logo
House Dem pushes to censure Boebert over TV interview about Al Green

House Dem pushes to censure Boebert over TV interview about Al Green

Yahoo11-03-2025

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., is pushing to censure Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., over a TV interview in which the Republican congresswoman criticized Rep. Al Green, D-Texas.
Green notably heckled President Donald Trump multiple times during his first address of his second term to Congress last week until House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., ordered the Sergeant at Arms to escort Green from the chamber.
Houlahan submitted a resolution Monday calling to censure Boebert "for her recent disparaging and derogatory comments" about Green.
Rep. Al Green Blames 'Invidious Discrimination' For Being Censured After Disrupting Trump's Speech
During a March 7 interview with Real America's Voice News, Boebert said "Al Green was given multiple opportunities to stand down, to sit down, to behave, to show decorum."
"For him to go and shake his pimp cane at President Trump was absolutely abhorrent," Boebert added.
Read On The Fox News App
The resolution said those words uttered by Boebert "are disparaging, derogatory, and racist toward another colleague, and are a breach of proper conduct and decorum of the U.S. House of Representatives."
It calls for Boebert to be censured, "forthwith present herself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure," and that Boebert "be censured with the public reading of this resolution by the Speaker."
In a statement, Houlahan said, "After my discussion on the House floor last week when Speaker Johnson told me he'd have to censure half the members if he actually enforced the rules of the Congress, I decided to help, and tonight introduced a resolution to censure Representative Boebert for her racist and derogatory statements about Representative Al Green (D-TX)."
At the start of Trump's address before Congress, Green stood up when the president described his electoral victory as a "mandate" from the American people.
"You have no mandate! You have no mandate to cut Medicaid!" Green shouted, waving his cane at Trump.
The lower chamber of Congress voted to censure Green the next day, and Johnson condemned how the Democrat "chose to deliberately violate House rules in a manner that we think is probably unprecedented in history."
Houlahan initially voted to table the motion, but she was among the 10 Democrats who ultimately joined with Republicans to censure Green.
Establishment Democrats and progressives promptly turned on each other over their party's disrupting behavior during Trump's address, complaining how they've failed to have a unifying message against Republicans.
Trump Blasts Rep Al Green As 'An Embarrassment' To Democrats, Says He 'Should Be Forced To Take An Iq Test
Houlahan acknowledged in an X post on Thursday that "today's vote to censure my fellow representative was not easy and has angered many of you."
Speaking to the Philadelphia Inquirer afterward, she defended her decision but also criticized past behavior from Republicans in the chamber that she argued also warranted censure.
"I voted to table that because I think we have much, much better things to do with our time than to continue to do this tit-for-tat nonsense with one another," Houlahan told the newspaper. "That being said, the motion to table failed, so we don't have the opportunity to not vote on this. And I believe we need to recognize that we have rules in the House of Representatives and we have standards of decorum that we all presumably agree to, and we all need to agree to those standards so we can get the work for the people done and so we can not be a banana republic."
After the vote, Houlahan told the Inquirer she pulled Johnson "to the side and had a very‚ very strong conversation with him where I explained I voted in favor but I am not OK with arbitrary and capricious applications of the same rule."
She said she complained about how there was no censure or sanction against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., and Johnson replied, "Well, she just wore a hat."
But Houlahan argued Greene "also yelled at the President of the United States," referring to her treatment of former President Joe Biden last year, "and I don't believe it's OK that she did not have same treatment."
"And I think it's absolute hypocrisy that people after the vote were standing there yelling at Mr. Green when their own colleagues have done very, very similar things, not wearing masks when it was mandated, wearing MAGA hats when there are literally no hats allowed on the floor," Houlahan said. "We had to make a special exception for wearing hijabs. It's insane… We need to behave like grown-ups and stop the madness."
Click To Get The Fox News App
Houlahan said it was a "really, really, really hard vote for me," but ultimately she did her duty. "And it's frustrating because Al Green's statement was true," Houlahan said. "It wasn't provocative or offensive. It was the truth. But I think each one of us had to make decisions about how we were going to comport ourselves and what was appropriate, and I know each colleague on both sides made those choices, and each one of us knows there are consequences to those choices."Original article source: House Dem pushes to censure Boebert over TV interview about Al Green

