Chinese student who drugged and raped 10 women in UK and China sentenced to life in prison
A serial rapist who was convicted of raping 10 women in the United Kingdom and China has been jailed for life with a minimum term of 24 years.
Zhenhao Zou, 28, was sentenced Thursday at Inner London Crown Court. Judge Rosina Cottage told him he would serve 22 years and 227 days before he was eligible for parole, taking into account time spent on remand, according to the UK's PA Media.
Zou was found guilty in March of 11 counts of rape, one count of false imprisonment, three counts of voyeurism and a number of other offenses, including the possession of extreme pornographic images and the possession of a controlled drug with intent to commit a sexual offense.
Many of his victims were 'unconscious and rendered defenseless' after being drugged, according to prosecutors.
Related article
UK police fear serial rapist may have had more than 50 other victims as more women come forward
Police and prosecutors said Zou, who also used the name 'Pakho' online, contacted students of Chinese heritage on WeChat and dating apps, inviting them to his apartments in London and China to drug and assault them. The police said he also took items from his victims, including jewelry and clothing.
The UK's Crown Prosecution Service said Zou filmed some of the attacks using a mobile device and hidden cameras. The police said he 'manipulated and drugged women in order to prey on them in the most cowardly way.'
Zou was a PhD student at University College London. He was arrested in January 2024 after one of his victims came forward to police.
Prosecutors in March said that the 'courageous women who came forward to report Zhenhao Zou's heinous crimes' had been 'incredibly strong and brave' and that there was 'no doubt' that their evidence had led to his convictions.
Ivana Kottasová contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Family remembers daughter who died in 2021 crash as DUI case approaches end
HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (WHNT) — A mother who has waited years for justice after her daughter was killed in a 2021 crash by an accused drunk driver says a chapter is closing on the case. 24-year-old Hannah Parton and 47-year-old Arlene Velasquez were killed in the crash. 'We love you': Family of missing Albertville teen desperate for answers 'You know, she just was that soft-natured young lady that wanted everyone to do well,' Sheila Smith said about her daughter Hannah. Smith said the families waited almost a year to see movement in the case. In October 2022, Jacob Stephens was charged with reckless murder and driving under the influence. 'It's easy to get bitter,' Smith said. 'It's easy to feel like you're being ignored. It's just hard. You know, losing Hannah was hard enough. It's still so hard.' Stephens is set to go to trial next week, but it is possible he will never appear in front of a jury. Smith said the District Attorney's Office told her Stephens is expected to take a plea deal. 📲 to stay updated on the go. 📧 to have news sent to your inbox. 'I've also done a lot of research in three and a half years waiting for justice, and I feel like it's probably the best outcome,' Smith said. Smith said no amount of prison time Stephens could serve would bring her daughter back. After years of grief, she wants to find a sense of normalcy in her life, living each day for Hannah. 'A lot has been lifted after three and a half years of complete chaos and uncertainty,' Smith said. 'Heartbreak. The continued heartbreak. Yeah, it's nice to finally be able to put it to a close.' The Madison County District Attorney's Office told News 19 that plea discussions have focused on Stephens serving 30 years in prison. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil is released after spending over three months at a Louisiana detention center
Mahmoud Khalil – a Palestinian activist at the center of a long-running deportation fight – has been released from the Louisiana ICE detention center where he has spent more than three months after he was arrested outside his apartment on Columbia University's campus, his attorneys said. Wearing a keffiyeh – a scarf seen as a symbol of Palestinian identity and resistance – a grinning Khalil pumped his fists as he walked out of the detention center Friday evening with one of his attorneys. Since March, he had been detained at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in the rural town of Jena, Louisiana. 