Gatwick-bound plane carrying 53 British nationals crashes in India
A total of 53 British nationals were on board a Gatwick Airport-bound plane that appeared to explode when it crashed shortly after take-off, Air India has said.
In a statement following the incident on Thursday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: 'The scenes emerging of a London-bound plane carrying many British nationals crashing in the Indian city of Ahmedabad are devastating.'
He added he is being kept updated as the situation develops.
The King said he is also being updated on the incident.
Air India's chairman Natarajan Chandrasekaran described the incident as a 'tragic accident' and a 'devastating event' and said emergency response teams are at the site.
A video of the incident, obtained by local media, shows the aircraft flying over a residential area before crashing, creating what appears to be a large explosion.
Commons Leader Lucy Powell said the Government will provide 'all the support that it can' to those affected by the incident.
Air India said the flight was departing from Ahmedabad Airport with 242 people onboard the Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft.
The airline said 169 passengers are Indian nationals, 53 are British, one is Canadian and seven are Portuguese.
The Reuters news agency reported 217 adults and 11 children were on board the flight.
In a statement, Mr Chandrasekaran said: 'With profound sorrow I confirm that Air India Flight 171 operating Ahmedabad London Gatwick was involved in a tragic accident today.
'Our thoughts and deepest condolences are with the families and loved ones of all those affected by this devastating event.
'At this moment, our primary focus is on supporting all the affected people and their families.
'We are doing everything in our power to assist the emergency response teams at the site and to provide all necessary support and care to those impacted.'
He added: 'An emergency centre has been activated and support team have been set up for families seeking information.'
Flight AI171, operating Ahmedabad-London Gatwick, was involved in an incident today, 12 June 2025. At this moment, we are ascertaining the details and will share further updates at the earliest on https://t.co/Fnw0ywg2Zt and on our X handle (https://t.co/Id1XFe9SfL).
-Air India…
— Air India (@airindia) June 12, 2025
Faiz Ahmed Kidwai, director general of India's directorate of civil aviation, told the Associated Press the crash happened in the Meghani Nagar area at 1.38pm local time (9.08am BST).
Mr Kidwai said there were 232 passengers and 12 crew members onboard.
It is the first crash involving a Boeing 787 aircraft, according to the Aviation Safety Network database.
Flight tracking website Flightradar24 posted on social media platform X: 'We are following reports of a crash of Air India flight #AI171 from Ahmedabad to London.
'We received the last signal from the aircraft at 08:08:51 UTC (shortly before 9.09am BST), just seconds after take off.
'The aircraft involved is a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner with registration VT-ANB.'
It added the signal from the aircraft was lost 'less than a minute after take off'.
Air India was acquired by Tata Group from the Indian government in January 2022 after racking up billions of pounds of losses.
The airline's UK operations are at Birmingham, Gatwick and Heathrow, with routes to a number of Indian cities such as Ahmedabad, Delhi, Mumbai and Bengaluru.
Recent analysis by the PA news agency found it was the worst airline for delays to flights from UK airports last year, with planes taking off by an average of more than 45 minutes later than scheduled.
The airline has gained a poor reputation for delays and cancellations in recent years, partly caused by a lack of funds to purchase spare aircraft parts, which led to some of its fleet being grounded.
The first flight of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft involved in the crash was in December 2013.
The plane was delivered to Air India during the following month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SNP's wish to ‘throw open our borders' would risk security
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has claimed the Scottish Government's stance on immigration would risk the country's security. Writing in the Daily Mail ahead of the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, Mrs Badenoch said the SNP's position 'is not remotely serious'. The Scottish Government is much more liberal than both the UK Labour Government and the Tories on immigration, repeatedly calling for more people to be allowed to come to Scotland, but Holyrood does not have the powers to make changes. Ministers have pushed for a shift in the system on a number of occasions, going so far as to propose a separate Scottish visa in 2020 under Nicola Sturgeon – a pitch which was quickly rejected by the Conservative-led government of the time. Mrs Badenoch wrote: 'We need a new, sustainable system that only admits a strict number of people who come here legally, do the right thing, and who contribute to society. 'That means we must introduce a strict numerical cap on legal migration, ensure there is zero-tolerance for foreign criminals, and pass the Deportation Bill to remove those who should not be here. 'The left-wing parties at Holyrood – not just the SNP, but also Labour and the Lib Dems – don't believe tougher action is necessary. Scottish Conservative Party Conference is now in full swing. Follow along to see how @RussellFindlay1 is bringing common sense to Scottish politics 🏴🇬🇧#SCC25 — Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) June 13, 2025 'On immigration, those parties have policies student politicians would be ashamed of. 'The SNP's stance, in particular, is not remotely serious. 'If they ever got their way, they would put our citizens' security at risk. It's the nationalists' view that we should just throw open our borders, without any checks or limitations on who comes into the country.' The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel's bravery shames our pusillanimous Prime Minister
