Local surplus auction in Bay County draws hundreds of attendees
BAY COUNTY, Fla. (WMBB) – Despite the weather, several local events went on as planned. The government surplus live auction is a community favorite.
Florida Auction network manager Jon Sewell said Saturday morning's event was a huge success, with several hundred community members in attendance.
Sewell said vehicles from Bay and Walton County Sheriff's offices, as well as Panama City, Callaway, and Panama City Beach Police departments, were auctioned off.
He adds that the money stays local, and the majority of proceeds go right back into government agencies' general funds to provide services to the community.
The next local government auction will be on June 21st.
There is an online auction that is open until 6 pm on May 13th. To learn more, click here, and to follow their social media page, click here
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newspaper seeks public release of Centennial Park feasibility study
Niagara Falls City Council Chairman Jim Perry has talked with Mayor Robert Restaino about the unreleased feasibility study for the proposed Centennial Park arena and events campus and said he's encouraged by what he's been told about it so far. In response to questions from the Niagara Gazette on Thursday, Perry did not say whether he would support releasing the study to the public in response to a Freedom of Information Law request filed by the newspaper. Instead, Perry said he spoke to city attorney Tom DeBoy who acknowledged receipt of the newspaper's formal request for the document and was assured that the city's legal department is working on it. 'I'm not part of that process, but (DeBoy) assured me it's being done,' Perry said on Thursday. Restaino confirmed in an interview with the members of the local press on May 13 that he received what he described as an incomplete version of the study, which was prepared by the private Florida-based consulting firm Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC at a cost of $140,000, plus expenses. While he has since indicated that the study results support the city building Centennial Park, he has declined to release the contents publicly. In an interview with the Gazette earlier this week, Restaino said he intends to do so by the end of the month after the results are shared with 'stakeholders,' namely representatives from New York's lead economy development agency Empire State Development Corp. and National Grid, the two entities that covered the city's cost for the study. 'One of the things we will do is meet with the stakeholders who paid for the study and show it to them,' Restaino told the Gazette in an interview earlier this week. 'And then we'll release it to the public. This month everything is going to be out in the open.' During an appearance on Monday on 'Your Community Accountability with Sam and Jon,' a Falls-based social media program aired on Facebook and YouTube, Perry said he has had a 'lot of discussions about it' and that it 'looks positive.' On Thursday, Perry told the newspaper he hadn't seen the study but had talked to the mayor about it. 'I can't share everything because this will be up to the mayor to unveil, but this project should be one of the more positive advancements to our local economy I've seen in my 70-plus years here in the city if everything falls into place,' Perry said. On Thursday, the newspaper filed a formal Freedom of Information request with the city's legal department and clerk's office, requesting a copy of the study from Restaino's administration. The newspaper's request cited two opinions from the New York State Committee on Open Government that indicate state law allows public agencies to release documents in their possession even in instances where they are considered to be drafts or incomplete. 'Draft records are subject to FOIL,' said Paul Wolf, a Williamsville attorney and founder of the government transparency group, the New York Coalition for Open Government. The city clerk's office acknowledged the newspaper's request on Thursday afternoon. Under state law, public agencies are allowed up to 20 business days to either grant or deny requests for information. In its initial response, the city clerk's office indicated that should 'circumstances arise' that prevent the delivery of a response within 20 business, the newspaper would be contacted with a 'new response date.' 'Examples of circumstances that may lead to extended response times include staff shortages, requests for a large volume of records and requests that require significant document redaction and/or seek documents that are not maintained electronically,' the response from the clerk's office notes. The results of the feasibility study are expected to more clearly define elements of the Centennial Park project and shed light on whether it would, as proposed, be viable in the Falls. A previous arena study, commissioned by Niagara County in 2017, concluded that the city lacked a sufficient number of hotel rooms needed to support such a project at that time. City officials, including Restaino and Perry, are seeking to acquire, using the city's power of eminent domain, 10 acres of land currently owned by the private firm Niagara Falls Redevelopment for the purposes of building