'Although justice prevailed but it's long, very long overdue, and this shouldn't have taken three months,' Khalil told reporters outside the detention center, adding he couldn't wait to reunite with his wife and newborn son. Judge Michael Farbiarz ordered Khalil's release on bail Friday after finding he is not a flight risk or a danger to public safety. The judge said it's 'highly unusual' to be seeking his detention at this point. The judge also cited several 'extraordinary circumstances' in Khalil's case that led him to order his release, including 'that there is a due process violative effort to punish' the Columbia University graduate who played a central role in negotiations on behalf of pro-Palestinian student protesters last year. Khalil 'is not a flight risk, and the evidence that has been presented to me at least is that he is not a danger to the community, period, full stop,' Farbiarz said. Khalil, a lawful permanent resident who is married to a US citizen and has not been charged with a crime, was one of the first arrestees in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown targeting student activism. As his case dragged on for over 100 days, several other student activists targeted for deportation by the Trump administration were released. Khalil said he is leaving behind immigrants still in detention who are 'in a place where they shouldn't have been.' 'The Trump administration are doing their best to dehumanize everyone here,' he said. 'Whether you are a US citizen, an immigrant or just a person on this land, doesn't mean that you are less of a human.' Khalil's wife, Noor Abdalla, said in a statement that she can 'breathe a sigh of relief' knowing that Khalil will be reunited with his family after missing the birth of his first child during months of detention at a facility over 1,000 miles away. Judge Farbiarz previously ruled the government can't hold Khalil on the premise that his presence in the country is against the national interest, and on Friday found that Khalil doesn't need to be detained based on a second allegation against him that he failed to give required information in his application to become a legal permanent resident of the US. 'It's overwhelmingly unlikely, I found, that a lawful permanent resident would be detained on the remaining available charge' of failing to accurately fill out an immigration application, the judge said during Friday's hearing. At the hearing, Khalil's attorneys argued that the court should allow him to be released on bail or transferred to a detention center closer to his wife and newborn son. They said the chilling effect of his detention has made it an 'extraordinary case.' 'I'm aware, of my 20 years of representing immigrants, of no other case where the government announced the day that it detained someone that they were detaining them in order to send a message that their arrest would be the first of many, that they were going after student protesters,' Khalil's attorney Alina Das argued before the court. The federal government requested to temporarily halt Khalil's release, which the judge denied Friday. 'The court concluded there's no reason he should continue to be detained given the serious harms that are happening, the chill that is happening to his speech and other people's speech as a result of his detention,' one of his attorneys Baher Azmy told CNN Friday. In response to the ruling, the Department of Homeland Security said that 'The Trump Administration acted well within its statutory and constitutional authority to detain Khalil.' As the case played out in immigration and federal courts, the administration has argued that Khalil should be deported because his presence in the United States threatens the administration's foreign policy goal of combatting antisemitism. His lawyers contended that he was targeted for his pro-Palestinian views in violation of his constitutional rights. 'There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish the petitioner. And of course, that would be unconstitutional,' Farbiarz said Friday. As part of his release conditions, Khalil's lawyers were required to surrender his passport to immigration authorities in Louisiana and he was prohibited from traveling internationally, limiting travel to a handful of states. The government was ordered to provide Khalil his green card and a copy of his passport, allowing him to board a plane home to New York Friday. Khalil will however not have to report to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement in New York, Magistrate Judge Michael Hammer ordered. Though he's been released, Khalil's immigration proceedings will continue. Azmy, Khalil's attorney, said the legal team learned immigration Judge Jamee Comans in Louisiana separately reaffirmed her removability ruling an hour into Friday's hearing. Khalil's lawyers will appeal her decision through immigration court – a long process his lawyers say will be easier now that he is out of detention. 'I'm confident that on appeal, we will prevail,' Johnny Sinodis, one of Khalil's attorneys, told CNN's Laura Coates Friday, noting Khalil's insistence throughout court proceedings that he 'committed no misrepresentation, no fraud' during his green card application. Khalil's wife said the ruling doesn't begin to address the injustices their family has been through but said she's 'celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family, and the community that has supported us since the day he was unjustly taken for speaking out for Palestinian freedom.' The ruling comes exactly one week after Farbiarz ruled Khalil can remain in detention. After the judge said the government could no longer hold Khalil on the premise that his presence in the country is against the national interest, attorneys for the Department of Justice said the judge's decision