NBA players sound off on league's gambling partnerships and their impact
It has been almost seven years since the Supreme Court opened the door to legalized sports betting across the country, and the NBA now finds itself deep into this gambling world that comes with massive (financial) perks and problems.
The league partnered with FanDuel and DraftKings as its betting partners in 2021, and several teams have done deals with casinos as well. (The Athletic has a partnership with BetMGM.) With people able to place bets at games or on their phones, and the focus shifting from fandom to financial for so many observers, the athlete experience during games and online has often become toxic along the way. The controversy has extended beyond the court, too.
Advertisement
Last year, then-Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter was banned from the league for what the NBA called a 'cardinal sin' of betting on games and sharing inside info. Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier has been under federal investigation as well, though the league has cleared him of any wrongdoing.
For a significant segment of players who are merely trying to do their jobs as best they can, there's another destructive element to all this. Some fans who've lost bets take their frustrations out on players online. In the most extreme cases, players have received death threats. It's part of the dark side of the lucrative cash cow that is sports gambling.
Sports gambling is an important, complex topic. That's why The Athletic included a question about it in this year's Anonymous NBA Player Poll. Nearly one-third of the entire league — 150 of the 158 players with whom we spoke — shared their opinions with our writers.
Responses to this question were so spirited, and so diverse and thoughtful, that we decided to share all of the perspectives here.
'It blurs the line between intentions and purity of the game. And I just think it's, in my opinion, (it's) a little predatory the way they push it. You want to encourage gambling responsibly, and (tell gamblers), 'Oh my God! Look at all this money you can make!' When in reality, the only reason why these things exist is because they make tons of money. Why do you think they can spend that much money on advertising? They're taking your money and throwing it back in your face. And so, I think on that question alone, I think it's dangerous to have such a close partnership. I get that it increases your own money, but it's a little unsettling to me. … I get 10 messages, DMs (direct messages) a game, (saying), 'F— you, I'm gonna f— your family up.''
Advertisement
'The gambling partnerships are horrible for the league because you guys are selling your soul for the worst types of people in your fan base, and they don't see us as human beings anymore, which again, they never did. But you're just going to start seeing more and more of — I hope not — you're going to see more and more people throwing games because of under-the-table deals.'
'It's not great when you're banning players, understandably, for gambling, and then you're promoting it. It would be like telling us not to do cocaine and then giving the players cocaine in the locker room.'
'If you ask the players, the messages and s— that we get after games, it's starting to really, I'm not going to say ruin the game, but gambling is having a massive effect on the fans. It used to be you just come and watch people hoop, but now it's turned into, 'How can we come to the game and win money?' So I think it's bad for the league, but I get it because they make a lot of money from it.'
'There is money in it, but I think it makes things really hard on players.'
'I personally hate gambling. Hate everyone talking about parlays this, parlays that. I hate getting DMs in my Instagram talking about, 'You f—– up my parlay.' I hate people sending me threats because I messed up their parlay.'
'I feel like anytime you click on TV or NBA TV, you always see something about spreads or gambling. As you know, some players have had problems with it. I feel like it's kind of antagonizing players to think about it, and also, I think it's a conflict of interest for the NBA, too. So, I think it's bad.'
'They've turned the fans crazy. Some fans can go crazy with that.'
'Bad, because it's in the players' faces, whether it be at home or in the game or in the stands, it's just thrown in the players' faces. It's taking away from the real fan experience. It's a money drip.'
Advertisement
'People are looking at the game as just bets, and for us players, they cuss us out. It's losing the fun of the game. You should keep it to just betting on which team will win, and that's it.'
'Terrible. I think it's terrible because you can't see everything. There's a lot of inside work going on there that we don't see.'
'I don't think they should be partnered (or) pushing it. People already think it's rigged. I'm in the league, and if I was watching some of these games at home with the way they go, I would think somebody made a call. I just don't think it's a great look.'
'I don't think gambling ever is a good thing in sports. People stop watching us for what we do and only to make money for themselves. It takes a hit on the integrity of what we do out there.'
'That's terrible. I don't know where this league is going with stuff like that.'
'I don't mind if it puts money in our pockets. But it's terrible right now. Terrible. People (are) calling my mom during games (about their bets).'
'It's not good. It benefits money-wise, but for players and everybody in the organization, it's bad.'
'It's bad, but the NBA makes money off of it, so that makes sense. But I don't like it because it brings the fans to not really understand basketball. It just makes it worse.'
'Bad because it just makes people think they can talk to us however they want.'
