US and Iran disagree on scale of damage to nuclear facilities from US strikes, Kremlin aide says
MOSCOW, June 25 (Reuters) - The United States and Iran disagree when it comes to how much damage U.S. air strikes caused to Iranian nuclear facilities, Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov said on Wednesday.
Ushakov said Moscow welcomed the ceasefire between Iran and Israel and hoped it lasted and noted what he said were differing assessments of the impact of the U.S. attack.
"The one that carried out the strikes believes significant damage was inflicted. And the one who received these strikes believes that everything was prepared in advance and that these objects did not suffer excessive, significant damage," Ushakov told reporters.
A spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry said earlier on Wednesday that the U.S. strikes had caused significant damage to Tehran's nuclear facilities.
Earlier in the day, the Kremlin had said it thought it was too early for anyone to have an accurate picture of the extent of damage caused.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Iran-linked' group backs Palestine Action
An Iran-linked group has backed Palestine Action's violent protest campaign against Israeli targets despite the group's proscription as a terrorist organisation. The Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) has been described as an 'Islamist group ideologically aligned with the Iranian regime' that has a history of 'extremist links and terrorist sympathies' in a Government review of the counter-terror Prevent programme. In social media posts and at events over the past 10 months, the IHRC in north London has campaigned in support of 10 Palestine Action activists charged with criminal damage, violent disorder and aggravated burglary after a protest at a factory belonging to Israeli arms company Elbit Systems in Bristol last August. The so-called 'Filton 10' were initially arrested under the Terrorism Act, which meant they could be held for 14 days without charge. None were charged with terrorism offences but the Crown Prosecution Service said there was a 'terrorism connection'. The break-in was cited by Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, on Monday as she announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation after the group damaged two military plans at RAF Brize Norton at a potential cost of millions of pounds. However, in its response to the proscription, the IHRC said it stood by Palestine Action, saying: 'We are all part of the resistance! We are all Palestine Action!' If posted after the official designation as a terror group, the statements could be a criminal offence. The ban has meant that any members of Palestine Action or anyone who supports it could face up to 14 years in prison. The order banning the group will be laid in Parliament on Monday and is expected to become law on July 4. The IHRC, which is funded by a registered charity, said that if Ms Cooper proscribed Palestine Action, 'it will not only be the latest outcome of unchecked political and legal Islamophobia in the UK but another nail in the coffin of the British legal system'. There is no suggestion of any wrongdoing by the IHRC, which has said it has consistently supported the right to protest and civil resistance, particularly by holding governments and companies accountable for 'their roles in enabling human rights abuses, such as the genocide taking place in Gaza.' It said it has 'no institutional or financial link' with the Iranian government, and that allegations suggesting otherwise were 'baseless.' However, Lord Walney, the former Government adviser on political violence, said: 'It is outrageous that a body with a registered charitable arm is proclaiming itself 'part of the resistance' in support of a group about to be proscribed under terrorism law. 'The IHRC has spoken up for Palestine Action time and again while claiming to be a legitimate charity. 'Ministers must wake up to the links between supporters of the Iranian regime and Palestine Action's long campaign of criminal damage inflicted on the UK defence industry.' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said he condemned the IHRC for supporting Palestine Action, which has used 'violence, intimidation and criminal damage' to try to achieve its political aims. 'The IHRC and the MPs who support [Palestine Action's] violent methods are advocating mob rule and should hang their heads in shame,' he said. 'Just because you disagree with someone doesn't give you the right to smash up their property. Mob rule has no place in a civilised country. 'The IHRC Trust is, in essence, the same organisation as the IHRC and has charitable status. I call on the Charity Commission to urgently revoke their charitable status – no close affiliate of a registered charity should be allowed to support mob violence and attacks on police officers.' The IHRC has described itself as a campaign, research and advocacy non-profit that 'struggles for justice for all peoples'. It was created in 1997 and has special consultative status with the economic and social council of the United Nations. In a letter to Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, in January, the IHRC accused the police and Government of misusing anti-terror legislation against the Filton 10. In a letter to the UN, it called for charges to be dropped against Palestinian activists. 'The rights of free expression and protest are too important in a democracy to allow individuals to be investigated for potential terrorism merely because they may have been involved in protests or hold critical opinions,' the IHRC said. Senior figures in Palestine Action have spoken at Quds Day rallies organised by IHRC, a tradition which began in Iran in 1979 shortly after the Iranian revolution. Responding to The Telegraph, the IHRC said Palestine Action was 'not a terrorist organisation'. 'The move to proscribe it illustrates how politicised and malleable the term 'terrorism' has become – now so broad as to border on the meaningless,' it said in a statement. It said the assertion that the IHRC was 'ideologically aligned' with Iran was 'not evidence – it is opinion, and a deeply prejudiced one at that.'
