
O'Farrell family left with ‘unanswered questions' after minister's apology
The family of a Monaghan cyclist who was killed in a hit-and-run crash almost 14 years ago said they still have 'unanswered' questions' following an apology from the Minister for Justice.
On August 2 2011, law graduate Shane O'Farrell, 23, was cycling home when he was struck by a car in the Carrickmacross area of Co Monaghan.
On Tuesday, Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan announced a review into bail and suspended sentences after he apologised to the family for failures in the criminal justice system that exposed Mr O'Farrell to danger.
The driver of the car, Zigimantas Gridziuska, failed to remain at the scene.
The Lithuanian national had a number of previous convictions including for theft and drugs offences.
The Dail heard that the day he struck Mr O'Farrell, Gridziuska should have been in jail for breaches of bail conditions that were applied to him at the time.
In one instance, the late Judge John O'Hagan had told him that he would be 'going to prison' if he got in trouble again after January 11 2011.
He received multiple convictions after that date, for which he lodged appeals.
He was also serving a number of suspended sentences and there had been numerous warrants for his arrest which had not been executed.
In addition, the Garda Drug Squad stopped the car approximately one hour before the collision and the Dail has previously heard it was observed to be in a dangerous, defective condition, but allowed to continue with Gridziuska as the driver.
Gridziuska was prosecuted in February 2013 for dangerous driving causing Mr O'Farrell's death.
He was acquitted of that charge by direction of the trial judge and, under the law at the time, a lesser charge of careless driving was not open to the jury.
The Dail heard that he has returned to Lithuania.
Mr O'Farrell's family have been calling for a public inquiry into the circumstances of his death and why Gridziuska had not been in jail.
That call was supported by Fianna Fail TD Mr O'Callaghan while he was in opposition.
Mr O'Callaghan, who has since become Minister for Justice, told the Dail in March that he cannot now ignore that a scoping exercise into Mr O'Farrell's death recommended that there should be no further public inquiry.
Delivering an apology to the O'Farrell family in the Dail on Tuesday, he said he did not need a public inquiry to establish the facts in the case or address failings that led to the fatal incident.
He acknowledged that the Dail and Seanad had previously voted to support an inquiry, but added that he did not need one to confront those failings or issue the apology.
Mr O'Callaghan said Mr O'Farrell had his 'whole life ahead of him' and that his 'loss was incalculable'.
He said he could not alleviate the pain felt by the family and added: 'It is incumbent on me as Minister for Justice to apologise to Shane O'Farrell and the O'Farrell family for the fact that the criminal justice system did not protect him as it should have.'
Mr O'Callaghan announced a range of reforms including a review of bail laws and suspended sentences, as well as an amendment to road traffic laws to allow juries to consider a lesser charge of careless driving in instances where a trial judge has directed the acquittal of a person on dangerous driving.
'The legitimate questions that the O'Farrell family have asked are why the persistent breaches of bail conditions by Gridziuska, through the commission of further offences, did not trigger a response under our criminal justice code, and why were consecutive sentences not imposed in respect of the offences he committed whilst on bail, and why warrants that were issued were not executed.'
He added: 'The broader question that needs to be answered is how our criminal justice system should respond to a recidivist offender who persistently breaks summary laws and whether, even if the theft offences had been brought back to the attention of Judge O'Hagan, the Judge would have had the jurisdiction through statutory power to remand Gridziuska in custody.'
The minister also announced plans to memorialise Mr O'Farrell with a Department of Justice-funded scholarship that will be awarded to a student who distinguishes him or herself in the Masters in Law degree at University College Dublin every year.
In a statement, the family said it welcomes the 'long overdue State apology' for the 'catalogue of systemic failures' that led to his death.
His sister Gemma O'Farrell said: 'Today's State apology is significant, and a solemn recognition of the systemic failure that 'exposed Shane to a threat to which he should not have been exposed' and which cost him his life.'
Speaking to reporters outside Leinster House, Shane's sister Hannah said the family is still left with 'unanswered questions' about the circumstances around how Gridziuska was at large at time of the incident.
Shane's mother Lucia O'Farrell said they are still seeking the publication of reports into the matter by the Garda Siochana Ombudsman Commission which have been refused to them, as well as a file on Gridziuska with the Garda National Crime and Security Intelligence Service.
