Apple WWDC 2025: What we expect including new iOS software updates, macOS, AI and more
Apple's big 2025 software reveal is nearly upon us. On June 9, the Worldwide Developers' Conference (WWDC) keynote will showcase the changes coming with its 2025 software. That includes — deep breath — iOS, iPadOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS and visionOS.
Leaks suggest this year will be a biggie. In addition to the requisite Craig Federighi gags and a California-themed name for the latest macOS update, expect a significant visual overhaul — one of Apple's biggest ever — and (shocker) new Apple Intelligence features.
The company is reportedly set to unveil a platform-wide visual overhaul. The revamp is said to be a dramatic change, drawing inspiration from Apple's mixed reality headset.
According to Front Page Tech's Jon Prosser, that may even include (nearly) round icons on the home screen and in Control Center. He also noted subtler changes, like a redesigned tab view within apps and the search box in Messages being moved to the bottom of the screen.
One of Apple's core goals with the new software is to unify the design language of its operating systems. The idea is to make it less visually jarring to hop between devices. If executed well, jumping from iPhone to iPad to Mac (and so on) will feel like touring different flavors of the same OS.
Apple's last big macOS makeover was with 2020's Big Sur. For the iPhone's software, you have to go all the way back to 2013. That's when iOS 7 kicked skeuomorphic design to the curb, replacing it with a flat, minimalistic look. Minus some iterative changes, it's still the UI you see today.
Along with the big visual refresh, Apple is also rumored to be changing how it names its operating systems. Instead of having random version numbers at the end, the company is apparently planning to unify the names by year — so iOS 19 would become iOS 26, as it'll be Apple's platform for the coming year. The same goes for all of Apple's other software, so we're looking at iPadOS 26, macOS 26 and so forth.
Of course, it goes without saying that macOS should still get a California-themed name; hopefully Apple won't be throwing that tradition in the bin just yet. It'll stick around, according to Bloomberg : the current rumor is that the next version of macOS will be named Tahoe. Nathan Ingraham for Engadget
Could 2025 be the year the iPad Pro starts to feel… Pro? The high-end versions of Apple's tablet have been more than capable on a hardware level for generations. (Especially when they switched to M-series chips.) But the software has held it back. That's presumably because the company doesn't want to cannibalize Mac sales. After all, if the iPad Pro can truly replace a laptop, then fewer people would buy both.
The bad news for those wanting a full-on Mac experience: The iPad won't switch to macOS. The good news: iPadOS may get much more Mac-like. This year's update will reportedly focus on productivity, featuring improved multitasking and app window management.
It's not that Apple hasn't inched the iPad's software in that direction. It incrementally did so with Stage Manager in iPadOS 16. The year before, it added the multitasking menu at the top of app windows. But for many, those tweaks fell far short of the full-on productivity overhaul they craved. Will it be enough this time? Bloomberg 's Mark Gurman thinks it will "likely go far enough" for most power users. (Is that a "Hallelujah!" I hear?)
Even if leaks hadn't already suggested as much, this one would be a no-brainer. After all, AI has been every tech company's obsession since ChatGPT took the world by storm over two years ago. Expect a healthy portion of the keynote to be devoted to Apple's AI advances. These will reportedly include improvements to existing features and a few new ones.
Remember when Apple promised a more personalized Siri at last year's conference? The one that many wished would come ahead of the visual overhaul? Well, we're still waiting on that. The last official update we heard was in March, when the company told Daring Fireball , "It's going to take us longer than we thought." (Oops!) Apple expects the new Siri features to arrive "in the coming year," a clear-as-mud description if ever there was one.
A report from The Information last month hinted that the upgraded Siri was nowhere near ready. The 2024 demo, where Siri condensed minutes of multi-app planning into mere seconds, reportedly came as a surprise to team members working on Siri. (Never an encouraging sign.)
Separate reporting this month from Bloomberg sheds a bit more light, adding that we probably won't hear much about those Siri upgrades at WWDC 2025. The publication described those updates as being months away from shipping. The company is also reportedly separating its Apple Intelligence and Siri marketing. The logic behind this is that users are so fed up with Apple's assistant that it's hurting Apple's AI push.
The company's 2024 presentation was undoubtedly impressive. It showed a more context-sensitive Siri that better understands what you're doing. It pulled info from various apps and spliced them together in a seamless flow. It recorded a specific type of video in a third-party app. It shared a meeting summary via email with a teammate. And it found missing information the user remembered reading... somewhere . It even controlled system settings and explained them when needed.