'Bad because the people who gamble heavy say crazy things, and it's like we're encouraging that.'
'Terrible. I hate the gambling. I hate everything that comes with it. … The way they do it, that's all people talk about now. You've got a bunch of people in my DMs after the game just talking about price points. I just think it's bad. It's a bad look.'
'Terrible. Hate them. Every game, no matter if it's a good game or bad game, you've got motherf—— sending death threats, saying racist s—. Every game. I guarantee you, if I check right now, I'll probably have something from this game. Every game. Everywhere. DMs, Twitter. People be tripping, bro. I hope it doesn't happen, but it's going to come to a point where players are going to be targeted because people have lost so much money on them. That's what I think. But hopefully I'm wrong.'
Advertisement
'Most of these people aren't fans of the game. They're just trying to make money.'
'I get so many DMs, death threats. I don't look at it or take it serious, but I don't like the culture around it.'
'People get caught up in the gambling. They're harassing the players.'
'Bad because it exposes us to people that think they can say anything they want to because they bet their money on us.'
'Terrible. … They're taking away the ethics of the sport. We're getting fans that don't even care about wins or losses. They don't care about a certain team. They just care about a ticket to win money. The fact that we're sponsoring it, to get the money, I guess, helps us in a way. But I think it takes away from the ethics of the sport a little bit.'
'Fans are disrespectful when it comes to it. They hit you after every game in your DMs and stuff like that. I just feel like it takes away from that genuine fan that just appreciates talent. Because you're just looking to see if a guy can cover rebounds or points. You're not really appreciating his team. You're not appreciating all the other stuff that comes with watching the NBA.'
'Good for the money, I guess, but they're bad, I think, for the game because now fans — not all of them, but a good amount of them — all they care for is their parlays. And I personally hate when I'm walking to the court, and all I hear is, 'I need 10 rebounds. I need 15 points. I need this. I need that.' I think it's very disrespectful to the game and to what we do and the work we put in.'
'I just think the gambling is a bad idea. If you've got guys point shaving, it's bad.'
'I'm sure it's making a lot of money, but I think it f—- with the integrity of the game, all this gambling. Everybody's into the gambling but us, but we're the ones that control all of it. I don't think it's good for the league, but it makes the league more money.'
Advertisement
'I hate 'em. I personally hate 'em. There's just too many people just going out of nowhere, saying 'F you' for their parlays and stuff like that. It's just saturated the game to where people aren't just enjoying the game. It's just 'I've got to watch this person to see if I get this parlay, or this one.' It kind of reminds me of the movie 'Casino.' It's all money-oriented. There's nothing pure about it.'
'I just think the fact we promote gambling as a country is just wrong. I think you should be able to gamble, but the way it's promoted, it's super dangerous. You've got people losing money. I don't like it at all. Fans are gonna heckle regardless, but I think it's more about promoting gambling to the youth. Kids watch this. So, when you're promoting FanDuel, I don't think that's good for anybody.'
'It's the dumbest thing ever. Some people just don't really watch the game. They just look at the numbers. If you mess up someone's parlay, they bother you — they say some crazy stuff you've gotta deal with. They say something about your family. If it was none of that happening, we wouldn't hear none of that stuff. If you mess up their money or parlay, that's when they say something to you. So it's the dumbest thing ever.'
'I think it's hurting the soul of the game. I think it's good financially for the short term, but I don't think it's good for the essence of the game over the long term.'
'It's bad, just because you're mixing that world with the integrity of the sport. We talk about teams truly trying to compete and win out there, when there's teams probably tanking to get picks, and it's just not a good look.'
'It's tough, because it's business at the end of the day. If they're going to do that, why be so strict on us? But I get it, point shaving and things of that nature that can go into making the game nasty (are a concern). But at the end of the day, it's just about money.'
'I understand it from a monetization standpoint. But in terms of fans' relationship with the players and vice versa, I think it's bad for the league.'
Advertisement
'From a player's point of view, it's maybe a little bit bad because you get more angry fans coming at you.'
'I think it just ruins the fan aspect of basketball or any sport, to be honest. If you hit someone's parlay, they love you. If you don't, they want to murder you.'
'It's bad for the league. It helps generate income, that's one thing. But you have situations where guys are gambling. If it's everywhere, it's hard not to want to do something if they're promoting it in front of your face.'
'Bad. It just causes a lot of hate.'
'Bad for the league. It undermines the commitment for NBA players and encourages fans to value it over the players.'
