Bloomberg Law:ICE Arrests Activist & Law Firm Targeted
Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight and former head of the Office of Immigration Litigation in the Obama administration, discusses federal immigration officers arresting a Palestinian activist, who is a permanent US resident, because of his role in the student protests at Columbia. David Lopez, a professor at Rutgers Law School and the General Counsel of the EEOC during the Obama administration, discusses Trump's attack on law firms and DEI policies. June Grasso hosts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Karine Jean-Pierre abandons Dems after years fiercely defending Biden policies
Former Biden-era White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre abruptly left the Democratic Party in her rear-view mirror, announcing in June that she had become an Independent after spending more than two years as President Joe Biden's top spokesperson and defender. "Our country has become obsessed with blind loyalty to a two-party democratic system. In her new book, timed for publication just one year after the 2024 election, Karine Jean-Pierre shares why Americans must begin to look beyond party lines and why she chose to embrace life as an Independent," a press release announcing Jean-Pierre's upcoming book, "Independent," stated while revealing that the former spox had ditched the Democratic Party. "Jean-Pierre didn't come to her decision to be an Independent lightly, she has served two American presidents, Obama and Biden. . . . She takes us through the three weeks that led to Biden's abandoning his bid for a second term and the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision," the press release continued. Fox News Digital took a look back at Jean-Pierre's history as press secretary – which spanned from May 13, 2022, until January 20, 2025 – including the most partisan stances and statements she made in defense of the administration as the immigration crisis spiraled to new highs, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the administration embraced transgender issues, and the White House's heated rhetoric aimed at President Donald Trump ahead of the 2024 election. Former Biden Officials Ridicule Karine Jean-pierre's Book As 'Bizarre Cash Grab' "We are not finishing a wall. We are cleaning up the mess that the prior administration made. We are trying to save lives. This is what the prior administration left behind that we are now cleaning up," Jean-Pierre declared from the White House briefing room's podium in July of 2022, as the Biden administration said it would not continue work on the Trump administration's border wall. Read On The Fox News App "A border wall is an ineffective use of taxpayer dollars, so it's ineffective," she added. Months later, as Title 42, a Trump-era policy that allowed U.S. officials to turn away migrants who came to the U.S.-Mexico border because of health concerns was set to expire, Jean-Pierre argued, "It would be wrong to think that the border is open. It is not open." Biden-era White House Reporters Express Disbelief On Karine Jean-pierre's Sudden Party Switch Critics at the time slammed the press secretary over the comment, calling the comment a "bold-faced lie" as migrants were seen coming across the border with little consequences. The Biden administration was in power when the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision effectively ending the recognition of abortion as a constitutional right in the Dobbs v. Jackson decision in June of 2022, with Jean-Pierre calling the ruling "extreme." "When the Supreme Court made that extreme decision on Dobbs, it really put a lot of families and women's lives at risk," she said during a press conference in July of 2022. Karine Jean-pierre Switches Affiliation To Independent, Releasing New Book About 'Broken' Biden White House The Biden White House frequently celebrated LGBTQ holidays during its four years, including fiercely defending transgender issues and policies that the Trump administration has since ended. "Tomorrow is Trans Visibility Day," Jean-Pierre said during a March 2023 press conference slamming Republicans who put forth legislation that aimed to keep biological boys out of girls' sports and end transgender surgeries for minors. "On a day that we should be lifting up our trans kids and our trans youth and making sure that they feel seen, we're seen more and more of these hateful, hateful bills." "We've been very clear about these anti-LGBTQ bills that we're seeing in state legislatures across the country, in particular these anti-trans bills, as they attack trans kids, as they attack trans parents. It is shameful, and it is unacceptable," she added. In the months leading up to Election Day, Trump faced two separate assassination attempts, including one in Butler, Pennsylvania, during a campaign rally in July that left him with an injury to the side of his head after a bullet whizzed towards him, and another in September when a man attempted to kill Trump while he played golf in Florida. "It's been only two days since somebody allegedly tried to kill Donald Trump again, and you're here at the podium in the White House briefing room calling him a threat," Fox News' Peter Doocy pressed during a news conference in September of 2024. "How many more assassination attempts on Donald Trump until the president and the vice president and you pick a different word to describe Trump other than 'threat'?" Then-Vice President Kamala Harris and Biden had both repeatedly claimed that "Democracy is on the ballot" last year amid Trump's re-election campaign. While the White House, Biden and Harris additionally described Trump as a "threat" to democracy, Fox Digital previously extensively reported. Biden Book Author Reveals How White House Staff Truly Felt About Karine Jean-pierre As Press Secretary Jean-Pierre exhaled in a sign of disapproval before answering: "Peter, if anything, from this administration, I actually completely disagree with the premise of your question, the question that you're asking. It is also incredibly dangerous in the way that you are asking it, because American people are watching. And to say that, when you start bringing political rhetoric. . . . That is not okay." "There are people watching at home who might miss the part where you say, let's lower the temperature. And there are mentally unstable people who are attempting to kill political candidates, attempting to kill Donald Trump. And they are still hearing this White House refer to him as a threat. Is there no concern?" Doocy continued in the press conference. "We're using examples. We're not just saying that just to say it," Jean-Pierre article source: Karine Jean-Pierre abandons Dems after years fiercely defending Biden policies
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump's 'big beautiful bill' would end EV subsidies: Could this kill Tesla?