did not prevent them from continuing to hold Khalil on a second claim – that he failed to give required information in his application to become a legal permanent resident of the US. The judge ruled last week that the administration's interpretation of his order is correct, keeping Khalil in detention. Khalil's attorneys at the time accused the administration of using 'cruel, transparent delay tactics' to keep Khalil in custody. Azmy on Friday said the charges still pending that Khalil made misrepresentations on his green card application are 'baseless' and will be litigated. When asked if Khalil will continue to protest when released, Azmy said: 'He's a peace activist, he's an international human rights activist, and he's Palestinian, and I don't expect he will ever stop advocating for justice for Palestinian people and an end to their continued slaughter and starvation.' This story has been updated with additional information. CNN's Gloria Pazmino contributed to this report.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jurors see more texts between Cassie and Diddy as prosecutors prepare to rest case
Diddy's trial was abbreviated this week. The proceedings were effectively canceled Wednesday after a juror called in sick, and federal court wasn't in session Thursday in observance of the Juneteenth holiday. But this morning, all the key players returned to the courtroom to hear testimony from one of the rapper's former personal assistants. Here's what you need to know about Day 27 of the trial: Brendan Paul testified about the demands of his job as one of Diddy's former assistants. He told jurors he once went without sleep for three days. He recalled being asked to buy thousands of dollars' worth of drugs. He said the music mogul didn't take 'no' for an answer and compared his staff assistants to the U.S. military's SEAL Team 6. Paul, facing cross-examination from defense attorney Brian Steel, agreed that Diddy's ex-girlfriend 'Jane' did not seem hesitant or apprehensive before 'freak offs.' Paul said Jane appeared to be a willing participant in the sexual encounters — contradicting her testimony and the government's narrative. U.S. government prosecutors walked jurors through text messages from Cassie Ventura to Diddy. In one text, Ventura said she didn't deserve to be beaten by him. 'That's not love, that's possession,' Ventura wrote, apparently referencing the 2016 hotel assault recorded on video. The defense again attempted to portray 'freak offs' as consensual encounters. They entered into evidence a March 2017 text message in which Ventura wrote: 'I love our FO's, when we both want it.' Diddy, wearing a white sweater and black pants, appeared engaged in today's testimony. He seemed to pay close attention to prosecutor Maurene Comey as she questioned U.S. government summary witness Joseph Cerciello, a special agent with the Department of Homeland Security. Paul, the ex-assistant, struck an ambiguous note as he concluded testimony for the day. When asked by prosecutor Christy Slavik how he feels about Diddy today, Paul replied with two cryptic words: 'It's complicated.' Cerciello, the Homeland Security special agent, testified about charts of evidence compiled by prosecutors to confirm they correspond to thousands of pages of records, including text messages. Diddy will almost surely not testify. But it doesn't really matter. That's because in a modern criminal case — especially a federal criminal case — prosecutors can get witnesses and defendants' 'testimony' in front of the jury without them ever taking the stand. Combing through thousands of pages of text messages is something at which special agents and federal prosecutors excel. It doesn't matter that a single text message or a short series of messages could be taken out of context. Prosecutors will introduce it and add their own context. After all, if the defendant thinks these statements are misleading, he can take the stand and dispute them, right? Except, most of the time, the defendant does not take the stand. In this case so far, the star witnesses have arguably not been the humans. They have been things like text messages, financial records and other documents. For some reason, people have always put things in text messages as though they could never become public. We're all guilty of that, too. All of us are likely part of a text message 'group' with our friends or family where we say things that, if publicly revealed, would cause us a lot of problems. Certainly for Diddy, these texts have caused him a lot of problems — arguably more than the people who testified against him. U.S. government prosecutors are expected to rest their case on Monday. Diddy's defense team has signaled it will need around two days to present its case. If that rough timeline holds, closing arguments could take place Thursday. PSA: Every night during Diddy's trial, NBC's 'Dateline' will drop special episodes of the 'True Crime Weekly' podcast to get you up to speed. 'Dateline' correspondent Andrea Canning chats with NBC News' Chloe Melas and special guests — right in front of the courthouse. Listen here. This article was originally published on