The bottom line: If or when Apple pulls off what it promised last year, that's big news for Siri. But don't hold your breath for it to show up at WWDC 2025.
According to Bloomberg , the Siri updates we do see will be much subtler. These would include adding the option to use Gemini instead of ChatGPT with the assistant.
Another iOS 19 scoop points to an Apple Intelligence feature that's easy to get behind. A new AI-powered battery management mode will reportedly analyze how you use your phone. It can then use that to make power-saving adjustments on the fly. If it works well, that could be pretty nifty.
It may also be a key ingredient to a new device: the "iPhone Air." Whatever Apple calls it, the rumored ultra-slim handset is expected to join Apple's lineup this year. Without this feature, the phone's smaller battery might struggle to make it through a typical day. (According to Gurman, it would last several hours less than Apple's other iPhones.) But with the AI battery feature activated, the svelte iPhone could become more practical.
Will we see this slim-jim iPhone at WWDC? Well, let's say you have as good a chance of Valve randomly showing up to announce Half Life 3 at Apple's conference. First, the svelte handset is expected to be part of the iPhone 17 lineup, which typically arrives around September. Second, Apple hasn't unveiled a new iPhone at WWDC since Steve Jobs showed off the iPhone 4 in 2010. So, in short, nope.
Apple is reportedly working on a virtual health coach. Allegedly codenamed Project Mulberry, the AI feature would pair a refreshed Health app with an AI-powered coach. Bloomberg says the feature would, to some degree, give you advice you'd usually seek from a doctor.
The virtual coach would collect data from your Apple devices and use AI to provide personalized health advice, chatbot-style. Apple is reportedly training the AI agent with data from company physicians. Meanwhile, outside experts would shoot educational videos.
In March, Bloomberg 's Gurman said the virtual coach could arrive as early as iOS 19.4, which wouldn't likely come until early to mid-2026. But a quick aside in a report this month from Gurman and Drake Bennett mentioned that it could be a point of focus at WWDC.
Bloomberg 's Mark Gurman is predicting that Apple will introduce a centralized, pre-installed app for gaming on the Mac, iPad, iPhone and Apple TV. It'll include some of the features in the long-neglected Game Center service like leaderboards and matchmaking and pair them with a dedicated game launcher and editorial content including recommendations —including a push towards the Apple Arcade service.
It wouldn't be an Apple keynote without some wacky Craig Federighi hijinks. Last year, Apple's software lead strapped on a hair-shaped helmet and skydived into Apple Park. At previous events, he showed off his parkour skills, summoned an iPad like he's a Jedi and jammed out on a three-necked guitar.
Say what you will about "Hair Force One." Federighi knows how to sell a sight gag. (With maybe just a teensy bit of help from Apple's visual effects artists.)
Following Apple's typical schedule, you can expect the first developer betas to arrive after the conference ends. (Likely the same day!) Public betas would follow early this summer. And you can expect the final versions of iOS 19, iPadOS 19, macOS 16 and so on to arrive alongside new iPhones this fall.
While Apple's developer conference will be jam-packed if they serve up even a fraction of the expectations above, there are a few things we can pretty confidently take off the board, too.
With the possible exception of the Mac Pro, nearly all of Apple's hardware lines have either just finished an upgrade cycle (consumer Macs, most iPads) or are going to get updated in the fall as usual (iPhone, Apple Watch). As such, we're not expecting any major hardware announcements. Apple has talked about the Mac Pro at past WWDC events, but that computer is updated so infrequently that it's hard to say with any confidence that we'll see any changes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
22 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Turned Bitcoin Into A Political Weapon. Here's Why It Matters
President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House, in Washington, ... More DC. (Photo by Alex Wroblewski) Over 30,000 people attended the 2025 Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas last week, one of the most significant crypto events of the year. Once known as a hub for decentralized ideals like privacy, financial freedom, and rebellion against centralized power, the Bitcoin Conference has taken a sharp political turn. In 2025, the event felt more like a Trump-aligned political rally than a crypto summit, complete with MAGA-themed sequined jackets, 'Make Bitcoin Great Again' hats, and an abundance of White House officials in attendance. Bitcoin, first introduced in 2009 with the now-famous genesis block message 'Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks,' was designed as a decentralized, apolitical alternative to government-controlled money. But today, there is a growing alignment between cryptocurrency and U.S. politics threatens the neutrality that made Bitcoin revolutionary. Bitcoin was created to allow peer-to-peer transactions without banks or governments acting as intermediaries. But in 2025, the growing mix of political ambition and financial power is