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump doubles down on Iran strikes
President Donald Trump closed out his NATO Summit trip in a combative mood, fighting with reporters in his press conference, issuing a bleak warning for Ira n and indicating that United States now needs a 'Secretary of War.' Trump was at The Hague to meet with the 32 members of the alliance, push for an increase in defense spending by those nations, and to discuss global affairs. The president was in fighting mode as he pushed back on a leaked intelligence report that casted doubts on the results of his Iran strike. Over the weekend, Trump authorized the U.S. military to use B-2 bomber planes to drop 30,000 'bunker busters' to 'obliterate' Iran's three largest nuclear sites. The stealth attack was a large success and Trump touted it as a total 'victory' for the U.S. and its ally Israel against Iran. But days later, CNN and the New York Times published a scathing leaked Pentagon intelligence assessment suggesting the damage from the bombings was limited and Iran may have moved much of its enriched uranium out ahead of the attack. During the NATO press event, Trump also snapped at reporters as he called on them after they brought up the leaked assessment. He grew combative as he fired back that Iran's nuclear capabilities were finished and defended his work trying to end the Ukraine war. 'My whole life, my whole life - that's all I do is make deals,' he said. The president was visibly frustrated with repeated questions about the leaked intelligence assessment that found his strikes against Iran's key nuclear facilities only set the country's program back a few months. Trump spent most of his 24 hours at The Hague complaining about CNN , The New York Times , and other outlets covering the finding from his Pentagon. He begrudgingly took a question from CNN's Kaitlan Collins during the NATO press conference and used the opportunity to criticize her. 'Fake News, here we go. When you hear this question, should really say how great our soldiers and our warriors are,' he said. 'I think everyone appreciates our soldiers and our warriors,' Collins replied and then went on to ask about the intelligence report findings. Trump told her there has been additional intelligence collected since that assessment came out. 'We've collected additional intelligence. We've also spoken to people have seen the site, and the site is obliterated,' he said. He also argued there have been many after-action reports, pointing to ones that claim Iran's nuclear capabilities took a huge setback. 'There are numerous of those reports, and they're coming out fast and furious,' he said. 'The site was obliterated, just like I said it was, and just like the pilots should be given credit for.' His combative tone continued throughout his press conference. 'Okay, Kelly, go ahead. Here we go. Here's another one. Thank you. We got them all today,' he said as he called NBC's Kelly O'Donnell. 'You should be making them heroes,' he chided her about American troops when she asked about an intelligence assessment. 'You know you should be proud, you especially you should be proud of those pilots, and you shouldn't be trying to demean them,' Trump lectured. 'Let me just tell you, you and NBC, fake news, which is one of the worst, and CNN, New York Times are all bad.' The sites the United States struck in Iran were buried deep in the ground, leading to questions about how much damage the B-52s could do - even with the multi-ton bombs they dropped. CNN's Wolf Blitzer, appearing on that network after the press conference, pushed back on Trump's claim their reporting disparaged the military. 'I speak as a former Pentagon correspondent, and we appreciate we love the men and women of the United States military who risked their lives to protect all, all of us. And we're not criticizing them at all,' he said. 'The only thing that we were doing was, of course, reporting what the Pentagon's top intelligence agency, the DIA, the defense intelligence agency, said in their preliminary report about the damage that was assessed as a result of this mission. And we reported that fairly and accurately and in detail, and it was not fake news,' he added. The president, meanwhile, was defense in all his comments. When he was asked about his meeting with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky, he said negotiations with Ukraine and Russian President Vladimir Putin have been 'difficult' and pointed to the ceasefire between Israel and Iran. 'Frankly, I had some problems with Zelensky. You may have read about them, and it's been more difficult than other wars. I mean, look, we just ended a war in 12 days that was simmering for 30 years,' he said of his work. But he did note the meeting with Zelensky was 'nice.' 'What I took from the meeting - couldn't have been nicer, actually - but I took from the meeting that he'd like to see it end. I think it's a great time to end it. I'm going to speak to Vladimir Putin see if we can get it ended,' Trump said. The president was in a combative mood from the start. At the top of his 45 minute press conference, Trump, speaking with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth flanking him, hinted the United States needs to get more aggressive in its relationships with the world. 'I have Marco Rubio with me, and Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State and Secretary of War. Should we say secretary? You know, it used to be called Secretary of War,' he said. Originally, the United States had a Department of War until it was remained the Defense Department in 1949. But Trump indicated he may bring the more aggressive moniker back. 'Maybe for a couple of weeks we'll call it that because we feel like warriors,' he said. 'In fact, if you look at the old building next to the White House, you can see where it used to be Secretary of War. Then we became politically correct and they called it Secretary of Defense. I don't know, maybe we'll have to start thinking about changing it, but we feel that way.' Trump also expressed confidence the ceasefire between Israel and Iran will hold because they are 'both tired, exhausted.' 