
NBA players sound off on league's gambling partnerships and their impact
It has been almost seven years since the Supreme Court opened the door to legalized sports betting across the country, and the NBA now finds itself deep into this gambling world that comes with massive (financial) perks and problems.
The league partnered with FanDuel and DraftKings as its betting partners in 2021, and several teams have done deals with casinos as well. (The Athletic has a partnership with BetMGM.) With people able to place bets at games or on their phones, and the focus shifting from fandom to financial for so many observers, the athlete experience during games and online has often become toxic along the way. The controversy has extended beyond the court, too.
Advertisement
Last year, then-Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter was banned from the league for what the NBA called a 'cardinal sin' of betting on games and sharing inside info. Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier has been under federal investigation as well, though the league has cleared him of any wrongdoing.
For a significant segment of players who are merely trying to do their jobs as best they can, there's another destructive element to all this. Some fans who've lost bets take their frustrations out on players online. In the most extreme cases, players have received death threats. It's part of the dark side of the lucrative cash cow that is sports gambling.
Sports gambling is an important, complex topic. That's why The Athletic included a question about it in this year's Anonymous NBA Player Poll. Nearly one-third of the entire league — 150 of the 158 players with whom we spoke — shared their opinions with our writers.
Responses to this question were so spirited, and so diverse and thoughtful, that we decided to share all of the perspectives here.
'It blurs the line between intentions and purity of the game. And I just think it's, in my opinion, (it's) a little predatory the way they push it. You want to encourage gambling responsibly, and (tell gamblers), 'Oh my God! Look at all this money you can make!' When in reality, the only reason why these things exist is because they make tons of money. Why do you think they can spend that much money on advertising? They're taking your money and throwing it back in your face. And so, I think on that question alone, I think it's dangerous to have such a close partnership. I get that it increases your own money, but it's a little unsettling to me. … I get 10 messages, DMs (direct messages) a game, (saying), 'F— you, I'm gonna f— your family up.''
Advertisement
'The gambling partnerships are horrible for the league because you guys are selling your soul for the worst types of people in your fan base, and they don't see us as human beings anymore, which again, they never did. But you're just going to start seeing more and more of — I hope not — you're going to see more and more people throwing games because of under-the-table deals.'
'It's not great when you're banning players, understandably, for gambling, and then you're promoting it. It would be like telling us not to do cocaine and then giving the players cocaine in the locker room.'
'If you ask the players, the messages and s— that we get after games, it's starting to really, I'm not going to say ruin the game, but gambling is having a massive effect on the fans. It used to be you just come and watch people hoop, but now it's turned into, 'How can we come to the game and win money?' So I think it's bad for the league, but I get it because they make a lot of money from it.'
'There is money in it, but I think it makes things really hard on players.'
'I personally hate gambling. Hate everyone talking about parlays this, parlays that. I hate getting DMs in my Instagram talking about, 'You f—– up my parlay.' I hate people sending me threats because I messed up their parlay.'
'I feel like anytime you click on TV or NBA TV, you always see something about spreads or gambling. As you know, some players have had problems with it. I feel like it's kind of antagonizing players to think about it, and also, I think it's a conflict of interest for the NBA, too. So, I think it's bad.'
'They've turned the fans crazy. Some fans can go crazy with that.'
'Bad, because it's in the players' faces, whether it be at home or in the game or in the stands, it's just thrown in the players' faces. It's taking away from the real fan experience. It's a money drip.'
Advertisement
'People are looking at the game as just bets, and for us players, they cuss us out. It's losing the fun of the game. You should keep it to just betting on which team will win, and that's it.'
'Terrible. I think it's terrible because you can't see everything. There's a lot of inside work going on there that we don't see.'
'I don't think they should be partnered (or) pushing it. People already think it's rigged. I'm in the league, and if I was watching some of these games at home with the way they go, I would think somebody made a call. I just don't think it's a great look.'
'I don't think gambling ever is a good thing in sports. People stop watching us for what we do and only to make money for themselves. It takes a hit on the integrity of what we do out there.'
'That's terrible. I don't know where this league is going with stuff like that.'
'I don't mind if it puts money in our pockets. But it's terrible right now. Terrible. People (are) calling my mom during games (about their bets).'
