logo
Gray whales are dying again off the Pacific Coast. Scientists look at if climate change is to blame

Gray whales are dying again off the Pacific Coast. Scientists look at if climate change is to blame

Yahoo09-04-2025

Dozens of gray whales are dying in Pacific Ocean waters again this year and human-caused climate change may be to blame, scientists say.
At least 70 whales have died since the start of the year along Mexico's Baja California peninsula, marine scientist Dr. Steven Swartz told The Los Angeles Times this week. Swartz's Gray Whale Research in Mexico — an international team of researchers who study the whales in Laguna San Ignacio — have been observing the gentle giants since the 1970s.
He noted that only five mother and calf pairs were identified in Laguna San Ignacio, where wintering whales gather.
'In the winterbreeding and calvinglagoons ofBaja California, however, counts of female calf pairs were the lowest recorded since our abundance surveys in these winter aggregation and breeding areas began in 2006, suggesting a major decline in the reproductive capacity of this population in recent years during the unusual mortality event,' an annual report from his group said.
Swartz's findings regarding gray whale mortality and reproduction come as several gray whales have recently died in the San Francisco Bay Area during their migration north toward Alaska and their Arctic feeding grounds. One of the whales was described by the Marine Mammal Center as emaciated.
Notably, the number of whale strandings tends to increase as whales head north in March and May, according to the California Academy of Sciences.
The recent strandings also follow an unusual mortality event that was declared in 2019, with hundreds of the Eastern North Pacific Gray Whales beached themselves along the U.S. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said whale autopsies found nutrition to be a common cause of death. But, the cause of the deaths was never definitively established and the investigation was closed in 2023 as the number of strandings fell. Past research published that year found that previous mass deaths may have been tied to Arctic sea ice loss.
Last winter saw the lowest levels on record for Arctic winter sea ice. Sea ice cover can block whales' paths, but a loss of sea ice that hosts algae the whales' eat could be to blame for population hits, Joshua Stewart, an associate professor at Oregon State University and the author of that study, told The Independent.
'It doesn't feel like too much of a mystery to me,' he said of the recent gray whale deaths, adding they are linked to migratory patterns.
The whales journey some 6,000 miles along the Pacific Coast to the Arctic where they feed in the shallow basin and the seafloor. They're specifically looking for small crustaceans that live in the sediment. However, the health of those ecosystems is dictated by algae that grow on the underside of sea ice.
When the algae dies, it sinks and reintroduces nutrients to the seafloor. The fertilized ecosystems attract migratory species from all over the world. But if the algae don't make it to the sea floor, thanks to the ice melting earlier, its nutrients are released closer to the surface. Ultimately, there's less food for the gray whales.
'And, those Arctic ecosystems are some of the fastest-warming ecosystem on the planet and they're experiencing really profound changes right now — major regime shifts that are moving away from that benthic productivity to more water column productivity, which could be good for some other whale species, but seems to be extremely bad for gray whales,' he explained.
Gray whales have been much less impacted by human effects such as vessel strikes than other large whale species, Stewart noted, pointing out that federal research is critical to understanding all factors that affect the nearly 50-foot-long creatures.
'So, it seems like almost all of the population fluctuations are being driven by conditions on their feeding grounds in the Arctic. And, some of that is natural variability,' he said.
While gray whales are adaptable and have lived through previous climatic changes — although nothing as rapid as the current changes — Stewart said that there has been a 'reproductive failure' and a decline in abundance since 2019. Skinny whales stop investing energy in reproduction, and birth rates drop severely.
'We have exceptionally low reproductive rates every year for the last six years now. And, that's the difference here, is that this effect is lingering. It's not a short-term variability that we've seen in these previous mortality events. This time, it's consistent. The population has continued to decline. The birth rates haven't recovered. Whales are still skinny, and I think that that's a reflection of really dramatic regime shifts in those Arctic feed grounds, which just means there's not enough food to support as many gray whales as we had five or 10 years ago,' he said.
Stewart said the status of gray whales is a 'harbinger' of what's to come for marine species.
'In my view, at this point, we're seeing the effects of climate change on some of these big, charismatic, economically important, culturally important species that we as a society value quite a bit and which we're going to have to deal with massive declines as a result of our actions,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mercury from centuries-old pollution still circulating in oceans, study finds
Mercury from centuries-old pollution still circulating in oceans, study finds

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Mercury from centuries-old pollution still circulating in oceans, study finds

