logo
Plenful Raises $50M To Transform Healthcare Providers' Back Office With AI, Saving Millions

Plenful Raises $50M To Transform Healthcare Providers' Back Office With AI, Saving Millions

Forbes30-04-2025

Founder & CEO Joy Liu
Courtesy of Plenful
Healthcare may be slow to modernize, but AI-powered startups like Plenful are betting big that change is coming to its most painful corners — the back office — through automation. The San Francisco-based startup has announced a $50 million Series B raise co-led by Arena Holdings and billionaire Mitchell Rales, co-founder of Danaher Corporation, with participation from Notable Capital, Bessemer, TQ Ventures and Susa/Kivu Ventures, to automate the repetitive, bloated administrative workflows that cost healthcare providers millions every year and fuel rampant provider burnout. 'This is a trillion-dollar market with significant white space, and Plenful has built a compelling wedge,' explains Chelcie Taylor of Notable Capital. 'That's why we were excited to invest.'
With AI at its core, Plenful is positioning itself as the "behind-the-scenes fix" for a healthcare system struggling under the weight of outdated processes. And the startup has rapidly gained traction, onboarding 60 healthcare institutions to date — including Cencora, UCLA, MUSC, and Tampa General — and is sustaining strong momentum with 4x year-over-year revenue growth.
To get a deeper understanding of the actual day-to-day problems Plenful is addressing, I spoke with Founder & CEO, Joy Liu in an exclusive interview for Forbes. Prior to founding Plenful in 2022, Liu worked as Director of Strategic Operations at Shields Health Solutions, a specialty pharmacy, where she was able to see first-hand the 'sheer volume of work' that staff have to manage. 'It was eye popping…and that workflow burden definitely shows up for the patient,' she explained. By leveraging automation, 'we are freeing up staff who can now focus more on patients,' and support a greater patient load.
The reality is that physicians spend nearly twice as much time on paperwork as they do on direct patient care. Furthermore, nurses spend up to 25% of their shift on documentation tasks (non-clinical work), while pharmacists spend 30% of their time verifying prescriptions versus other duties like patient education and counseling.
To help ease this workload, Plenful focuses on various workflows that consume valuable staff time, such as prior authorization workflows and compliance with the 340B Drug Pricing Program. Here's a closer look at each.
If you are not a medical professional, chances are you may not be familiar with the mechanics of how this antiquated system works, but prior authorization (PA) is a complex set of requirements that US healthcare providers must satisfy to get medical care and medications approved by health insurers – payers.
The PA submission and review process often involves providers scrambling to gather patient-specific medical information including a summary of the patient's condition and treatment history. The submissions are typically manual, with phone calls, or faxed paperwork going back and forth between providers and insurers. And during the PA review period, a patient's medical care is often delayed - for days or even weeks, if the treatment, test, or medication requires PA before insurance will pay for it.
Dr. Elizabeth Ofili, a practicing cardiologist and founder of Health 360x, a platform supporting healthcare institutions with clinical research, shared that: 'in one case, after many hours of my time and staff time, we were unable to convince the health plan that a 55 year old man, with significant risks for heart disease should receive a recommended heart catheterization. After many visits to see me with complaints of chest pains and an inconclusive nuclear scan, he was eventually approved for the test, which showed severe heart blockage in his main artery – and this type of blockage is actually called the 'widow maker' because it can lead to sudden death.' Indeed, 29% of physicians report that PA has led to a serious adverse event for a patient in their care, according to the 2024 American Medical Association (AMA) Prior Authorization Survey.
Beyond the potentially catastrophic consequences for patient care and wellbeing, the PA process places an immense amount of financial strain on healthcare institutions and, by extension, patients. According to a 2023 CAQH Report, the cost of manual prior authorization administration for providers was $1.05 billion annually. In addition, when medical care is provided before a PA is approved, which is sometimes necessary in urgent or ambiguous cases, providers are often forced to absorb the full cost if the claim is later denied, which can lead to thousands of dollars per patient — which are subsequently passed on to patients in the form of unexpected medical bills.
Plenful's belief is that in many instances, the health information necessary to satisfy PA is available though perhaps not easily accessible. And so the platform is designed to find and extract required information from various sources of medical records.
Plenful's Dashboard for Prior Authorization
Courtesy of Plenful