'I think it's just another opportunity to make money. This s— is a business.'
'It's great. Gambling is great for the league. More money, more eyes, more fan engagement.'
'I think they're good. It's more money.'
'I think they're fine as long as players don't partake in that. But other than that, I think it's fine. Let the public do what they want.'
'I think it brings more eyes to the game, especially in the regular season. Obviously, you have die-hard fans, but you need more people just watching to watch NBA basketball. If that means that's why they're engaged and watching that, we want that. Obviously, the complaint is people DMing you, whatever, hate mail and all that. At the end of the day, we make more money based on viewership, so I'd rather have more money and people screaming at me than no one screaming at me and less money.'
'I think it's good. It helps the league make money. That's the goal. The more money the league makes, the more money we make.'
'I think it engages the fans. I feel like we earn some fans off that. And I feel like it helps the guys who know the game but don't have money and are trying to get some more money. It doesn't really hurt us. I really don't care. I feel like the guys who care are sensitive.'
Advertisement
'It helps fans engage in a whole different way.'
'I think it brings more eyes to the NBA. I think it brings a little bit of a different fan base and views. And more eyes are always good.'
'It makes the league more money.'
'There's a lot of money to be spent in gambling. So I think at some point, we get a piece of that. It's good for the game. It's good for the fans. Obviously, it's not good if players are doing it. But I think overall, it's good.'
'All publicity is good publicity. It brings in more money, more revenue, more engagement. It is what it is.'
'I don't mind it. It's entertainment for the fans. Some people hate it. I do think it takes away from the true fans, but, s—, (people) got to make (money).'
'Good. It gets the fans more engaged into the games. All you have to do is just worry about a safety hazard for the players. But when you're trying to get fan engagement, that's definitely something that helps.'
'It gets more people involved watching it. Whether it's for the good or bad, people will engage with the league more.'
'However we get more money is good.'
'It's fun. As long as, obviously, players and people involved aren't on it.'
'I think it's good. It gives fans the outlet to gamble on games, have fun with it. Obviously, you have to do it responsibly. But I think it's good.'
'They're good, because it helps promote the league and all the companies. I think it's good, benefits both sides.'
'It's good, but because of it, people don't actually watch the games.'
'I think it's good. I think it makes people watch the game. When people have money on the game, they're invested.'
'It puts more money in the league's pockets. But it also puts your players on the line, in a sense. I'd say it's good. I personally don't like it, but I think it's good for the league.'
'I think it creates an opportunity for our fan base to grow, and I have no problem with it at all.'
'(The) good (part is the partnerships) bring in a lot of money. Bad because I hear about every single shot I miss.'
'Overall, it's good for the money that they bring. But it's annoying dealing with it.'
'Business-wise, and money-wise, it's good. But player-fan relationship (wise), it's horrible.'
'It's OK. Some people take it too serious.'
Advertisement
'It depends. Obviously it's all for money, if you see it for what it is. Obviously a situation (like Porter) is not ideal for the league. It's not impossible to happen again. I don't think it's that good for the league in the long term. But, money.'
'It's good because I'm sure it makes lots of money. But I think gambling is overall a bad thing, so I'm not sure the league should be encouraging people to do it.'
'It's good for making money, I guess. But it's bad for people who take it too far in how they approach people and games and stuff like that. But I'd say I'm 50-50. I think it can be good, (and) it can be bad.'
'It's good and bad. It's raising money. The money's always good. But then, at the same time, you get caught with some jackasses that have a habit of gambling off the court, and you mix that in sometimes. The league is already cracking down on a few guys. But that kind of gave our league a little bit of a black eye.'
'I think bad. But they're in the business of making money. So good. Just being honest!'
'It gives the fans something to look forward to, but they be doing too much. They think it's all about stats. It's 50/50. I'm not against it. Yeah, I'm with it. I ain't mad at it.'
'I mean, it's good from a business perspective. From a moral perspective, probably not. But to grow the business, I would say it's good.'
'Obviously, viewership will go up. They watch more because they've got money on the game. But also, it's kind of bad for the game because now people are showing up calling you out your name when you don't get one more assist. So it's like, yeah, it's good for the viewership. But also, the humanity piece of it kind of f—- with the players.'
'It's tough, because it's business at the end of the day. If they're going to do that, why be so strict on us? But I get it, point shaving and things of that nature that can go into making the game nasty. But at the end of the day, it's just about money.'
Advertisement
'Both. Gambling allows us to make more money. But at the same time, you get less real fans who are just trying to make money, who are really just losing money.'