She said: 'Our child lies in a grave – we should be given the answers.
'An apology, yes, it goes so far but we do need answers to our questions – and that doesn't have to be through a long process of an inquiry.'
Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald said the apology was a vindication of the 'courageous and relentless pursuit of truth and justice' by the O'Farrell family.
However, Ms McDonald said no answers had been provided to 'credible allegations' that Gridziuska 'had been operating as a garda informer'.
She also said that the 'bereft family' had been 'forced to battle for more than a decade against a State and a system that should have their backs'.
Ms McDonald said: 'This person was routinely able to flout bail, court orders and custodial sentences.
'He hit and killed a young man with his car – at a time when he should have been in jail.
'The big unanswered question is this: why he was at liberty on the night that he fatally struck Shane with this car?'
Prior to the apology, Taoiseach Micheal Martin and Tanaiste Simon Harris also acknowledged the deep pain, trauma and sense of loss suffered by the family and commended their bravery.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cambridge man jailed for murdering ex-flatmate after passport row
A man who murdered his former flatmate has been jailed for Lakhani, 38, was strangled to death at his home in Greengates Court, Cambridge, in September.A trial at Huntingdon Crown Court was told that he and Jonathon Austin, 23, had argued after Mr Lakhani accused him of stealing his who had moved to a different flat in the complex off Histon Road, was found guilty of murder and was told he must serve a minimum of 16 years before being considered for parole. "You knew exactly what you were doing," said Judge David Farrell."I am sure that you intended to kill him."Judge Farrell said evidence showed that Mr Lakhani had cancer, a history of drug use, and mental health said the victim experienced "mood swings" and could appear pair were living in the same flat when prosecutors said they argued, before Austin attacked showed Mr Lakhani suffered a cardiac arrest after Austin strangled had autism, but Judge Farrell said this did not have a "significant impact" on his "culpability"."You knew how to handle him," the judge told him."You are much bigger, fitter and a younger man."He said Austin had disarmed Mr Lakhani and could have "simply walked out". In a statement read out by a lawyer, Mr Lakhani's mother Chandrika Lakhani said her son's death had a "devastating impact"."No words can truly express the depth of my pain," she said."There is always an empty chair." Austin, who had no previous convictions and is from South Africa, had told police how Mr Lakhani was "often abusive" and behaved said he stopped living with Mr Lakhani a few weeks Nichola Cafferkey, who represented Austin, argued that her client may have thought he had no choice but to defend well as autism he had a background of trauma, she said. A detective who led the investigation said after the hearing said "walking away is always the best option"."There were plenty of opportunities in that flat for Mr Austin to walk away - and he chose not to," said Det Insp Lee Martin."And at one point he said in court that he wanted to stay to be the bigger man." Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Reuters
44 minutes ago
- Reuters
Houston Trial Attorney Will Moye Secures $37.9 Million Verdict in Zero-Offer Case Against 3M, Just One Day After Helping Defeat Texas Tort Reform Bill
HOUSTON, TX, June 6, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- In a victory for Texas plaintiffs and community safety, Will Moye, opens new tab, founding attorney of Moye Law Firm, opens new tab secured a $37.9 million jury verdict Tuesday in a case where 3M offered nothing to settle. The win came just one day after Moye helped defeat Senate Bill 30, opens new tab (SB 30), a controversial tort reform measure, opens new tab aimed at capping civil jury awards and limiting Texans' access to full compensation. 'This was a week where truth prevailed at the Capitol and in the courtroom. We warned the legislature that SB 30 would silence victims and their families. And on Monday, that bill died. On Tuesday, a Harris County jury sent a $37.9 million message that justice still matters in Texas,' Moye said. Moye tried the case alongside Robert Kwok and Ryan Loya of Kwok Daniel, LLP. The jury found 3M and its subsidiary Teledyne Detcon responsible for selling and servicing a gas detection system that catastrophically failed during the January 2020 explosion at Watson Grinding and Manufacturing. The blast killed three people, injured many more, and destroyed hundreds of homes in Houston's Spring Branch neighborhood. Trial evidence showed that a 3M technician had falsely certified the system as operational, despite critical alarms and sensors never being properly connected. Before trial, 3M refused to offer even a nominal settlement. Instead, the company insisted it bore no responsibility and urged the jury to assign all blame to Watson Grinding, which filed for bankruptcy shortly after the explosion. At one point during trial, a 3M attorney asked one of the plaintiffs, a 50-year-old Latina housekeeper whose home and health were destroyed, why she had not 'just driven for Uber' to recover financially. 