Centennial Park. The courts have sided with the city's argument that it has the right to forcibly acquire the property — located off John B. Daly Boulevard at the intersection of 10th and Falls streets — for the purposes of developing the 'park.' The city is currently engaged in litigation, arguing that 5 of those 10 acres are actually still owned by the city as NFR failed, more than a decade ago, to properly obtain permission from the state to annex what was at the time public parkland formerly known as 10th Street park. NFR is disputing the city's position in court. The company also insists it intends to use the 10 acres for the first phase of a project of its own, a proposed $1.5 billion data center it says it intends to build in partnership with the Canadian firm, Urbacon. During his interview on Sam Archie's social media program on Monday, Perry backed the city's position that the city, not NFR, owns the 5 acres because it was formerly public parkland that was never properly acquired by the company. He said he agrees with the city's position based on maps and other documents that show the area in question was a public park dating back to the 1940s. 'A park is a park forever until you get that it is no longer parkland by permission from the state,' he said. 'When it was transferred over, those papers were never filed,' he added. 'You can argue all you want, that is still a park. Unless it's done legally, there is no claim to it.' As to NFR — a company owned by the Milstein family of real estate developers in New York City — Perry said the city has heard 30 years of promises and stories from the company with no tangible results. He also said there 'is no two solutions,' a reference to what some residents and officials have suggested could be a compromise that would allow both projects to happen. 'The convention center is real,' Perry said, referring to Centennial Park, 'and I know that because I've been working on issues and I've been talking to people. The data center, to me, is another pie in the sky.' 'If we gave this fight up tomorrow, (and said), 'OK, you guys can have the park, we'll do the paperwork and turn it over to you.' Let them have it, turn it over to NFR, all the stuff, you know what's going to happen? They are going to say, 'Well, you took so long Urbacon's not interested in it anymore' because that's the M.O.' Perry did concede in his interview with show host Sam Archie that, if the city is successful in its claim for the 5 acres, it may be required to reimburse NFR for taxes paid on the property in the past. 'I would assume that is correct,' Perry said.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
British holidaymakers to miss out on compensation after EU rule change
Britons will miss out on compensation for delayed flights after Brussels adopted a rule change following complaints from airlines. Payouts that were previously triggered by delays exceeding three hours will now only be made after four hours of holdups, European transport ministers agreed. The new regulation, hammered out following a decade of discussions and bargaining over passenger compensation, will apply to all services from EU countries to the UK. For the time being, travellers headed from Britain to the Continent will still qualify for a refund when flight delays hit the three-hour mark, unless they are flying with an EU-registered airline. While raising the compensation threshold, ministers also agreed to increase the minimum level of payment from €250 (£210) to €300 for shorter journeys and to €500 for those above 3,500km (2,175 miles). The original regulation, known as EU261, was passed in 2004 with the aim of ensuring that passengers received money and assistance in the event of flights being cancelled at short notice. Following Brexit, the UK adopted it into law so that the rights of travellers remained unchanged. However, the Government will now have to decide whether to adopt the amendments for outbound flights or stick with the original version. Taking no action might be welcomed by consumer groups but would have consequences for UK airlines, which would be at a disadvantage to their European rivals. It could also affect fares, with Ryanair having claimed that EU261 costs passengers £7 per ticket. Airlines for Europe, an industry group, had pressed for a higher compensation threshold, arguing that extending it to five hours – as originally proposed by the European Commission – would allow 70pc of flights that are cancelled to be rescued. It argued said that airlines inevitably scrapped flights once compensation was triggered, especially since the payouts involved were often higher than the ticket prices charged. It said a five-hour threshold would have made it more practical for carriers to fly in replacement aircraft so that more flights would get away, potentially benefiting 10m passengers a year. A spokesman said: 'Getting to their destination is the primary concern of passengers, even if it means getting to bed or arriving at their holiday resort late. But with a low cancellation threshold it makes more sense to call off the flight and take that hit.' Airlines have also railed against the fact that the compensation applies whether delays are caused by a crew shortage or technical issue that might be laid at their door, or by severe weather or air traffic control issues beyond their control. A number of extraordinary circumstances are expected to be added as part of revisions to 31 different air passenger rights. The revisions must still clear the European Parliament but are expected to become law in the bloc by the end of the year. The Department for Transport said the UK did not have to amend its legislation in line with any changes from the EU, and that any potential future reforms would require careful consideration on their merits, and be subject to public consultation. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