'It's not good. It benefits money-wise, but for players and everybody in the organization, it's bad.'
'It's bad, but the NBA makes money off of it, so that makes sense. But I don't like it because it brings the fans to not really understand basketball. It just makes it worse.'
'Bad because it just makes people think they can talk to us however they want.'
'Bad because the people who gamble heavy say crazy things, and it's like we're encouraging that.'
'Terrible. I hate the gambling. I hate everything that comes with it. … The way they do it, that's all people talk about now. You've got a bunch of people in my DMs after the game just talking about price points. I just think it's bad. It's a bad look.'
'Terrible. Hate them. Every game, no matter if it's a good game or bad game, you've got motherf—— sending death threats, saying racist s—. Every game. I guarantee you, if I check right now, I'll probably have something from this game. Every game. Everywhere. DMs, Twitter. People be tripping, bro. I hope it doesn't happen, but it's going to come to a point where players are going to be targeted because people have lost so much money on them. That's what I think. But hopefully I'm wrong.'
Advertisement
'Most of these people aren't fans of the game. They're just trying to make money.'
'I get so many DMs, death threats. I don't look at it or take it serious, but I don't like the culture around it.'
'People get caught up in the gambling. They're harassing the players.'
'Bad because it exposes us to people that think they can say anything they want to because they bet their money on us.'
'Terrible. … They're taking away the ethics of the sport. We're getting fans that don't even care about wins or losses. They don't care about a certain team. They just care about a ticket to win money. The fact that we're sponsoring it, to get the money, I guess, helps us in a way. But I think it takes away from the ethics of the sport a little bit.'
'Fans are disrespectful when it comes to it. They hit you after every game in your DMs and stuff like that. I just feel like it takes away from that genuine fan that just appreciates talent. Because you're just looking to see if a guy can cover rebounds or points. You're not really appreciating his team. You're not appreciating all the other stuff that comes with watching the NBA.'
'Good for the money, I guess, but they're bad, I think, for the game because now fans — not all of them, but a good amount of them — all they care for is their parlays. And I personally hate when I'm walking to the court, and all I hear is, 'I need 10 rebounds. I need 15 points. I need this. I need that.' I think it's very disrespectful to the game and to what we do and the work we put in.'
'I just think the gambling is a bad idea. If you've got guys point shaving, it's bad.'
'I'm sure it's making a lot of money, but I think it f—- with the integrity of the game, all this gambling. Everybody's into the gambling but us, but we're the ones that control all of it. I don't think it's good for the league, but it makes the league more money.'
Advertisement
'I hate 'em. I personally hate 'em. There's just too many people just going out of nowhere, saying 'F you' for their parlays and stuff like that. It's just saturated the game to where people aren't just enjoying the game. It's just 'I've got to watch this person to see if I get this parlay, or this one.' It kind of reminds me of the movie 'Casino.' It's all money-oriented. There's nothing pure about it.'
'I just think the fact we promote gambling as a country is just wrong. I think you should be able to gamble, but the way it's promoted, it's super dangerous. You've got people losing money. I don't like it at all. Fans are gonna heckle regardless, but I think it's more about promoting gambling to the youth. Kids watch this. So, when you're promoting FanDuel, I don't think that's good for anybody.'
'It's the dumbest thing ever. Some people just don't really watch the game. They just look at the numbers. If you mess up someone's parlay, they bother you — they say some crazy stuff you've gotta deal with. They say something about your family. If it was none of that happening, we wouldn't hear none of that stuff. If you mess up their money or parlay, that's when they say something to you. So it's the dumbest thing ever.'
'I think it's hurting the soul of the game. I think it's good financially for the short term, but I don't think it's good for the essence of the game over the long term.'
'It's bad, just because you're mixing that world with the integrity of the sport. We talk about teams truly trying to compete and win out there, when there's teams probably tanking to get picks, and it's just not a good look.'
'It's tough, because it's business at the end of the day. If they're going to do that, why be so strict on us? But I get it, point shaving and things of that nature that can go into making the game nasty (are a concern). But at the end of the day, it's just about money.'
'I understand it from a monetization standpoint. But in terms of fans' relationship with the players and vice versa, I think it's bad for the league.'
