logo
Foreign students wary as Trump presses dehumanizing campaign

Foreign students wary as Trump presses dehumanizing campaign

Kuwait Times2 days ago

US administration expands crackdown on elite universities
CAMBRIDGE: Donald Trump's expanding crackdown on elite universities is prompting some international students to abandon applications to campuses in the United States and spreading stress and anxiety among those already enrolled. The president has upended the country's reputation among foreign students, who number around one million, as he presses a campaign against US universities he sees as obstructing his 'Make America Great Again' populist agenda. He has blocked Harvard hosting international scholars in a maneuver being challenged legally, targeted non-citizen campus activists for deportation, and most recently suspended student visa processing across the board.
Harvard applied mathematics and economic student Abdullah Shahid Sial, 20, said the Trump administration's campaign against US universities that the president accused of being hotbeds of liberal bias and anti-Semitism had been 'dehumanizing.' 'It's really unfortunate that this is the case for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds who came here without any family, and in most cases, haven't been to the US before,' said Sial, who is from Pakistan and hopes to be able to return to Harvard next academic year.
Sial said he advised acquaintances to have backup plans if US colleges became inaccessible, and that a friend applied to Harvard's law school, as well as Columbia's, and two less reputable British institutions - ultimately opting to go to the UK. 'He definitely liked Harvard way more (but) he doesn't want this amount of uncertainty surrounding his education,' Sial said. Karl Molden, a Harvard government and classics student from Austria, said Trump's move to block the university hosting and enrolling foreign students meant he was unsure if he would be able to return after summer vacation.
'Target group'
While that decision - affecting some 27 percent of the overall Harvard population - was paused by a judge pending a hearing Thursday, the move still threw student plans into chaos. 'I kind of figured I would be in the target group of Trump. I'm personally right in the middle of it, so an option for me would be to study abroad... I have applied to study at Oxford because of all the action' taken by Trump, said Molden, 21.
'It's just really hard.' Harvard academics say they have already started to feel the impact of Trump's vendetta against the school, in feedback from colleagues based outside the United States. 'I've already heard this from professors in other countries who say 'we encourage our best students to go to the United States',' Harvard professor Ryan Enos told AFP at a noisy rally against Trump's policies Tuesday, adding 'we wonder if we can tell them that anymore.'
The halt to visa processing revealed this week is reportedly to allow for more stringent screening of applicants' social media - and protest activity. 'International students already represent the most tracked and vetted category of non-immigrants in the United States. It is a poor use of taxpayer dollars,' said the NAFSA Association of International Educators non-profit. Trump meanwhile continued his assault on Harvard, saying university leaders have 'got to behave themselves.
'Harvard is treating our country with great disrespect, and all they're doing is getting in deeper and deeper,' he said Wednesday in the White House. One Spanish student of politics and statistics, who declined to be named for fear of retaliation, told AFP she would not be deterred from pursuing her planned year abroad at Columbia University. 'It's scary, because we think to ourselves that all our activity on social networks could be monitored, for example if we like pro-Palestinian posts or anti-Trump posts. All of that could see us denied a visa,' she said. Students due to return to Harvard after the summer break are in limbo pending a ruling on Harvard's exclusion from the foreign student system.
'I'm completely in the dark,' said 20-year-old Alfred Williamson, a Welsh-Danish physics and government student in his second year at Harvard. 'As for my other options, and like all other international students, I'm just clinging on to the hope that Harvard will win this battle against the White House.' Sial, the Harvard student from Pakistan, said foreign students like him were 'made to fight this battle which no one signed up for.' 'It's really unfortunate that it's come down to that.'— AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk calls Trump's big tax break bill a ‘disgusting abomination,' testing his influence over GOP
Musk calls Trump's big tax break bill a ‘disgusting abomination,' testing his influence over GOP

Arab Times

time9 hours ago

  • Arab Times

Musk calls Trump's big tax break bill a ‘disgusting abomination,' testing his influence over GOP

