions that were stupid. But never illegal, never criminal, never anything," he told Rosanna. The other side FOX 5 NY has reached out to victims for comment… Dig deeper Rosanna's full interview with Harvey Weinstein will air starting at 7 a.m. on Good Day New York on Friday. You can watch live in the media player below, The full interview will also be available on our FOX LOCAL app. The Source This article uses information from Harvey Weinstein's interview with Rosanna Scotto along with background from previous FOX 5 NY news reports and the Associated Press. FOX 5 NY has also reached out to accusers for comment.