steadily undermining that vision. At the Bitcoin Conference, Vice President JD Vance, speaking with rhetoric that felt unmistakably campaign-driven, described Bitcoin as a hedge not only against inflation but against 'the private sector itself.' He also told the audience that stablecoins do not threaten the U.S. dollar, which reflects the administration's broader effort to align with the crypto industry. While the message sounds anti-establishment, the actions tell a different story. The Trump administration is centralizing influence over a decentralized protocol, raising concerns among early Bitcoin supporters about the loss of its politically neutral foundation. The Trump administration's growing involvement in cryptocurrency is testing the limits of Bitcoin's political neutrality. On the opening day of the 2025 Bitcoin Conference, Trump Media unveiled a $2.5 billion bitcoin treasury strategy. Just days earlier, World Liberty Financial, a Trump family crypto venture, advanced its own stablecoin initiative. These announcements highlight the administration's deepening role in shaping U.S. crypto policy. Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of Strategy (MSTR), has likened it to a global financial awakening. However, critics argue that it signals the political capture of a system originally built to be decentralized and apolitical. Natalie Smolenski, Executive Director of the Texas Bitcoin Foundation, said in an interview that Bitcoin was 'designed from politically neutral principles' and warned that lobbying efforts, even with good intentions, can easily lead to compromised outcomes. Smolenski's concerns reflect a broader unease in the Bitcoin community. As political actors and private ventures increasingly blur the line between public policy and personal gain, many fear that Bitcoin's foundational values are at risk of being overwritten. The shift in the cryptocurrency movement is hard to ignore. What began as a decentralized push for financial sovereignty and libertarian ideals has increasingly become defined by political alignment and elite influence. At the 2025 Bitcoin Conference, at least 18 speakers had direct political connections, including sitting Senators, members of Congress, White House officials, and both Eric and Donald Trump Jr. One of the most defining moments came when Vice President J.D. Vance addressed the crowd, emphasizing that under President Trump, cryptocurrency now has a strong ally in the White House. His remarks, which were met with loud applause, underscored the Trump administration's effort to present itself as a champion of digital assets and crypto-friendly policy. The Trump administration's alignment with the cryptocurrency industry is raising red flags across the digital asset community. Support for the GENIUS Act, a proposed bill to regulate the U.S. stablecoin market, is weakening as concerns grow over President Trump's direct financial involvement in crypto ventures. Critics argue that this conflict of interest could compromise the integrity of future crypto legislation. According to CNBC digital asset reporter MacKenzie Sigalos, the administration's executive order establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, funded through seized digital assets, effectively turns Bitcoin into a government-controlled asset. This fusion of public policy and private enrichment casts serious doubt on the United States' ability to support a truly decentralized financial system. In its pursuit of mainstream legitimacy, the Bitcoin movement now risks becoming the very force it was created to resist. The threat is not just symbolic. When political power becomes intertwined with financial infrastructure designed to remain neutral, it opens the door to manipulation, centralization, and loss of public trust. Despite growing political entanglements, Bitcoin's core code has not changed. The network remains borderless, censorship-resistant, and decentralized by design. However, the culture surrounding it is shifting rapidly. What was once a movement grounded in financial freedom is now being reshaped by nationalist rhetoric and centralized political agendas. This transformation is drawing global attention. As the United States transitions from crypto skeptic to the largest government holder of Bitcoin, there is risk that the cryptocurrency is being repurposed as a tool of American political influence. Instead of serving as a global system for monetary autonomy, Bitcoin could be recast as a state-aligned asset shaped by partisan objectives. The Trump family's growing presence in the cryptocurrency industry is raising serious ethical concerns. From launching politically branded memecoins and filing for a Bitcoin ETF to raising billions for Bitcoin treasury initiatives, Trump-affiliated ventures are becoming deeply embedded in nearly every sector of the crypto ecosystem. Their aggressive expansion signals a willingness to test boundaries, both regulatory and political. These ventures could benefit directly from crypto-friendly legislation and executive orders emerging from Washington. The President's personal financial stake in the digital asset space risks creating a feedback loop of policy-making driven by self-enrichment. This potential conflict of interest poses a challenge to the credibility of any regulatory framework intended to support a fair and decentralized crypto economy. If history offers any lesson, it is that the more difficult, principled path is often the one that endures. Smolenski aptly said, 'None of us is the incorruptible innocent. None of us is an exception to the possibility of being compromised.' Bitcoin still represents a powerful vision rooted in financial freedom, transparency, and self-sovereignty. The Bitcoin protocol remains neutral. The network is global, secure, and decentralized. Yet the culture surrounding it is changing. Whether Bitcoin continues to serve as a tool for individual empowerment or becomes just another instrument of political control depends entirely on the people guiding its future. The code is intact, but the narrative is still being written.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple bulls and bears don't see tariffs changing the story
