logo
A conclave like no other: How papal pick gathering is different this year

A conclave like no other: How papal pick gathering is different this year

Yahoo06-05-2025

The conclave that begins May 7 to pick a successor to Pope Francis will feature many long-established rituals, as befits a church that has been around for nearly 2,000 years.
Cardinal electors will be sequestered from the outside world until a new pope is chosen. Every person involved – including support staff – will be required to take an oath of secrecy. Smoke from the Sistine Chapel chimney – black for no, white for yes – will announce whether a decision has been made.
Within all those traditions that go back centuries, some new developments have emerged. Though Francis didn't make any major changes to the conclave itself, his outreach to what he called "the peripheries" left an imprint that will be felt in the upcoming gathering to elect his replacement.
Here are some ways this conclave is different:
The highest number of cardinal electors in any conclave
Pope Paul VI set a rule in 1975 limiting the number of cardinal electors to 120, a norm that wasn't strictly adhered to in the College of Cardinals meetings known as consistories.
However, this is the first time a conclave has gone over the 120 mark, and not just by a couple. Of the 252 current cardinals, 135 are under 80 and eligible to vote, though Antonio Cañizares of Spain and John Njue of Kenya have said they won't attend for health reasons.
That leaves 133 voters, and a record 108 of them were appointed by Francis, more than 80%. That doesn't mean a progressive that follows in his footsteps will get the nod − many of the new cardinals hardly know each other and may not share his views − but it likely eliminates a hardcore conservative. A two-thirds majority is required.
The most diverse conclave
For the first time in memory, Europeans make up less than 50% of the voting cardinals, coming in at 47%. The trend in that direction was set in motion decades ago, but the advances of other regions stand out more than ever.
In an unprecedented distribution, representatives from Latin America (18%), Asia and the Pacific (16%) and Africa and the Middle East (14%) all make up at least 14% of the voting cardinals at the conclave. That's the same percentage of those from Italy, the formerly dominant presence at these events.
The Asian and African contingents made the biggest leaps since the 2013 conclave that elected Francis, no coincidence considering his outreach to those continents.
Cardinals attend a mourning Mass for Pope Francis on the fifth day of Novendiali (nine days of mourning after the pope's funeral) at St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican on April 30, 2025.
The first Asian or African pope in modern times?
There has never been a pope from what's now known as Asia, nor an African pope since the end of the fifth century. The three African popes before that – Victor I, Miltiades and Gelasius I – were believed to be Black and born during the Roman Empire. All three became saints.
Now one of the seemingly top candidates for the papacy is Luis Antonio Tagle, 67, an ally of Francis and a native of the Philippines, home to the largest Catholic population in Asia (about 85 million) and third biggest in the world. Hardly a list of contenders is published without including Tagle's name.
Likewise, two African cardinals – Peter Turkson of Ghana and Fridolin Ambongo of the Democratic Republic of Congo, both advocates for social justice – are often mentioned as papabili, or potential candidates.
They hail from fertile ground for the church, which saw an increase of more than 3% in African Catholics from 2022 to 2023, totaling more than 280 million. That's 20% of the estimated 1.4 billion Catholics worldwide.
The fewest Italian cardinals
There was a time – 455 consecutive years, to be exact – when betting the new pope would hail from Italy made for easy money. Now it's a much iffier proposition.
The centuries-old tradition of Italian pontiffs ended when John Paul I unexpectedly died in 1978 and was succeeded by the Polish-born John Paul II. The next two popes, Benedict XVI and Francis, were from Germany and Argentina, respectively, and suddenly Italy was on an extended losing streak.
There are strong Italian contenders among the current cardinals, including Vatican Secretary of State Pietro Parolin and Bologna Archbishop Matteo Zuppi, but with Italian voting representation down to 14%, odds of the next pope coming from the Bel Paese have diminished.
Still, it will be a while until any other nation catches up. Italy's 216 popes are 200 more than the next country on the list, France.
A man holds a cross as he walks on Saint Peter Square with St Peter's Basilica in the background on April 28, 2025.
Several newcomers to the voting process
Francis would be proud that the electors at this conclave hail from 71 countries, in keeping with his desire for the church to become more inclusive.
Italy still leads with 17, followed by the United States with 10 and Brazil with seven. Perhaps more notable is the presence of more than two dozen cardinal electors from countries that have never voted for a pope, among them Rwanda, Myanmar and South Sudan, according to the Washington Post.
'It has become more exotic,' said Massimo Faggioli, a professor of theology and religious studies at Villanova University. 'There are now many cardinals from Asia and North Africa who are potential popes. That makes it different than it has been for many centuries.'
Contributing: Marc Ramirez
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: A conclave like no other: How picking a pope is different this year