Liu explained: 'There's so much disparate data that exists in all these organizations. Whether it's a fax, a messy Excel spreadsheet or pulling from one of their existing electronic medical records or other systems, we've built a very robust machine learning stack to wrangle those data sources.' After submission, the platform assists with tracking the status of each PA request and flagging any follow-up actions needed from providers in a dashboard interface.
Now another key use case for Plenful is 340B compliance because the 340B Drug Pricing Program is big business in healthcare — to the tune of $54 billion, and is actually quite complex. Launched in 1992, as a safety net program to help support cash-strapped healthcare institutions serving medicaid patients (termed, 'covered entities'), the 340B program allows for price arbitrage – where healthcare institutions buy prescription drugs from pharmaceutical manufacturers at a discounted price and get reimbursed by insurance companies, or payers at the market price – and the savings goes to support lower-cost medication and medical care for low-income and uninsured patients, in theory. It's the 'Robin hood principle' in action.
The eligibility criteria has evolved since the program's inception due to both policy changes and industry consolidation, and so too the number of participating institutions. For example, in 2010 the Affordable Care Act added Critical Access Hospitals, Rural Referral Centers, Sole Community Hospitals, and Free-Standing Cancer Hospitals to the program. Around the same time the agency that administers the 340B program – the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) expanded coverage to the outpatient clinics and pharmacies attached to existing hospitals; in addition, covered entities were permitted to contract with multiple retail pharmacies to dispense 340B drugs, further extending the universe of 340B participants. While there were fewer than 1,000 covered entities in 1994 — mostly public hospitals, community health centers, and clinics receiving federal funding, today there are over 50,000 covered entities eligible for the 340B Program.
Chart Tracking Growth of 340B Entities
Author Generated
With billions of dollars of discounted drugs flowing to healthcare institutions, alarm bells have been ringing, especially from drug manufacturers, about a lack of transparency and accountability in the administration of the program, and a misallocation of the cost savings away from the intended recipients - lower income patients. On the other hand, healthcare institutions insist that the intent of the program is being honored, with 340B savings being reinvested in community health services, free clinics, charity care, uncompensated care, and patient access initiatives. Some healthcare executives admit the program has veered from its original intent, but assert that healthcare organizations operate at 'razor thin margins', struggling to make ends meet due to being underpaid for services by payers, and '340B savings fills the gap'. In either case, the pressure placed upon healthcare institutions to tighten up their 340B programs has increased, in line with the enhanced scrutiny of the program.
LLM Field Extraction Illustration
Courtesy of Plenful
Enter Plenful, which performs compliance audits to ensure adherence to the HRSA rules and manufacturer terms, checking for things such as site eligibility and unlawful duplicate discounts (receiving a 340B discount and then submitting a Medicaid claim for the same drug). At the same time, the platform is able to review prescriptions or treatments that were originally assumed ineligible for 340B discounts — and uncover hidden savings by identifying eligible claims that manual processes might have missed. As a point of clarification, although institutions purchase drugs at a 340B discount, they often determine after the fact which prescriptions meet the full eligibility criteria based on data pulled across different systems – EHRs, pharmacy dispensing systems and medical billing platforms. Liu shared that in one instance, 'after two months of working with a system, we identified $1.2 million of additional 340B savings. It was really exciting to see that kind of output.'
Addressing the controversy around 340B, Liu noted that given the macro environment and increased scrutiny from both manufacturers and payer groups, the operational complexity and burdens have just increased on healthcare providers, so having a platform like Plenful which offers more transparency has really resonated. 'We're all about transparency and data harmony.'
The fact that healthcare in America is a broken system is an often cited but less understood reality. Beneath the surface of every delayed treatment and rising hospital bill lies a maze of outdated, manual back office processes and workflows that drain both financial and human resources. Plenful is not trying to reinvent clinical care — it's aiming to modernize the infrastructure beneath it. By automating some of the most time-consuming and error-prone workflows, from prior authorizations to 340B compliance, the company is unlocking real savings for institutions and giving frontline staff something increasingly scarce: time to focus on patients.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DoorDash purchases hospitality tech company SevenRooms
DoorDash purchases hospitality tech company SevenRooms

