logo
American brands like Coke and Jim Beam are paying the price abroad for Trump's trade war

American brands like Coke and Jim Beam are paying the price abroad for Trump's trade war

Yahoo11-05-2025

Backlash to tariffs and other US policies has hit some of the biggest American brands.
Some shoppers abroad are avoiding products like Coca-Cola and Jim Beam, given their ties to the US.
Not all American brands have been affected to the same degree, however.
For some people abroad, a Jim Beam and Coke isn't going down as easily as it once did.
Companies that make some of the biggest American brands have noted different degrees of pain as some consumers overseas avoid their products in protest of President Donald Trump's trade war.
Globally, consumers are less likely to buy many major US brands than they were just a few months ago, survey data published late last month by Morning Consult found.
"This suggests that overseas consumers are uniquely singling out some American brands due to their country of origin," the report says.
US companies already face plenty of problems because of tariffs, mostly in the form of snarled supply chains and higher import costs. The backlash abroad points to another issue: What happens when a brand's connection with America starts becoming a liability instead of a selling point?
In Mexico, for instance, the share of customers who said they were "absolutely certain" to buy a Coca-Cola product in the near future fell from 40% in January to 28% in February before rebounding to 34% in April, according to Morning Consult data.
Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey said that some Latino consumers in the United States and in Mexico pulled back on their purchases of the company's products during the first quarter after videos circulating on social media in February said, without evidence, that Coke had reported some of its own employees to US immigration authorities.
Quincey said that the videos were "completely false, but they impact the business" anyway.
McDonald's CEO Chris Kempczinski said during an earnings call last week that the fast-food chain didn't see a hit from diners abroad pulling back in results during the first quarter. But the chain did note an uptick in anti-American sentiment generally, he said, especially in Canada and Northern Europe.
"What we have seen in our survey work is that there has been an increase in people in various markets saying that they're going to be cutting back their purchase of American brands," Kempczinski said.
Since the start of the year, Japan-based Suntory Holdings has been bracing for a hit to Jim Beam and Maker's Mark, two American whiskey brands it owns.
Suntory expected that in 2025 American products would be "less accepted by those countries outside of the US because of first, tariffs and, second, emotion," CEO Takeshi Niinami told the Financial Times in February. Suntory did not respond to questions about how the whiskey brands have performed in recent months.
Instead of buying products associated with the United States, foreign consumers could shift their spending to local brands. That's already happening in Canada, where shoppers are eschewing US products at grocery stores and other retailers in favor of Canadian-made equivalents.
"The risk for US brands is that consumers' growing antagonism toward the United States resulting from an onslaught of tariffs emanating from Washington will cause them to seek out alternative goods and services provided by local and foreign (non-U.S.) brands," Morning Consult wrote in its April report.
Not all big US brands that sell abroad are feeling the same pinch.
Tapestry, the company that makes luxury purses and other accessories under the Coach and Kate Spade New York brands, said on Thursday that it wasn't seeing any sales slowdown due to anti-American sentiment abroad.
Levi Strauss & Co., the jeans brand, said that its sales haven't been affected either.
CFO Harmit Singh said on an earnings call in April that "we're entrenched with the local consumers" in other countries. He added that in some international markets, Levi Strauss has been selling jeans for several decades.
"Right now, international business is fairly strong," Singh said.
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Feds seek to ditch settlement over alleged redlining with North Jersey bank
Feds seek to ditch settlement over alleged redlining with North Jersey bank

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Feds seek to ditch settlement over alleged redlining with North Jersey bank

