
Your biggest career move? Choosing a spouse or partner
If your boss ever invites you and your spouse to a
work
party, do you accept immediately, confident your charming, supportive partner will boost your standing in the office?
Or do you automatically turn down the invitation, knowing there is a high chance your loud-mouthed, prickly other half will be an embarrassing blight on proceedings and your career?
Lucky you if you can answer yes to the first question. You have won one of life's great lotteries by acquiring a vital, yet under-appreciated asset: a partner who makes working life easier rather than harder.
I thought about this the other day as I was reading When The Going Was Good, the recent
memoir by former Vanity Fair magazine editor Graydon Carter
. It ends with a list of life advice that includes what Carter thinks are the essential ingredients to look for in a mate, namely someone who is Fisk: funny, interesting, smart and kind.
READ MORE
He's right. These traits are hugely important and not to be taken for granted in corporate life.
Over the years, I have come across a non-trivial number of people who have succeeded despite their actively disagreeable spouses.
As it happens, I have ended up with a partner drenched in Fisk qualities, a sentence I would type even if he did not read almost everything I write.
I had not realised quite how fortunate this makes me until this week, when I spoke to an academic who has spent years studying career advancement.
'For women with high ambition, you must find a partner who will support your career,' says Anna Carmella Ocampo of Spain's Esade business school. 'Otherwise, the evidence is clear: just stay single.'
This is partly because women are still stuck with what Ocampo calls the double bind of pressure to be a perfect partner and parent, as well as a perfect worker. For those overloaded with family responsibilities who can't afford childcare and other home help, something often gives, like a career.
This pressure is pernicious, even for the brightest budding female leaders. A 2017 paper by three economists who studied the behaviour of students in an elite MBA programme in the US revealed this in bracing detail.
The research showed single, female students dialled down open displays of career ambition if they thought they were being watched by their male counterparts – and potential future partners – rather than by other women.
The single women participated 'much less' in class than married women and, when asked for their job preferences, said they would work fewer hours, travel less and get paid less if they expected their classmates to see their answers. If they thought their answers would stay relatively private, they responded in the same way as non-single women.
Employees with emotionally competent spouses had as much as 26 per cent more of the traits that bosses value
But women are not the only ones who stand to gain a lot from a career-supporting spouse.
A paper Ocampo published this year suggests there are sizeable benefits for men and employers too. The study looks at something psychologists think is a big factor in success at work, so-called 'emotion regulation ability', or the way people manage their own and others' feelings.
Existing research has focused on the way that high levels of this type of emotional competence can make you better at certain jobs, more valuable in teams and, crucially, more desirable to bosses.
But a worker can gain a lot from having a spouse with the emotional ability to boost their resilience, confidence and general capacity to navigate the world of work, Ocampo and her co-authors found.
Employees with emotionally competent spouses had as much as 26 per cent more of the traits that bosses value, compared with those with less helpful partners, the study showed.
[
Gen Z is leading the charge back to the office
Opens in new window
]
Importantly, that competence was drained if such spouses were burdened with family demands, meaning it is in both employees' and employers' interests if workers have the time and flexibility to help share domestic chores.
It might seem obvious that a happy home life makes for a happier and therefore more productive work life. But that is far from the case in many workplaces, where domestic life can often be regarded as at best irrelevant, and at worst an irksome distraction.
The bottom line is, do your best to find a full-Fisk partner. And then find a job with the flexibility to let you help them stay that way. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Are WhatsApp adverts the tip of an iceberg?
When Meta bought WhatsApp back in 2014, there were widespread predictions that the company, then known as Facebook, would start selling ads. It has taken 11 years, but it seems that the doomsayers have finally been proven right. Sort of. From this week, WhatsApp users will start to see advertising in the app, but not inside their private chats. Instead, Meta is concentrating on the Updates tab – the tab you accidentally click on once in a blue moon, where all those channels you signed up to in a fit of enthusiasm months ago are gradually building up unread updates. [ Meta introduces advertising to WhatsApp in push for new revenues Opens in new window ] There are a couple of ways that Meta is finally making advert money from the app. First, there are the subscriptions, where users can pay a fee for exclusive content in channels. READ MORE Business can also pay Meta a fee to promote their channels or buy adverts in the Status section, potentially hitting up to 1.5 billion pairs of eyeballs. Assuming that people are paying attention, of course. This is not the first time that Meta has put out the idea of adverts in WhatsApp. Back in 2020, the company was said to have plans to integrate advertising into the Status feature. However, it dropped the plans and disbanded the team that had been working on it. Only weeks later, a global pandemic shut down business activity across the world. Meta must have been kicking itself for letting a captive audience slide away unmonetised at a time when everyone was glued to their screens because there was little else to keep them entertained. Will rent reform make building apartments viable? Listen | 40:12 The fact that WhatsApp has managed to get to this point without some form of advertising shoehorned in there is probably more notable. Its founders, Jan Koum and Brian Acton, once proclaimed they would never sell advertising and Koum reportedly kept a note from Acton that proclaimed, 'No ads, no games, no gimmicks'. A decade is a long time in the tech world, though, and given that they both exited the company by 2018, that promise couldn't have been relied on. As soon as they sold the company to Meta, its days were numbered. But encryption and targeted advertising are not easy bedfellows, posing a real challenge for Meta in how it could make money from the app without the usual flow of data it requires. For now, it is using basic data – country of location, language and so on. It is more complex if users have linked their WhatsApp to other Meta platforms, such as Facebook and Instagram. The real question is: what comes next?