Trump's 'big beautiful bill' would end EV subsidies: Could this kill Tesla? Show Caption Hide Caption Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' aims at cutting EV tax credits President Donald Trump's tax bill includes a measure to kill an Obama-era electric vehicle tax credit. Billionaire Elon Musk is fighting to make sure federal tax incentives for electric vehicles (EVs) -- a key subsidy that makes buying EVs more affordable -- remain in place. President Donald Trump's new bill seeks to eliminate these tax incentives, which would otherwise be in place until 2032. Musk's company Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has already seen sales struggle to grow across many key geographies. Deliveries last quarter fell by 32% quarter over quarter, and by 13% year over year. Could the elimination of EV tax credits be a lethal blow to the struggling automaker? You might be surprised by the answer. Is Tesla struggling financially? When it comes to potential regulation "killing" an operating business like Tesla, the first thing investors must consider is the effect on sales growth. Already, demand growth has been stagnating for Tesla. And while the company has teased new potential revenue sources like its robotaxi venture, there aren't many high-visibility milestones ahead that will meaningfully boost revenue over the next year or two. Analysts expect the company to refresh its existing lineup, but details are scarce on releasing any brand new models in 2025 or 2026. Even if a new model is released, it's unlikely that production will scale meaningfully over the next 12 to 24 months. Is Tesla coming out with a new model soon? Where does this leave Tesla over the near term? In the same position it is in today, attempting to stoke demand for an increasingly stale lineup. Making the company's vehicles $4,000 to $7,500 more expensive -- the range of federal incentives that Trump is proposing to eliminate -- could ultimately accelerate sales declines for Tesla. Any potential demand boost from releasing a more affordable Model Y or Model 3, meanwhile, could be completely offset by eliminated tax credits, resulting in minimal net savings for customers. In return, Tesla may need to compress its profit margins in order to keep demand growth on track. Does Tesla have a lot cash on hand? Fortunately, Tesla has the capital to withstand a multiyear stagnation in sales growth. It has $16 billion in cash and equivalents on the books, more than every other competitor. Its profit margins are also positive -- a rarity in the EV world -- meaning it can afford to cut profits a bit without going into the red. It should be mentioned, though, that Tesla has also relied on selling automotive regulator credits -- earned by selling carbon-free vehicles -- to maintain profitability. The company earned $595 million last quarter by selling these credits versus a net income of $409 million. But most of this "free" income from selling credits comes from states like California and New York, as well as incentive programs in the E.U., making them unlikely to be cut should U.S. federal incentives change. Still, Tesla's biggest advantage is its $1 trillion market cap. Tesla could easily double the cash levels on its balance sheet while diluting shareholders by just 1% to 2%. This makes it very unlikely for the company to go under anytime soon. In fact, the elimination of EV tax credits could be a secret win for Tesla. Eliminating EV tax credits could actually help Tesla Many investors might be surprised to learn that ExxonMobil wishes for a carbon tax to be implemented. A carbon tax would make its output more expensive to buyers, potentially limiting demand. But if production costs rise, it's possible that many small competitors can't compete, leaving more of the market for well-capitalized behemoths like Exxon. The same may prove true for Tesla. Most of its EV competition comes from unprofitable companies with minimal room for error like Rivian and Lucid Group. These EV makers are roughly 99% smaller than Tesla, with limited ability to tap the market for more capital at will. The elimination of EV tax credits would hurt them more than Tesla, potentially leaving more long-term market share for Musk and his investors. Of course, the immediate effect will be negative for Tesla and the rest of the industry. But it should be stressed that bills are not laws. The EV tax credit may end up in place until 2032 like previously planned. But the elimination of these subsidies certainly won't "kill" Tesla. In fact, there's an argument that it could be a long-term advantage due to lessened competition. Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Offer from the Motley Fool: Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $368,190 !* if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $37,294 !* if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $653,702!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you joinStock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
‘Never again' must also mean ‘Not in my name'
