
Supreme Court reaffirms that property shares become self-acquired after a joint family split, granting the right to sell
The Supreme Court has reaffirmed that after the partition of joint family property, the shares allotted to each member become their self-acquired property. The individual holding such property has the right to sell, transfer, or bequeath it as desired.
What this order means is that a property acquired by a member of a joint Hindu family after the severance of status is considered self-acquired property that means that the individual now has full control and ownership over that property. If a family member chooses to sell their individual share, they have the legal right to do so as they would with any self-acquired property.
In practical terms, if the property has been partitioned and the individual share is clearly defined and separated, the person can sell, transfer, or otherwise dispose of that share without needing approval from other family members, since it's now their self-acquired property. This also means they can decide how to handle the property—whether to sell it, gift it, or pass it on through a will—according to their own wishes.
However, if the family hasn't formally partitioned the property, selling an individual share may still require agreement from other coparceners, depending on the legal status of the property and local laws regarding partition, said legal experts.
'After the joint family property has been distributed in accordance with law, it ceases to be joint family properties and the shares of the respective parties become their self acquired properties,' the court said in its recent order.
A bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan held recently that after a partition, each party receives a separate and distinct share which becomes their self-acquired property with absolute rights to sell, transfer, or bequeath. The Supreme Court held this in the case of Angadi Chandranna v. Shankar & Ors. (2025).
A Joint Hindu Family (JHF) is a family unit where the property is owned collectively by all its members, typically governed under the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) system. In this system, male descendants acquire a birthright in the family property, with up to three generations inheriting this right. Under traditional Hindu law, no coparcener (a member with a birthright) can claim a specific portion of the joint family property until a formal partition takes place, as each member holds an undivided interest in the entire property.
Following the 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, daughters now have the same birthright as sons in joint family property, ensuring equal inheritance rights.
In contrast, self-acquired property refers to property that an individual acquires through their own efforts, without utilizing any joint family resources or ancestral assets. This type of property may be obtained through personal income, individual enterprise, or personal skill, without relying on the family's ancestral wealth. The owner of self-acquired property has complete control over it, including the right to sell, mortgage, gift, or bequeath it, without needing the consent of other family members.
A joint Hindu family property is the property in which each member of the joint Hindu family has an inherent title and share irrespective of who acquires it. Partition of joint Hindu family confers severance of status of jointness and the united identity of the family is dissolved. 'Upon such partition the jointly held ownership of the properties belonging to the joint Hindu family transforms into separate ownership. After partition each member/coparcener gets the separate and distinct share which becomes his/her self-acquired property,' explains Sunil Tyagi, Managing Partner, ZEUS Law Associates.
This recent judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of 'Angadi Chandranna v. Shankar & Ors.' once again affirms the settled position regarding property rights of the coparcener after partition of the joint Hindu family. This judgment reiterates that any property acquired by a member of joint Hindu family post severance of status of joint Hindu family is his self-acquired property. A person who acquires such property has a right to sell, transfer or bequeath such self-acquired property in the manner he deems fit, he said.
This decision of the Supreme Court clarifies that a clear intention to waive separate rights must be established if such self-acquired property is to be considered once again as the joint Hindu family property, he said.
He also points out that a voluntary action by the owner of the property to include such self-acquired property into joint Hindu family hot potch, with intention of abandoning his separate rights therein must be established for it to qualify again as a joint Hindu family property.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Dwarka's Golf View Apartments: Delhi HC seeks RERA, Housing Ministry's response on DDA petition
The Delhi High Court on May 28 sought a response from the Centre's Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, and Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) on a petition filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the body. The petition challenges RERA's order directing DDA to register its housing projects with it. The development comes months after complaints were received by RERA from residents of Golf View Apartments in Dwarka's Sector 19B, alleging substandard construction quality. The real estate regulator in April had asked the DDA to set up a panel and look into the grievances and submit a report detailing the actions taken within a month. Arguing that DDA is not a real estate promoter but an independent authority and statutory body covered by the DDA Act and the Nazul Rules, the planning body had challenged RERA's provision, which makes it mandatory for all authorities, including government authorities, to register their projects for sale with the state-level RERA regulators. Section 3 of RERA mandates registration of real estate projects by the promoter before any advertisement, marketing, booking, selling, or offering for sale, or inviting persons to purchase in any manner. Section 59 of RERA includes provisions entailing penalties on the promoter in case of non-registration of the real estate project. Highlighting that the DDA (Management and disposal of Housing Estates) Regulations already confer jurisdiction to DDA, the body submitted that RERA has 'illegal, unauthorised assumption of jurisdiction'. This is, however, not the first time that DDA has found itself in a bind with the RERA over Golf View Apartments. In April last year, the regulator pulled up the planning and development body for initiating the advertising and sales process even before the Sector 19B project was registered. Justice Sachin Datta has posted the matter for further consideration on July 7.