Advertisement
'From a player's point of view, it's maybe a little bit bad because you get more angry fans coming at you.'
'I think it just ruins the fan aspect of basketball or any sport, to be honest. If you hit someone's parlay, they love you. If you don't, they want to murder you.'
'It's bad for the league. It helps generate income, that's one thing. But you have situations where guys are gambling. If it's everywhere, it's hard not to want to do something if they're promoting it in front of your face.'
'Bad. It just causes a lot of hate.'
'Bad for the league. It undermines the commitment for NBA players and encourages fans to value it over the players.'
'I think it's just another opportunity to make money. This s— is a business.'
'It's great. Gambling is great for the league. More money, more eyes, more fan engagement.'
'I think they're good. It's more money.'
'I think they're fine as long as players don't partake in that. But other than that, I think it's fine. Let the public do what they want.'
'I think it brings more eyes to the game, especially in the regular season. Obviously, you have die-hard fans, but you need more people just watching to watch NBA basketball. If that means that's why they're engaged and watching that, we want that. Obviously, the complaint is people DMing you, whatever, hate mail and all that. At the end of the day, we make more money based on viewership, so I'd rather have more money and people screaming at me than no one screaming at me and less money.'
'I think it's good. It helps the league make money. That's the goal. The more money the league makes, the more money we make.'
'I think it engages the fans. I feel like we earn some fans off that. And I feel like it helps the guys who know the game but don't have money and are trying to get some more money. It doesn't really hurt us. I really don't care. I feel like the guys who care are sensitive.'
Advertisement
'It helps fans engage in a whole different way.'
'I think it brings more eyes to the NBA. I think it brings a little bit of a different fan base and views. And more eyes are always good.'
'It makes the league more money.'
'There's a lot of money to be spent in gambling. So I think at some point, we get a piece of that. It's good for the game. It's good for the fans. Obviously, it's not good if players are doing it. But I think overall, it's good.'
'All publicity is good publicity. It brings in more money, more revenue, more engagement. It is what it is.'
'I don't mind it. It's entertainment for the fans. Some people hate it. I do think it takes away from the true fans, but, s—, (people) got to make (money).'
'Good. It gets the fans more engaged into the games. All you have to do is just worry about a safety hazard for the players. But when you're trying to get fan engagement, that's definitely something that helps.'
'It gets more people involved watching it. Whether it's for the good or bad, people will engage with the league more.'
'However we get more money is good.'
'It's fun. As long as, obviously, players and people involved aren't on it.'
'I think it's good. It gives fans the outlet to gamble on games, have fun with it. Obviously, you have to do it responsibly. But I think it's good.'
'They're good, because it helps promote the league and all the companies. I think it's good, benefits both sides.'
'It's good, but because of it, people don't actually watch the games.'
'I think it's good. I think it makes people watch the game. When people have money on the game, they're invested.'
'It puts more money in the league's pockets. But it also puts your players on the line, in a sense. I'd say it's good. I personally don't like it, but I think it's good for the league.'
'I think it creates an opportunity for our fan base to grow, and I have no problem with it at all.'
'(The) good (part is the partnerships) bring in a lot of money. Bad because I hear about every single shot I miss.'
'Overall, it's good for the money that they bring. But it's annoying dealing with it.'
'Business-wise, and money-wise, it's good. But player-fan relationship (wise), it's horrible.'
'It's OK. Some people take it too serious.'
Advertisement
'It depends. Obviously it's all for money, if you see it for what it is. Obviously a situation (like Porter) is not ideal for the league. It's not impossible to happen again. I don't think it's that good for the league in the long term. But, money.'
'It's good because I'm sure it makes lots of money. But I think gambling is overall a bad thing, so I'm not sure the league should be encouraging people to do it.'
'It's good for making money, I guess. But it's bad for people who take it too far in how they approach people and games and stuff like that. But I'd say I'm 50-50. I think it can be good, (and) it can be bad.'
'It's good and bad. It's raising money. The money's always good. But then, at the same time, you get caught with some jackasses that have a habit of gambling off the court, and you mix that in sometimes. The league is already cracking down on a few guys. But that kind of gave our league a little bit of a black eye.'
'I think bad. But they're in the business of making money. So good. Just being honest!'
