logo
World's only research centre for flesh-eating infection ransacked in Sudan

World's only research centre for flesh-eating infection ransacked in Sudan

Yahoo28-04-2025

The footage sent Dr Ahmed Fahal into shock. On the outskirts of Khartoum, his research centre had been completely ransacked – the reception burned, the laboratory stripped, and four decades of biobank samples destroyed.
'I'm not sure when it took place… but we discovered the damage two weeks ago,' he told the Telegraph from Cairo, where he fled when a brutal civil war broke out in Sudan in April 2023.
'[When I saw the video], I was not able to start or to talk or to communicate with anybody. All this time I had believed the centre was safe – but now we found this. It's a really sad, sad story,' he said.
Dr Fahal heads the Mycetoma Research Centre in Sudan, the world's only specialist facility treating and researching the flesh-eating infection.
But it's become yet another victim of the country's conflict, in a 'major blow' for efforts to tackle the disease.
'I don't know how to describe the kind of set back it has provided,' said Dr Borna Nyaoke-Anoke, head of mycetoma at the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi). 'It's devastating.'
The Mycetoma Research Centre after the ransacking
Mycetoma, dubbed a neglected tropical disease by the World Health Organization (WHO), can be caused by roughly 70 different bacteria and fungi found in soil. These burrow into minor cuts and scrapes, most commonly among farmers and herdsmen who toil without shoes.
The slow-moving infection then causes massive swelling, peppering patients with lesions and sores as it attacks their bodies. It can lead to disability, amputation and – in severe cases – death. Data remains patchy, but experts estimate that there are around 20,000 new cases every year.
'It affects the poorest of the poor in remote communities,' said Dr Fahal. 'Eventually mycetoma destroys their soft tissue, their bones, and can kill the patients. It eats their bones and ends their lives.'
It is now 34 years since Dr Fahal, frustrated at the lack of treatment available for those affected, launched the Mycetoma Research Centre at the University of Khartoum with 'zero budget and minimum support'.
Since then, the facility has grown to treat roughly 12,000 patients every year, and became a WHO collaborating centre in 2015. People travelled from as far away as Yemen to access free care at the facility – which broke the mould by closely following patients after treatment and offering vocational training for those who lost livelihoods due to mycetoma-related disabilities.
The ransacked offices of Mycetoma Research Centre
With around 50 Sudanese and international researchers, it has also become a critical research hub – only five months ago, it published the first randomised, double blind trial looking at new mycetoma drugs.
But the civil war has wrought havoc on operations.
When conflict broke out in April 2023, staff had to flee Khartoum, which was then at the epicentre of the war. They have been tracking patients through WhatsApp, and set up temporary operations in Wad Madani – before fleeing to Sanga and then Kassala as the conflict shifted and spread. But far fewer patients have been treated, while the next stage of various research projects were halted.
All this time Dr Fahal and his team – unable to access Khartoum – were optimistic that the facility was still standing, and that they could resume research once the capital was recaptured, which took place in March.
Instead, staff returning for the first time a fortnight ago found their facility completely ransacked, with the reception and laboratory burned, ceilings collapsed and high-tech equipment destroyed.
In the long run, the biggest blow is the loss of 40 years of samples – a unique biobank unmatched anywhere in the world.
'It had very rare types of fungi and bacteria, some of them reported on for the first time – we had 700 fungi and 1,000 samples of bacteria, collected over 40 years… [as well as] a lot of DNA extracted from blood samples,' said Dr Fahal.
'So this is the saddest story because this is a very, very, very, valuable biological material for research.'
Prof Trudie Lang, a professor of global health research at the University of Oxford and head of the Global Health Network, added: 'Sudan has brilliant scientists, doing incredibly important work and Dr Fahal's remarkable efforts in mycetoma is an exemplar of this.
'The research centre was doing vital work to tackling this disease and contributing unique evidence to the global research community… [I] hope Dr Fahal can get this back on track.'
Dr Nyaoke-Anoke added that organisations should come together to help rebuild the centre, but warned the incident should also be a 'wake up call' for the global community not to rely on a single facility to research and treat any given disease.
Two weeks after the initial shock, Dr Fahal is determined not to give up.
'We started in 1991 with zero budget,' he said. 'It is our job now to think how we can rebuild this centre and work together. Really, these patients need to be supported.'
Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scientists make disturbing discovery in riverbed that could endanger millions: 'An emerging public health concern'
Scientists make disturbing discovery in riverbed that could endanger millions: 'An emerging public health concern'

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Scientists make disturbing discovery in riverbed that could endanger millions: 'An emerging public health concern'

A new study has discovered evidence that the presence of microplastics in river water could influence microbial communities, leading to more pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes. The research team collected water samples from the Oder River, which flows over 522 miles through Czechia, Germany, and Poland, putting them in sanitized containers and adding pre-drained sediment and microplastic particles. Compared to a control group, which did not contain microplastics, the test samples showed a higher abundance of pathogenic bacteria such as Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio spp., Escherichia coli, and Salmonella. The microplastic-contaminated samples also showed higher levels of antibiotic resistance genes, per the study published in Scientific Reports. "The presence of microplastics in [a] water environment and their bioavailability may contribute to, or alter the pattern of, the spreading of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes," the researchers stated, adding that this could be due to microbial competition and their use of microplastics to create biofilms, which makes these particles an environmentally favorable niche for some bacteria species. "This represents an emerging public health concern, particularly in the context of the One Health framework, which emphasizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health," researchers said. Antimicrobial resistance genes are problematic because they help bacteria resist the drugs meant to treat them. Antimicrobial resistance is one of the top global health threats, according to the World Health Organization, which says it makes infections harder to treat and other medical procedures and treatments, such as surgery and chemotherapy, much riskier. Meanwhile, this is not the first time scientists have sounded the alarm about microplastics, which are small plastic particles that break off of larger plastics as they degrade. These plastics are everywhere, including in water, soil, air, clothing, seafood, and salt. For instance, one study found microplastics in nearly every protein source tested, including chicken, tofu, and beef. While researchers and experts still don't understand the health impacts of microplastics, they've been linked to health problems such as cancer, dementia, and impaired blood flow in the brain. These tiny plastic particles could also be harming some of the world's most important archaeological sites. Researchers in England called attention to this issue following the discovery of microplastics in the soil at two historic sites. While it's difficult to remove microplastics from the environment, it's not impossible. For instance, one group of scientists has discovered a way to rid water of microplastics by using egg whites. How often do you worry about the quality of your drinking water? Never Sometimes Often Always Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Plus, some cities and countries are tackling plastic pollution, which is the source of microplastics. For one, England and France banned plastic cutlery for most fast food and takeout meals, while Los Angeles has banned Styrofoam takeout containers. You can cut down on your own plastic use at home by investing in reusable items like metal razors and non-plastic sandwich bags. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store