logo
'The epitome of what you want in a public servant:' Klobuchar, Smith remember Hortman

'The epitome of what you want in a public servant:' Klobuchar, Smith remember Hortman

Yahooa day ago

'The epitome of what you want in a public servant:' Klobuchar, Smith remember Hortman originally appeared on Bring Me The News.
U.S. Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith paid tribute to slain state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, from the Senate floor on Tuesday.
"Melissa is someone that I wish the whole Senate and the whole nation knew," Klobuchar said during her speech. "We treasured her in Minnesota. She was the epitome of what you want in a public servant. She went into it for all the right reasons."
Klobuchar characterized Mark Hortman as "accomplished in business and a kind, kind person," Klobuchar said.
First elected in 2004, Melissa Hortman served in the Minnesota House for 20 years, including six years as House speaker. "She left a lasting impact," the senator stated. "Melissa was one of the most consequential speakers in the history of our state."
Here's how Klobuchar summed up Melissa Hortman's legacy: "Minnesotans will be feeling the impact of her leadership forever. When a Minnesota student gets a free school lunch, that's Melissa. When a Minnesota parent is able to take paid leave to spend those early, precious moments with a newborn, that's Melissa. When a Minnesota voter casts a ballot without facing unfair discrimination, that's Melissa. When a woman is able to access reproductive care in our state, that's Melissa. And when our state achieves 100% clean energy by 2040, that will be because of Melissa."
"She was a generational leader, and she led with integrity and with courage," Klobuchar said.
During her time on the floor, Smith also attempted to paint a picture of who Melissa Hortman was as a person and a leader.
"She believed and acted on one of our most American of values: the conviction that we all have a responsibility to one another," Smith said. "Service to and respect for others was the guiding principle in Melissa's life."
Melissa Hortman's focus on that "shared humanity" helped her win not only the loyalty of fellow Democrats, but also the respect of Republicans on the other side of the aisle, according to Smith.
The senator described Melissa Hortman as someone who "lived her values." By the time, she was elected House speaker, Smith said that Melissa Hortman "had a remarkable record as a negotiator, an honest broker, someone's who's true to her principles even when she had to make tough choices."
"She knew how to stand up for others and insisted that we all treat one another with dignity and respect as we undertake the serious work of public service, even in a political climate that too often rewards meanness and sort of a dehumanizing of one another," Smith said.
Towards the end of her speech, Smith shared her hope for other lawmakers to "take heart and inspiration" from Melissa Hortman's example and rededicate themselves "to what it means to be a legislator."
Melissa and Mark Hortman were assassinated in their Brooklyn Park home early Saturday. Vance Boelter, 57, faces state and federal murder charges in the couple's deaths. He is also charged with attempted murder in an alleged attack on state Sen John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, who were shot multiple times in their Champlin home just before the Hortmans were killed.
On Tuesday, the bodies of Melissa and Mark Hortman were transferred in a formal procession from the Hennepin County Medical Examiner's Office in Minnetonka to a south Minneapolis funeral home. The Hortman family hasn't yet announced whether they will take Gov. Tim Walz up on his offer for the couple to lie in state at the Capitol in St. Paul.
A candlelight vigil for the Hortmans is planned for Wednesday from 8 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on the steps of the State Capitol. Attendees are asked to provide their own candles and not to bring signs of any kind.
This story was originally reported by Bring Me The News on Jun 18, 2025, where it first appeared.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump doesn't rule out sending Ukraine more Patriot missiles after Zelenskyy meeting

time15 minutes ago

Trump doesn't rule out sending Ukraine more Patriot missiles after Zelenskyy meeting