'That kind of corporate arrogance is exactly why we go to trial. They didn't take the case seriously. Thankfully, the jury did,' Moye said. With five years of pre-judgment interest, the total judgment is expected to exceed $40 million. Frequently Asked Questions Who is Will Moye? Will Moye, opens new tab is a veteran Houston trial attorney with more than two decades of courtroom experience. He previously defended some of the world's largest corporations before founding his own plaintiffs-only law firm in 2024. What is the Watson Grinding explosion case? The January 24, 2020 explosion at Watson Grinding and Manufacturing in Spring Branch killed three people and destroyed a residential neighborhood. Moye helped prove that 3M and Teledyne Detcon failed to properly install or test a gas detection system that could have prevented the blast. What was the verdict? A Harris County jury awarded $37.9 million to five plaintiffs. With pre-judgment interest, the award will exceed $40 million. Why is this verdict significant? The verdict coincided with the death of SB 30, Texas legislation aimed at reducing large jury awards. Will Moye played a direct role in defeating the bill and securing justice for his clients—all in the same week. About Will Moye and Moye Law Firm Will Moye, opens new tab is a courtroom-tested trial attorney with over 25 years of experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants. Before founding Moye Law Firm, opens new tab, he spent his career defending some of the nation's largest energy companies, manufacturers, and insurers, giving him a rare, strategic understanding of how powerful corporations assess and fight legal claims. Today, Moye uses that insider knowledge, opens new tab to fight for individuals and families, opens new tab catastrophically harmed by explosions, workplace safety failures, defective products, and corporate negligence. He has tried high-stakes cases across Texas, from major metropolitan areas like Harris and Travis Counties to smaller rural venues, earning a reputation for tough, strategic, and compassionate advocacy. Moye is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), one of the most prestigious organizations in the legal profession, reserved for experienced trial lawyers who exhibit high personal character, integrity, and proficiency in trial advocacy. He founded Moye Law Firm in 2024. Headquartered in Houston, it is a plaintiffs-only trial firm dedicated exclusively to catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death litigation. The firm's mission is simple: to deliver fearless, strategic, and personalized representation to those whose lives have been shattered by preventable disasters. The firm's attorneys bring over 80 years of combined courtroom experience, including significant backgrounds as former defense counsel for major corporations. Their unique perspectives enables the firm to anticipate defense strategies and build powerful, winning cases on behalf of injured clients. Their primary practice areas include: For more information, visit opens new tab. Media Contact Amanda Orramanda@ ### SOURCE: Moye Law Firm Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Newton Aycliffe man jailed for kidnap and intent to rape teenager
A man who kidnapped a girl with the intention of raping her has been jailed for 11 well as kidnap, Matthew Hindhaugh had also pleaded guilty to assaulting and intentionally strangling the teenager in Crown Court heard that the 22-year-old, of Rowan Place in Newton Aycliffe, had also admitted possessing a samurai sword and making indecent images of children. Durham Police said Hindhaugh claimed he was trying to help the girl who he said had fallen over and hurt her face, but that "overwhelming CCTV evidence and witness statements proved otherwise". The victim said her attacker had punched her in the face before putting his hands over her mouth and telling her to be then forced her into his house and on to his bed where he held her down and started to unzip his described the girl as "quick-thinking" after she told Hindhaugh she would not tell anyone what had happened if he let her then escaped leaving a shoe behind. 'Chastity belt' Det Supt Peter Carr said the victim's bravery was "nothing short of extraordinary"."Not only did her resilience and quick-thinking actions manage to get her to safety, but she managed to prevent Hindhaugh from causing harm to anyone else," he said. "He is an extremely dangerous predator, whose actions were abhorrent that night."When arrested Hindhaugh was wearing a chastity belt which he told officers was to try and stop his sexual admitted eight charges including kidnap with the intention to commit rape, assault causing actual bodily harm and intentional strangulation, all committed on 27 also pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children, including 171 in the most serious category, between May 2015 and September 2024. Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.