Welsh government disability plan accused of lacking measurable targets
Plans to improve the lives of disabled people have been criticised for lacking measurable targets.The Disabled People's Right Plan aims to give people more rights across a range of areas in Wales.But critics have said much of the detail could fall off the agenda, especially after a new government is elected next year.The Welsh government said short-term recommendations from a disability rights taskforce had been "turned into actions" while longer-term aims will help guide future governments towards its "10-year vision".
Ministers have been working on the taskforce for the past four years, which has included disabled people and groups which represent them.It produced more the 300 recommendations for reform in areas such as social care, employment, housing and travel, in a plan that stretches over the next 10 years.But some who took part have said the recommendations have not been incorporated in the document sent out for consultation.
Rhian Davies, chief executive of Disability Wales, said it was "very frustrating"."The taskforce was set up by the [then First Minister] Mark Drakeford in November 2021, but because of the complexity and number of barriers that disabled people face in society, crossing every policy area, it is a complex task engaging so many people," she said. "We would have wanted to see the plan out much sooner so there was a very real chance of progress on some of the recommendations and the actions, so that the next government would have been further ahead on delivery."Ms Davies added: "I think disabled people deserve that."
Prof Debbie Foster co-chaired the taskforce and said she was concerned the plan could end up gathering dust if politicians from all parties do not commit to it."I'm really very worried," she said. "I think that the fact that we've been put in this position, that it's come out so late in this political administration, is really a bit depressing."She added that what was created was "very robust and innovative"."It's got the voices of disabled people in it, and we have had a really good civil service to support the whole mechanism of trying to co-produce a task force."I think also, given the wider UK picture with benefit cuts, we need the Welsh government to be coming out, whichever political party is in charge, and assuring disabled people in Wales, that they have a different plan than the current UK government."
The issue was also brought up with the minister responsible by opposition members in the Senedd this week.The chair of the Senedd's all party group on disability, Mark Isherwood MS, asked on behalf of disabled groups how the Welsh government responded to its statement which said many of the long-term objectives lacked firm commitments.He also asked how it intended to ensure continuity and accountability for the longer-term objectives beyond the current administration.The Welsh Conservative politician added there had also been criticism from within the sector that the plan does not have concrete targets, which he said made it impossible to hold the Welsh government to account on progress.
Jane Hutt, the cabinet secretary responsible for the plan, responded: "I think what's important is that this is a comprehensive 10-year plan, which lays out our long-term ambitions and the actions we will take now."She added the plan was also a progress report which set out some of the achievements made so far and the Welsh government's ongoing work to achieve positive outcomes for disabled people.She said: "It is future Senedd government's who will set out the medium to long-term actions that they will take to achieve the ambition and outcomes for disabled people set out in this 10-year plan, but we've started to take forward some of the short-term actions now."We don't have to wait until the next Senedd term to take action to improve outcomes for disabled people."
The Welsh government said it was "committed to creating an inclusive, accessible Wales where disabled people can live free from barriers and discrimination". It added short-term recommendations from the Disability Rights Taskforce had been "turned into actions" while longer-term aims will help guide future governments towards its "10-year vision"."We call on all disabled people and allies to please feed into the plan. This is a plan for now and into the future."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
25 minutes ago
- Sky News
Rachel Reeves turning around UK's finances 'like Steve Jobs did for Apple', claims minister
Rachel Reeves will turn around the economy the way Steve Jobs turned around Apple, a cabinet minister has suggested ahead of the upcoming spending review. Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle compared the chancellor to the late Apple co-founder when asked on Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips where the £86bn for his department is coming from. The package, confirmed ahead of the full spending review next week, will see each region in England granted £500m to spend on science projects of their choice, including research into faster drug treatments. Asked by Trevor Phillips how the government is finding the money, Mr Kyle said: "Rachel raised money in taxes in the autumn, we are now allocating it per department. "But the key thing is we are going to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future. "Just bear in mind that how Apple turned itself around when Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. "Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod. "Now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector... they will create jobs in the future." The spending review is a process used by governments to set departmental budgets for the years ahead. Asked if it will include more detail on who will receive winter fuel payments, Mr Kyle said that issue will be "dealt with in the run-up to the autumn". "This is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years, so you're sort of talking about two separate issues at the moment," he said. 0:42 Scrapping universal winter fuel payments was one of the first things Labour did in government - despite it not being in their manifesto - with minsters saying it was necessary because of the financial "blackhole" left behind by the Tories. But following a long-drawn out backlash, Sir Keir Starmer said last month that the government would extend eligibility, which is now limited to those on pension credit. It is not clear what the new criteria will be, though Ms Reeves has said the changes will come into place before this winter. Mr Kyle also claimed the spending review will see the government invest "the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system". However, he said the chancellor will stick to her self-imposed fiscal rules - which rule out borrowing for day-to-day spending - meaning that while some departments will get extra money, others are likely to face cuts.