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mayor Adams offers a surprising compliment to Democratic primary challenger Zohran Mamdani
Mayor Adams offers a surprising compliment to Democratic primary challenger Zohran Mamdani

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mayor Adams offers a surprising compliment to Democratic primary challenger Zohran Mamdani

Mayor Adams Tuesday offered a surprising compliment to challenger Zohran Mamdani as the democratic socialist makes a run at knocking off frontrunner Andrew Cuomo just two weeks before the Democratic mayoral primary. During his weekly press conference on Tuesday, Adams, while acknowledging he's 'diametrically opposed' to Mamdani's policies, said he respects him for being consistent. 'Mamdani is the same Mamdani that he was before, same person,' Adams said of the current state assemblymember. 'I disagree with him, but at least he's not this politician that puts a finger in the air and sees where the wind is blowing. The rest of these guys are not consistent, you know?' Adams has chosen to skip the June primary and instead run for reelection as an independent in the November election. Mamdani is polling second to ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who resigned in disgrace in 2021 amid allegations of sexual harassment but has now mounted a powerful comeback campaign. The results of the June 24 primary typically determine who the next mayor will be in the heavily Democratic Big Apple, but with Adams running outside party lines and both Cuomo and Mamdani possibly also running on independent or the Working Families Party lines, the November general election could be competitive, as well. The mayor has slammed Cuomo for his pledge to work to do away with Tier 6 pensions despite instating them as governor, a promise to advocate for a $20 minimum wage despite rejecting a similar proposal from Mayor de Blasio and his support for crime crackdowns despite signing off on bail reforms laws. 'I respect people who are authentic and consistent, not who talk out of both sides of their mouths,' Adams said from City Hall on Tuesday. The mayor said that, no matter how the Democratic primary shakes out, he expects to compete against Mamdani in November because he's earned the support of the Working Families Party. During the press conference, Adams also took shots at Cuomo and his so-called rose garden campaign strategy, under which he rarely takes questions from the press. Adams also claimed that Cuomo is touting endorsements from communities that don't overwhelmingly back him. 'I have a Master's in public administration, but I have a PhD in Andrew,' Adams said. 'He comes out on weekends, he'll stop at a Black church, and then they'll list him as an endorsement, and oftentimes they call me and say, we never endorse him. He'll go and identify one or two people in a community and say, I have the community.' Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said in response: 'You can quote me shrugging — another Tuesday and another unhinged rant from the MAGA mayor going through the seven stages of grief,' he said. 'He sold out the city to Trump for his own personal benefit and New Yorkers aren't going to ever forget that.'

Jewish leaders condemn John Liu for endorsing Zohran Mamdani for mayor
Jewish leaders condemn John Liu for endorsing Zohran Mamdani for mayor

New York Post

time44 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Jewish leaders condemn John Liu for endorsing Zohran Mamdani for mayor