Indian Express
14 hours ago
- Indian Express
Pakistan boosts defence budget by 20% but slashes overall spending in 2025-26
Pakistan will raise defence spending by a steep 20% after a military clash with its old enemy India last month, but will slash overall federal expenditure for fiscal 2025-26 by a hefty 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion). The budget presented on Tuesday by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's government allocated 2.55 trillion rupees ($9 billion) to defence in July-June 2025-26, up from 2.12 trillion. It projected a deficit of 3.9% of GDP against the 5.9% targeted for 2024-25. Inflation was projected at 7.5% and growth at 4.2%. The South Asian nation wants to kickstart growth while boosting its defences after the worst fighting with its neighbour in nearly three decades – which it has cast as a victory – and meeting the strictures of an International Monetary Fund finance programme. 'After defeating India in a conventional war, now we have to surpass it in the economic field,' Sharif said in a statement. Pakistan must also contend with the uncertainty of new import tariffs being imposed by the United States, its biggest export market. The clash with India was sparked in April by Islamists who killed 26 men in an attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir. Islamabad denied New Delhi's allegation that the militants were backed by Pakistan. Four days of fighting featured jets, missiles, drones and artillery. For the coming year, Pakistan's government allocated 742 billion Pakistani rupees ($2.63 billion) to military pensions, taking the entire defence budget to 3.292 trillion Pakistani rupees ($11.67 billion). That included 704 billion Pakistani rupees ($2.5 billion) in spending on equipment and other physical assets. India's defence spending in its 2025–26 (April-March) fiscal year was set at $78.7 billion, up 9.5%, including pensions and $21 billion earmarked for equipment. It has indicated that it too will boost defence spending further. Sharif's government has projected 4.2% economic growth in 2025-26, saying it has steadied the economy, which looked at risk of defaulting on its debts as recently as 2023. Growth this fiscal year is likely to be 2.7%, against the budgeted target of 3.6%. Pakistan's growth lags far behind the region. In 2024, South Asian countries grew by an average of 5.8% and the Asian Development Bank expects 6.0% in 2025. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said the government intended to complete the privatisation of Pakistan International Airlines, a request of the IMF. Growth should be aided by a sharp drop in the cost of borrowing, the government says, after a succession of interest rate cuts. But economists warn that monetary policy alone may not be enough, with fiscal constraints and IMF-mandated reforms still weighing on investment. Aurangzeb said that the budget was the start of a strategy to boost exports, increase foreign currency reserves to avoid the balance of payments crises of the past, and create a more competitive economy. 'In short, our budget strategy is to change the economy's DNA by bringing basic changes,' he said.


Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
MMRDA seeks stay, HC: Deposit Metro 1 1,169cr arbitral award
Mumbai: Bombay HC on Tuesday directed MMRDA to deposit by July 15 Rs 1,169 crore awarded by a three-member arbitral tribunal in 2023 to Mumbai Metro One Pvt Ltd (MMOPL), a special purpose vehicle operating the Versova-Andheri-Ghatkopar Metro line 1 in which Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure holds majority stake. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It said the dispute would be fully examined at the final hearing but MMOPL's win in arbitration could not be rendered meaningless in the interim. Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan held that MMRDA failed to make a prima facie case for a stay without deposit. The tribunal had in Aug 2023 awarded Rs 992 crore to MMOPL as compensation for cost escalation and other contractual disputes. With interest accrued till May 31 this year, the sum rose to Rs 1,169 crore. MMRDA had sought an unconditional stay on the award, challenging it under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. It argued that the award was illegal and based on flawed assumptions about rent recovery, project delays and cost escalation. In response, MMOPL said MMRDA had approved key decisions and was now trying to backtrack from them. HC said the award, passed by a 2:1 majority, is in the nature of a money decree and that MMRDA, being a 26% equity holder in MMOPL, was actively involved in the project's financial decision-making. "The award cannot be termed perverse or arbitrary on the face of it," it said. The court made it clear that the amended arbitration law does not permit automatic stays and rejected MMRDA's request to avoid paying the deposit. The matter will be heard next on June 17. An official said MMRDA is yet to get a copy of the HC order. "MMRDA will thoroughly examine the order and take appropriate action."