Family of hit-and-run victim Shane O'Farrell to receive State apology over circumstances of his death
Members of Shane O'Farrell's family will be in the Dáil on Tuesday to hear the State apology over the circumstances of their son's death in a hit and run.
The 23-year-old cyclist died in August 2011. He was cycling home when he was struck by a car driven by Zigimantas Gridziuska, near Carrickmacross in Co Monaghan.
The following day, the Lithuanian surrendered himself to gardaí. However, the O'Farrell family feel he should never have been at liberty to kill Shane.
On a number of occasions in the two years before the incident, he had been granted conditional bail but it had not been revoked despite broken conditions.
At the time of Mr O'Farrell's death, he was on bail in connection with a number of separate incidents.
More than two hours has been set aside in the Dáil schedule for the apology and subsequent statements from 3.50pm on Tuesday afternoon.
Shane's mother Lucia, who has campaigned for several years for justice for her son, said she wondered 'what Shane would have thought of it all' and said the case had been a 'shameful way to treat victims'.
Lucia O'Farrell has campaigned for several years for justice for her son. Picture: Courtpix
In 2018, justice minister Jim O'Callaghan, who was then a back bench TD, tabled a motion calling for a public inquiry into the death. In March, he told the Dáil he did so because there were issues of concern including 'that the driver was on bail at the time, gardaí stopped his car one hour before the collision and he had previous convictions that should have triggered his reappearance before the courts'.
Two separate Gsoc examinations of different elements of the case were carried out, but a public inquiry has never taken place. A scoping exercise of the case carried out by retired judge Gerard Haughton was published in 2023, and a key finding was that an inquiry was unwarranted.
Last July, Sinn Féin, Labour, and Independent TDs brought a private members motion calling for the immediate establishment of an 'independent public inquiry into the death of Shane O'Farrell and the actions of State agencies before and after his death in respect of this case'.
The motion said there were multiple failures, adding it was now necessary to have the actions of An Garda Síochána, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Gsoc, and the Courts Service examined.
The then minister for justice Helen McEntee pledged to refer the recommendations of the scoping inquiry to the justice committee but did not do so in her tenure, she said, because of the proximity to the general election. Mr O'Callaghan has said he will refer the recommendations to the new justice committee.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
10 hours ago
- The Journal
New rental regulations will allow landlords increase rents if previous tenant leaves voluntarily
A REFORM OF rent regulations is set to go to Cabinet tomorrow, which will allow landlords to reset rent between tenancies. The matter was discussed at the party leaders' meeting this evening, attended by the Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Tánaiste Simon Harris and Minister of State Sean Canney, where the proposals were signed off on ahead of Cabinet tomorrow. While Housing Minister James Browne is set to announce the details after meeting with ministers tomorrow, it is expected that existing renters would likely remain protected by the current 2% cap. Under the proposal, rents for existing tenants in the entire country will be brought under control under the current Rent Pressure Zone (RPZ) system that is currently in place. However, the new plans will mean the that 2% rent cap will not apply to apartments built after a certain date, a move government is hoping will increase apartment construction by the private sector. Advertisement Landlords will also be allowed to hike rents in instances where tenants leave homes voluntarily. Tenancy protections will be brought in, according to a government source, who said that protecting renters is a key component. It is expected that new tenancies, while facing higher rents, will see a six-year security of tenure rolled out. Browne will also bring proposals forward to categorise landlords to the number of properties owned. It is not yet clear this evening to what end this categorization is proposed. These proposed changes are coming at a time when the Government is under pressure from left-leaning parties, trade unions and homelessness charities to create policies that favour renters over landlords. Sinn Féin's housing spokesperson, TD Eoin Ó Broin is of the view that renters are being punished for the Government's failures on housing, with the TD slamming the government for changes he said will result in higher levels of homelessness. Likewise, Social Democrats TD Rory Hearne, an academic who has written a book on the housing crisis, has said his party will 'strenuously resist' any attempt by the Government to end RPZs. Hearne has argued that the Government is prioritising the profits of international investors and developers over the needs of ordinary renters. Read Next Related Reads RPZ changes will have 'significant impact' says Minister, who claims he understands renters' fears The Labour Party's housing spokesperson Conor Sheehan has described RPZs as being 'very ham-fisted' but said that, regardless, they are the 'only bit of protection renters have in the private rented market at the moment'. Next week, the Raise the Roof campaign group will hold a demonstration outside Leinster House that is likely to heap further criticism on the government. Browne argues that the measures will boost investment and certainty in supply of homes for rental and the wider residential market. The minister told The Journal last month renters are 'very much to the forefront of my concerns', but acknowledged there is already an affordability challenge out there for renters. With reporting by Muiris Ó Cearbhaill Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tough decisions to tackle housing crisis are under way – but will they work?