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions
Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions

All members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board announced their resignation on Wednesday, releasing a statement accusing President Donald Trump's administration of political interference in the prestigious exchange program. The 12-member board alleged the Trump administration "usurped the authority of the Board" by denying Fulbright awards to "a substantial number of individuals" who were selected for the 2025-2026 academic year. The board also alleged the administration is currently "subjecting" an additional 1,200 international Fulbright recipients to "an unauthorized review process and could reject more." "We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute," the board said in its statement. MORE: State Department delivers crushing news to Fulbright scholar hopefuls in Afghanistan The board oversees the Fulbright Foreign Student Program, which offers international graduate students, young professionals and artists the opportunity to study and conduct research in the United States. The government-funded, non-partisan program -- which was established by Congress in 1942 under then-President Harry Truman's administration -- operates in more than 160 countries worldwide, providing scholarships to approximately 4,000 foreign students annually. In the joint letter on Wednesday, the board said the awards that were overridden by the administration were concentrated in biology, engineering, architecture, agriculture, crop sciences, animal sciences, biochemistry, medical sciences, music and history. MORE: State Dept. suggests Afghan Fulbright hopefuls seek other options as program stalls The board claimed it has raised "legal issues and our strong objections with" senior Trump administration officials "on multiple occasions," including in writing, but says the concerns have not been acknowledged. In a statement to statement to ABC News after the board announced its resignation, a senior State Department official called the decision "a political stunt attempting to undermine President Trump." "It's ridiculous to believe that these members would continue to have final say over the application process, especially when it comes to determining academic suitability and alignment with President Trump's Executive Orders." the official said. The board, however, said in its statement that the decision was not one "we take lightly," woth the board calling on Congress, the courts and future Fulbright Boards to "prevent the administration's efforts to degrade, dismantle, or even eliminate one of our nation's most respected and valuable programs." "Injecting politics and ideological mandates into the Fulbright program violates the letter and spirit of the law that Congress so wisely established nearly eight decades ago," the board concluded in its statement. Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions originally appeared on

More Americans see increased influence from religion in US: Gallup
More Americans see increased influence from religion in US: Gallup

The Hill

time11 minutes ago

  • The Hill

More Americans see increased influence from religion in US: Gallup

More Americans said they see an increased influence from religion in the U.S., according to a new Gallup poll. The Wednesday poll found that 34 percent of respondents said they believe 'religion as a whole is increasing its influence on American life,' up 14 points from May 2024. In December, 35 percent said the same about religion, one point higher than the recent Gallup poll. Back in April, President Trump pledged that 'religion is coming back to America' after kicking off his first White House Easter Egg Roll since coming back to office 'We're bringing religion back in America. We're bringing a lot of things back, but religion is coming back to America. That's why you see the kind of numbers that you see, the spirit and the kind of numbers that you see,' the president said in April. In Wednesday's Gallup poll, 59 percent of respondents said they believe religion's influence is dropping, down 2 points from December. Two percent also said religion's influence is the 'same' while 5 percent had 'no opinion.' In February, a Pew Research Center survey found that a decline in the number of Americans who identify as Christian appeared to be slowing down following years of losses. The Gallup poll took place from May 1 to 18, featuring 1,003 people and plus or minus 4 percentage points as a margin of sampling error.

Judge Bars Trump Administration From Detaining Mahmoud Khalil
Judge Bars Trump Administration From Detaining Mahmoud Khalil

New York Times

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Judge Bars Trump Administration From Detaining Mahmoud Khalil

A federal judge on Wednesday barred the Trump administration from continuing to detain Mahmoud Khalil. However, the judge, Michael E. Farbiarz, paused his own order, saying that it would not go into effect until 9:30 a.m. on Friday, which would allow the administration to appeal. Mr. Khalil, whose wife and infant son are American citizens, has been held in Louisiana for three months. He has not been accused of a crime. This is a developing story and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store