'It obviously brings more revenue. But it's also bad because people already look at us as entertainers, and then with gambling, they look at us (as) less than a human; more like my money-making market.'
'I mean, it's good from a business perspective. From a moral perspective, probably not. But to grow the business, I would say it's good.'
'It's good because it's more fun for fans. But it can be bad because we, as players, get all the hate.'
'From a business side, I'm sure it's good. I just think the players hate the backlash they receive for not hitting parlays. But I think it's probably good for business.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
What are draft experts saying about Sixers prospect VJ Edgecombe?
What are draft experts saying about Sixers prospect VJ Edgecombe? When it comes to the No. 3 pick in the 2025 NBA draft, the Philadelphia 76ers will have plenty of options. They can turn to the likes of Rutgers star Ace Bailey--or his teammate Dylan Harper if the San Antonio Spurs have different plans at No. 2--Duke's Kon Knueppel, or Baylor's VJ Edgecombe. Bailey has been the popular option for the Sixers in most mock drafts, but the other names mentioned--outside of Harper--have been options as well. The Sixers will be looking to add a talented young piece to a roster in need of youth, and while Bailey has been a popular choice, one has reason to believe that Edgecombe could be a better player long term. Here's what the draft experts at The Ringer have to say about Edgecombe: The smooth, frictionless explosion off one or two feet. The sheer elevation. The paraglider hang time. Edgecombe's run-jump ability is a sight to behold—there may be only a handful of players in the NBA who can match his blend of dynamic athleticism. He has absolute trust in his physical gifts, which grants him a certain level of on-court freedom not afforded to most players. Under those auspices, Edgecombe has honed an anticipatory sixth sense most commonly seen in shutdown cornerbacks. He has the skills, motor, and reaction speed to become one of the best shot-blocking guards in the NBA, to go along with his passing-lane ball hawking. And he has more of a proof of concept than most NCAA players his age, having shown off these abilities at some of the highest levels of international competition. Edgecombe was, at worst, the third-best player on the Bahamian national basketball team in the 2024 FIBA Olympic Qualifying Tournament, on a roster that also featured Deandre Ayton, Buddy Hield, and Eric Gordon. Edgecombe averaged a superb 2.1 steals per game in 2024-25 for the Bears and one has to wonder how that will translate to the league. He has the potential to be an absolute terror on the defensive end of the floor and one has to believe he is going to be able to be a candidate for the All-Defensive Team every year. He also has an ability to knock down an open 3 so that will be a big help.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
LeBron Shuts Down The 'No Bag' Talk: "I'm Sitting Here With 50 Billion Points"
LeBron Shuts Down The 'No Bag' Talk: "I'm Sitting Here With 50 Billion Points" originally appeared on Fadeaway World. LeBron James is done listening to people claim he has 'no bag.' On the latest episode of Mind The Game, the all-time NBA scoring king finally addressed the long-running internet narrative questioning his creativity and dribble package. In true LeBron fashion, he didn't raise his voice, he raised the bar. Advertisement "When I was growing up, it wasn't talked about it. The least amount of dribbles to get where you need to get to was what I grew up on." "Michael Jordan wasn't out there dribbling 1,000 times, you know, to get to the spot. He'd get to a spot and raise. Isiah Thomas, as great of a handle that Isiah Thomas had, Isiah would get to a spot and raise." "All these guys that I grew up on, Grant Hill, get to a spot, I'm bigger than you. Big Dog Robinson, I'm bigger than you. Allen Houston, all these great players, that I grew up watching and admiring." "Penny Hardaway, they could dribble the basketball, but there's no... Tracy McGrady, even as great as Tracy's handle was, it was, I'm bigger than you, I'm gonna get to the spot and the least amount of dribbles." Advertisement "Kevin Garnett... Just good footwork, get over the top. If I'm bigger than you and I get you on my shoulder, I get you on my hip, I'm gonna use my size." "I see it all the time. It's like, you know, I'll be on social media, like, LeBron has no bag. LeBron has no bag and I'm sitting over here with 50 billion points." That's not hyperbole. LeBron James has amassed 52,243 career points, a mind-boggling number that includes 42,184 in the regular season and 8,289 in the playoffs. That's over 50,000 points in the NBA alone. Add in his points for Team USA, All-Star Games, the In-Season Tournament, and various exhibition and international games, and the total vaults well beyond the 52K mark. To put it simply, if LeBron has no bag, then basketball doesn't need one. Advertisement What triggered LeBron's subtle roast of the internet critics was a deeper discussion about how offensive basketball was taught and understood in his generation. He