Even during the good times, Magnificent Seven stocks hardly moved in lockstep. The tariff-induced market shake-up has made that even more evident, as vulnerable names — like Apple (AAPL) — struggle to gain traction without a clear path ahead. But even as the prospect of a high-tariff regime — and a presidential threat — could deflate the company, the bull and bear cases largely look past the levies. Instead, they focus on the iPhone maker's established advantages and its long-held baggage. The political environment has changed for Tim Cook; that's hard to deny. But for his Wall Street backers and detractors, the fundamental Apple story remains, both the good parts and the bad. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy The bull case for Cupertino relies on its resilient earnings, a legacy built on underpromising and overdelivering. Executives have for years delivered stable results, seemingly perfecting the art of managing expectations. That may be especially hard to see now. As my colleague Josh Schafer reports, the Magnificent Seven combined for 62% of the S&P 500's advance in May, with all but one of the names outperforming the benchmark index's 6.2% gain. The sole laggard? You guessed it: Apple. Ahead of the company's annual developers conference next week, Apple stock is down almost 20% for the year. But bulls see the gap between Apple's performance and the broader market shrinking over time. Despite regulatory pressures and heightened competition, its stability and predictability hold advantages. As Bank of America analysts led by Wamsi Mohan wrote in a note this week, "Apple is seen as a defensive investment where even in challenging times, it meets or slightly beats consensus forecasts, and isn't prone to big guidance misses." Apple's commitment to shareholder returns also underscores its dependability. Buybacks and dividends are to Apple investors what the company's ecosystem of gadgets is to its customers: a good reason to stick around. As Mohan and his colleagues observe, Apple's aggressive buybacks act like a powerful buffer to protect earnings. By snatching back tens of billions of dollars worth of stock every year, Apple can still grow its EPS even if revenue stagnates. The scale of Apple's financial wizardry — and cash generation — is hard to replicate. Bears, on the other hand, acknowledge Apple's enormity but see a lumbering giant past its prime. "Bears question whether Apple has a 'next big thing' on the horizon that can re-ignite substantial growth, or if the company is now essentially at the maturity stage of its innovation cycle, relying on incremental improvements and accessories," Mohan wrote. Where bulls view Apple's services business as a growth engine, bears point to a deceleration from earlier years, undercutting a pillar of Apple's expansion thesis. In response to a maturing market for smartphones and longer upgrade cycles, the company's backers have leaned on services revenue to soften the blow of slowing device sales. It's unrealistic, the bears argue, to think Apple can continue to squeeze even more subscription cash from its user base with more shows starring Jon Hamm when its services business has already grown so much. And then there's the threat of AI disruption. If the iPhone is the nexus of a universe of apps, then a shift to an AI-driven interface — whether that's a new, screenless device or a reimagined operating system — would threaten Apple's flagship platform. Just last week, former Apple design chief Jony Ive announced he's working on a new consumer product with Sam Altman and OpenAI — and this week, in a joint interview with Laurene Powell Jobs, referenced the iPhone's dark side. The threat of onerous tariffs isn't helping Apple's prospects. But if you look past them, it's clear that the tech giant faces big questions about its long-term ambitions that have nothing to do with trade policy. Hamza Shaban is a reporter for Yahoo Finance covering markets and the economy. Follow Hamza on X @hshaban. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
I biked 12 miles with the Apple Watch 10 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6 — here's the winner