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Spending review: Schools to get more funding but police warned to ‘do their bit'
Schools are set to receive a funding boost in the spending review, a Cabinet minister has indicated, as he insisted other public services must 'do their bit' amid concerns about cuts to other budgets. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said the Government will commit to investing 'the most we've ever spent per pupil' next week, but declined to rule out the prospect of a real-terms squeeze on areas such as policing. Facing questions from broadcasters on Sunday about which public services will be prioritised, Mr Kyle said 'every part of our society is struggling' and numerous sectors had asked Chancellor Rachel Reeves for more money. 'On the fact that the police have been writing to the Chancellor, they have,' the Cabinet minister told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme. 'We also have letters from the universities, we have letters from doctors about the health service, we have letters from campaigners for child poverty writing to us, and other aspects of challenges in Britain at the moment. 'Every part of our society is struggling because of the inheritance that we had as a country and as a Government.' He pointed to the £1.1 billion extra funding already earmarked for police this year, warning that public services would be expected to 'do their bit' alongside Government as he defended Ms Reeves' stewardship of the country's finances. 'We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do, to do their bit for change as well. We are doing our bit,' Mr Kyle said. 'You see a Chancellor that is striving to get investment to the key parts of our country that needs it the most… You will see the priorities of this Government reflected in the spending review, which sets the departmental spending into the long term. 'But this is a partnership. Yes, the Treasury needs to find more money for those key priorities, but the people delivering them need to do their bit as well.' The Department of Health is set to be the biggest winner in Ms Reeves' spending review on Wednesday, with the NHS receiving a boost of up to £30 billion at the expense of other public services. Economists have said the expected 2.8% annual increase in its day-to-day budget, which amounts to a rise of about £30 billion by 2028, or £17 billion in real terms, will see other departments squeezed. Speaking on Sunday, Mr Kyle said the schools system, along with an £86 billion funding package for research and development, would be top priorities as the Government seeks to 'invest in the future.' 'You will see in this spending review that we are investing the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system,' he told Sky News. Mr Kyle said Labour was 'absolutely laser-focused' on delivering manifesto pledges amid questions about how competing commitments will be balanced with little room for manoeuvre amid narrow fiscal headroom. Asked about the Government's plan to build 1.5 million new homes by the end of the Parliament, the minister declined to guarantee Housing Secretary Angela Rayner's department would not face cuts. But he added: 'We made a manifesto commitment. We are absolutely laser-focused on delivering that.' He said the Government was also 'on the way' to delivering 13,000 new police officers, another manifesto pledge. Ms Reeves has acknowledged that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding in a sign of the behind-the-scenes wrangling over her spending review. She blamed the former Conservative government's stewardship of the economy rather than her self-imposed fiscal rules, which include a promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. It comes after the Government announced science and technology sectors would receive new funding as part of an £86 billion package set to be confirmed next week. Mr Kyle's Department for Science, Technology and Innovation (DSIT) said the money would help research into new drug treatments and microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The Tories accused Labour of copying their own plans in office over the commitment. Shadow technology secretary Alan Mak said: 'Labour's central budget announcement seems to be a reheat of Conservative plans just showing this Chancellor will copy and paste anyone's ideas to get out of the mess that she's put herself in. 'As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back.'
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Kemi Badenoch says she refuses to meet burka-clad constituents as Tories back allowing bosses to ban female staff from wearing Islamic veils
Kemi Badenoch has revealed she refuses to meet or speak to constituents who cover their faces as she backed allowing bosses to ban female staff from wearing burkas. The Conservative leader said she had a rule at surgeries in her North West Essex constituency that 'you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava'. It came as she backed allowing office managers to bar staff from wearing the traditional Islamic robe for women, which has only a transparent veil allowing them to see. However she stepped back from the idea of a nationwide ban on the garment, saying there were bigger issues when it came to integration. Her remarks came after Reform's chairman Zia Yusuf quit following a row over the subject after his colleague MP Sarah Pochin urged the Prime Minister to ban the burka 'in the interests of public safety'- before rejoining on Saturday night. Her position on burkas appeared to go further than that of shadow home secretary Chris Philp today. He agreed that 'employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not'. But asked if he would also ban face coverings at surgeries in his Croydon South constituency, he said: 'I have in the past spoken to people obviously wearing a burka – I represent a London constituency – but everybody can make their own choices, that's the point she was making, each employer should be able to make their own choices.' Mrs Badenoch said Britain could enforce a ban on burkas but what needs to be addressed are pressing issues around integration. She added that sharia courts and first-cousin marriage are an 'insidious' barrier to integration. She said: 'If you were to ask me where you start with integration – sharia courts, all of this nonsense sectarianism, things like first cousin marriage – there's a whole heap of stuff that is far more insidious and that breeds more problems. 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear.' She added: 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face, and I also believe that other people should have that control. 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear; it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' France is just one of a number of countries that have already banned the burka. But Mrs Badenoch said: 'France has a ban and they have worse problems than we do in this country on integration. So banning the burka clearly is not the thing that's going to fix things.' If employers started to tell staff to remove any religious clothing, they could face legal issues under equality and human rights laws on the grounds they were being discriminating. An organisation would have to demonstrate its ban was for a legitimate reason, such as ensuring health and safety or enabling effective communication.