'It gives the fans something to look forward to, but they be doing too much. They think it's all about stats. It's 50/50. I'm not against it. Yeah, I'm with it. I ain't mad at it.'
'I mean, it's good from a business perspective. From a moral perspective, probably not. But to grow the business, I would say it's good.'
'Obviously, viewership will go up. They watch more because they've got money on the game. But also, it's kind of bad for the game because now people are showing up calling you out your name when you don't get one more assist. So it's like, yeah, it's good for the viewership. But also, the humanity piece of it kind of f—- with the players.'
'It's tough, because it's business at the end of the day. If they're going to do that, why be so strict on us? But I get it, point shaving and things of that nature that can go into making the game nasty. But at the end of the day, it's just about money.'
Advertisement
'Both. Gambling allows us to make more money. But at the same time, you get less real fans who are just trying to make money, who are really just losing money.'
'It obviously brings more revenue. But it's also bad because people already look at us as entertainers, and then with gambling, they look at us (as) less than a human; more like my money-making market.'
'I mean, it's good from a business perspective. From a moral perspective, probably not. But to grow the business, I would say it's good.'
'It's good because it's more fun for fans. But it can be bad because we, as players, get all the hate.'
'From a business side, I'm sure it's good. I just think the players hate the backlash they receive for not hitting parlays. But I think it's probably good for business.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
33 minutes ago
- USA Today
CBS Sports' latest NBA mock draft has Walter Clayton Jr. going to this team out west
CBS Sports' latest NBA mock draft has Walter Clayton Jr. going to this team out west Former Florida basketball guard Walter Clayton Jr. is officially getting first-round buzz ahead of the 2025 NBA draft, with CBS Sports projecting him at No. 29 overall to the Phoenix Suns. Clayton, who averaged 18.3 points per game and shot 38.6 percent from three last season, was named Most Outstanding Player of the 2025 Final Four. His draft stock soared following a scorching NCAA Tournament run, where he averaged over 22 points and shot 43.5 percent from beyond the arc. CBS Sports' Gary Parrish called him "a skilled and unique shotmaker" and noted that while scouts have concerns about his decision-making and defense, his ability to score at all three levels make him a valuable late-first-round target. If selected, Clayton would become Florida's first NBA first-round pick since Tre Mann in 2021 when the Oklahoma City Thunder selected him with the 18th overall pick. Clayton's rise caps off a remarkable career transformation under head coach Todd Golden and solidifies the Gators' place back among college basketball's elite programs. What CBS Sports said about Clayton "Clayton was the star of Florida's national title run while averaging 22.3 points on 43.5% shooting from beyond the arc in those six NCAA Tournament games. There are concerns about his decision-making and approach to defense, but the Most Outstanding Player of the 2025 Final Four is such a skilled and unique shotmaker that he's worthy of a serious look this deep in the first round by a Phoenix franchise that probably needs to hit the reset button." Follow us @GatorsWire on X, formerly known as Twitter, as well as Bluesky, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Florida Gators news, notes and opinions.