WASHINGTON, June 4, (AP): Elon Musk blasted President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" of tax breaks and spending cuts as a "disgusting abomination" on Tuesday, testing the limits of his political influence as he targeted the centerpiece of Republicans' legislative agenda. The broadside, which Musk issued on his social media platform X, came just days after the president gave him a celebratory Oval Office farewell that marked the end of his work for the administration, where he spearheaded the Department of Government Efficiency. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted on X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The legislation, which has passed the House and is currently under debate in the Senate, would curtail subsidies that benefit Tesla, Musk's electric automaker. The tech billionaire followed his criticism with a threat aimed at Republicans. "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' he wrote in another X post. It's a sharp shift for Musk, the world's richest person, who spent at least $250 million supporting Trump's campaign last year. He previously pledged to help defeat Republican lawmakers deemed insufficiently loyal to Trump, but now he's suggesting voting them out if they advance the president's legislative priority. However, it's unclear how Musk will follow through on his criticism. He recently said he would spend "a lot less' on political campaigns, though he left the door open to political involvement "if I see a reason." The tech titan's missives could cause headaches for Republicans on Capitol Hill, who face conflicting demands from Trump and their party's wealthiest benefactor. Alex Conant, a Republican strategist, said "it's not helpful' to have Musk criticizing the legislation, but he doesn't expect lawmakers to side with Musk over Trump. "Senate Republicans are not going to let the tax cuts expire,' Conant said. "It just makes leadership's job that much harder to wrangle the holdouts.' Trump can change the outcome in Republican primaries with his endorsements, but Musk doesn't wield that level of influence, Conant said. "No matter what Elon Musk or anybody else says - and I don't want to diminish him because I don't think that's fair - it's still going to be second fiddle to President Trump,' said Republican West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito. Musk's business interests stand to take a hit if lawmakers approve Trump's bill, which would slash funding for electric vehicles and related technologies. Musk is the chief executive of Tesla, the nation's largest electric vehicle manufacturer, and SpaceX, which has massive defense contracts. Last month, Musk said he was "disappointed' by the spending bill, a much milder criticism than the broadside he leveled Tuesday. The budget package seeks to extend tax cuts approved in 2017, during Trump's first term at the White House, and add new ones he campaigned on. It also includes a massive buildup of $350 billion for border security, deportations and national security.

Global economy remains vulnerable to US tariffs
Global economy remains vulnerable to US tariffs