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DoorDash purchases hospitality tech company SevenRooms

Online food ordering and delivery platform DoorDash has concluded the acquisition of the hospitality software provider SevenRooms. The US-based food delivery company states that the deal will bolster in-store sales, customer relationships and profitability for merchants by adding SevenRooms' CRM, reservations and guest experience tools to the DoorDash commerce platform. In May 2025, DoorDash agreed to acquire New York City-based SevenRooms for $1.2bn and UK competitor Deliveroo for £2.9bn ($3.8bn). SevenRooms will benefit from DoorDash's scale, resources and global reach. The company's leadership will join DoorDash to further develop its offerings. DoorDash vice-president of strategy and operations Parisa Sadrzadeh stated: 'We're building a platform that makes it easier for local businesses to grow — whether that's through delivery, pickup, reservations or in-person hospitality.' 'These capabilities reflect DoorDash's focus on empowering local businesses to deepen their relationships with customers, however they choose to connect - whether that's going out, ordering in or engaging through a merchant's own online stores. With SevenRooms, we will be able to keep supporting an open, partner-friendly ecosystem.' SevenRooms co-founder and head Joel Montaniel stated: 'We're excited to accelerate our mission to help hospitality operators around the world understand their guests, build deeper relationships and grow their businesses sustainably.' 'Together with DoorDash, we're providing restaurants and hospitality businesses with the tools to own their guest experience, grow their customer base and thrive both inside and outside their four walls. With shared core values, we're energised for our shared future as we bring continued innovation to market faster through a merchant-centric approach.' The acquisition comes shortly after DoorDash purchases ad tech startup Symbiosys for $175m, aimed at expanding its offsite advertising capabilities. Symbiosys offers a self-serve platform that allows advertisers to launch campaigns across channels including search, social, and display, while leveraging DoorDash's closed-loop measurement system. "DoorDash purchases hospitality tech company SevenRooms" was originally created and published by Verdict Food Service, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Almarai to buy bottled-water producer Pure Beverages
Almarai to buy bottled-water producer Pure Beverages

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Almarai to buy bottled-water producer Pure Beverages

Saudi Arabian food and beverage group Almarai has agreed to acquire local bottled-water business Pure Beverages Industry Company for SR1.04 ($277m). In a stock-exchange filing yesterday (15 June), Almarai said the deal is in line with its 'growth strategy to expand its beverage portfolio and enhance its consumer offerings'. Almarai, which sells dairy and juice products under its namesake brand, added it is 'confident that this acquisition will create value for its shareholders'. Headquartered in Riyadh, Pure Beverages Industry Company owns the Ival and Oska brands, with factories in Riyadh, Jeddah and Dammam. According to its website, Pure Beverages Industry Company was set up by Saudi conglomerate Ajlan & Bros. Group in 1979. Almarai plans to finance the acquisition through its internal cash flows, with the completion of the transaction subject to contractual conditions and regulatory approvals in Saudi Arabia. The deal follows Almarai's recent unsuccessful attempt earlier this year to acquire Jordan-based Hammoudeh Food Industries. In March, Almarai said the deal could not proceed 'due to factors beyond the company's control, as the seller was unable to meet certain conditions required to complete the transaction'. Almarai added it is 'open to exploring future expansion opportunities, recognising the strategic importance of strengthening regional operations and expanding geographically to serve consumers in various markets'. The group operates in dairy, poultry, bakery, infant-nutrition, and juice sectors. In 2024, Almarai generated revenue of SR20.98bn, up from SR19.58bn in 2023. Operating profit stood at just under SR3bn, versus SR2.69bn a year earlier. Net profit was SR2.31bn, against SR2.05 the year previous. According to GlobalData, Just Drinks' parent, the size of Saudi Arabia's packaged water market in volume terms was 3.88bn litres last year. The data and analytics group forecasts growth of 3.9% this year to 4.03bn litres. In March, Berain Water, another Saudi bottled-water business, attracted a new investor. Hassana Investment Company acquired a 40% stake in Berain from Rajhi-Invest. Berain has three production plants in Jeddah and Riyadh, and markets bottled water in multiple size options. "Almarai to buy bottled-water producer Pure Beverages" was originally created and published by Just Drinks, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

