Chaos on campuses as schools warn Trump cuts could harm US ‘for decades'
Students, researchers, faculty and leadership at universities and colleges across the US are grappling with drastic short- and long-term impacts 'for decades to come' caused by funding freezes, cuts and executive orders from the Trump administration.
'It's sowing a lot of chaos on campuses,' said Sarah Spreitzer, vice-president and chief of staff of government relations at the American Council for Education, a non-profit representing more than 1,600 colleges, universities and related associations.
'This is going to have long-term impacts on the American public and post-secondary education that I don't think we can really even start to understand.'
Related: Trump threatens to pull federal funds for US schools allowing 'illegal protests'
Research grants across the US have been frozen or cut, scholarships funded by the federal government have been halted and the push to reduce the administrative costs for National Institutes of Health (NIH) research funding to 15% has institutions trying to figure out how to cover those costs of doing research, Spreitzer explained.
Donald Trump's federal congressional budget is also proposing billions of dollars in cuts in federal funding for research and institutions across higher education. Cuts to research tied to foreign aid, such as the US Agency for International Development, have resulted in lab closures. Trump has also threatened to pull federal funding from universities that allow 'illegal' protests.
The changes and threats have incited hiring freezes, layoffs and furloughs, cuts in graduate admissions, rescissions of job offers, and institutions scaling back the amount of research they conduct.
'Institutions are scrambling to figure out how they are going to support those students because they're unable to access the federal funding, or are they just going to end the programs,' added Spreitzer. 'Changing the indirect cost rate doesn't suddenly make research cheaper to do. Someone is going to have to bear that cost.'
Higher education institutions have already begun scaling back or are bracing for cuts. University of Pennsylvania has cut graduate admissions at its medical schools for fall 2025 by 35%. Graduate students across the US have reported admissions acceptances being rescinded.
MIT, Stanford and numerous other institutions have enacted hiring freezes.
This week Brown and Johns Hopkins warned of potential layoffs amid threats to federal funding revenues.
'Our admissions have been paused for a number of big grad departments,' said Levin Kim, a graduate worker; chair of Higher Education Labor United, a coalition of labor unions representing more than 200,000 academic workers; and president of UAW Local 4121 representing academic workers at the University of Washington, which is one of the largest public recipients of federal research funding. 'We're seeing a lot of uncertainty. Careers are being curtailed right now. It's not like once things are funded, it can just pick right back up. It's wreaking havoc throughout the whole pipeline.'
Kim argued Trump's actions have had a 'big chilling effect' on anything to do with research funding, despite ongoing legal battles to prevent research funding freezes and cuts.
'The attacks on research being carried out right now are attacks on workers as well as American public health infrastructure that will have impacts for decades to come,' said Kim. 'Clinical trials have been paused. Research has been paused on things like Alzheimer's research and cancer, things that effect everyone. There is a government takeover right now to sign away Americans' health in order to line the pockets of a few billionaires.'
Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors, expressed similar concerns facing faculty at institutions across higher education and the vast impacts it will have on its future, including work that has stopped or is being scaled back in response to Trump's anti-diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts.
'Billions of dollars in research has been frozen, and that's research on things that every American depends on,' Wolfson said. 'Members of mine having to lay people off, having to close their labs, having to ask for special circumstances to be able to keep rare supplies, like animals, alive. It's been a complete, utter, destruction of the United States research infrastructure.'
Wolfson explained that since the second world war, the federal government has partnered with higher education institutions to develop and maintain global leadership in research and development.
'Institutions are retrenching, and they're going to retrench at pretty quick rates. They're going to lay people off. Tuition is going to skyrocket and they're going to cut back on graduate programs. We're going to train fewer doctors and fewer engineers, and this is going to have a very bad effect on broader American society,' concluded Wolfson. 'The Trump administration, at the same time that they're saying that they're trying to create a great country, are destroying the sector that's one of the most critical in having a great, profitable and healthy democratic country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
5 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump renegotiating Biden-era Chips Act grants, Lutnick says
President Donald Trump's administration is renegotiating some of former President Joe Biden's grants to semiconductor firms, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said at a hearing on Wednesday, suggesting some awards may be axed. Some of the Biden-era grants "just seemed overly generous, and we've been able to renegotiate them," Lutnick told lawmakers on the Senate Appropriations Committee, adding the goal was to benefit American taxpayers. "All the deals are getting better, and the only deals that are not getting done are deals that should have never been done in the first place," Lutnick said, appearing to signal that not all the awards would survive renegotiation. Biden in 2022 signed the CHIPS and Science Act to plow $52.7 billion into boosting semiconductor chips manufacturing and research in the U.S. and luring chipmakers away from Asia. The program rolled out billions in grants for semiconductor heavyweights, including Taiwan's TSMC, South Korea's Samsung and SK Hynix, as well as U.S.-based Intel and Micron. The grants, while signed, had only just begun to be disbursed by the time Biden left office. The details of those plans are not public but the money is meant to be disbursed as companies make progress toward their pledged plant expansions. Lutnick pointed to TSMC as an example of successful renegotiation. He said the chipmaker -- which won a $6 billion Chips Act award -- had increased by $100 billion its initial pledge to invest $65 billion in U.S. manufacturing. "We were able to modify the award for the same $6 billion of (government) funding," he said. TSMC announced the $100 billion in added investment in March but it was not immediately clear whether that was part of a renegotiation of its Chips Act award. TSMC declined to comment. Reuters reported in February that the White House was seeking to renegotiate the awards and had signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements. Lutnick also said the administration agrees with the goal of having more than 50% of global AI computing capacity in America, responding to concerns that deals like the one announced by Trump last month to allow the United Arab Emirates to buy advanced American artificial intelligence chips could deprive the United States of key AI computing power.