Kuwait Times

time13 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

Global economy remains vulnerable to US tariffs

KUWAIT: The global economy remains vulnerable to US tariff policy with the recent US court developments injecting a new layer of uncertainty. In effect, as long as tariff cases are in front of the courts, not much progress can be expected in terms of US trade negotiations with trading partners. In the US, irrespective of court developments, the administration is sticking with its plans to impose tariffs, utilizing, if need be, other routes. In the Euro-zone, the ECB is set to cut rates again while the EU's trade negotiations with the US will likely be very difficult. In the UK, despite positive deal-making with the US/EU/India, the outlook is shaky amid limited policy support and global trade uncertainty. In Japan, soaring bond yields further complicate the BoJ's job and bring the public finances to the limelight. Finally, despite the recent heightened China-US tensions, a resumption of the de-escalatory bias between them will not be surprising. Irrespective of how the current tariff-related legal developments will unfold, the US administration will likely stick with its plans to impose tariffs, utilizing, if need be, several other routes. However, until the courts' final say on the current cases is clear, President Trump's bargaining power in his ongoing negotiations with the US's key trading partners is weakened substantially. Importantly, this means that not much can be expected from the US's trade negotiations with its main trading partners as long as the cases are in front of the courts. And while policy uncertainty has already been very high since Trump took office, another layer of court-related legal uncertainty has now been added. Court developments aside, a key date is July 9, which is the date when the pause on the 'reciprocal' tariffs would end. Earlier, the US and China had diffused their trade war, but negotiations have since stalled, and tensions re-escalated recently. While further escalation following the 90-day window is possible, we think the more plausible scenario is that a de-escalatory bias will resume as the world's two largest economies got a feel of the enormous economic damage that will ensue from a full-blown trade war. Meanwhile, the House passed the GOP's 'Big, Beautiful Bill', which is a step in the wrong direction given that it worsens an already unsustainable debt trajectory, although it is positive for economic growth in the short term. The bill is now in front of the Senate, where it is expected to undergo some amendments although it will very likely remain a debt-increasing bill. Meanwhile, GDP contracted in Q1 on tariff front-running, but the labor market remains broadly resilient with three-month average job gains at 155K/month. Hence, the Fed will likely remain in a wait-and-see mode while markets are currently pricing-in around two 25 bps rate cuts by year-end. In our view, a US recession will be avoided on condition that a major tariff escalation does not get re-ignited. The prior tariff de-escalation drove a V-shaped rebound in the S&P 500 index although the US dollar index remains 10 percent below a recent high reached in January. The Euro-zone economy started the year on a good note, growing by a higher-than-expected 0.3 percent q/q in Q1, strengthening from 0.2 percent in the previous quarter. Meanwhile, headline inflation is almost at target, standing at 2.2 percent y/y although further progress is needed in terms of core and services inflation. Nevertheless, more recent indicators are starting to reflect the tariff-related headwinds with the PMI dropping below 50 (49.5 in May) for the first time this year. The ECB has carried on with its easing policy, cutting rates seven times since June 2024, and near certain to cut again in its meeting this week. Despite the bank, back in March, dropping reference to their policy remaining 'restrictive', the futures market is still indicating additional one-to-two cuts in the second half of the year, reflecting the magnitude of the trade-related uncertainties ahead. Obviously, the EU's (US's largest trading partner) trade-related developments are a key factor shaping the outlook, especially following Trump's threat to hike the 'reciprocal' tariffs on the EU to 50 percent. Even if the courts upheld the initial ruling of blocking Trump's reciprocal tariffs, sectoral tariffs on autos and steel/aluminum (soon doubling) remain in place, while many other sectoral tariffs are in the pipeline, meaning that the Euro-zone will not be immune to further trade-related shocks. Irrespective of the court rulings, Trump's statements, on several occasions, exhibited high animosity towards the EU, which coupled with a high merchandise trade imbalance in favor of the EU, mean that US-EU negotiations will likely be very difficult. The structure of the EU, and its generally slow decision-making process, is another factor making these negotiations challenging. Having said that, EU officials have exhibited a strong preference not to escalate matters with the US. Notwithstanding an above-consensus GDP growth in Q1 (0.7 percent q/q), UK's outlook remains uninspiring as the rise came mainly on manufacturing and exports front-running US tariffs, while domestic consumption remained stagnant. The UK managed to strike a trade framework with the US, which should benefit UK auto exporters among others, but the 10 percent baseline tariff remained in place, the status of which is in front of the courts now. Talks are continuing to finalize details with still several key sticking points. In other positive developments, the UK successfully reset its post-Brexit trade ties with the EU and signed a long-awaited trade agreement with India. Despite these favorable trade-related developments, the Bank of England (BoE) warned of US' tariff policies and their indirect impact through disruptions to global supply chains. A continued subdued growth outlook would further pressure the public finances, noting that Chancellor Reeves, in March, had reduced some welfare and other spending items to help maintain her fiscal rule. Moreover, the hike in employers' national insurance contributions could continue to adversely impact employment levels. Accordingly, the BoE, in May, trimmed its growth forecast for the coming quarters, to only 0.1 percent q/q in Q2 and around 0.3 percent in Q3/Q4 while cutting the policy rate by 25 bps to 4.25 percent, but simultaneously guiding for 'a careful and gradual approach' and anticipating 'temporary' spikes in inflation over the coming months. CPI inflation jumped to a 15-month high of 3.5 percent y/y in April from 2.6 percent in March mainly on higher utility and other government fees, which the BoE does not expect to persist next year. Amid an uninspiring economic landscape but still elevated wage growth (5.6 percent y/y) and slow progress on services inflation (5.4 percent y/y), markets are currently pricing-in one to two 25 bps rate cuts by end-2025. Soaring bond yields in Japan further complicate BoJ's job and bring the public finances to the limelight. Japan's economy contracted by 0.2 percent q/q in Q1, its first decline in a year, driven by flattening consumption, a 0.6 percent q/q decrease in exports, and a sharp 2.9 percent rise in imports. Despite a robust 5.4 percent wage hike from the 2025 Shunto negotiations that built on a similar increase last year, real wages decreased in Q1, weighing on household spending while export performance deteriorated under the strain of US tariffs. Meanwhile, inflationary pressures continued with the core CPI (excluding fresh food) rising by 3.5 percent y/y in April, the highest since January 2023 with food inflation remaining particularly acute. In response to these challenges, the government recently rolled out a relief package worth JPY2.8 trillion ($20 billion) to support households grappling with the rising cost of living and to counter the negative impact of higher US tariffs. Trade negotiations with the US are continuing with the US-imposed 25 percent sectoral tariff on autos, a key sector for Japan, one of several important sticking points. Prime Minister Ishiba and President Trump are scheduled to meet in mid-June on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada, and agreeing on some sort of a trade framework by then remains a possibility although a limited one given the court developments in the US. Meanwhile, increasing fiscal vulnerabilities coupled with the Bank of Japan's (BoJ) ongoing tapering of bond purchases have contributed to pushing long-term bond yields to multi-year highs. This is putting the BoJ in an even more difficult position, which has already been grappling with major growth headwinds and inflation that has exceeded target for around three years. The steep rise in bond yields will strain public finances, dampen growth, and risk delivering large losses to institutional investors' balance sheets. Despite the headwinds, the Chinese economy grew 5.4 percent y/y in Q1, beating expectations and the 'around 5 percent' government's growth target for 2025. Exports continue to be a main growth driver, surging by 12 percent and 8 percent y/y in March and April, respectively, easily beating expectations as lower exports to the US were more than compensated by higher exports elsewhere, especially to East Asian countries. The prior de-escalation with the US, although supposedly temporary given the 90-day window, was a major relief. In our view, China has emerged having the upper hand as, even before the recent court rulings in the US, and excluding the original 20 percent fentanyl-related deemed tariffs, US tariffs on Chinese imports stood at 10 percent, equal to the Chinese tariffs on US imports. Comparatively, almost all countries globally were slapped with that 10 percent baseline US tariff, that none had retaliated against. While renewed escalation following the 90-day window is possible (especially given the current stalled negotiations), we think the more plausible scenario is that a de-escalatory bias will resume, as mentioned before. Prior to the de-escalation with the US, overall sentiment weakened with the official PMI decreasing to 50.2 in April with the manufacturing PMI falling to a 16-month low of 49.0, before both improved slightly in May. Meanwhile, domestic demand remains muted with CPI inflation in negative territory for the third straight month in April and the PPI in deflation for more than 2.5 years. Given the headwinds, the central bank eased policy in May, cutting several of its policy rates and the reserve requirement ratio, among other measures taken. Looking ahead, while a stronger fiscal and monetary policy support may be forthcoming, a sustained de-escalatory stance with the US will lower the scale of such support.