Following his closed-door meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the NATO Summit on Wednesday, President Donald Trump didn't rule out sending Ukraine monetary and defense aid as he voiced frustrations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. During his press conference at the conclusion of his trip to The Hague, Netherlands, Trump signaled a willingness to provide Ukraine with additional aid and sell or send Patriot air-defense missiles to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia. "They do want to have the anti-missile, missiles," Trump said of Ukraine. "As they call them the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available." Trump's openness comes as Zelenskyy told ABC News earlier this month the United States diverted anti-drone weapons, previously promised to Ukraine under a Biden administration agreement, to the Middle East. "You know, they're very hard to get. We need them to. We were supplying them to Israel, and they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective," Trump said. "As far as money going, we'll see what happens. There's a lot of spirit," Trump added. Trump also appeared to shift his tone when describing his conversation with Zelenskyy, a relationship marked by many pivots. "He was very nice, actually. You know, we had little rough times sometimes. He was uh - couldn't have been nicer. I think he'd like to see an end to this. I do," he said of Zelenskyy. Zelenskyy offered similar praise of Trump, calling their meeting "long and substantive" while affirming he told him Ukraine is ready to buy more U.S. weapons. "With the President, we discussed the protection of our people — first and foremost, the purchase of American air defense systems to cover our cities, our people, churches, and infrastructure," Zelenskyy said in a statement on Wednesday. "Ukraine is ready to buy this equipment and support American arms manufacturers. Europe can help as well," Zelenskyy said. "We also talked about possible joint drone production. We can strengthen each other." During his press conference, Trump added Zelenskyy was fighting a "brave" and "tough" battle while putting pressure on Putin to show more willingness to end the conflict. "Look. Vladimir Putin really has to end that war. People are dying at levels that people haven't seen for a long time." Then, when pressed on why he wasn't able to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine quickly as he adamantly claimed while on the campaign trail, Trump again pointed the blame towards Putin. "It's more difficult than people wouldn't have any idea," Trump said. "Vladimir Putin has been more difficult. Frankly, I had some problems with Zelenskyy. You may have read about him, and it's been more difficult than other wars." Trump's public praise of Zelenskyy marks a shift in tone for the President, who has had public battles with the leader of Ukraine. Most notably in February, a public Oval Office spat between the two officials led to a scrapped bilateral mineral deal, which wasn't finalized for two months until the pair sat down together on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral. Then, in recent weeks, as Trump focused on negotiating an agreement between Iran and Israel, he left last week's G7 Summit in Canada early, skipping out on a bilateral with Ukraine. However, after their meeting on Wednesday, Trump displayed more compassion for the situation in Ukraine in a moment highlighted by his exchange with a Ukrainian reporter who said her husband was a Ukrainian soldier while she and her children fled to Warsaw for safety. "Wow, that's rough stuff, right? That's tough," Trump said, asking the reporter many personal questions before answering her policy question. "That's very good question. And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband. Okay?" Trump said.

War Powers Resolution From House Democratic Leaders May Not Limit Trump's War Powers
War Powers Resolution From House Democratic Leaders May Not Limit Trump's War Powers

The Intercept

time17 minutes ago

  • The Intercept

War Powers Resolution From House Democratic Leaders May Not Limit Trump's War Powers