I test a lot of smartwatches, and two of my favorite recent releases are the Apple Watch Series 10 and Garmin Vivoactive 6. Starting at $399 and $299, respectively, each device sports a bright and responsive touchscreen paired with physical controls. Comfortable, slender and brimming with holistic sensors and safety features, either of these top smartwatches is a great choice for keeping tabs on your overall health, sleep quality and workout habits. But which is the more accurate fitness tracker? When I recently tested the Apple Watch Series 10 versus the Garmin Vivoactive 6 in an 8,000-step walk test, Cupertino's device came out on top. Will the result be the same when the event switches from walking to cycling? Read on to find out. But first, it's worth noting that the Apple Watch Series 10 has one potential advantage over the Garmin Vivoactive 6 regarding workout tracking accuracy. While both devices sport onboard GPS for location data, only the Apple Watch has an altimeter for precise elevation tracking. The Garmin still provides hill climb data for outdoor workouts, but from my testing, its measurements tend to be conservative. For example, the Vivoactive 6 undercounted my elevation gain in prior head-to-head walk tests versus the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and versus the Apple Watch 10. This inner-urban bike ride included a considerable amount of uphill pedaling. So did Garmin's data do my efforts justice? What about Apple's? Read on. The Garmin Vivoactive 6 is a lightweight and comfortable smartwatch with tons of workout training tools, impressive sleep tracking insights, solid battery life and a useful smattering of smart features. The Apple Watch Series 10 boasts a bright and beautiful touchscreen with improved viewing angles, a slender and easy-wearing design, and more smart features and available apps than nearly any other smartwatch available today. To fight the Sunday scaries and get in some cardio, I embarked on a 12-mile bike ride around Seattle, Washington's Lake Union. Cruising through no fewer than 10 neighborhoods, as noted, this ride involved lots of elevation changes — Seattle is quite the topographically diverse city — and plenty of people watching and sightseeing. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. With the exception of getting stuck at one of the two drawbridges along my route (not bad for a beautiful and busy Sunday), the ride went smoothly. Even Seattle's mostly mindless drivers were passing with caution and ample space. I wore the Garmin on my left wrist and the Apple Watch on my right. As a control, I ran Strava on my iPhone 12 mini mounted on my handlebars. Here's how the results compare: Apple Watch 10 Garmin Vivoactive 6 Strava Total distance 12.26 miles 12.22 miles 12.35 miles Total elevation gain 682 feet 664 feet 690 feet Average speed 9.8 mph 11 mph 11 mph Max speed 19.6 mph 24.2 mph 25.9 mph Average heart rate 156 bpm 156 bpm n/a Max heart rate 176 bpm 178 bpm n/a Total calories burned 689 calories 760 calories n/a Battery drained 11% 7% n/a Distance data is a near-match across the board, though the Apple Watch's mileage is slightly closer to Strava's tally. Elevation data is a different story. As I suspected, the Vivoactive 6 undercounted my hill climb efforts by a notable margin. This is almost certainly due to the lack of an onboard altimeter. As I suspected, the Vivoactive 6 undercounted my hill climb efforts by a notable margin. Apple, meanwhile, marked my climb at just 8 feet shy of Garmin's measure, an impressive and reassuring result. In a previous head-to-head versus the Garmin Instinct 3, the Apple Watch 10's elevation gain data was waaaaay off. Fortunately, that appears to be an anomaly rather than the norm. While both Garmin and Strava calculated an 11 mph average speed for my ride, Apple reported a slightly slower average pace of 9.8 mph. More notably, Apple's max speed measurement is significantly slower than Garmin's and Strava's, something that is both frustrating and difficult to account for. I know this route well and bike it often, almost always with some form of tracking. While I'm no speed demon, there are several spots along the trek where it's easy to reach speeds of 25 mph without too much effort. With that in mind, I'm convinced that Apple's top speed stat for this particular ride is lower than it should be. I'm convinced that Apple's top speed stat for this ride is lower than it should be. Fortunately, heart rate data is oh so clean between the Series 10 and the Vivoactive 6. This shouldn't come as too much of a surprise, given both Apple and Garmin's reputation for heart rate tracking accuracy. It's worth noting that the Vivoactive 6 isn't using Garmin's latest/greatest sensor array. However, based on this test and previous head-to-heads, Garmin's older holistic tech seems just as reliable as Apple's latest. Despite logging a slightly further ride with more elevation gain, the Apple Watch 10 estimated 71 fewer calories burned than Garmin. Finally, my 1 hour, 7 minute bike ride resulted in 11% battery drain for the Apple Watch versus 7% exhaustion for the Garmin. This was a pretty close one. Both devices turned in impressively accurate distance measurements for my ride, but Apple was slightly closer. More importantly, Apple's hill climb data is off by only 8 feet compared to 26 feet for the Garmin. As an avid cyclist in a hilly environment, accurate ascent data is a must for me. As such, I likely won't be using the Vivoactive 6 to track future bike rides in the Emerald City; the device consistently undercounts my climb efforts, whether walking or biking. Truth be told, I probably won't reach for the Apple Watch Series 10, either, based on its wacky max speed data in this test. So, what's my go-to smartwatch for bike rides in 2025? The same as my go-to for snowboard tracking, the rugged and long-lasting Garmin Instinct 3.