
Trump lawyer and DOJ enforcer faces confirmation hearing for federal judgeship
President Donald Trump has nominated several of his personal attorneys to top legal posts in his administration, but his nomination of Emil Bove to the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals marks the first time he has selected one of his lawyers to serve on the federal bench.
For the past six months, Bove has served as a high-ranking official in the Justice Department. In that short time, he has proven himself to be a reliable ally for the president and also been embroiled in a series of major controversies – including dropping federal charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams; investigating officials who worked on cases related to January 6, 2021; and pursuing Trump's deportation goals in ways that prompted a whistleblower to allege Bove intended to ignore court orders and mislead federal judges.
A Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing Wednesday will be the first time Democratic lawmakers will have the chance to grill the reclusive Bove on his time at the Justice Department and his work for Trump. If confirmed, Bove would be one of roughly a dozen judges with the power to review federal cases being appealed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and the Virgin Islands.
Despite his involvement in high-profile cases and controversies, Bove has mostly avoided the limelight.
'He has been right there but kind of in the shadows, he doesn't go on TV, he doesn't talk to the press,' a senior Justice Department official told CNN. 'He is a brilliant lawyer, he is just an amazing writer, critical thinker … he clerked for two rock star judges, he worked at Sullivan and Cromwell. He is a legit genius lawyer, but nobody knows who he is.'
Bove graduated from Georgetown Law School in 2008 and then went on to spend a decade working as a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, where he focused on international terrorism and narcotics cases.
During that time Bove successfully brought narco-terrorism charges against Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in 2020. He also prosecuted Ahmad Khan Rahimi, the man responsible for a 2016 pressure cooker bombing in New York that left 30 people injured. Rahimi was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
A former colleague who worked with Bove describes him as an 'a**-kicker … he is whip smart, has a high level of curiosity, is naturally intelligent, and extremely effective.'
'I wouldn't want to be one of his adversaries,' they said.
Bove joined Trump's legal team in 2023 and worked on three of Trump's criminal cases over the span of roughly 18 months. He sat second chair, alongside now-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, to represent Trump in his New York hush money trial. Trump was ultimately found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records in that case, which he is still appealing.
He also worked on Trump's federal criminal cases related to alleged mishandling of classified documents and allegations of interfering with the 2020 election.
Bove's resume has many of the hallmarks of a federal judge, but he has never served on the bench, and it is unclear how he would rule on major issues.
'He is completely empathic and fair – he is very strategic and thoughtful about applying law to the facts. He is a brilliant writer and critical legal thinker. He will make opinions that come out of the third circuit tighter and better,' the senior Justice Department official said.
But some Senate Democrats are not convinced and want to focus Wednesday's hearing on Bove's controversial actions while at the Trump Justice Department.
Just hours after Trump took office, Bove was tapped to assume the powerful position of interim deputy attorney general – the No. 2 job at the Justice Department, which had him running the sprawling agency while Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Blanche were awaiting confirmation.
His brief tenure has earned him many detractors as he tried to reshape the department to align with Trump's vision and clashed with career officials.
One of Bove's first actions at the department was to issue a memo threatening to prosecute state and local officials who resist the administration's federal immigration crackdown.
'The administration had a directive to depoliticize the department. He was met with instant resistance from entrenched bureaucrats who are not accustomed to change,' his former colleague told CNN. 'He was there to execute a mission and institute policy – he was not there to make friends.'
He then ordered the firing of eight senior officials and sent a memo demanding information about all current and former employees who had any involvement in January 6 investigations.
The request became a point of contention between the FBI and DOJ, sparking two lawsuits that aimed to stop the collection or release of any such information, saying that its release would put FBI employees in danger.
His most high-profile controversy has been dropping federal corruption charges against Adams.
Adams was charged in September 2024 with five federal charges of bribery, wire fraud and conspiracy and soliciting campaign contributions from foreign nationals.
In a memo to prosecutors in February, Bove cited two reasons as to why the case should be dropped: It had been tainted by publicity, and it was preventing Adams from doing his job, which included helping Trump with his immigration crackdown.
Federal prosecutors at first rebuffed his demand to drop the case, and some quit in protest, including the interim US Attorney in Manhattan, Danielle Sassoon, and the acting chief of the public integrity section of the department.
Bove ended up personally arguing for the case to be dismissed. Judge Dale Ho ultimately agreed to do so in April 2025.
