
Starvation Of Gaza A Continuation Of A Decades-old Plan
Reading an NBC News report a couple of days ago about a Trump administration plan to relocate 1 million Gazans to Libya reminded me of a conversation between the legendary Warsaw Ghetto leader Marek Edelman and fellow fighter and survivor Simcha Rotem that took place more than quarter of a century ago.
In the conversation, first reported in Haaretz in 2023, Rotem said the Jews who walked into the gas chambers without a fight did so only because they were hungry.
Edelman disagreed, but Rotem insisted. 'Listen, man. Marek, I'm surprised by your attitude. They only went because they were hungry. Even if they'd known what awaited them they would have walked into the gas chambers. You and I would have done the same.'
Edelman cut him off. 'You would never have gone' [to the gas chamber.] Rotem replied, 'I'm not so sure. I was never that hungry.' Edelman agreed, saying: 'I also wasn't that hungry,' to which Rotem said, 'That's why you didn't go.'
The NBC report claims that Israeli officials are aware of the plan and talks have been held with the Libyan leadership about taking in 1 million ethnically cleansed Palestinians.. The carrot being offered is the unfreezing of billions of dollars of Libya's own money seized by the US more than a decade ago.
The Arabic word Sumud – or steadfastness – is synonymous with the Palestinian people. The idea that 1 million Gazans would agree to walk off the 1.4% of historic Palestine that is Gaza is inconceivable.
But then the idea that my great grandmother and other relatives walked into the gas chambers is equally incomprehensible. But we've never been that hungry.
The people of Gaza are. No food has entered Gaza for 76 days. Half a million Gazans are facing starvation and the rest of the population (more than 1.5 million people) are suffering from high levels of acute food insecurity, according to the UN.
Last year, Israel's finance minister Bezalel Smotrich was widely condemned when he suggested starving Gaza might be 'justified and moral.'
The lack of outrage and urgency being expressed by world leaders – particularly western leaders – after nearly 11 weeks of Israel actually starving the inhabitants of what retired IDF general Giora Eiland has called a giant concentration camp – is an outrage.
As far as I'm aware there's been no talk of cutting off diplomatic relations, trade embargos or even cultural boycotts.
Israel – which last time I looked wasn't in Europe – just placed second in Eurovision. 'I'm happy,' an Israeli friend messaged me, 'that my old genocidal homeland (Austria) won and not my current genocidal nation.'
A third generation Israeli, she's one of a tiny minority protesting the war crimes being committed less than 100km from her apartment.
Spanish prime minister Pedro Sanchez and Irish president, Michael Higgins, is an honourable exception to the muted criticism being expressed by western leaders.
Sanchez had declared Israel a genocidal state and said Spain won't do business with such a nation,
And peaking at a national famine commemoration held over the weekend Higgens said the UN Security Council has failed again and again by not dealing with famines and the current 'forced starvation of the people of Gaza.'
He cited UN secretary general António Guterres saying "as aid dries up, the floodgates of horror have re-opened. Gaza is a killing field – and civilians are in an endless death loop."
Nobel Prize winning economist Amartya Sen argued in his 1981 book Poverty and Famines that famines are man-made and not natural disasters.
Unlike Gaza, the famines he wrote about were caused by either callous disregard by the ruling elites for the populations left to starve or the disastrous results of following the whims of an all-powerful leader like chairman Mao.
He argued that a famine had never occurred in a functioning democracy.
It's a horrifying fact that a self-described democracy, funded and abetted by the world's most powerful democracy, has been allowed by the international community to starve two million people with no let-up in its bombing of barely functioning hospitals and killing of more than 2000 Gazans since the ban on food entering the strip was put in place. (Many more will have died due to a lack of medicine, food, and access to clean water.)
After more than two months of denying any food or medicine to enter Gaza Israel is now saying it will allow limited amounts of food in to avoid a full-scale famine.
'Due to the need to expand the fighting, we will introduce a basic amount of food to the residents of Gaza to ensure no famine occurs,' prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu explained.
'A famine might jeopardise the continuation of Operation Gideon's Chariots aimed at eliminating Hamas.'
If 19-months of indiscriminate bombardment, the razing to the ground of whole cities, the displacement of virtually the entire population, and more than 50,000 recorded deaths (the Lancet estimated the true figure is likely to be four times that) hasn't destroyed Hamas to Israel's satisfaction it's hard to conceive of what will.
But accepting that that is the real aim of the ongoing genocide would be naïve.
