Deaths on Scots roads rise to 160 in last year, new figures reveal
New data has been published by Transport Scotland.
Some 160 people died on Scotland's roads in the last year- an 8% increase.
But the overall number of casualties has reduced, according to new figures from Transport Scotland.
The national transport agency has published provisional road casualty figures looking at the number of deaths in 2024 compared with the previous year.
The data shows 160 people died on Scotland's roads in 2024, an increase of 13 from a revised figure of 147 in 2023. This was largely due to a rise in deaths involving cars.
There were 1,931 serious casualties in 2024, a slight reduction from the 1,952 recorded in 2023.
Less severe accidents, known as slight casualties, decreased by 7% during the same period, with 3,739 incidents in 2023 and 3,485 in 2024.
With serious and slight casualties combined, there was a 4% overall decrease in 2024 – from 5,838 to 5,576.
Deaths involving cars rose from 57 to 74. Motorcycle deaths increased from 27 to 31.
The number of active travel fatalities also reduced, with 47 pedestrian and seven cyclist fatalities in 2023, compared with 41 pedestrian and three cyclist deaths in 2024.
Road casualties were lower in 2020 and 2021 as the pandemic led to less travel. However in 2024, the number of fatalities was the third-lowest recorded in a non-pandemic year.
Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop said: 'Behind every one of these statistics is a person or a household that has been changed forever, and my thoughts are with the families and friends that have lost loved ones and those who've been injured.
'One life lost on our roads is one too many, and I want to reiterate that road safety remains an absolute priority for the Scottish Government.
'I updated Parliament last year that fatal casualties were tracking above targets in 2024 and, sadly, the figures published today confirm an overall rise in casualties last year.
'However, I refuse to accept that people being killed or injured on our roads is inevitable and it is more important than ever that we continue to support the vital work of the Scottish Government and partners to save lives.
'We are increasing investment in road safety in this budgetary year to a record £48 million.
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
'This will help fund safety improvements on both trunk roads and local roads, high-profile campaigns to raise awareness of key issues like speeding, seatbelts and drink/drug-driving, as well as advancing the use of technology aimed at making our roads safer.
'It's vital that we continue to work with our partners at all levels as we look towards reaching our target of Scotland having the best road safety performance in the world by 2030.
'I recently spoke to organisations at the Road Safety Scotland annual seminar and I am set to chair the next strategic partnership board meeting later this month, where I will continue to impress the importance of road safety investment on members.
'These figures are a painful reminder of the challenge we face, but I remain absolutely determined to save lives and ensure we continue working towards our long-term vision of no-one being killed or seriously injured on Scotland's roads by 2050.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Holiday let owners face tax ‘triple whammy'
Airbnb owners are set to face a triple whammy of taxes as the Government increasingly treats them as 'walking ATMs,' a senior Tory MP has warned. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing minister, criticised ministers for hitting short-term let owners with little-known licensing fees when they are already paying double council tax. From April 1, all English councils were given the powers to charge a 100pc council tax premium on second home owners. More than 230 chose to implement the charge – which The Telegraph is campaigning to be cut or abolished. But the new legislation included scope for the Government to introduce a registration scheme to regulate holiday lets and ensure they are recorded with councils. This is expected to involve a licensing charge, which experts estimated would be around £100 per year – though Labour has failed to provide a timeframe for when this will be introduced. The result could be that owners are saddled with paying double council tax bills, plus an annual licensing fee. A similar fee for short-term lets already exists in Scotland. Mr Hollinrake has argued that the double council tax bill should cover the cost of an owner registering a short-term let. In a written parliamentary question, he asked the Government whether it 'will ensure that homes subject to a second homes council tax premium by local authorities are not charged additional registration fees'. But Chris Bryant, the culture minister, refused to confirm the exemption in his response. He added that the 'scope of the scheme is still being determined'. A loophole in the business rates system means some households could avoid the double tax altogether. Mr Hollinrake told The Telegraph: 'Labour's thirst for tax cannot be quenched, and people may now be hit by a triple whammy of council charges – two lots of council tax, and a licensing fee on top if they ever want to rent it out. 'Such licensing charges are especially pointless, as councils already know the property is being used as a second home by virtue of the council tax surcharge. 'Local taxpayers deserve better than being treated like walking ATMs by this punishing Labour government.' Andy Fenner, head of the Short Term Accommodation Association (STAA), said: 'This appears to be purely a revenue-generating exercise rather than a genuine policy need. Short-term rental tourism provides vital investment and supports thousands of jobs and businesses throughout our communities. Alistair Handyside, of the Professional Association of Self-Caterers UK, said it was supportive of the scheme but concerned about 'the amount of other interventions such as the council tax premiums, the abolition of the furnished holiday lets tax regime and the new EPC standards, these are closing businesses at a very fast rate'. The second home council tax premium was originally brought in by the Tories. However, Labour has come under criticism for refusing to monitor the impact of the policy on housing, tourism and local economies. Ministers said it was up to individual councils to decide if the double tax is 'effective'. But The Telegraph revealed earlier this month that eight in 10 local authorities who charge the premium failed to carry out impact assessments before introducing it. If a property is let out for 70 nights a year, it qualifies for business rates and is therefore exempt from council tax. Many second home owners will qualify for small business rates relief, which offers up to 100pc relief, if the property is the only one they let. This loophole will cost local authorities £334m this year in missed revenue, a figure which politicians said proved the premium was backfiring. If a property is not let for 70 days, however, it will still be on the hook for all three charges. A government spokesman said: 'A registration scheme will help local authorities across England identify the short-term lets in their area so they can address any community impacts. We will set out more details on how the scheme will work in due course.' AirBnb was also approached for comment.
BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
President Trump bans people from some countries from travelling to USA
US President Donald Trump has signed a ban on travel to the United States for citizens from twelve mostly African and Asian by people from seven other countries will be restricted in Trump says the ban, which comes into effect next week, would keep America human rights groups have criticised his plans, calling them "cruel," and some experts say it is likely to be challenged in US is the second time President Trump he has ordered a ban on travel from certain countries - he signed a similar order in 2017, during his first term in office. What has Donald Trump announced? From 9 June, citizens from 12 countries will be blocked from travelling to the countries are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Nationals from another seven countries - Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - will face a partial there are a few situations when the new rules won't include some dual citizens - people who are citizens of two countries at the same time - as well as for athletes travelling to America to compete in major sporting tournaments are due to be held in the US over the next few years including the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympics in Los order also says the American government may grant exemptions on a "case-by-case" White House said these were "common sense restrictions" which would "protect Americans" and help keep the country US president made immigration a big issue in last year's election campaign. What has the reaction been to the ban? Sone people and organisations have criticised President Trump's plan and it is expected to be challenged in from President Trump's rival Democratic Party in the US said the ban "betrayed" the ideals of the USA's founders and warned it would "only further isolate" America on the world rights groups have also spoken out against the International USA described it as "discriminatory, racist, and downright cruel." There has also been reaction from some of the countries named in President Trump's promised to work with the United States to address any security Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello warned that "being in the United States is a great risk for anyone, not just for Venezuelans." Has this happened before? President Trump ordered a similar travel ban during his first term in the White House in featured some of the same countries as his latest order, including Iran, Libya and gathered at airports around the US to protest against the ban, including lawyers who offered their services for free to help those 2021, when Joe Biden became US President after Donald Trump, he scrapped the travel ban.
STV News
18 minutes ago
- STV News
Swinney urges Hamilton voters to reject ‘gutter politics' of Reform
First Minister John Swinney has urged voters in the Hamilton by-election to reject the 'gutter politics' of Reform UK as polls open. The vote sparked by the death of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie in March will take place on Thursday, with a result expected early on Friday. The SNP and Labour were initially seen as the frontrunners in the race, but Nigel Farage-led Reform UK has surged in the seat and hopes to push for second place. One of the major talking points of the campaign has been the criticism levelled at Reform after an attack advert published by the party claimed Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar prioritises people from Pakistan over those in Scotland. The ad showed a speech from the Labour MSP where he urged more people from a south Asian background to enter politics, and it was later denounced as racist by Reform's opponents. Speaking ahead of polls opening at 7am on Thursday, Mr Swinney again claimed the contest is between the SNP and Reform, saying: 'Today, people in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse can reject the politics of Nigel Farage and elect a local champion by voting SNP. 'Farage doesn't care about Scotland – he wants to cut our budget, undermine our Parliament and introduce charges for the NHS. 'Labour have given up on the campaign and have barely even bothered to defend their record of scrapping the winter fuel payment and cutting support for disabled people. 'So this by-election is a two-horse race between the SNP and Farage. And today, people in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse can unite behind the SNP and defeat the gutter politics of Nigel Farage by voting for Katy Loudon.' PA Media Anas Sarwar said his party's candidate Davy Russell is a 'local champion' (Jane Barlow/PA). The by-election presents the first real test of both Scottish Labour and the SNP since last year's general election, where the former returned to being the biggest Westminster party in Scotland and the latter haemorrhaged MPs, falling to just nine. Ahead of the vote, Mr Sarwar said the choice facing voters is 'more failure with the SNP or a local champion' with Scottish Labour's Davy Russell, accusing the nationalists of talking up Reform to 'distract from their own failures'. He added: 'Time and time again, the SNP has failed Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. 'From our overstretched NHS to our declining education system to our crisis-hit housing system, almost all of what is broken in Scotland is run by the SNP. 'They don't deserve to win, but only Scottish Labour can beat them. 'The SNP wants to talk up Reform to distract from their own failures, but Scots will see through the spin. 'This is a chance to put this failing Government on notice and chart a new direction for all of Scotland – let's seize that opportunity.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