Bove's handling of the Adams case has been the focus of many of the objections to his judicial nomination.
Even the conservative The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board wrote Tuesday, '… his recent handling of the case against New York May Eric Adams doesn't inspire confidence.'
Justice Connection, a coalition of former Justice Department officials, released a video on Monday with statements from formal federal prosecutors warning the public of Bove's alleged unlawful practices.
Ryan Crosswell, a federal prosecutor for more than a decade, was one of the lawyers who resigned over the case.
'We don't bring charges or dismiss them based on political loyalties. Emil Bove asked us to base a prosecutorial decision not on the facts, not on the law, but on a political calculation,' Crosswell says in the video.
'He took on a hard job the first five weeks of the administration doing what the president was elected to do,' said the senior Justice Department official. 'Whether someone is qualified to be a judge is not determined by what they did over five-to-six-week period of administration.'
Bove has also drawn scrutiny for his approach to executing the president's aggressive goals on immigration.
On Tuesday, Erez Reuveni, the former acting deputy director for the Office of Immigration Litigation, sent a whistleblower letter to members of Congress and independent investigators in the executive branch regarding Bove's alleged conduct.
Reuveni was an immigration attorney who lost his job after working on the case of mistakenly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
He complained internally about the department's lack of respect towards the court which ultimately led to him being removed. Reuveni also claims that Bove told prosecutors in a meeting in March that the Justice Department could ignore court orders, and that the department could tell the courts, 'f**k you.'
In the wake of these controversies, the Justice Department points to accomplishments that have occurred under Bove's leadership, including securing the transfer of 29 cartel leaders to face charges in the US. Bove was also a part of the Justice Department team that worked with the DEA to execute the largest fentanyl seizure in history.
But his former colleague says Bove's varied experience is what makes him perfect for the federal bench.
'He has seen it from both sides – he has worked in a federal prosecutors' office, he has worked at DOJ, and he worked in the private sector and defended people targeted by the federal government,' they said. 'He is attuned to overreach. He is exactly who you would want on federal bench.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump judicial nominee Bove faces questions as whistleblower claims he floated ignoring court orders
WASHINGTON (AP) — A top Justice Department official under scrutiny over a whistleblower's claims that he suggested ignoring court orders will face questions on Capitol Hill on Wednesday as he seeks to be confirmed as a federal appeals court judge. Emil Bove, a former criminal defense attorney for President Donald Trump, has been behind some of the most contentious actions that Justice Department leadership has taken since January. The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing comes a day after a former Justice Department lawyer alleged in a whistleblower complaint that he was fired after resisting efforts to defy judicial orders. Bove was nominated last month by the Republican president to serve on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears cases from Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. A former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, Bove was on the defense team during Trump's New York hush money trial and defended Trump in the two federal criminal cases brought by the Justice Department. The White House said Bove "is unquestionably qualified for the role and has a career filled with accolades, both academically and throughout his legal career, that should make him a shoo-in for the Third Circuit.' "The President is committed to nominating constitutionalists to the bench who will restore law and order and end the weaponization of the justice system, and Emil Bove fits that mold perfectly,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in an email. Bove is likely to face heated questions over the allegations made by the whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, who was fired in April after conceding in court that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man who had been living in Maryland, was mistakenly deported to an El Salvador prison. Reuveni sent a letter on Tuesday to members of Congress and the Justice Department's inspector general seeking an investigation into allegations of wrongdoing by Bove and other officials in the weeks leading up to his firing. Reuveni described a Justice Department meeting in March concerning Trump's plans to invoke the Alien Enemies Act over what the president claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. Reuveni says Bove raised the possibility that a court might block the deportations before they could happen. Reuveni claims Bove used a profanity in saying the department would need to consider telling the courts what to do and 'ignore any such order,' Reuveni's lawyers said in the letter. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche called the allegations 'utterly false,' saying that he was at the March meeting and 'at no time did anyone suggest a court order should not be followed.' 'Planting a false hit piece the day before a confirmation hearing is something we have come to expect from the media, but it does not mean it should be tolerated,' Blanche wrote in a post on X on Tuesday. Bove has been at the center of other moves that have roiled the Justice Department in recent months, including the order to dismiss New York City Mayor Eric Adams' federal corruption case. Bove's order prompted the resignation of several Justice Department officials, including Manhattan's top federal prosecutor, who accused the department of acceding to a quid pro quo — dropping the case to ensure Adams' help with Trump's immigration agenda.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump lawyer and DOJ enforcer faces confirmation hearing for federal judgeship