4 Different Levels of FIRE Retirement and How To Pick the Right One for You
FIRE, short for Financial Independence, Retire Early, is more than a one-size-fits-all movement. 'The goal of FIRE is to hit the level of financial security and independence so that you can retire before the traditional retirement age (usually around 65 years old),' said Meg K. Wheeler, CPA, and founder of The Equitable Money Project. Read More: Find Out: Wheeler explained, 'This is done by getting rid of all debt and saving and investing enough to generate earnings that will fund your expenses in retirement. Most FIRE followers will aim for saving 25 [times] of their expected annual retirement expenses.' Whether someone dreams of retiring in their 30s or wants the freedom to leave a stressful job early, here are the four different levels of FIRE retirement and how to pick the right one for you. LeanFIRE is the most minimalist version of early retirement, where individuals save just enough to cover their essential living expenses, typically between $25,000 and $40,000 per year. It's ideal for those willing to embrace a frugal lifestyle in exchange for maximum freedom. 'If you're a minimalist who genuinely loves simple living, DIY home fixes, and free activities and hobbies for fun, this could be a good fit,' said Lawrence Klayman, founding partner of Klayman Toskes PLLC. 'You might also consider geographic arbitrage. For example, instead of retiring in Florida, you could live in lower-cost Georgia, with its similar beaches and weather.' Discover Next: Traditional FIRE aims to accumulate sufficient savings to support a modest, middle-class lifestyle without needing to work. It's a balanced approach for those who want early retirement without making extreme sacrifices or excessive luxuries. 'FIRE, or 'regular' FIRE, is the middle path,' said Jason Breck, owner of 40 North Media. Breck said he is implementing the FIRE Method. 'You're financially independent with room to breathe. You can say yes to a spontaneous trip, a nice dinner out, or upgrading your phone without guilt. That usually means a $1 million to $2 million nest egg and spending between $40,000 and $80,000 a year.' Breck explained, 'FIRE fits people who want balance. Maybe you're raising kids or just want a little margin in your life. You're still mindful of money, but you're not saying no to every latte or family vacation.' ChubbyFIRE offers a more comfortable version of early retirement. It's ideal for those who want financial freedom but aren't interested in strict frugality. 'Think of this as the balanced approach,' Wheeler said. 'The goal is still to save and invest enough to retire early, but without sacrificing all of your joy today, or in the future. Folks following the ChubbyFIRE method focus on balancing their debt pay down and investing while still spending money on things they want today, and they set themselves up for a more moderate lifestyle in retirement.' FatFIRE is the most financially ambitious version of early retirement, designed for those who want to stop working early without giving up a high-end lifestyle. It typically requires a large investment portfolio and is best suited for high earners who can save aggressively. Isheeta Borkar, owner and author of the blog Travelicious Couple, with her husband, said the couple has been targeting FIRE for some time now. They have been traveling slowly around the world. 'FatFIRE is living it up,' Borkar said. 'Think five-star trips, expensive dinners, and the freedom to say 'yes' to pretty much anything that calls to us. It's a little difficult to achieve for most.' Choosing the right FIRE path begins with understanding the numbers and tracking current expenses to determine how much is truly needed to retire. It's also important to assess risk tolerance; while LeanFIRE may sound appealing, it can feel too restrictive over time. 'FIRE often comes with low-income years,' Breck said. 'Take advantage by converting traditional IRAs to Roths while your tax rate is minimal.' Life stage matters, too, as FatFIRE might be unrealistic in one's 20s but more attainable by their 40s. Most importantly, individuals should think beyond the numbers: what kind of life do they actually want to wake up to each day? 'Want to upgrade to FIRE or ChubbyFIRE?' Breck said. 'I tell people to try spending like that for six months. If your portfolio holds up and your values still align, step up.' More From GOBankingRates 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks This article originally appeared on 4 Different Levels of FIRE Retirement and How To Pick the Right One for You Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
