logo
‘Hope food was good': Shashi Tharoor invokes ‘Osama episode' on Donald Trump lunching with Pakistan's Asim Munir

‘Hope food was good': Shashi Tharoor invokes ‘Osama episode' on Donald Trump lunching with Pakistan's Asim Munir

Mint5 hours ago

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has weighed in on the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir, expressing hope that the discussions included pointed reminders about Pakistan's alleged role in terrorism.
'I hope the food was good and he gets some food for thought in the process', the Congress MP remarked sarcastically adding, 'People in the US could not have forgotten the Osama episode so quickly'.
Harping on India's tough stance against terrorism and its foster home Pakistan, Tharoor said, 'I hope that in these interactions, the Americans reminded Pakistan of not enabling, guiding, training, arming, financing, equipping, and dispatching terrorists to our country from their soil.'
Reminding people of the way Pakistan's Bilawal Bhutto was shut down repeatedly in US, Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor said, 'Some American Senators and Congressmen who met the Pakistani delegation did do this.'
US President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir for a private luncheon at the White House, marking a rare high-level engagement between the two nations' military leadership.
The unprecedented meeting risked worsening a disagreement with India over the president's claim that he stopped last month's conflict between the nuclear-armed South Asian foes.
The meeting, held on June 18, centred on discussions about regional security challenges, counterterrorism efforts, and the evolving geopolitical dynamics in South Asia.
The lunch meeting was the first time a US president had hosted the head of Pakistan's army, widely regarded as the most powerful figure in the country, at the White House unaccompanied by senior Pakistani civilian officials.
While the official agenda of Trump-Munir talks remained confidential, the luncheon was seen as an attempt by Washington to maintain open channels with Pakistan's military establishment, even as concerns about terrorism and cross-border militancy persist.
The meeting lasted over an hour and included senior US defence and diplomatic officials, underscoring the strategic importance Washington places on its relationship with Pakistan's military leadership.
Donald Trump said he was honoured to meet Asim Munir and that they had discussed Iran, which he said Pakistan knew better than most. Trump told reporters he had thanked Munir for ending the war with India, for which he also praised Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who he spoke to on Tuesday night.
"Two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war; that could have been a nuclear war," Trump told reporters.
Shashi Tharoor invoked the 'Osama episode' to underline the gravity of Pakistan's past actions in harbouring terrorists.
Tharoor noted, 'People in the US could not have forgotten the Osama episode so quickly.'
The reference alludes to the decade-long hunt for Osama bin Laden, who was found hiding in a safe house near a Pakistani Army camp in Abbottabad. 'Pakistan's culpability in hiding this man until he was finally found... cannot easily be forgotten and forgiven by the Americans,' Tharoor added.
Osama bin Laden, founder of the terrorist group al-Qaeda, masterminded the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, which involved hijacking four commercial airplanes and crashing them into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania.
These coordinated attacks killed nearly 3,000 people and marked the deadliest terrorist incident on American soil, prompting the US to launch the War on Terror. After nearly a decade in hiding, bin Laden was located and killed by US special forces in a 2011 raid in Pakistan.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Despite China's ambitions, renminbi in no position to topple dollar
Despite China's ambitions, renminbi in no position to topple dollar

Business Standard

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Despite China's ambitions, renminbi in no position to topple dollar

The Donald Trump administration is pushing the United States (US) into uncharted territory in so many ways that it's difficult to gauge where and how things will eventually settle Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai Listen to This Article People's Bank of China Governor Pan Gongsheng on Wednesday made a strong pitch for a multipolar international monetary system and warned against excessive reliance on a single currency. The message clearly is to shift away from the dollar-denominated global financial system. China has been consistently trying to project the renminbi (RMB) as an international currency. Six foreign banks announced on Wednesday that they would use China's Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, an alternative to the SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) payment system. In principle, there is merit in the argument that the world should not rely on one currency

TikTok Up And Running In US For 90 More Days As Donald Trump Extends Sale Deadline
TikTok Up And Running In US For 90 More Days As Donald Trump Extends Sale Deadline

News18

time33 minutes ago

  • News18

TikTok Up And Running In US For 90 More Days As Donald Trump Extends Sale Deadline