The Trump administration is asking a judge to drop a 2022 settlement the Justice Department had reached with North Jersey-based Lakeland Bank — which was later absorbed by Provident Bank — over allegations of redlining against Black and Hispanic customers. While Provident Bank said it will continue to provide low-cost mortgages to underserved communities, the motion by the U.S. Justice Department to abandon the settlement has drawn the ire of community advocates and legal experts, who say it would make it easier for banks to engage in redlining. 'It goes without saying it's a good thing when financial institutions are complying with those consent orders, but when you take away the teeth — the actual enforcement — who's to say that they will continue to comply,' said Leila Amirhamzeh, director of community reinvestment for New Jersey Citizen Action, a consumer advocacy four-page motion by the Justice Department, filed May 28 in U.S. District Court, seeks to terminate the consent order the Biden administration negotiated with what was then Lakeland Bank. In the initial complaint, the Justice Department said Lakeland violated the federal Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act by deliberately avoiding banking with Black and Hispanic customers, particularly in and around Newark. The discrimination in question allegedly took place between 2015 and 2021, according to the Biden administration. To settle the complaint, Lakeland agreed to pay $12 million to subsidize mortgages, home improvement loans and home refinancing loans for Black and Hispanic residents and open two branches in underserved neighborhoods. Lakeland also had to provide $150,000 a year for advertising, outreach and consumer finance education in the Newark area. Newark Mayor and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ras Baraka wanted one of those new branches to be in his city, and the Greater Toms River Chamber of Commerce also wanted a branch in its area. According to the Provident Bank website, there are currently four locations in Newark and three in Toms River. After acquiring Lakeland, Provident took ownership of the settlement and the mandate to open two branches in underserved areas of New Jersey. The Justice Department in its motion to terminate the order said Lakeland reached substantial commitment to comply with the consent agreement and it is committed to continuing its disbursement of the loan subsidy. Provident spokesperson Keith Buscio told and the USA TODAY Network New Jersey that the bank remains committed to the loan subsidy initiative. He said Provident is not a party to the litigation and referred other questions to the Justice Department. The Justice Department could not immediately be reached for comment. Baraka's office in Newark said it is planning to hold a press conference about the motion by the Justice Department on June 5. Court filings show two attorneys who helped file the initial complaint against Lakeland, Michael Campion and Susan Millenky, withdrew as counsel from the case. Campion was appointed in 2022 to lead the U.S. Attorney's Office's Civil Rights Division that was created to enforce federal civil rights laws in New Jersey. The Fair Housing Act was passed as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 to prohibit landlords and mortgage lenders from discriminating based on race, religion, national origin or sex. Nearly 60 years later, racial wealth disparity remains vast. In New Jersey, the median household wealth of white families is $322,500, compared with $17,700 for Black families and $26,100 for Hispanic families, the New Jersey Institute for Social Justice said. In New Jersey, 77.3% of white residents owned a home in 2020. By comparison, 42.8% of Black residents and 32.7% of Hispanic residents were homeowners, according to the Urban Institute, a research group. Critics said the Justice Department's motion to drop the Lakeland settlement is a step by the Trump administration's bid to reverse diversity, equity and inclusion programs. David Troutt, a professor at Rutgers Law School in Newark, said the motion by the Justice Department to terminate the consent decree is part of a larger campaign by the department to rescind investigations and agreements involving anti-Black racism, while beginning investigations into what it deems 'illegal DEI.' 'The Trump administration's withdrawal from a federal consent decree without justification is an extraordinary act of endorsing racist practices and housing market manipulation,' Troutt said. 'For the very government that successfully enforced those borrowers' civil rights to now repudiate them sends a message unlike any we've seen since the federal government first endorsed redlining in the 1930s,' Troutt said. Lakeland isn't the only New Jersey bank that faced scrutiny under the Biden administration. Toms River-based OceanFirst Financial Corp. agreed to pay $14 million to subsidize mortgages, helping settle a lawsuit that alleged the bank violated federal discrimination laws. Since then, it has improved the rating given by federal bank regulators who oversee investments in underserved communities to 'outstanding.' The Justice Department hasn't filed a motion seeking to terminate the consent order with OceanFirst. But two attorneys who represented the U.S. in the initial complaint, Millenky and Nathan Shulock, have filed motions to withdraw from the case, according to the court docket. A combined 22 Provident and Lakeland branches closed in 2024 following the $1.3 billion merger creating a 'super community bank.' Each branch that closed was within roughly three miles of a nearby branch. Activists and opponents warned that the merger would mean fewer banking services would be available for underserved communities, such as people of color, the elderly and disabled. New Jersey Citizen Action applauded Provident for its continued commitment to the terms of the consent order. But the group said the Justice Department should continue to enforce it. 'When you actually terminate these consent orders, there's no deterrence, and it's basically telling financial institutions that the Department of Justice is going to be taking a hands-off approach to fair lending issues, to redlining,' New Jersey Citizen Action's Amirhamzeh said. Daniel Munoz covers business, consumer affairs, labor and the economy for and The Record. Email: munozd@ Twitter:@danielmunoz100 and Facebook Michael L. Diamond is a business reporter for the Asbury Park Press. He has been writing about the New Jersey economy and health care industry since 1999. He can be reached at mdiamond@ This article originally appeared on Feds seek to drop Lakeland Bank settlement over alleged redlining

Citigroup reverses firearms policy after pressure from Trump administration on big banks
Citigroup reverses firearms policy after pressure from Trump administration on big banks

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Citigroup reverses firearms policy after pressure from Trump administration on big banks

A month after the 2018 mass school shooting in Parkland, Florida, Citigroup enacted restrictions for its clients that sold firearms — the first major bank on Wall Street to do so. On Tuesday, the bank rolled back that policy. 'We also will no longer have a specific policy as it relates to firearms,' the company said in a statement Tuesday. 'The policy was intended to promote the adoption of best sales practices as prudent risk management and didn't address the manufacturing of firearms.' The decision comes as the Trump administration alleges that Wall Street is biased against conservatives — a right-wing talking point since more than a dozen state auditors accused Bank of America of 'politicized de-banking' in an open letter last year (de-banking is when a bank closes an account for a customer it deems high risk). At the time, Bank of America said it has 'no political litmus test.' On Tuesday, Citi said it was 'following regulatory developments, recent Executive Orders and federal legislation.' In 2018, Citi said it would ban banking services to businesses that sold firearms to those under 21, those who didn't pass a background check, or sold bump stocks (used by the gunman in the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas) or high-capacity magazines. The policy applied to small businesses, commercial and institutional clients, and credit card partners, but did not restrict how individual customers used their cards. Big banks have recently caught the ire of the president as well as the crypto industry. In January at the annual World Economic Forum, President Donald Trump scolded Brian Moynihan, the CEO of Bank of America. 'You've done a fantastic job, but I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank,' Trump said. 'You and Jamie and everybody… What you're doing is wrong,' referring to JPMorgan Chase head Jamie Dimon. Citigroup also announced on Tuesday that it will update its employee Code of Conduct and its external Global Financial Access Policy 'to clearly state that we do not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation in the same way we are clear that we do not discriminate on the basis of other traits such as race and religion.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump promises to hike steel and aluminum tariffs to 50% starting Wednesday. Here's what we know
Trump promises to hike steel and aluminum tariffs to 50% starting Wednesday. Here's what we know

Washington Post

time36 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Trump promises to hike steel and aluminum tariffs to 50% starting Wednesday. Here's what we know

NEW YORK — U.S. President Donald Trump has promised to hike nearly all of his tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum to a punishing 50% on Wednesday, a move that would hammer businesses from automakers to home builders, and likely push up prices for consumers. Foreign-made steel and aluminum is used in household products like soup cans and paper clips as well as big-ticket items like a stainless-steel refrigerators and cars. Economists warn that the latest tariffs will significantly squeeze the wallets of both companies and shoppers alike.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store