At this moment, the world is witnessing the mass killing and starvation of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Western governments, especially in Europe and North America, continue to provide military, political, and economic support to the Israeli government responsible for this devastation. While some rhetoric has recently shifted — with growing condemnation of Israel's conduct — material support, including arms shipments and intelligence sharing, persists. To Jews around the world, this should be profoundly alarming. The phrase 'never again' emerged from the ashes of the Holocaust, a moral declaration rooted in Jewish suffering. Today, that phrase risks losing its universal meaning. When governments tolerate ethnic cleansing, rationalize the killing of children, and remain silent in the face of state-sanctioned cruelty — all while claiming to uphold Jewish safety — it not only endangers Palestinians but also erodes the moral credibility of those invoking that principle. Western support for Israel's current leadership may be softening in tone, but not in substance. Despite growing public criticism, there are still no arms embargoes, financial sanctions, or diplomatic consequences imposed on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government. This inaction stems from unresolved historical guilt, political calculations, and fear of accusations of antisemitism. But verbal disapproval without accountability amounts to complicity. If I were Jewish, I would be deeply disturbed. If this horror is justified once, what's to stop it from happening again? And who might be the next victims? Many of us believed the 21st century would be defined by shared humanity and the hard lessons of history. Yet Netanyahu and his extremist allies have taken the region in the opposite direction. Over two decades, he has tried to dismantle any realistic path to a two-state solution, empowered Hamas by weakening Palestinian moderates, and misled not only his own citizens but also the international community. These were not policy missteps. They were deliberate decisions to consolidate personal power at the expense of peace. If Israelis are serious about defeating Hamas, they must also confront those who empowered it — Netanyahu chief among them. His divide-and-rule strategy fragmented Palestinians, allowing Israel to claim there was 'no partner for peace.' That cynicism only deepened the crisis. In 2016, I wrote about how Israel could contribute to Saudi Vision 2030. I envisioned a future of integration and cooperation. But such integration must be rooted in justice. A viable Palestinian state is not an obstacle to peace — it is its foundation. Just days ago, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan met in Amman with his Jordanian, Egyptian, Bahraini, and Palestinian counterparts to coordinate efforts to end the war and revive a two-state solution. Israel refused to allow that meeting to take place in Ramallah — a decision that reflects the current Israeli government's contempt for diplomacy. Netanyahu, Defense Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir have adopted a zero-sum strategy that endangers both regional stability and Israel's own long-term security. Saudi Arabia and its Arab partners remain firmly committed to a just and lasting peace. Today, 147 countries recognize the State of Palestine. Last year, Norway, Spain, and Ireland joined them. France and others may soon follow. These efforts seek to end the cycle of violence and build peace on two essential pillars: Palestinian statehood and Israeli security. Netanyahu argues that a two-state solution would threaten Israel. The opposite is true. It is the only credible path to peace — precisely why it is opposed by both Netanyahu and Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei. These two strange bedfellows are united in their desire to kill the two-state dream. In fact, one of Netanyahu's major goals has been to rebrand the two-state solution as the 'two-state delusion' — a slogan designed to undermine both hope and diplomacy. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has expressed a bold vision: 'I don't want to leave this world before seeing the Middle East transformed into a leading global region — into the new Europe.' That cannot happen without a just resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. If Saudi Arabia normalizes ties with Israel, more than 50 Muslim-majority countries could follow. The resulting trade, diplomacy, and development could be historic. But that vision must include dignity, statehood, and justice for Palestinians. Jewish communities in the West should be disturbed if their governments support Netanyahu's regime. Instead, let us unite two essential principles: 'Never again' and 'Not in my name.' Together, they reject genocide and collective punishment while affirming justice and humanity. The world is waking up. Consciences are stirring. It's not too late to stand on the right side of history. Salman Al-Ansari is an writer and researcher based in Saudi Arabia.
