North Dakota House passes bill to shorten time for educators to attain lifetime licensure
Jan. 27—BISMARCK — A bill that would reduce the time it takes for a North Dakota teacher to earn a lifetime educator license passed through the House by a substantial margin Friday, Jan. 24.
Representatives voted 79-12 to advance
House Bill 1238,
sponsored in part by Rep. Zachary Ista, D-Grand Forks.
The House Education Committee unanimously recommended the bill for passage Thursday, though the bill received mixed reviews among education circles during a hearing Tuesday.
The bill would make a teacher eligible for a lifetime license when reaching 20 years in their career, instead of the current 30-year mark.
Anyone with a lifetime license who intends to keep teaching shall report to the state's licensing agency, the Education Standards and Practices Board, at least once every five years, the bill states.
Reporting could include any crime a teacher committed or other behavior that could lead to license revocation or suspension.
Nothing in the bill would prevent the board from taking its own action against a teacher's lifetime license, if warranted.
The bill is a holdover from the last legislative session, Ista said, during which it received widespread support in the House but failed on a tie vote in the Senate, with one member absent.
One thing that is different this time is the reporting element, he said, which was a sticking point last time with ESPB.
Much of the support for HB 1238 comes in the name of improving recruitment and retention of teachers.
Ista said the bill would reduce continuing education expenses for teachers, estimating the average educator could save up to $1,000 in out-of-pocket expenses.
Also testifying in support Tuesday was Nick Archuleta, president of North Dakota United, the union representing public education and public services employees in the state.
Archuleta said some opponents maintain the bill would cause teachers to stop taking educational credits they might otherwise have earned.
"Not only is that argument a slight to the professionalism of teachers, it also discounts entirely the fact that teachers ... have to take coursework to make lane changes and advance on the salary schedule," he said.
Testifying in opposition of House Bill 1238 were representatives from the state Education Standards and Practices Board.
Executive Director Rebecca Pitkin said most states require continuing education for license renewal.
"Teachers are the model of lifelong learning. Ongoing education, potentially until almost the end of a career, is critical," she said.
Pitkin also said reducing ongoing education requirements for teachers would not promote the profession.
Cory Steiner, ESPB chair and superintendent of the Northern Cass School District, agreed.
"There could be unintended consequences, seeing education as 'less than' other fields, where it should be equal to or more than," he said.
Pitkin said there are currently around 18,000 licensed educators in the state system, with around 10,000 of them currently working.
Providing neutral testimony was Ann Ellefson, director of academic support at the North Dakota Department of Public Instruction.
Ellefson said the state's teachers have easy access to an online educational hub offering professional development, training opportunities and educator resources.
Many of the courses are no cost or low cost across all North Dakota zip codes, she said, while some do charge a nominal $40 fee at registration.
There are 557 active users taking part in 68 courses that include child nutrition, North Dakota Native American studies, science of reading, mathematics and educator ethics, Ellefson said.
On the House floor Friday, Rep. LaurieBeth Hager, a Fargo Democrat and cosponsor of the bill, said the legislation would reduce red tape for teachers.
Rep. Pat Heinert, R-Bismarck, said Friday the goal of the bill is to keep teachers in the profession.
Further action on the bill was not scheduled as of Friday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
37 minutes ago
- Politico
Troops deployed to LA will cost $134M, Pentagon official says
President Donald Trump's decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles amid mass deportation protests will likely cost $134 million, the Pentagon's budget chief told lawmakers. Acting Pentagon comptroller Bryn MacDonnell, testifying at a House budget hearing on Tuesday alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, said the estimate covers costs such as travel, housing and food. Trump has ordered 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to assist law enforcement with the protests, although California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have said they are not needed. Hegseth sparred with Democrats during the hearing in defense of the deployment, arguing Newsom and Bass, both Democrats, mishandled the situation.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Senate Republican questions megabill deadline — and says Musk ‘missed an opportunity' to shape it
Utah Republican Sen. John Curtis raised doubts on Tuesday the GOP could pass its megabill by its self-imposed Independence Day deadline. Curtis, speaking at the POLITICO Energy Summit in Washington, said, 'I think a lot of us would be surprised if it passed by July 4.' He added: 'I think that's a false deadline. I don't think that we need to put a specific deadline on it. Let's get it right.' Curtis, who has been pushing for specific changes to the House-passed tax cut, energy and security spending budget bill, said the package would unfairly phase out tax credits from the Democrats' 2022 climate law. He said the rollbacks could harm energy workers and the economy. 'I think that banks, the investors have invested billions of dollars based on the rules of the road, and you have employees who have set careers based on these things,' he said. 'And if they're to go, and I do think some of them should go. … Let's just be thoughtful in how we phase them out,' Curtis said. 'Let's not destroy careers and things like that.' As an example, Curtis said he's pushing for changes to the construction start date language. The senator's comments come as colleagues hash out details over contentious matters including renewable energy incentives, Medicaid changes and other provisions. The comments by Curtis, a relative moderate, underscore how difficult it could be for President Donald Trump and congressional leaders to get all Republicans in line before July. Asked if Elon Musk's recent opposition to the megabill because of deficit concerns could upend the effort, Curtis downplayed the billionaire's influence among Republican senators and suggested he does not appreciate how slowly government operates. 'If he would stop and slow down and realize the way Washington works, because what he does with a business is very different in the culture and everything is so different than what we do in Washington, D.C.,' Curtis said, adding, 'There's a lot we could learn from him and vice versa.' Curtis also said he was unsure exactly why Musk hates the bill. 'I'm a U.S. senator voting on this bill, and I don't know why he hates it. You can see how he's missed an opportunity.' More broadly, Curtis suggested Democrats were partly to blame for demonizing the fossil fuel industry — leading to Trump having an 'overreaction' on energy policy and rhetoric. 'I think what you're sensing is an overreaction to the demonizing that we've had of fossil fuels and how they should be 100 percent eliminated, and perhaps what you're seeing is simply a reaction to that to say, 'Wait a minute.'' Curtis said the reality is that energy demand for the coming decades will require renewables and fossil fuels as well as emerging technologies. 'I believe for us to get to our energy future, we're going to need 100 percent of everything,' he said.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Mike Johnson says Newsom should be "tarred and feathered"
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) declined to say Tuesday whether he believes California Gov. Gavin Newsom should be arrested — but he did say that the Democrat should be "tarred and feathered." Why it matters: President Trump and White House border czar Tom Homan have both floated the idea of arresting California officials — including Newsom — for allegedly impeding deportations. "I would do it if I were Tom. I think it's great," Trump said on Monday. "I like Gavin Newsom. He's a nice guy. But he's grossly incompetent." Newsom has pushed back by daring Homan to arrest him, saying Sunday: "Come after me, arrest me, let's just get it over with tough guy. I don't give a damn." What he's saying: Johnson at a House Republican leadership press conference on Tuesday morning said the question of whether Newsom should be arrested is "not my lane." "I'm not going to give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested," the speaker continued. "But he ought to be tarred and feathered, I'll say that." "He's standing in the way of the administration of carrying out of federal law. He is applauding the bad guys and standing in the way of the good guys. He is a participant, an accomplice," Johnson said. A Newsom spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Between the lines: The comments come amid a growing clash between Democrats and Republicans on how to handle a wave of recent protests in Los Angeles against Trump's deportation campaign.
