Legislation to decriminalise abortion for women clears the Commons
Legislation which would see abortion decriminalised for women terminating their own pregnancies has cleared the Commons.
MPs voted 312 to 95, majority 217 to approve the Crime and Policing Bill at third reading on Wednesday.
This comes after the Commons backed Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment, which will remove the threat of 'investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy.
The issue was treated as a matter of conscience, with MPs given a free vote and the Government remaining neutral.
Downing Street said the change to abortion laws must be 'workable and safe', following Tuesday's verdict.
MPs voted 379 to 137, majority 242, to back Ms Antoniazzi's amendment.
A No 10 spokesman said: 'We'll look at this in detail, considering whether any changes are necessary to make it workable and safe. But, of course, this would not change the intent of the amendment passed.'
The spokesman added: 'As with all laws, the Government has a responsibility to ensure it is safe and workable.'
The Bill will now undergo further scrutiny in the House of Lords.
It will also introduce a two-step verification process for the sale of knives and crossbows purchased online, and greater protections for emergency workers from racial and religious abuse during house calls are also included in the Bill.
Speaking during report stage on Tuesday, Ms Antoniazzi said she pushed for the change in the law after cases of women being investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions.
The Gower MP said: 'This is the right change at the right time. I implore colleagues who want to protect women and girls and abortion services to vote for new clause one.
'Let's ensure that not a single desperate woman ever again is subject to traumatic, criminal investigation at the worst moments in their lives.'
Medics or others who facilitate an abortion after the 24-week time limit could still face prosecution if the change becomes law.
Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several Cabinet ministers were among the MPs who backed the amendment.
They included Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Defence Secretary John Healey, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, Environment Secretary Steve Reed, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, Wales Secretary Jo Stevens and Commons Leader Lucy Powell.
Kemi Badenoch and many members of the Conservative front bench voted against it but shadow education secretary Laura Trott voted in favour.
Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence unless with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability.
It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is under 10 weeks pregnant.
Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th century law, the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
In the City: Even a Reversal May Not Bring the Ultra-Rich Back
It's no secret the Labour government's policy to tax the UK's wealthiest as part of its effort to fix a budget crisis left by the Conservatives has caused Prime Minister Keir Starmer some headaches. The biggest exodus of wealth in the UK's recent history appears to be underway, and the data shows the departure is likely to be a drain on the economy. But is it enough for Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves to change course? And should she? Bloomberg reporter Benjamin Stupples joins host Allegra Stratton to discuss.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
President Trump's plan to "wean off" FEMA doesn't resonate with some N.J. residents still recovering from hurricanes
President Trump said recently he wants to move toward getting rid of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, better known as FEMA, and get states to take on responsibilities. But some disaster survivors in New Jersey and an organization that helps them are not in favor of the idea. "The FEMA thing hasn't been a very successful experiment" Mr. Trump said June 10 the plan is to "wean off of FEMA, and we want to bring it down to the state level, a little bit like education. We're moving it back to the states." The president said he wants that to start after hurricane season and for governors to lead the way. "Now, if they can't handle it, they shouldn't be governor. But these governors can handle it," Mr. Trump said. "The FEMA thing hasn't been a very successful experiment. [It's] very, very expensive and it doesn't get the job done." The president said once this all comes together, it will be good for the country. CBS News New York reached out to the local FEMA office, but it said it could not comment. We also tried to get comment from the national office, but have not heard back. Some N.J. residents sound off on Trump's FEMA stance Nearly four years after Hurricane Ida damaged her Milford home, Leanna Jones is still waiting for state help. "I still haven't gotten my money from the state to do the long-term recovery," Jones said. Jones said despite FEMA's imperfections, the agency was there for her right after disaster struck. "They did put $4,000 in my pocket right away, even before my insurance company came to do the first inspections," Jones said. That's why she says she's worried about what the president is saying about FEMA. "If everything is handed to the states, then people will be waiting for four years to get any money. That is just not okay," Jones said. Organizations helping Superstorm Sandy and Ida survivors also don't think it's a good idea. In recent recommendations to the FEMA Review Council, both the New Jersey Resource Project and New Jersey Organizing Project suggested more FEMA aid and less denial rates, adding, "None of our recommendations included dismantling FEMA. Rather, we have specific suggestions on how FEMA can be improved and provide continued benefit to impacted communities."
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
An Ex-Marxist Is Taking Risks to Reshape Sri Lanka
Last week, regulators in cash-strapped Sri Lanka raised power prices by 15%. President Anura Dissanayake, who during his successful election campaign last year promised to lower the cost of electricity by a third, had to explain his U-turn. The treasury could no longer afford to subsidize power, he said. Seven months into his term, the former radical has realized that keeping his country from one more crisis requires him to break promises and lose friends.