10 minutes ago
Critical US-Iran nuclear talks on shaky ground
The future of high-stakes negotiations over Iran's nuclear program remains shrouded in uncertainty as the U.S. and Iran publicly clash over the terms of an interim agreement proposed by the Trump administration that is intended to pave the way for a longer-lasting deal. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, slammed that proposal during an address on Wednesday, saying it "contradicts our principle of power by 100%" and vowing that Iran would not agree to stop enriching uranium on its own soil, calling it "a key tool in the nuclear program." The Iranian foreign minister, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, succinctly underscored Iran's terms in a post on X shortly after the Ayatollah's speech, writing "no enrichment, no deal." Iran's stance contrasts sharply with that of President Donald Trump, which he emphasized on his social media platform on Monday. "Under our potential Agreement -- WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. While the president and his Cabinet officials have repeatedly said Iran would be required to end enrichment activities under the terms of a deal, U.S. officials say that the initial interim proposal -- which is only intended to be a stepping stone to a broader agreement -- did not prohibit Iran from enriching uranium at low levels while a long-term solution to fuel Iran's civilian nuclear energy program could be established. Trump's post appeared to contradict the position staked out by his negotiators, and although Iran has not yet formally responded to the interim proposal, it remained unclear on Wednesday whether the U.S. would stand by all the terms in its initial offer. Whether delegations from Iran and the U.S. would meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations also remained unclear, although a U.S. official said a possible meeting in the coming days was under discussion. After holding a phone call with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, Trump signaled that he would look to Moscow to play a greater role in negotiations with Iran. "President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!" But optimism among both U.S. and Iranian officials appears to have cooled in recent days. An Iranian official, who spoke with ABC News on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations, said that the U.S.' proposed terms are "unreasonable, greedy and unconventional." "The U.S. constantly changes its positions, which has led to a growing accumulation of mistrust regarding its intentions and heightened uncertainty about its will and seriousness to fulfil commitments, assuming any agreement is even to be formed," they told ABC News. "This document is not even open to be reviewed or responded to," the official added. Iran is pushing for relief from sanctions that have badly damaged the national economy. This week, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Tehran needs guarantees regarding the "real end of the sanctions." That would include details on "how and through what mechanism" they would be lifted, Baghaei said, in remarks carried by the official IRNA news agency. Araghchi and Khamenei were downbeat on the U.S. proposal in comments this week. The document has "many ambiguities and questions," the Iranian foreign minister said in a Telegram post on Tuesday. "Many issues in this proposal are not clear," he added.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs proclamation to ban travel from 12 countries
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Wednesday evening to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks. The ban will fully restrict entry of nationals from 12 countries: Afghanistan; Myanmar, also known as Burma; Chad; Republic of the Congo; Equatorial Guinea; Eritrea; Haiti; Iran; Libya; Somalia; Sudan; and Yemen. People from seven countries will have partial restriction: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The proclamation includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, certain visa categories and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. The president made the final call on signing this proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, according to a White House official. He was considering it beforehand, but Sunday's assault put it into motion faster. The White House is touting the new president's travel ban as 'fulfilling' a campaign promise to 'protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm.' 'President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm. These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information,' White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson wrote on X. Trump said in a video posted Wednesday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world.' 'The list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made. And likewise new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world, but we will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm and nothing will stop us from keeping America safe,' the president said. The proclamation takes effect at 12:01 AM on June 9, according to the White House. Wednesday's proclamation comes less than five months after the president was inaugurated into office for his second term. On his first day in office, he issued an executive order directing cabinet members, including the secretary of state, to compile a list of countries 'for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.' In his first term, Trump barred travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations from coming to the US, a policy that saw court challenges before President Joe Biden repealed it when he took office in 2021. The barring of nationals from Afghanistan could impact Afghans who worked alongside the US during its two decades of war there. Tens of thousands of Afghans have already been caught in limbo due to other Trump administration executive orders suspending the US refugee admissions program and the suspension of foreign aid funding for flights of Afghan Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) holders. This story and headline have been updated with additional information.