Jewish leaders and activists have signed an open letter condemning Queens state Sen. John Liu for endorsing staunch Israel foe Zohran Mamdani for mayor, The Post has learned. The letter, signed by more than 60 mostly Jewish residents in the borough, called Liu's endorsement a betrayal. It is set to appear as an ad in local Queens Jewish publications, said the letter's organizer, Michael Nussbaum, a board member of the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York and former head of the Queens Jewish Community Council. Advertisement 3 New York City Jewish leaders condemned state Sen. John Liu for endorsing Zohran Mamdani for mayor. Brigitte Stelzer 'Mamdani has made it clear that he is a virulently anti-semite in words and deeds… As a leader in our county, and a representative of a large Jewish population, we consider your endorsement a slap in our face,' states the missive, which shows the Israeli flag with the Star of David in the top right corner. 'Given the history of hateful acts against our community, this support will not go unnoticed,' it says. Advertisement Liu's 16th District in northeast Queens has a significant Jewish population and his endorsement was a coup for Mamdani. Mamdani supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel and has opposed its right to exist as a Jewish state. Liu, a former city comptroller and councilman, is an Asian-American trailblazer who is widely respected. 3 Liu endorsed Mamdani despite saying they have a 'big disagreement' on Israel. X / @ZohranKMamdani Advertisement Nussbaum told The Post he has known the state senator for decades and respects him as a gifted politician and good public servant — and that's why he was shocked that Liu was backing the most anti-Jewish and Israeli candidate in the race. 'Why would he attach his name to someone who is an enemy of Israel and the Jewish people?' Nussbaum asked. During his June 2 endorsement of Mamdani, Liu noted that he had a 'big disagreement' with the Democratic socialist assemblyman on the 'the issue of Israel and how the Jewish community needs to be viewed in this social climate.' Nussbaum said he didn't 'buy Liu's explanation' for backing Mamdani. Advertisement 3 The letter to Liu from Jewish leaders. The wellbeing of the Jewish people is the defining issue in this race given the rise in antisemitism, he said. Other signatories of the letter include former CUNY trustee Jeffrey Wiesenfeld, Yaniv Meirov, CEO at Chazaq Organization; cantor Alan Brava of the Free Synagogue of Flushing, Zev Berman, executive vice president of the Queens Jewish Community, retired judges Jeremy Weinstein and Jeff Leibowitz, and David Aronov of the UJA Federation of New York. In closing, the letter quotes scripture: 'Even my close friend whom I trusted, he who shared my bread, has lifted up his heel against me.' Liu, in a statement on Tuesday, defended his endorsement of Mamdani but also said he would continue to stand with the Jewish community. 'This public rebuke – and the many private protestations – come from respected individuals and organizations with whom I've worked for many years, and I accept them and the consequences they will bear,' Liu said. 'Notwithstanding the deep disapproval of my endorsement, I will continue to stand with and up for the Jewish community.'

Mike Johnson Says 'Clear Distinction' Between Jan. 6 and Los Angeles Riots
Mike Johnson Says 'Clear Distinction' Between Jan. 6 and Los Angeles Riots

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Mike Johnson Says 'Clear Distinction' Between Jan. 6 and Los Angeles Riots

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Tuesday that there's a "clear distinction" between the January 6, 2021, siege on the U.S. Capitol and the widespread demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Los Angeles. What To Know CNN's Manu Raju asked Johnson whether he thinks it's "hypocritical" for President Donald Trump to condemn the anti-ICE protesters in L.A. for clashing with law enforcement when Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of everyone charged in the deadly Capitol riot, many of whom were convicted of beating or impeding law enforcement. "Look, no, I think there's a clear distinction between those two," Johnson said. "We've seen what's happened in L.A. in the early '90s and other times, when these things get out of control ... you have to stay on top of that and you cannot let it get out of control." Johnson was referring to the deadly 1992 riots that broke out in L.A. after a jury acquitted four police officers accused of brutally beating Black motorist Rodney King after a high-speed chase. "But what's the difference between the violent protesters on January 6 [and anti-ICE demonstrators]?" Raju pressed the House speaker. "Everybody wants me to relitigate January 6, I'm not going to do that," Johnson said. "There's a very clear distinction between the two. People who broke the law and destroyed property [on January 6] were met with the proper consequences on that." He added that the government has to be "consistent" on that issue in L.A., before turning to walk away. The protests in Los Angeles erupted after ICE raided a number of downtown neighborhoods with high immigrant populations and labor-intensive industries. More than 50 people have been arrested as a result of the raids and five Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officers have been injured, officials said. Senator Majority Leader John Thune was also asked about Trump's "inconsistency" on the L.A. demonstrations and January 6 siege. "Do you see any inconsistency when the president criticizes or condemns the violent Los Angeles protesters but then pardons the violent January 6 protesters?" a reporter asked the South Dakota Republican. Thune dodged the question, saying, "I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in L.A." "And clearly the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task of getting the job done there," he added. California Governor Gavin Newsom, local officials and the LAPD have all rebuffed that claim, saying they had the protests under control until Trump deployed the National Guard and mobilized the Marines to crack down on the demonstrations, which led to more unrest. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store