President Donald Trump has nominated several of his personal attorneys to top legal posts in his administration, but his nomination of Emil Bove to the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals marks the first time he has selected one of his lawyers to serve on the federal bench. For the past six months, Bove has served as a high-ranking official in the Justice Department. In that short time, he has proven himself to be a reliable ally for the president and also been embroiled in a series of major controversies – including dropping federal charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams; investigating officials who worked on cases related to January 6, 2021; and pursuing Trump's deportation goals in ways that prompted a whistleblower to allege Bove intended to ignore court orders and mislead federal judges. A Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing Wednesday will be the first time Democratic lawmakers will have the chance to grill the reclusive Bove on his time at the Justice Department and his work for Trump. If confirmed, Bove would be one of roughly a dozen judges with the power to review federal cases being appealed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and the Virgin Islands. Despite his involvement in high-profile cases and controversies, Bove has mostly avoided the limelight. 'He has been right there but kind of in the shadows, he doesn't go on TV, he doesn't talk to the press,' a senior Justice Department official told CNN. 'He is a brilliant lawyer, he is just an amazing writer, critical thinker … he clerked for two rock star judges, he worked at Sullivan and Cromwell. He is a legit genius lawyer, but nobody knows who he is.' Bove graduated from Georgetown Law School in 2008 and then went on to spend a decade working as a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, where he focused on international terrorism and narcotics cases. During that time Bove successfully brought narco-terrorism charges against Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in 2020. He also prosecuted Ahmad Khan Rahimi, the man responsible for a 2016 pressure cooker bombing in New York that left 30 people injured. Rahimi was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. A former colleague who worked with Bove describes him as an 'a**-kicker … he is whip smart, has a high level of curiosity, is naturally intelligent, and extremely effective.' 'I wouldn't want to be one of his adversaries,' they said. Bove joined Trump's legal team in 2023 and worked on three of Trump's criminal cases over the span of roughly 18 months. He sat second chair, alongside now-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, to represent Trump in his New York hush money trial. Trump was ultimately found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records in that case, which he is still appealing. He also worked on Trump's federal criminal cases related to alleged mishandling of classified documents and allegations of interfering with the 2020 election. Bove's resume has many of the hallmarks of a federal judge, but he has never served on the bench, and it is unclear how he would rule on major issues. 'He is completely empathic and fair – he is very strategic and thoughtful about applying law to the facts. He is a brilliant writer and critical legal thinker. He will make opinions that come out of the third circuit tighter and better,' the senior Justice Department official said. But some Senate Democrats are not convinced and want to focus Wednesday's hearing on Bove's controversial actions while at the Trump Justice Department. Just hours after Trump took office, Bove was tapped to assume the powerful position of interim deputy attorney general – the No. 2 job at the Justice Department, which had him running the sprawling agency while Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Blanche were awaiting confirmation. His brief tenure has earned him many detractors as he tried to reshape the department to align with Trump's vision and clashed with career officials. One of Bove's first actions at the department was to issue a memo threatening to prosecute state and local officials who resist the administration's federal immigration crackdown. 'The administration had a directive to depoliticize the department. He was met with instant resistance from entrenched bureaucrats who are not accustomed to change,' his former colleague told CNN. 'He was there to execute a mission and institute policy – he was not there to make friends.' He then ordered the firing of eight senior officials and sent a memo demanding information about all current and former employees who had any involvement in January 6 investigations. The request became a point of contention between the FBI and DOJ, sparking two lawsuits that aimed to stop the collection or release of any such information, saying that its release would put FBI employees in danger. His most high-profile controversy has been dropping federal corruption charges against Adams. Adams was charged in September 2024 with five federal charges of bribery, wire fraud and conspiracy and soliciting campaign contributions from foreign nationals. In a memo to prosecutors in February, Bove cited two reasons as to why the case should be dropped: It had been tainted by publicity, and it was preventing Adams from doing his job, which included helping Trump with his immigration crackdown. Federal prosecutors