Donald Trump signed an executive order granting a third extension for the Chinese company to sell its platform. US President Donald Trump signed an executive order granting Chinese tech giant ByteDance an additional 90 days to sell TikTok to an American owner, extending the deadline to September 17, 2025. The move marks the third such extension for the app. 'I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025). Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Donald Trump posted on Truth Social. Earlier the US President said he believed Chinese President Xi Jinping would be open to approving a deal that allows the short-form video app to continue operating in the United States. 'I think he'll go along with it," Donald Trump said, suggesting a final agreement may require sign-off from Beijing, where TikTok's parent company ByteDance is headquartered. What White House Has Said On TikTok Ban? The White House emphasized that the extension is aimed at avoiding service disruption for TikTok's roughly 170 million US users. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, 'President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark. This extension will last 90 days, which the administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure." Donald Trump vs TikTok TikTok has consistently denied posing any security risk to the United States, asserting that American user data is not stored in China. After the initial ban, Donald Trump issued a 75-day deadline for TikTok's parent company ByteDance to find an American buyer, which expired on April 5. In the days leading up to the deadline, several suitors emerged including Amazon, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian, AI startup Perplexity AI and Steven Mnuchin. As no deal was finalized, Donald Trump granted another 90-day extension. About the Author Mallika Soni First Published: June 19, 2025, 21:31 IST

BCI hits back at Society of Indian Law Firms over foreign law firm rules
BCI hits back at Society of Indian Law Firms over foreign law firm rules

The Hindu

time34 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

BCI hits back at Society of Indian Law Firms over foreign law firm rules

The Bar Council of India (BCI) on Thursday (June 19, 2025) pushed back against criticism from the Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF), the apex body of law firms in India, over its recent move to let foreign lawyers and law firms work in India in a limited capacity. Responding to SILF's public statements, the BCI — the regulatory authority for the legal profession — said the group does not speak for most Indian law firms, especially smaller and newer ones. 'It (SILF) functions primarily as a closed group dominated by a few large, well-established firms. Its stance and actions do not reflect the concerns or aspirations of more than 90% of India's smaller or emerging law firms,' BCI said. Also read: India warms to foreign law firms, but legal concerns simmer In May 2025, the BCI introduced a notification permitting foreign lawyers to function in non-litigious areas only. BCI said the decision was 'based on extensive consultations and overwhelmingly positive feedback from Indian law firms across the country'. 'Contrary to the misleading claims being circulated, these rules do not allow foreign lawyers to practice Indian law, litigate in Indian courts, or appear before any Indian tribunal or statutory authority,' it said. The rules restrict foreign law firms and lawyers strictly to advisory roles in non-litigious matters involving foreign law, international law, or international commercial arbitration, all subject to regulatory oversight and a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Government of India. Committee set up BCI said it has already constituted a high-level committee chaired by Cyril Shroff and comprising senior partners from leading law firms, who have been tasked with reviewing the rules and incorporating feedback from stakeholders, including SILF. The council has also resolved to individually engage with law firms nationwide and are working to convene a national-level conference of Indian law firms in Mumbai this September. 'Old win in new bottle' While speaking to The Hindu last month, SILF chairman Lalit Bhasin while welcoming the entry of foreign law firms and lawyers in India raised a few legal concerns. Mr. Bhasin said the BCI's move might go against a 2018 Supreme Court ruling. While the earlier 2023 BCI notification was put on hold, he said that the latest notification feels like 'old wine in a new bottle'. He also suggested that Parliament should step in and amend the law to avoid confusion. On the other hand, the BCI targeted SILF saying it has 'historically acted to preserve its members commercial interests at the expense of young, deserving Indian lawyers and new legal practices striving to grow in an increasingly competitive and global legal arena'. BCI alleged that many of the firms comprising SILF have maintained 'close, long-standing professional affiliations with major foreign law firms'. 'These affiliations have enabled a parallel legal services economy, wherein foreign legal work is funnelled through select Indian firms. This has systematically denied fair opportunities to the vast majority of Indian legal practitioners,' it said. It also stated that SILF has, for over 20 years, opposed any serious engagement with foreign firms — hurting Indian law firms that want to grow internationally.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store