Scientists issue dire warning after disturbing discovery made at the bottom of the ocean: 'Not a single inch of it is clean'
Littering is a pet peeve of many, and unfortunately, nowhere seems to be safe from this disgusting habit.
Scientists have even found trash at the very bottom of the Mediterranean Sea.
As Universitat de Barcelona shared, an international team of researchers found 167 items at the bottom of the Calypso Deep, the deepest point of the Mediterranean Sea that is around 3.2 miles below the water level.
According to the report, 148 of the items were marine debris, while the other 19 are thought to be of human origin. The experts said this is one of the highest concentrations on record of trash found in the great depths of the sea.
The researchers sent a manned submarine into the waters off the southwest coast of Greece, and images were taken and then studied by the team. Miquel Canals, a professor at the Department of Earth and Ocean Dynamics at the Universitat de Barcelona, said that among the items found were full bags of rubbish, with evidence that these were dropped by boats.
In addition to being deplorable, inappropriate dumping of rubbish can have severe negative impacts on ecosystems — and that's especially true in oceans and seas.
Creatures can get caught up in discarded fishing nets, ingest plastic waste, and even be buried by items that are large enough.
What's more, depending on the type of debris dropped in the ocean, it could release toxins that can impact the health of marine animals.
"Unfortunately, as far as the Mediterranean is concerned, it would not be wrong to say that 'not a single inch of it is clean,'" Canals said.
Because Calypso Deep is set within the Hellenic Trench, it's an ideal location to trap waste that has been carried by ocean currents. Since humans have such limited access to this area, clean-up efforts are near impossible, so it's likely these items could remain in the area for decades and cause damage to the ecosystem all the while.
Do you think America has a plastic waste problem?
Definitely
Only in some areas
Not really
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
First and foremost, we need to be careful about how we deal with waste materials. Understanding your recycling options means plastic, paper, and glass can be processed properly and even given a second life — and stop them from ending up in the sea.
According to Our World in Data, "one to two million tonnes of plastic [around 1.1 to 2.2 million tons] enter our oceans yearly," so reducing our use of this material — especially single-use items — can make a real difference.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25-04-2025
- Yahoo
Researchers make disturbing discovery about invisible particles invading our bodies: 'These things get into your body ... without your knowledge'
Tiny plastic particles are a big problem. Experts and scientists gathered for a conference that was hosted by Moms Clean Air Force to discuss plastics. We've known about microplastics and their impact on our health for a while, but several studies are showing it's worse than we thought. Global plastic production is increasing with no signs of slowing down. According to Our World in Data, "Plastic production has more than doubled in the last two decades." Unfortunately, very little of this plastic is recycled, due to cost and inadequate recycling systems. Instead, millions of tons of plastic enter landfills and waterways and eventually break down into harmful microplastics. Microplastics are inside us — a participant in this medical study found about half a teaspoon of plastic in her blood. While the full effect of microplastics on the body is still being researched, findings so far have suggested DNA damage, infertility, organ system disruption, and even neurological disorders. Shanna Swan, an epidemiologist, emphasized how increasingly difficult microplastics are to avoid. Whether they're ingested, inhaled, or absorbed through your skin, "these things get into your body, every day, 24-7, without your knowledge," Swan said, per The New Lede. Scientists, politicians, and others gathered in April for an annual summit to address the growing plastic problem. In attendance was Pennsylvania representative Summer Lee, who "announced the launch of an environmental justice caucus in Congress that will aim to address harms caused by plastics manufacturing and pursue solutions," per The New Lede. Do you worry about the longevity of EV batteries? For sure Not really Not at all I've never thought about it Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Researchers are working tirelessly to find ways to recycle plastic and create new, sustainable alternatives. From wax worms that eat plastic to hydrothermal liquefaction, there's still time to change the way we deal with plastic waste. As they work to fix plastic pollution at the government level, there's an easy way you can avoid extra exposure to microplastics — use less plastic. Opt for a reusable, stainless steel water bottle instead of plastic bottles. Use reusable fabric or paper grocery bags, rather than store-provided plastic ones. Ditch single-use health and beauty products in favor of sustainable packaging and eco-friendly ingredients. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
USA Today
20-04-2025
- USA Today
Earth's orbit may be in trouble. Why space debris is to blame.