at first rebuffed his demand to drop the case, and some quit in protest, including the interim US Attorney in Manhattan, Danielle Sassoon, and the acting chief of the public integrity section of the department. Bove ended up personally arguing for the case to be dismissed. Judge Dale Ho ultimately agreed to do so in April 2025. Bove's handling of the Adams case has been the focus of many of the objections to his judicial nomination. Even the conservative The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board wrote Tuesday, '… his recent handling of the case against New York May Eric Adams doesn't inspire confidence.' Justice Connection, a coalition of former Justice Department officials, released a video on Monday with statements from formal federal prosecutors warning the public of Bove's alleged unlawful practices. Ryan Crosswell, a federal prosecutor for more than a decade, was one of the lawyers who resigned over the case. 'We don't bring charges or dismiss them based on political loyalties. Emil Bove asked us to base a prosecutorial decision not on the facts, not on the law, but on a political calculation,' Crosswell says in the video. 'He took on a hard job the first five weeks of the administration doing what the president was elected to do,' said the senior Justice Department official. 'Whether someone is qualified to be a judge is not determined by what they did over five-to-six-week period of administration.' Bove has also drawn scrutiny for his approach to executing the president's aggressive goals on immigration. On Tuesday, Erez Reuveni, the former acting deputy director for the Office of Immigration Litigation, sent a whistleblower letter to members of Congress and independent investigators in the executive branch regarding Bove's alleged conduct. Reuveni was an immigration attorney who lost his job after working on the case of mistakenly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He complained internally about the department's lack of respect towards the court which ultimately led to him being removed. Reuveni also claims that Bove told prosecutors in a meeting in March that the Justice Department could ignore court orders, and that the department could tell the courts, 'f**k you.' In the wake of these controversies, the Justice Department points to accomplishments that have occurred under Bove's leadership, including securing the transfer of 29 cartel leaders to face charges in the US. Bove was also a part of the Justice Department team that worked with the DEA to execute the largest fentanyl seizure in history. But his former colleague says Bove's varied experience is what makes him perfect for the federal bench. 'He has seen it from both sides – he has worked in a federal prosecutors' office, he has worked at DOJ, and he worked in the private sector and defended people targeted by the federal government,' they said. 'He is attuned to overreach. He is exactly who you would want on federal bench.'
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How many NYC Democratic mayoral candidates are running in the primary election?
With less than a week until the New York City primary election, registered Democrats are already heading to the polls in early voting to choose the candidate who will represent them on the general election ballot in November. On June 24, the main focus will be on who can unseat Democratic NYC Mayor Eric Adams, who is now running as an independent. Additionally, there are several other city positions up for grabs and all 51 City Council seats. Early voting, which is in effect from June 14 to June 22, is showing strong turnout, particularly for an off-year primary. According to unofficial counts from the NYC Board of Elections, more than 212,000 ballots have been cast after the sixth day of early voting. More: Primary lessons: Trump rules, Dems are revved. NYC's melee is next. In the City Hall race, there are 11 Democrats on the ballot hoping to advance to the general election on Nov. 4. Democrats (11) Adrienne E. Adams Dr. Selma Bartholomew Michael A. Blake Andrew M. Cuomo Brad Lander Zohan K. Mamdani Zellnor Myrie Paperboy Love Prince Jessica Ramos Scott M. Stringer Whitney R. Tilson Whoever wins the Democratic mayoral primary on June 24 will face Republican candidate, Curtis Sliwa and two independents: NYC Mayor Eric L. Adams and Jim Walden in the general election on Nov. 5. Starting in 2021, NYC only uses ranked choice voting in primary and special elections for city offices, where a voter can rank up to five candidates instead of just one. If a candidate receives more than 50% of first-choice voters, they are the winner. If no candidate receives over 50% of the votes in the first round, subsequent rounds will take place. The candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated in each round. If your top-ranked candidate is eliminated, your vote goes to your next choice. This continues until only two candidates remain, with the one with the most votes declared the winner. No. You only get one vote. Your selection will count toward your highest-ranked candidate who has not been eliminated. If your number one choice loses, your vote will count toward your next highest-ranked candidate. Yes! Early voting is underway throughout NYC until June 22, and the final day to register to vote in person is June 23 at your local board of elections. It all depends. The local Board of Elections will announce unofficial, first-choice-only votes after the polls close at 9 pm ET on June 24. If any candidate wins more than 50% of first-choice votes, they will be declared a winner, but with so many candidates and elections, it's unlikely that anyone will secure half of the total votes. NYC's primary election is on June 24, with polls open from 6 am to 9 pm. ET Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What to know ahead of NYC's mayoral primary on June 24