USA Today
33 minutes ago
- USA Today
NBA rumors roundup: Latest on Giannis Antetokounmpo, Jason Kidd, more
NBA rumors roundup: Latest on Giannis Antetokounmpo, Jason Kidd, more While the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder play in the NBA Finals, the rest of the league is already focused on all of their offseason moves. After the Bucks were eliminated from the playoffs, ESPN's Shams Charania reported that two-time NBA MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo was "open-minded" about his future. There are plenty of other rumors floating around the league right now, including a coaching vacancy in New York after they moved on from Tom Thibodeau. ESPN's Brian Windhorst recently predicted that the offseason will happen "faster than normal" this summer and that the majority of the action will happen around the 2025 NBA Draft. Here are the latest updates about the biggest storylines to follow over the course of the next few weeks. Giannis Antetokounmpo There is no bigger story in the NBA than where Milwaukee superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo will land if he is traded. While the Mavericks were briefly floated as a potential option when they surprisingly landed the No. 1 overall pick in the 2025 NBA Draft, the franchise reportedly plans to select Cooper Flagg. Other rumored destinations include the Houston Rockets and San Antonio Spurs, and the Spurs are the favorites. The superstar was also recently linked to the Toronto Raptors, which would shake up the Eastern Conference. It is worth noting that Antetokounmpo recently stated that he hopes to return to the NBA Finals with the Bucks. Windhorst reported that the 2021 NBA Finals MVP has not asked for a trade and that Milwaukee is not looking to trade him. Meanwhile, per Jake Fischer, talks have "significantly stalled" of late as well. More: The Giannis Antetokounmpo era in Milwaukee ended in embarrassing fashion Kevin Durant According to Windhorst, there are a "handful" of teams who will have interest in trading for Kevin Durant. Charania pegged that number as between four and six and one of those teams is the New York Knicks, who reportedly made an offer for Durant at the NBA trade deadline. Meanwhile, the San Antonio Spurs are a potential destination as well. In fact, The Ringer's Bill Simmons believes that Durant to San Antonio is already a "done deal" and just awaiting an announcement. The Spurs likely would not have to include the No. 2 overall pick in such an agreement. If the Bucks don't end up making a deal for Antetokounmpo, the Raptors may also have interest in Durant. The Clippers have been linked to KD as well. Additionally, the Suns are reportedly dangling Durant for the Rockets in an attempt to regain some of their draft capital from the franchise. While there was initially some speculation the 76ers may have interest in Durant using the No. 3 overall pick, NBA insider Marc Stein has debunked those theories. More: Kevin Durant's journeyman career is kinda sad Jason Kidd When the Knicks decided to move on from Tom Thibodeau, there were several candidates who we believed could take over for him. (There were also a few candidates, like Jay Wright, who we speculated are unlikely to take the job.) Although he is currently employed by the Mavericks, one name to keep an eye on is Jason Kidd. More: Jason Kidd may have to choose between the Knicks and Cooper Flagg New York would likely need to include a draft pick to acquire Kidd from Dallas and, per Windhorst, there is "mutual intrigue" between the two parties. Dallas would have to grant permission for New York to interview Kidd, however, and may not have much incentive to do that unless they had a different head coach in mind to replace him.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Bill Plaschke reveals Parkinson's disease diagnosis: 'It hurts to even say it.'
Bill Plaschke reveals Parkinson's disease diagnosis: 'It hurts to even say it.' Show Caption Hide Caption Kon Knueppel on the drive of former Duke teammate Cooper Flagg Kon Knueppel chats with Bryan Kalbrosky ahead of the NBA Draft about his former teammate Cooper Flagg and what makes him special Sports Seriously Bill Plaschke, the award-winning Los Angeles Times columnist and longtime "Around the Horn" panelist on ESPN, revealed this week that he has Parkinson's disease. He made the announcement as part of an LA Times column about a boxing program he attends for those trying to slow the effects of the condition. "I've got Parkinson's, and it hurts to even say it," Plaschke wrote. "I'm still mobile, still active, I don't have the trademark tremors that distinguish the famously afflicted Michael J. Fox or the late Muhammed Ali but, damn it, I've got it." Plaschke, 66, noted that he was diagnosed with Parkinson's four years ago after feeling weakness in his right arm, but had only told his family until now. The neurodegenerative disease has no cure and progressively impacts how a person moves and speaks. OPINION: Don't forget harsh price NFL players pay Plaschke wrote that it's a struggle for him to get dressed and "my pills come in gallon jugs and I spend entire Dodger games trying to discreetly swallow them in the press box." "I don't smile as much now," he added. "It's harder to smile when afflicted with the trademark Parkinson's masked face. When I FaceTime with my darlin Daisy, I worry she won't see past my dour expression and never know how much her granddaddy loves her." Plaschke has written for the Los Angeles Times since 1988 and became a sports columnist there in 1996. He has been named the national sports columnist of the year by the Associated Press Sports Editors nine times and is a member of the National Sports Media Hall of Fame and California Sports Hall of Fame. He was also one of the original panelists on "Around the Horn," beginning in 2002, and remained a regular contributor to the show until its 23-year run ended last month. Plaschke sounded a hopeful note at the end of his column, citing the inspiration provided by Kaizen Kinetics and everyone else dealing with Parkinson's disease through its boxing program. "I have Parkinson's," Plaschke wrote, "But, by God, it doesn't have me."