The expected move to ease rent caps is part of a Government response to the worsening housing crisis which will see further policy changes announced in the coming weeks, before a revised plan for housing is finalised in July. Government insiders hope that the departures will show them finally getting to grips with the housing crisis. But it would be an exaggeration to say there is confidence that all this will work quickly to increase housing supply. Meanwhile, opposition to the rent cap changes is growing and will be heard both in the Dáil tomorrow and on the streets next week when Raise the Roof, an umbrella group co-ordinated by the trade unions and including NGOs and Opposition parties, holds a major protest outside Leinster House. The housing measures include some already announced and some yet to come. There will be changes in planning regulations to allow small residences in back gardens, extensions and attic conversion s without planning permission; potentially also changes in regulations on apartment construction; the role of the Land Development Agency will be expanded to include mixed-use developments with private sector partners; the appointment of a 'housing tsar' ( just don't call it that ) is also coming; commencing the changes in last year's mammoth planning Act will make it harder to block planning permissions; and money will be provided for new planners in local authorities and An Bord Pleanála to speed up the planning process. READ MORE [ Explainer: Garden rooms and attics – What are the proposed changes to regulations? Opens in new window ] Divisions remain in Government over the possibility of tax incentives for builders and developers of certain types of housing, and they are unlikely to be settled until the budget. But at the top level of Government, there is a growing sense that urgent action is needed on housing, with one insider insisting that the series of decisions now under way will place housing at the very centre of the Government's priorities from now until the summer recess in mid-July. However, there is also an awareness that some measures to increase supply will leave the Coalition open to political attack and public unpopularity. [ Proposed changes to rent rules will incentivise evictions, housing charity warns Opens in new window ] And the problem for the Government is that the unpopularity and the political attacks will be immediate – but any potential payback from the measures in the shape of increased supply is at best years away, and may not even be felt until after the next general election. Even without the planning delays and legal actions that they have to factor into their considerations, builders and developers say it can still take three to four years to deliver a block of apartments. There is no doubt the measures will be welcomed by developers and landlords. But that is not necessarily the same thing as prompting them to move quickly to increase supply. Many will want to see if tax incentives are introduced in the budget; others will want to see if the Government has the political will to resist the pressure already building on the rent pressure zone changes. 'Look, the reality is there is no silver bullet,' says one senior Government source. But, the source says, we need apartments, and the people who build apartments are not building them right now because of the rent caps. [ Rules for renters: What are the planned reforms and will they work? Opens in new window ] All very well, but the simple and logical outcome of changing the rent cap rules is that rents will go up – that's why the landlords and the developers are in favour of it. The Government says that its package will protect renters – but among groups working at the coalface of homelessness, there is little confidence in that. An uptick in evictions and rising rents – both predicted by Opposition parties – would pile enormous pressure on the Government. Within Government, there is an undoubted willingness to take difficult decisions, and an awareness that the time to take them is in the first year of its term of office. But that is not matched by any great confidence that the measures will work. [ Ireland's housing crisis: Why is there such a shortage of homes to buy and rent here? Opens in new window ]
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Opposition tables second motion to ban Central Bank role in approving Israeli bonds
Members of the main Opposition parties have combined for a second time to put pressure on the State to stop facilitating the sale of Israeli bonds through the Central Bank . A fortnight after the defeat in the Dáil of a Sinn Féin Bill to prevent the Central Bank's role in approving Israeli bonds for sale in the European Union , the Social Democrats have tabled a private members' motion calling for the exact same measures. The Central Bank of Ireland has a role in approving documents on bonds issued by the Israeli government, which have been described as 'war bonds' by the Opposition. The Bill would have prevented the Irish Central Bank from approving the prospectus that allows Israel to trade its bonds in the European Union. Israel traditionally had its European bond prospectuses rubber-stamped in the UK, but turned to the Central Bank for authorisations after Brexit. READ MORE Sinéad Gibney of the Social Democrats said the Government had insisted the State is not selling the bonds. She argued the fact remained that Ireland was 'facilitating' the sale of bonds within Europe. 'Countries sell these bonds to raise money, and in the case of Israel, that money is being spent on bullets and on weapons to kill people, and that's why we have to stop it,' she said. Ms Gibney, Seán Crowe of Sinn Féin, Duncan Smith of Labour and Paul Murphy of People Before Profit all spoke against the bonds at a joint media conference by the four main Opposition parties on Monday, and argued that by facilitating their sale, Ireland became complicit in the Israeli war effort. They said the Central Bank should have no role in approving the prospectus that allows Israel to trade its bonds in the European Union. 'What's happening is these bonds are basically going toward blood money,' said Mr Crowe. 'It's buying the bullets, it's buying the ammunition.' [ 'Repulsive'; 'obscene'; 'genocide': Dáil voices rise in unison over Israel's slaughter in Gaza Opens in new window ] He added: 'Is there anyone in Ireland comfortable with the fact that we're facilitating this blood money coming into our country and being spent on weapons that are killing men, women and children?' Mr Murphy said that in the past day Israel had seized a boat carrying humanitarian aid from international waters and 'kidnapped' activists, including Greta Thunberg . He said the argument of the Government 'boiled down to the fact that if they don't authorise the bonds, someone else in Europe will authorise the bonds, and they'll be able to be to be sold. 'We do not accept that we should be assisting in the sale of Israeli bonds used for genocide at all,' he said. Mr Smith said that Ireland may be doing more than other European countries but the bar was so low, it was nowhere near enough. 'This motion could send a clear signal that Irish people do not stand for the selling of Israeli war bonds. We are asking for the Government to legislate, on an emergency basis, for the Central Bank to ban those sales.' [ Harris praises Madleen volunteers for highlighting 'urgent need for humanitarian aid' to reach Gaza Opens in new window ] Ms Gibney said the Government had a very clear mandate of support for Palestine from the population. 'Other Member States have much more divided populations, much more gritty things to deal with in terms of getting people on board. The Irish Government has the mandate of the Irish people, and they should be leaders on this. And it is simply not good enough to say, 'if we don't do it, somebody else will', because that is the absolute definition of complicity. If we stand up and stop this, other countries will follow suit.' Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said during the Dáil debate at the end of May that the Sinn Féin legislation was 'unworkable' and inconsistent with EU law.