In the first cabinet meeting following the Six Day War, long before Hamas came into existence, ridding Gaza of its Palestinian inhabitants was top of the agenda.
"If we can evict 300,000 refugees from Gaza to other places … we can annex Gaza without a problem," defence minister Moshe Dayan said.
The population of Gaza was 400,000 at the time.
"We should take them to the East Bank [Jordan] by the scruff of their necks and throw them there,' minister Yosef Sapir said.
Fifty-eight years later the possible destinations may have changed but the aim remains the same. And a shamefully indifferent western world combined with a malnourished and desperate population may be paving the way to a mass expulsion.
If the US, Europe and their allies demanded that Israel stop, the killing would end tomorrow.
By Jeremy Rose
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
Gaza's 'Humanitarian' Façade: A Deceptive Ploy Unravels
Just one day before the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operating officially inside the Gaza Strip, its executive director, Jake Wood, resigned. The text of his resignation statement underscored what many had already suspected: GHF is not a humanitarian endeavor, but the latest scam by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to control the Gaza Strip, after 600 days of war and genocide. "It is clear that it is not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence," Wood said in the statement, which was cited by CNN and other media. This begs the question: why had that realization become 'clear' to Wood, even though the aid operation was not yet in effect? The rest of the statement offers some explanation, suggesting that the American contractor may not have known the extent of the Israeli ploy until later, but knew that a disaster was unfolding – the kind that would surely require investigating and, possibly, accountability. In fact, an investigation by Swiss authorities had already begun. The US news network, CBS, looked into the matter, reporting on May 29 that GHF originally applied for registration in Geneva on January 31 and was officially registered on February 12. However, in no time, Swiss authorities began noticing repeated violations, including that the Swiss branch of GHF is "currently not fulfilling various legal obligations". In its original application, GHF "pursues exclusively charitable philanthropic objectives for the benefit of the people." Strangely, the entity that promised to provide "material, psychological or health" services to famine-stricken Gazans, found it necessary to employ 300 "heavily armed" American contractors, with "as much ammunition as they can carry," CBS reported. The 'psychological' support in particular was the most ironic, as desperate Gazans were corralled, on May 27, into cages under extremely high temperatures, only to be given tiny amounts of food that, according to Rami Abdu, head of the Geneva-based Euro-Med Monitor, were in fact stolen from a US-based charitable organization known as Rahma Worldwide. Following the CBS news report, among others, and following several days of chaos and violence in Gaza, where at least 49 Palestinians were killed and over 300 wounded by those who promised to give aid and comfort, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed that the funding for the operation is coming directly from Israel. Prominent Israeli politician and Knesset member Avigdor Lieberman went even further, claiming that the money, estimated by the Washington Post to be $100 million, 'is coming from the Mossad and the Defense Ministry.' But why would Israel go through all of this trouble while it can, at no financial cost, simply allow the massive shipments of aid, reportedly rotting on the Egyptian side of the border, to enter Gaza and to stave off the famine? In Netanyahu's mind, the aid mechanism is part of the war. In a video message, reported by The Jerusalem Post on May 19, he described the new aid distributing points, manned jointly by GHF and the Israeli army, as "parallel to the enormous pressure" Israel is putting on the Palestinians – exemplified in Israel's "massive (military) entrance (into Gaza)" – with the aim of "taking control of all of the Gaza" Strip. In Netanyahu's own words, all of this, the military-arranged aid and ongoing genocide, is "the war and victory plan." Of course, Palestinians and international aid groups operating in Gaza, including UN-linked aid apparatuses, were fully aware that the secretive Israel-US scheme was predicated on bad intentions. This is why they wanted to have nothing to do with it. In Israel's thinking, any aid mechanism that would sustain the status quo that existed prior to the war and genocide starting on October 7, 2023, would be equivalent to an admission of defeat. This is precisely why Israel labored to associate the UN Palestinian refugee agency, UNRWA, with Hamas. This included the launching of a virulent campaign against the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres himself, and other top officials and rapporteurs. On July 22, the Israeli Knesset went as far as to designate UNRWA a 'terrorist organization'. Still, it may seem to be a contradiction that the likes of extremist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich would agree to such an 'aid' scheme just days after declaring that Israel's intention is to "entirely destroy" Gaza. However, there is no contradiction. Having failed to conquer Gaza through military force, Israel is trying to use its latest aid scheme to capitalize on the famine it has purposely engineered over the course of months. Luring people to 'distribution points', the Israeli army is trying to concentrate the population of Gaza in areas that can be easily controlled through leveraging food, with the ultimate aim of pushing Palestinians out, in the words of Smotrich, "in great numbers to third countries." The latest scheme is likely to fail, of course, like other such stratagems in the last 600 days. However, the inhumane and degrading treatment of Palestinians further illustrates Israel's rejection of the growing international push to end the genocide. For Israel to stop scheming, the international community must translate its strong words into strong action and hold, not just Israel, but its own citizens involved in the GHF and other ploys, accountable for being part of the ongoing war crimes in Gaza. - Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is ' Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out'. His other books include 'My Father was a Freedom Fighter' and 'The Last Earth'. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is


Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
France, UK Preparing To Recognise Palestinian State, NZ Must Join Them
Justice for Palestine welcomes the news that France and the United Kingdom are planning on recognising the State of Palestine at the UN conference on the two-state solution on 17 June. We urge the New Zealand government to follow suit. 'The Minister said New Zealand recognising Palestine was 'a matter of when, not if'. The time has come to join not only France and the UK, but 147 out of 193 UN member states that recognise the State of Palestine,' says Kate Stone, Justice for Palestine co-convenor. The UN conference hosted by France and Saudi Arabia will occur against the backdrop not only of the war in Gaza, but also against Israel's increasingly brazen moves to expand its illegal settlements on Palestinian land. Israeli Ministers have recently declared Israel will establish 22 new illegal settlements and 'legalise' existing informal settlements or outposts with the express purpose of preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state. In 2016 when New Zealand was on the UN Security Council we co-sponsored a resolution which reaffirmed that the establishment of Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories was illegal and 'a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-State solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace' (UNSC 2334). 'Israel is and has for decades been flagrantly violating international law with impunity and standing in the way of any just solution in Palestine. New Zealand, alongside France, the UK and others, must stand up against Israel, and stand up for the rights of Palestinians to self-determination,' say Kate Stone. 'This is also about standing up against might over right, and standing up for the international rules based order, which we all benefit from through the protection of our rights,' 'What's more the people support New Zealand recognising Palestine. Polling we conducted in September 2024 showed that of those that had a view two-thirds supported recognition of Palestine.' The time for moral clarity and decisive action is now. After 77 years of dispossession, suffering, and systemic injustice at the hands of Israeli apartheid, the Palestinian people deserve action, not further delay. New Zealand must not remain silent in the face of what the international community is increasingly recognising as a campaign of ethnic cleansing both in Gaza and in the wider Occupied Territories. We must act. Justice for Palestine calls on the New Zealand Government to: Recognise the State of Palestine, as the basis for equal negotiations for a just peace that respects Palestinians' right to self-determination and to return to their homeland Impose sanctions on Israel, until it complies with international law Create a special emergency visa for Gazans with family in Aotearoa Continue and increase aid funding to UNRWA


Scoop
13 hours ago
- Scoop
UN Chief Urges World Leaders To Keep Two-State Solution ‘Alive'
5 June 2025 ' It is absolutely essential to keep alive the two-State solution perspective with all the terrible things we are witnessing in Gaza and the West Bank,' Mr. Guterres told reporters at UN Headquarters in New York. He was responding to a question about his message to leaders gathering at a high-level international conference later this month on a comprehensive and lasting peace in the region. 'And for those that doubt about the two-State solution, I ask: What is the alternative? Is it a one-state solution in which either the Palestinians are expelled or forced to live in their land without rights? ' Mandated by the UN General Assembly, the high-level event is aimed at charting an 'action-oriented' path toward a comprehensive and lasting peace based on the two-State formula. The meeting will include thematic roundtables on key issues such as security, humanitarian reconstruction, and the economic viability of a Palestinian state. Disappointed over failed resolution Mr. Guterres also expressed deep disappointment following the Security Council's failure on Wednesday to adopt a resolution demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, and the release of all hostages. The text, endorsed by all ten elected members of the Council, received support from the other four permanent members, but was vetoed by the United States. 'We are always disappointed when ceasefires do not materialise, releases of hostages [do not happen] and humanitarian aid is not distributed or is distributed in a way that puts at risk the lives of so many Palestinians,' he said, responding to another correspondent. The Secretary-General reiterated that only a permanent ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages, and unimpeded humanitarian access would allow the UN to deliver meaningful relief to civilians in Gaza. He emphasised that during previous temporary ceasefires, the UN was able to mobilise large-scale assistance.