It would, to say the least, be helpful if we had a Prime Minister who understood even his own supposed principles. Since taking office last year, Sir Keir Starmer has been admirably strong and consistent in supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression, at least in his statements, if not in actual firepower. But his response to the Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear and military sites is not just naïve, it is pusillanimous and shows how empty a vessel he really is: 'The reports of these strikes are concerning and we urge all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently. Escalation serves no one in the region. Stability in the Middle East must be the priority and we are engaging partners to de-escalate. Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy.' Starmer grasps the need to stand up to Putin's aggression, but crumbles into spineless diplo-speak when confronted by a theocratic tyranny. For a leader with a clear understanding of the Iranian threat – of reality, in other words – there should be relief, not consternation. Just yesterday, for example, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) declared that Iran was in breach of its non-proliferation obligations, refusing to answer questions on uranium particles found in undeclared sites in the country and the stockpiling of uranium enriched to nearly weapons grade. Iran then revealed it is operating a previously secret new uranium enrichment centre. The threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon has not been theoretical but very real and increasingly imminent. According to Sir Keir, 'Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy.' This is the precise opposite of what it is the time for. Diplomacy led us to the disastrous Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) which relaxed sanctions on the regime, handed it huge amounts of money from oil exports, and thus funded not just the Iranian proxies Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis but the nuclear weapons programme. In this sense Israel has been acting not only on its own behalf but on behalf of all those Middle Eastern states which have been destabilised by Iran – and on behalf of the West itself. This is a familiar story; twice before Israel has saved us all from nuclear enemies, in 1981 when it destroyed Saddam's reactor in Iraq and in 2007 when it destroyed Assad's facilities in Syria. One irony of this is that the so-called Free Palestine brigade, who will doubtless be back on the streets soon, should be cheering Israel today – if they genuinely cared about securing a Palestinian state. There are reports that the UK is on the verge of recognising such an entity next week at the special UN conference called by France. But there will never be a secure and stable Palestinian state while Iran continues to spread its malign influence through its proxies – and should it acquire a nuclear weapon the prospect of a Palestinian state would be the first casualty. Contrary to Sir Keir's spineless timidity, this is the time for action by a clear eyed state which understands the threat posed by its enemy and is willing to act to defend itself by neutering that threat. Far from stopping now as Sir Keir urges, it is essential that Israel finishes the job it began last night. Israel has not started a war – it has prevented one. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why UK can leapfrog EU and US on crypto, according to Coinbase exec
More than two years after then-chancellor, and later UK prime minister, Rishi Sunak pledged to make the UK a "global crypto hub," the digital asset landscape has evolved rapidly. In an industry where two years can feel like a decade, has the UK managed to keep pace with global developments, or is it slipping behind? On the latest episode of Yahoo Finance Future Focus, Coinbase (COIN) UK's senior country director Keith Grose weighed in on the UK's crypto trajectory, and what the shift to a new Labour government could mean for the sector's future. 'Two years might be a long time in crypto,' Grose said, 'but that's not a long time in regulation world.' Despite the crypto industry's blistering pace, Grose said the UK is making meaningful progress. Just last week, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) released long-awaited draft rules on stablecoins, cryptoasset custody, and exchange operations, steps Grose sees as significant milestones toward making the UK crypto-friendly. 'The whole crypto regime is being put into force this year,' he explained. 'The FCA is really moving quickly to make this a friendly place for crypto. They're very growth-focused.' Read more: Crypto live prices This comes at a time when other major markets, particularly the US, are dramatically stepping up their crypto efforts. The US Congress is debating multiple bipartisan bills, including the Stablecoin Act and the FIT21 crypto framework, while president Donald Trump has floated the idea of a national digital asset reserve. Still, Grose believes the UK has a unique advantage. With the EU's MiCA regulation taking effect and the US experimenting with various policy directions, Britain has a "third-mover advantage." 'We get to look at what's happening in Europe and the US,' he said. 'If the FCA is smart about how they're regulating, we can leapfrog some of the challenges others are facing.' One of the most exciting developments, Grose said, is the UK's move to regulate stablecoins, which are increasingly seen as a foundational piece of future payment infrastructure. 'We haven't seen a pound-backed stablecoin at scale yet in the UK, but it's coming,' Grose said. 'And when it does, it's going to be very exciting.' According to Grose, both the FCA and the Bank of England are working on a regulatory framework to support stablecoins as legitimate payment rails, signalling a broader shift toward crypto being embedded into the mainstream financial system. This could also be a strategic response to developments across the Atlantic, where US states are beginning to adopt strategic reserves of bitcoin, and where the idea of a federal crypto strategy is now on the table. 'You have Trump releasing executive orders, Congress working on regulation, and both the SEC and CFTC taking action. That's the full force of government,' Grose said. 'I'd love to see something like that here in the UK.' With the Labour government now in power, there's hope that regulatory momentum will continue, or even accelerate. While Labour hasn't yet laid out a comprehensive crypto strategy, Grose is optimistic that the UK's institutional machinery is aligned for progress. The key, he suggested, will be ensuring that crypto is not siloed within just one regulatory body, but instead becomes a whole-of-government priority, as is increasingly the case in the US. 'I think there's a lot happening behind the scenes, at the policy level, industry level, to make Rishi's original vision a reality. We're not there yet, but we're well on the way.' Read more: 6 crypto developments in 2025 that will keep fuelling bitcoin's rally Grose revealed that Coinbase has ramped up its operations, receiving its VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider) registration, a license that makes Coinbase the largest authorised crypto firm in the UK. 'We've brought all of our UK users back in-house,' Grose said. 'We're now servicing them directly from our UK entity and can run our own financial promotions.' And that means more visibility for Coinbase in the UK market. While Grose didn't give away all the details, he hinted that something big is coming in early July, and that Londoners should keep an eye out for Coinbase's next move. 'You'll see the Coinbase brand more,' he said. 'And you'll see a lot of new products coming out of the UK.' Read more: Why pension funds are buying bitcoin What we know about Elon Musk's controversial blockchain vision for US How AI could change the internetError while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