Toxins released by long-extinguished fossil fuel fires and gold smelters are showing up in the bodies of Arctic wildlife, according to new research pointing to mercury released by pollution hundreds of years ago still circulating in ocean currents. A paper published Thursday in Nature Communications sought to untangle a paradox: why levels of the potent neurotoxin mercury in Arctic whales and polar bears are increasing — despite steps the world has taken to curb mercury pollution. Those levels are now 20 to 30 times higher in Arctic wildlife than they were before the industrial era began, even as global mercury pollution has fallen since the 1970s. 'We've monitored mercury in Arctic animals for over 40 years. Despite declining global emissions since the 1970s, we see no corresponding decrease in Arctic concentrations — on the contrary,' coauthor Rune Dietz of Aarhus University, said in a statement. The researchers' conclusion: mercury released by pollution hundreds of years ago is still circulating in ocean currents, which convey it up to the Arctic. The findings come amid reports that the Trump administration is seeking to overturn rules limiting the release of mercury from U.S. power plants — a step that reverses a long campaign to slow its accumulation in the atmosphere. If these U.S. changes take place, the findings suggest, they will continue to contaminate the environment well into the 2300s. Mercury — particularly forms that have been processed by bacteria — wreaks havoc on the brain and body, disrupting the ability of humans and animals to move, sense and think. While a global effort has been successful in cutting levels of mercury in the atmosphere, Thursday's findings point to a mystery: Levels of the toxin in the muscle and tissue of top predators like seals and polar bears are still going up. In addition to being released into the environment from burning fossil fuels, mercury is also used to purify gold extracted in small-scale or wildcat mining — a practice that is still common in the world's forests, but has significantly decreased from its 19th Century peak. In gold rushes like those in 1850s California or the modern Amazon, miners used mercury to bind together gold together from a slurry of dirt and ore, and then burn it off to leave pure gold — sending the mercury into the atmosphere. From there, mercury rains down onto the land and flows into lakes and rivers, where bacteria break it down — as well as into the oceans, where that breakdown can take as much as 300 years. The same quality that lets mercury pull together gold flakes gives it an insidious role in the environment because animals cannot easily purge it from their bodies. That means mercury levels concentrate in the bodies of top predators — whether bears or humans. The long duration of mercury in oceans gives it time to make its own epic journey from 19th Century smelters to the modern Arctic, the scientists found. 'Transport of mercury from major sources like China to Greenland via ocean currents can take up to 150 years,' Dietz said. 'This helps explain the lack of decline in Arctic mercury levels.' Though China is working to phase out mercury mining and pollution from coal, the findings suggest a long lag time. Even if mercury pollution continues to decrease, the scientists projected, its levels will continue to go up in the Arctic. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Study: Centuries-old mercury pollution threatens Arctic wildlife
Study: Centuries-old mercury pollution threatens Arctic wildlife

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Study: Centuries-old mercury pollution threatens Arctic wildlife

June 12 (UPI) -- Mercury concentrations in Arctic wildlife are on the rise despite reductions in mercury release, according to a new study published Thursday. Researchers from Aarhus University and the University of Copenhagen found that ocean currents may be transporting centuries-old mercury pollution to the Arctic, the study published in the journal Nature Communications said. "We've monitored mercury in Arctic animals for over 40 years. Despite declining global emissions since the 1970s, we see no corresponding decrease in Arctic concentrations -- on the contrary," said Professor Rune Dietz from Aarhus University said in a statement. Mercury from coal combustion and gold mining can remain in the air for about a year but when it enters the ocean, it can stay for 300 years. Researchers have looked at more than 700 environmental samples from animals across Greenland over the past 40 years which has led them to identify regional differences that go alongside current patterns. "These isotope signatures act like fingerprints, revealing the sources and transport pathways of mercury," Senior Researcher Jens Sondergaard from Aarhus University explained. Mercury disrupts the normal function of nervous systems in polar bears and toothed whales. The concentrations are higher by 20-30 times before industrialization. It creates serious health risks to native marine mammals. "Transport of mercury from major sources like China to Greenland via ocean currents can take up to 150 years," said Rune Dietz. "This helps explain the lack of decline in Arctic mercury levels." The "GreenPath" project team is continuing its work on the study of mercury pollution across the Arctic.

Study: Centuries-old mercury pollution threatens Arctic wildlife
Study: Centuries-old mercury pollution threatens Arctic wildlife

UPI

time19 hours ago

  • UPI

Study: Centuries-old mercury pollution threatens Arctic wildlife

A new study published shows that despite reductions in mercury release, mercury concentrations in Arctic wildlife continue to rise. Photo by Bill Greenblatt/UPI | License Photo June 12 (UPI) -- Mercury concentrations in Arctic wildlife are on the rise despite reductions in mercury release, according to a new study published Thursday. Researchers from Aarhus University and the University of Copenhagen found that ocean currents may be transporting centuries-old mercury pollution to the Arctic, the study published in the journal Nature Communications said. "We've monitored mercury in Arctic animals for over 40 years. Despite declining global emissions since the 1970s, we see no corresponding decrease in Arctic concentrations -- on the contrary," said Professor Rune Dietz from Aarhus University said in a statement. Mercury from coal combustion and gold mining can remain in the air for about a year but when it enters the ocean, it can stay for 300 years. Researchers have looked at more than 700 environmental samples from animals across Greenland over the past 40 years which has led them to identify regional differences that go alongside current patterns. "These isotope signatures act like fingerprints, revealing the sources and transport pathways of mercury," Senior Researcher Jens Sondergaard from Aarhus University explained. Mercury disrupts the normal function of nervous systems in polar bears and toothed whales. The concentrations are higher by 20-30 times before industrialization. It creates serious health risks to native marine mammals. "Transport of mercury from major sources like China to Greenland via ocean currents can take up to 150 years," said Rune Dietz. "This helps explain the lack of decline in Arctic mercury levels." The "GreenPath" project team is continuing its work on the study of mercury pollution across the Arctic.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store