As Democrats try to push forward legislation that would block further strikes on Iran, one measure advanced by House leadership could actually strengthen the Trump administration's justification for subsequent attacks, anti-war advocates warn. House progressives on Wednesday were trying to reach a compromise with Democratic leaders that would curb further U.S. military involvement in Iran while satisfying concerns from pro-Israel members about American support for Israel's missile defense. There are three different war powers resolutions in play in Washington. In the Senate, a resolution from Tim Kaine, D-Va., appears to be on track for a vote on Friday. In the House, however, Democrats remain sharply divided between two resolutions. 'There's no upside to advancing a competing War Powers Resolution. It's not just unnecessary — it's actively counterproductive,' Cavan Kharrazian, a senior policy adviser at Demand Progress, said in a statement. 'There's still time to reconcile this on the House side, and we hope an agreement can be reached to enable a strong vote with the best possible language.' The resolutions in both chambers face long odds, thanks to near-unanimous support from the majority Republicans for President Donald Trump's strikes. Congressional Democrats are responding to Trump's strikes by pursuing a vote under the War Powers Act, the Vietnam War-era law designed to limit presidents' ability to launch military action abroad without congressional approval. Kaine's initial resolution introduced last week directs Trump to halt hostilities against Iran, while making clear that the president can still defend the U.S. from imminent attack. Kaine's resolution has drawn support from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. It is expected to come to a voter later this week. Amid concerns from pro-Israel Democrats, Kaine said Tuesday that he was co-sponsoring an amendment to his resolution with Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Andy Kim, D-N.J. The amendment is intended to continue to allow the U.S. to participate in Israeli missile defense. Pentagon officials said last April that the U.S. — not Israel — shot down most Iranian drones and missiles during an Iranian attack. 'This amendment would leave no doubt that Senator Kaine's resolution would ensure that President Trump has to make the case to the American people for further action against Iran without constraining our ability to help defend the Israeli people from Iranian attacks,' Kim said in a statement. While most Senate Democrats appeared to have coalesced around Kaine's resolution, House Democrats remained split on Wednesday over how to respond to Trump's strikes. Advocates last week said they were frustrated that Democratic leaders were not moving forward with a resolution as Trump publicly mulled attacking Iran. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., teamed up with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., to introduce a resolution. After the strikes were launched, three House Democratic committee ranking members introduced an alternative resolution that its authors claim would also force Trump to cease hostilities with Iran. The sponsors are Reps. Jim Himes of Connecticut, Adam Smith of Washington, and Gregory Meeks of New York. Anti-war advocates worry that the House leadership measure could actually wind up strengthening Trump's justification for launching further strikes on Iran. In an apparent nod to Israel, the leaders' resolution would give the president the power to 'defend the United States or an ally or partner of the United States from imminent attack.' Trump has already justified his strike on Iran as an act of 'collective self-defense of our ally, Israel,' according to a letter he sent Congress, despite the assessment of U.S intelligence agencies that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon. Critics say the House Democratic leadership resolution mirrors the language of Trump's justification far too closely. 'We think if it passes, it would be worse than not having a war powers resolution.' 'We think if it passes, it would be worse than not having a war powers resolution,' said Yasmine Taeb, the legislative and political director for the Muslim advocacy group MPower Change. 'This war powers resolution gives the impression that the president has broad authority to be able to engage in military offensive action with respect to Iran — if Israel is asking us to.' Spokespersons for Himes, Meeks, and Smith's offices did not immediately comment. Khanna has said that his resolution is intended to preserve the U.S. military's ability to participate in Israeli missile defense. Advocates said they understood there were ongoing discussions about a compromise. The two sides have ample time: A vote on the measure is not expected to come to the floor before mid- to late-July. Whether or not the two sides come to an accord, however, the push to respond to Trump's strikes could face serious pushback from Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson. Johnson said Tuesday that he thought the War Powers Act itself was unconstitutional and signaled that he may use a procedural move to prevent it from coming to the floor. The War Powers Act states that resolutions brought under its auspices must be fast-tracked to the House floor within 15 working days. Johnson, however, could try to block the resolution from receiving such a 'privileged' status — although that would likely force a vote on the procedural maneuver itself. Massie's co-sponsorship of the resolution gave it bipartisan support, but it's unclear whether he will continue to push its passage in the face of intense pressure from the White House and the ceasefire announced by Trump on Monday. Massie has said he is taking a 'wait and see' approach. As a shaky ceasefire between Israel and Iran continued to hold Wednesday morning, progressives in the House said they were pursuing a vote on their preferred resolution despite the opposition from Johnson. Khanna said at a Capitol press conference that blocking the vote with a procedural maneuver would be an 'unprecedented abrogation of congressional power.' 'The fundamental point here is that we don't know what the strikes accomplished, but we do know a lot of the harm,' Khanna said. 'It has hardened the resolve in Iran to now race towards a nuclear weapon.'

Democratic congressman hurls profanity-laced message at Stephen Miller
Democratic congressman hurls profanity-laced message at Stephen Miller

Fox News

time24 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Democratic congressman hurls profanity-laced message at Stephen Miller

A Democratic lawmaker hurled profanity at White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller on Wednesday, going on to imply that Miller is a Nazi. Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wisc., made the statement on social media in response to some of Miller's commentary on New York City. Miller was discussing democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani's victory in the Democratic primary for New York City's mayoral election, saying unchecked immigration was a major contributor to the city's leftward slide in recent years. "NYC is the clearest warning yet of what happens to a society when it fails to control migration," Miller wrote. Pocan chimed in: "Racist ****. Go back to 1930's Germany." Pocan weighed in on Mamdani's win multiple times, lashing out at another user who claimed the democratic nominee, who is Muslim, supports "Sharia Law." "I love watching MAGA nut jobs spinning total bull**** to overcome blatant racism and xenophobia," Pocan responded to the post. "People want progressive populism that focuses on making their lives better, not redistribution of wealth from working people to the wealthiest. Trumpism is on the decline." Republicans have capitalized on Mamdani's victory as evidence of the extremism of the current Democratic Party. The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) was among the first to make the connection. "The new face of the Democrat Party just dropped, and it's straight out of a socialist nightmare," they wrote in an email. Aiming to tie House Democrats to Mamdani, NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella argued that "every vulnerable House Democrat will own him, and every Democrat running in a primary will fear him." Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, a top ally of President Donald Trump who is seriously considering a run for Empire State governor next year, also pounced. Stefanik claimed that "a radical, Defund-the-Police, Communist, raging Antisemite will most likely win the New York City Democrat Mayoral primary." Vice President JD Vance also weighed in, writing, "Congratulations to the new leader of the Democratic Party" in a post on Blue Sky, a social media platform frequented by progressives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store