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
My apartment's management continues to delay fixing our window. What can we do?
I am seeking your assistance in highlighting a serious consumer-affairs issue regarding a long-standing failure to address a health and safety hazard in my apartment. Since reporting a dangerously loose window to the management agency, late last year, I have been met with delay after delay, despite repeated follow-ups. While I was initially told a contractor would be consulted, no meaningful action has been taken, and I have been forced to arrange my own temporary fixes. Each storm exacerbates the issue, yet the management company has failed to provide a clear resolution. This is not the first instance of neglect – last year, a leak in my second bedroom took 10 months to be addressed. This situation has caused my wife and me considerable stress, and I have now sought legal advice. I believe this type of mismanagement affects many property owners, and I would appreciate your help in bringing attention to it. What would you advise a homeowner to do in this situation? A consumer-affairs issue normally relates to an issue with a product or service that a consumer has purchased. The relationship between an owner and their management company may not constitute a consumer-affairs issue given that the owner is a member of the management company and is eligible to become a director of the management company. This would give them the power to ensure that the management company properly fulfils its obligations to all owners, such as proper maintenance of the building. I note that while you describe the broken window as a health and safety hazard, you don't detail the exact circumstances. In addition, the nature of the water leak which was resolved by the management company would be important to understand because each water leak is different and will require different remedies and periods of time to resolve. Notwithstanding these information gaps, I will consider the two issues you raise in general terms. READ MORE In a multi-unit development, the windows generally form part of the structure of the building and in this regard are in the ownership of the owners' management company (OMC). When there is an issue with the window it is therefore the responsibility of the OMC to have the issue addressed. Similarly, when a water leak occurs into an apartment, and is coming through the common areas, the OMC must ensure that the water leak is stopped. The cost of repairs may form part of a water damage claim on the buildings insurance policy. With regard to the loose window, there are two main ways that an owner can address such situations. Obtaining legal advice and seeking a legal remedy is one route but I believe the most effective route would be for the owner to become part of the solution. The operations of an OMC are based on the principle of collective responsibility, whereby all owners are members. As such, all owners have a responsibility to their OMC to get involved in the running of the company either formally, by becoming a director, or informally by being a member of the residents' committee. [ Can a telecoms provider install cables in my garden – even though I'm not their customer? Opens in new window ] The best-run OMCs and apartment blocks are the ones where the owners themselves are engaged and involved in the running of their OMC. A high level of understanding and acceptance of responsibility by owners means they have more control over the OMC's decision making and can ensure better outcomes for all concerned. As always with OMCs, proactive and constructive engagement by owners is always more productive than criticising from the sidelines. Aisling Keenan is a property managing agent, consultant and an associate member of the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland Do you have a query? Email propertyquestions@ This column is a readers' service. The content of the Property Clinic is provided for general information only. It is not intended as advice on which readers should rely. Professional or specialist advice should be obtained before persons take or refrain from any action on the basis of the content. The Irish Times and it contributors will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on any content.


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The agony and the equity: Most stocks fall more than 50% at some point
Stock-picking isn't just hard, it's a blood sport. It's not just that picking winners is hard, according to recent research by Morgan Stanley's Michael Mauboussin. Avoiding losers is almost impossible. From 1985 to 2024, the median US stock suffered a maximum drawdown of 85 per cent. This isn't a tale of meme stocks or speculative bubbles. It's the norm. If you had bought a typical stock at its peak, you would have lost most of your money. Almost all stocks – 93 per cent – got cut in half at some stage. READ MORE Even the market's most dazzling performers were no strangers to despair. Amazon fell 95 per cent during the dot-com bust. Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia all endured drawdowns exceeding 80 per cent. Overall, the best stocks suffered an average maximum drawdown of 72 per cent. Nor does time heal all wounds: more than half of stocks never regain prior highs. Those that do recover take a median of 2.5 years. Warren Buffett's former sidekick Charlie Munger once said if you're not prepared to see your holdings fall 50 per cent more than once a decade, you're not fit to be a shareholder. Mauboussin's data suggests he was being optimistic.