'They have fought a hell of a war, very hard,' Trump said. 'I think the war ended, actually, when we hit the various nuclear sites with planes.' 'I think they've had it. They've been at it for 20 years, and I don't see that happening' he said of a new conflict. 'Now, if it does, we're always there.' He also announced U.S. representatives would meet with Iranian officials next week but then shrugged off the need for any kind of formal agreement on Tehran's nuclear ambitions. 'I don't care if I have an agreement or not,' he said. 'The the only thing we would be asking for is what we were asking for before ... I said Iran will not have no nuclear.' It is unclear what form next week's talks would take, or whether they would be direct or indirect negotiations, or where they will take place.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
NATO chief red-faced as he battles fierce backlash after calling Trump 'Daddy'
Mark Rutte, NATO Secretary General, referred to Donald Trump as 'Daddy' as he praised the US president's approach to the Iran-Israel ceasefire in reference to Trump's F-bomb tirade on live TV NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has come under fire after referring to Donald Trump as 'daddy' during the alliance's annual summit as he was forced to defend his campaign of Trump flattery. The comment triggered widespread backlash and raised fresh concerns over the politicisation of the organisation's leadership. The former Dutch Prime Minister made the remark while praising Trump's approach to the Iran-Israel ceasefire, saying: 'Sometimes daddy has to use strong words'. Rutte spoke in reference to the US President's expletive-laden tirade outside the White House when the president shouted, 'They don't know what the f*** they're doing,'** in reference to the Iran-Israel ceasefire fiasco he claims to have masterminded. Asked about the 'Daddy' comment, Trump later said: 'He likes me, I think he likes me. If he doesn't, I'll let you know. I'll come back, and I'll hit him hard, OK? Very affectionate.' The exchange capped off a volatile summit dominated by Trump's demands, vague promises, and escalating attacks aimed at both allies and adversaries. The US President declared victory after securing a pledge from alliance members to increase defence spending to five per cent of GDP, calling it a 'very historic milestone.' 'It's a monumental win for the United States, because we were carrying much more than our fair share,' Trump said. 'It's been a big win to Europe and for Western civilisation.'But within hours, Trump turned his attention to Spain, threatening to impose punitive trade tariffs unless Madrid meets the new target. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez had suggested Spain might seek an opt-out. 'I think it's unfair they're not paying,' Trump said. 'I'm going to negotiate directly with Spain… I'm going to do it myself. You know what we're going to do, we're negotiating with Spain on a trade deal… we're going to make them pay twice as much.' Trump also acknowledged that his long-standing claim to resolve the war in Ukraine within 24 hours has fallen short. 'It's more difficult than people would have any idea. Vladimir Putin has been more difficult,' he admitted, adding that he'd had 'some problems' with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the past. Still, Trump described a meeting with Zelensky on the sidelines of the summit yesterday as cordial, saying it 'couldn't have been nicer.' When asked by a Ukrainian journalist if he would send Patriot missile systems to protect Ukraine from Russian airstrikes, Trump did not commit. 'We'll see if we can make some available,' he told a reporter, whose husband is a soldier. 'That's rough stuff... I can see it's very upsetting to you. Say hello to your husband for me.' Trump also issued a full-throated defence of the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, after intelligence leaks suggested the damage inflicted may have been significantly less than the White House initially claimed. 'I got a call from pilots on the planes, they were devastated because [the media] was trying to minimise the attack… they have real scum come out and write reports that are as negative as they could possibly be,' Trump said. He insisted that Iran's Fordow nuclear site, one of the primary targets, had been 'obliterated.' 'The whole thing is collapsed, and a disaster. And I think all of the nuclear stuff is down there, because it's very hard to remove,' he claimed. Trump then walked away from the podium, as he was pressed further, handing the stage to his Defence Secretary, Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News presenter. Hegseth backed up his boss. 'So if you want to make an assessment of what happened at Fordow, you better get a big shovel and go really deep, because Iran's nuclear programme is obliterated and somebody, somewhere, is trying to leak something…' Hegseth boasted. Not all of NATO's heads of state were impressed by Rutte's handling of Trump. Sources told the Mirror that European leaders were increasingly frustrated with Trump's increasingly unilateral tone. The decision to reduce the summit's official communiqué to a single page and shorten the meeting to just three hours was a deliberate attempt to prevent one of Trump's signature blow-ups. But the view of Rutte's deference - particularly in referring to Trump as 'daddy' - amplified concerns about the Secretary General's impartiality. Critics say toadying comment undermined NATO's credibility while highlighting a deeper shift in the alliance's power dynamics. Rutte was forced to deny that his campaign of flattery aimed at Donald Trump was 'demeaning'. The Nato secretary-general told a news conference: 'It is a question of taste.' As Trump departed The Hague, declaring 'a big win for America', the unease among European leaders was apparent.