Earth's orbit may be in trouble. Why space debris is to blame. You might think space as a vast emptiness. But according to the European Space Agency, it's getting incredibly crowded – at least around our planet. A European Space Agency report released April 1 studied the space above Earth. The report says that if space debris buildup is not controlled soon, the area surrounding our planet may become so congested that we won't be able to use certain orbits. "This chain reaction can make certain orbits become unsafe and unusable over time as debris continues to collide and fragment again and again, creating a cascading effect," the ESA says in a summary. The agency estimates at least three satellites or rocket bodies fall back to Earth every day. Where does space debris comes from? Since 1957, the United States has launched 11,969 objects into space, according to Our World in Data. The United States, Russia and China are responsible for 96% of orbital debris. Each nation has contributed about a third of the debris. Unable to view our graphics? Click here to see them. Space debris brings increased risk of uncontrolled reentries There are still few regulated reentry plans for most rocket launches, which means many rocket bodies aren't controlled as they reenter the atmosphere. In 2024, there were a record 120 uncontrolled rocket debris reentries and 258 successful rocket launches. More than 2,300 rocket bodies orbiting the Earth can't be controlled and will eventually reenter the atmosphere, according to For the first time, controlled reentries of rocket bodies outnumbered uncontrolled reentries, according to the ESA. Where is most of the space debris? Space debris usually travels within 1,200 miles of the Earth's surface, or in low Earth orbit. Orbits fall into three basic categories: Low : The majority of research satellites, such as the fleet of NASA's Earth Observing System. : The majority of research satellites, such as the fleet of NASA's Earth Observing System. Medium : Navigation and specialized satellites, intended to observe a specific area. : Navigation and specialized satellites, intended to observe a specific area. High: Most weather and communications satellites. Space Junk: the impact of global warming on satellites A recent report from MIT documents the effects of climate change on satellites in the Earth's upper atmosphere. Why is space debris a problem? There are roughly 1.1 million debris fragments larger than 0.04 inches and about 40,500 fragments larger than 4 inches in orbit according to the ESA. NASA states that debris can reach speeds of 18,000 mph. That's 10 times faster than a bullet, so even a paint chip can harm sensitive satellite electronics and solar arrays or tear a spacesuit. Even though most satellites are engineered to burn up upon reentry, the amount of debris is growing, which could endanger current and future missions. More: Space junk: the impact of global warming on satellites | The Excerpt What's the risk of being hit by a piece of falling space debris? Your risk of being injured by falling space debris is less than 1 in 100 billion, the ESA says. That means you have much better odds of winning a Powerball jackpot at 1 in 292 million. Though it's not zero, your chances of being hit by a falling satellite are 65,000 times lower than the risk of being struck by lightning and three times lower than the risk of being struck by a meteorite, the ESA says. CONTRIBUTING James Powel, Eric Lagatta, Jim Sergent and Robert Abitbol
Yahoo
18-04-2025
- Yahoo
Scientists unveil next-gen technology that could transform how we cool our homes: 'Potential for ... large-scale application'
A team led by researchers at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology may have found a more eco-friendly alternative to traditional cooling systems, allowing people to stay cool without heating up the planet. Air conditioning is great for keeping homes cool but also contributes to warming the climate, as some of the electricity consumed to power AC units comes from dirty energy. As detailed in a university report posted by Tech Xplore and a corresponding study published in Nature, the team of researchers developed the world's first-ever "kilowatt-scale elastocaloric green cooling device." Elastocaloric cooling, a form of solid-state cooling, uses shape memory alloys (SMAs) to cool homes without emitting heat-trapping gases, according to the university's report. It's also highly energy-efficient, making it a promising alternative to commercial ACs. However, previous elastocaloric cooling devices couldn't pass the kilowatt-scale threshold needed for commercial ACs. The researchers discovered two core issues that prevented previous devices from meeting the kilowatt-scale requirement. First, the devices struggled to balance the refrigerant's specific cooling power with the total active mass. Second, the devices couldn't transfer heat efficiently enough for high-frequency operation. To address these issues, the team proposed a multi-cell architecture design they referred to in their study as "SMAs in series — fluid in parallel." Per the report, this design links 10 elastocaloric cooling units along the force application direction, with nickel-titanium alloy tubes contained in each unit. The tubes boost the device's heat exchange efficiency. The parallel fluid channels also help improve efficiency by keeping the system pressure under 1.5 bar, ensuring its stability during high-frequency use. The proposed design replaced traditional distilled water with graphene nanofluid, a heat transfer medium that can conduct heat 50% more effectively, even at just two grams per liter concentration. As the Tech Xplore post explained, researchers tested the cooling device in a 2.7-cubic meter model house in a summer outdoor environment and managed to stabilize indoor temperatures at 21-22 degrees Celsius (about 70-72 degrees Fahrenheit) within 15 minutes, even when outdoor temperatures were at 30-31 degrees Celsius (about 86-88 degrees Fahrenheit). This reportedly marked the first time an elastocaloric cooling device has surpassed the kilowatt-scale threshold. "This achievement demonstrates the potential for the large-scale application of elastocaloric cooling technology," said Professor Sun Qingping, one of the lead researchers, per the publication. "We are working with the industry to drive its commercialization." With global temperatures rising, the demand for air conditioning and cooling also grows. Per Our World in Data, the International Energy Agency has estimated that the demand for air conditioners could triple by 2050. Do you think all new homes should use heat pump technology? Definitely Let each state decide Let homeowners decide No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Air conditioning accounted for approximately 3% of global heat-trapping carbon pollution and 7% of global electricity consumption as of 2022, according to the same report. These percentages are likely to rise with the growing demand for AC and cooling. If the research team's breakthrough allows elastocaloric cooling technology to become commercially available, consumers could be able to lower their electricity bills and reduce their reliance on dirty energy. Pairing it with green energy solutions like installing solar panels could further improve energy efficiency while helping homeowners reduce carbon footprints. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