Canada-US renewed rivalry highlights Oilers vs Panthers NHL title series rematch
Canada-US renewed rivalry highlights Oilers vs Panthers NHL title series rematch

Kuwait Times

time13 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

Canada-US renewed rivalry highlights Oilers vs Panthers NHL title series rematch

Edmonton try to end Canada's Stanley Cup drought by dethroning Florida WASHINGTON: A tension-packed Canada-United States rivalry reaches an emotional high starting Wednesday when the Edmonton Oilers try to become the first Canadian club since 1993 to win the Stanley Cup. The Oilers, powered by superstar Connor McDavid, will face defending champion Florida in the NHL's best-of-seven championship series in a rematch of last year's final, won by the Panthers in seven games. Not since the Montreal Canadiens in 1993 has a Canadian team captured the trophy, but in what has been an intense US-Canada rivalry year, the Oilers have a chance to end the epic drought and US possession of the Cup. 'It's going to be an incredible battle again,' Panthers forward Sam Reinhart said. 'They're playing some pretty dominant hockey, so we're excited for the challenge. We've got to be ready for it.' A US-Canada grudge match fueled by political overtones could be in the making when the series begins on Wednesday in Edmonton. US President Donald Trump began the tensions by calling for Canada to become the 51st state, even calling former prime minister Justin Trudeau 'governor' as if he were only in charge of a US state not a nation. Tariffs against the border neighbors didn't help either. It all boiled over in the NHL's Four Nations Faceoff tournament when the United States played Canada at Montreal in a round-robin game on February 15 and fans booed the pre-game singing of the US national anthem. Once the puck was dropped, there were three fights in the first nine seconds as the crowd roared. A hard-hitting contest followed with the Americans winning 3-1. Five nights later, the USA and Canada met in the tournament final at Boston, where microphone-wearing referee Gord Dwyer said, 'Let's get ready for an epic battle,' before dropping the puck. Only one penalty was called and the teams delivered a world-class contest with McDavid scoring the winning goal for Canada in a 3-2 overtime triumph. 'You can't take our country -- and you can't take our game,' Trudeau posted on X moments after the finish. Heated emotions remain in US-Canada relations. Canadian hockey legend Wayne Gretzky faced backlash at home over his support for Trump. 'Never say never' Travel from Canada to the United States has dipped dramatically and new Canadian prime minister Mark Carney had a minor confrontation in a White House visit with Trump. Carney told Trump Canada would never be for sale, with the US leader replying, 'Never say never.' That is the backdrop for the Oilers and Panthers rematch, the 12th time the same two teams meet in consecutive Cup finals, the first since Pittsburgh beat Detroit in 2009 after losing to the Red Wings the previous year. No NHL team has beaten the same rival in back-to-back finals since Montreal beat Boston in 1977 and 1978. McDavid and German teammate Leon Draisaitl lead all NHL playoff scorers and Edmonton goaltender Stuart Skinner has rebounded after losing his starting job earlier in the playoffs. The Panthers seized a 3-0 lead in last year's final before the Oilers pulled level only to fall in game seven. 'I think we were better for going through last year. It was a great learning experience and it has really driven us all year,' McDavid said. 'This run has felt different than last year. It has felt very normal. It hasn't been as emotional. We haven't had the highs and we haven't had the lows. It has just kind of been steady and I think that has put us in a good position.' Florida makes a third consecutive finals appearance, having lost to Vegas in 2023 before winning last year. The Panthers are sparked by Finnish forward Alexander Barkov, who has six goals and 11 assists to lead Florida in this playoff run. Sam Bennett has a playoff-best 10 goals for the Panthers and right wing Matthew Tkachuk, who started one of the early fights in the US-Canada Four-Nations slugfest, brings an emotional lift to the trophy holders. Russian 36-year-old goaltender Sergei Bobrovsky is 12-5 in the playoffs with a 2.11 goals-against average for Florida. — AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store