US pharma bets big on China to snap up potential blockbuster drugs
US pharma bets big on China to snap up potential blockbuster drugs

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US pharma bets big on China to snap up potential blockbuster drugs

By Sriparna Roy and Sneha S K (Reuters) -U.S. drugmakers are licensing molecules from China for potential new medicines at an accelerating pace, according to new data, betting they can turn upfront payments of as little as $80 million into multibillion-dollar treatments. Through June, U.S. drugmakers have signed 14 deals potentially worth $18.3 billion to license drugs from China-based companies. That compares with just two such deals in the year-earlier period, according to data from GlobalData provided exclusively to Reuters. That increased pace is expected to continue as U.S. drugmakers look to rebuild pipelines of future products to replace $200 billion worth of medicines that will lose patent protection by the end of the decade, analysts, investors, a banker and a drug company executive told Reuters. "They are finding very high-quality assets coming out of China and at prices that are much more affordable relative to perhaps the equivalent type of product that they might find in the United States," said Mizuho analyst Graig Suvannavejh. The total cost of licensing agreements, including low upfront payments and subsequent larger payouts, averaged $84.8 billion in the U.S., compared with $31.3 billion in China over the past five years, according to GlobalData. A licensing agreement grants a company the rights to develop, manufacture, and commercialize another company's pharmaceutical products or technologies in exchange for future target-based, or "milestone", payments while mitigating development risks. China's share of global drug development is now nearly 30%, while the U.S. share of the world's research and development has slipped 1% to about 48%, according to pharmaceutical data provider Citeline's report in March. Chinese companies have licensed experimental drugs to U.S. drugmakers that could be used for obesity, heart disease and cancer, reflecting abundant Chinese government investment in pharmaceutical and biotech research and development. While small molecules, like oral drugs, have been the most commonly licensed, there has been a notable shift toward novel treatments such as targeted cancer therapies and first-in-class medicines, Jefferies analysts said in a note in May. "Chinese biotechs are moving up the value chain by the day. They are... challenging their Western peers," said Macquarie Capital analyst Tony Ren. The growth is happening even as the U.S. and China have wrangled over tariffs and U.S. President Donald Trump pushes a made in America agenda. That has cut into traditional mergers and acquisitions, which are down 20%, with only 50 such transactions so far this year, according to data from database. Roughly a third of the assets that large pharmaceutical companies licensed in 2024 were from China, said Brian Gleason, head of biotech investment banking at Raymond James, who estimated such licensing deals would increase to between 40% and 50%. "I think it's only accelerating," Gleason said. The Trump administration is currently doing a national security investigation as it weighs if it will impose tariffs on the pharmaceutical sector. But one healthcare analyst said licensing deals should continue because the yet to be marketed products are not impacted by tariffs. "The law that gives the president the right to impose tariffs applies to goods. It explicitly excludes intellectual property," said Tim Opler, managing director in Stifel's global healthcare group. In May, Pfizer spent $1.25 billion upfront for the right to license an experimental cancer drug from China's 3SBio. That is the largest such deal this year and could be worth up to $6 billion in payments to 3SBio if the drug is successful. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals in June paid $80 million upfront in a potential $2 billion deal for an experimental obesity drug from China's Hansoh Pharmaceuticals. 'WAKEUP CALL' By licensing a drug in development, U.S. and European drugmakers get very quick access to a molecule which would take them longer and cost more to discover or design themselves, analysts say. U.S.-based drug developer Nuvation Bio bought AnHeart Therapeutics in 2024, gaining access to the China-based company's experimental cancer drug taletrectinib, which received U.S. approval last week. "We consider our presence in China not only a great avenue for R&D, but we also view it as an inside track on obtaining further assets to grow our company further and find new and better therapies to offer patients," Nuvation CEO David Hung told Reuters. What makes China attractive, said EY analyst Arda Ural, "a fraction of the cost and then multiples of time." Analysts have pointed to large drugmakers strategically securing rights to drugs at lower cost and running efficient early-stage trials in China to obtain important data, paving the way for global trials and potential earlier market entry. "It's a little bit of a wakeup call to our industry," said Chen Yu, Managing Partner at U.S.-based healthcare investment firm TCGX.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store