pointed out that players he admired growing up like Michael Jordan, Penny Hardaway, Grant Hill, and Tracy McGrady, all emphasized efficiency over flash. He mentioned legends like Allen Houston and 'Big Dog' Glenn Robinson, who dominated their matchups by using size, footwork, and precision, not a flurry of crossovers or highlight-reel ankle breakers. Even someone like Isiah Thomas, known for his handle, played within a framework that emphasized getting to a spot with purpose. In that context, LeBron sees himself not as lacking a bag, but simply operating from a different philosophy. Advertisement The comments are a timely reminder that "bag" talk — especially the internet's obsession with flashy dribbling and aesthetic shot creation — often ignores the actual results. LeBron didn't need to dance with the ball. He bulldozed, he glided, he orchestrated, and he dominated. From post fades to downhill drives, from bullet passes to chase-down blocks, LeBron's game is built on control, versatility, and overwhelming impact. And while social media might be fixated on who has the deepest handle or slickest combo, LeBron is focused on the scoreboard and history. Whether or not someone wants to call it a 'bag,' LeBron's point is simple: the man with over 50,000 points, four championships, and a two-decade run of dominance doesn't need to prove his artistry. He is the canvas. Related: Dominique Wilkins Says LeBron James Is A Sidekick For The Lakers After Luka Doncic Trade This story was originally reported by Fadeaway World on Jun 8, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Luka Doncic On Playing With LeBron James: "He Shows Up Like 10 Hours Before The Game"
Luka Doncic On Playing With LeBron James: "He Shows Up Like 10 Hours Before The Game" originally appeared on Fadeaway World. Luka Doncic hasn't been shy about expressing his awe at teaming up with LeBron James, and for good reason. The generational Dallas Mavericks talent, who was traded to the Los Angeles Lakers in a blockbuster move last offseason, is now sharing the floor with one of the most legendary figures in NBA history. And for Doncic, even after years of dominating the league himself, the experience has been eye-opening. Advertisement In a recent interview with on Mind The Game, Doncic reflected on what it has meant to play alongside LeBron. "I mean, it's great. You see, I've never played with a guy like this. And, you know, just being traded to here, to L.A., I mean, it was different. But just to play with guys like him, like, it's unbelievable." "Like, I could learn so many stuff, you know. First of all, off the court, you know, all the things he does just to be ready for the game. And obviously on the court, everybody knows what kind of player he is." That readiness, according to Luka, is part of what sets LeBron apart. When asked by Nash for a specific example, Doncic laughed and said: Advertisement "Well, first of all, he shows up like 10 hours before the game. So that was really the main, like, I was, what? I came to the arena. He was already done working out. I was like, what?" While the duo's chemistry is still developing, Doncic sees it trending upward. 'I think it's a work in progress,' he said: "I think I still think it's a work in progress. When we two are out there, and AR, you know, he's been playing unbelievable. And I think it's just still a work in progress. You know, I think we're getting better and better every day." Despite flashes of brilliance, the Lakers' 2024-25 season ended in disappointment. Advertisement The team's glaring roster flaw, the absence of a true center, proved fatal in the playoffs, especially against the physicality of the Minnesota Timberwolves. Anthony Davis had left in the blockbuster trade and the Lakers never found a proper replacement. The Lakers were bounced in five games, leaving both Luka and LeBron frustrated. This offseason, Lakers GM Rob Pelinka has acknowledged that failure and made it clear that getting a center is priority number one. He also emphasized the importance of meeting LeBron James' expectations in what could be his final season. LeBron is expected to opt into his player option for his 23rd NBA season, and with Doncic now locked in as the franchise's future, the Lakers are in win-now and win-later mode. Advertisement Austin Reaves remains a key part of that vision. While rumors swirl about his trade availability, the Lakers have made it clear they won't move him unless it's for an All-Star talent. His agent has also come out publicly denying that Reaves is getting traded, reinforcing that he's still part of L.A.'s long-term core. Among the centers linked to the Lakers this summer are Daniel Gafford, Nic Claxton, and Brook Lopez. The team also holds valuable trade assets, including Dalton Knecht and a future first-round pick. With those chips in play, expect the Lakers to be aggressive in finding a center who can anchor the defense and complement both Luka Doncic's pick-and-roll mastery and LeBron James' all-around brilliance. Related: Luka Doncic Reveals How He Fell In Love With Basketball This story was originally reported by Fadeaway World on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.
