logo
What investigators know about the Palm Springs bombing suspect

What investigators know about the Palm Springs bombing suspect

It has been four days since the bombing of the American Reproductive Centers fertility clinic in Palm Springs left one dead and at least four injured in what the FBI called 'an intentional act of terrorism.'
DNA tests of body parts found outside the facility showed that the suspect, 25-year-old Guy Edward Bartkus, was killed in the blast.
Law enforcement sources told The Times they are looking into videos, audio files and other online postings attributed to Bartkus as they try to determine the motive for the attack. They also are exploring whether incidents in Bartkus' childhood laid the foundation for later beliefs in 'antinatalism,' an idea that procreation is wrong in an overpopulated world struggling with environmental harm and violence.
Here's what we know about the investigation:
YouTube videos probably posted by the suspect depict M-80s exploding in desert sand, a hydrogen balloon being set ablaze, and a bucket of radioactive uranium ore that causes a radiation detection device to wail.
The voice in the videos, my colleagues have reported, is the same as the one captured on a 30-minute audio file that authorities believe was made by Bartkus.
In the audio file, the speaker gives the following reason for bombing a fertility clinic: 'Basically, it just comes down to I'm angry that I exist and that, you know, nobody got my consent to bring me here.'
In an interview with my colleague Jenny Jarvie, the suspect's estranged father, Richard Bartkus, said the boy, then 9, set his family's Yucca Valley home on fire.
In 2008, the elder Bartkus said, his son took some matches outside his family's rented house to conduct what he called an experiment. The boy burned down the house, a shed, and all of the family's possessions, Richard Bartkus said.
'It destroyed the whole house,' he said. 'So he didn't feel good about that at all.'
But his son, Richard Bartkus said, continued to ramp up his experiments with explosives — making rockets, stink bombs and smoke bombs. The elder Bartkus said he became more strict with his son, worrying that his experimentation with increasingly powerful explosives was getting out of hand.
Court records offer a window into the family discord that marked the suspect's youth, including his parents' messy divorce and allegations of verbal and emotional abuse.
After Bartkus' mother moved out of the family home with her son and daughter in 2012, records show, she obtained a restraining order against Richard Bartkus, saying she felt 'scared of his irrational behavior.'
Richard Bartkus disputed many of her allegations.
The investigation also is focused on how Bartkus obtained a massive cache of explosives, some of which were found in a house in rural Twentynine Palms that he shared with his mother.
My colleagues have reported that investigators are likely to look into Bartkus' proximity to the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in Twentynine Palms, which is touted as the largest Marine training base in the world.
Capt. Johnathon Huizar, a spokesman for the combat center, said there is no record of Bartkus — who was not a Marine — entering the base. Huizar would not comment on whether there have been any recent instances of lost or stolen explosives.
In 2021, 10 pounds of plastic explosives vanished from the base during a training exercise and were suspected to have been stolen, according to news reports. The material was ultimately recovered, according to news reports, but the military has released little information about the episode.
Joann says, 'Coronado.'
Shelley says, 'Manhattan Beach area.'
Email us at essentialcalifornia@latimes.com, and your response might appear in the newsletter this week.
Today's great photo is from contributor Amanda Villegas, of a hillside property in Silver Lake that features an 1,150-square-foot ADU below the existing house and which cost $830,000 to build.
Hailey Branson-Potts, staff reporterKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters
How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@latimes.com. Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on latimes.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Was the Boulder attack terrorism or a hate crime? 2 experts unpack the complexities
Was the Boulder attack terrorism or a hate crime? 2 experts unpack the complexities

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Was the Boulder attack terrorism or a hate crime? 2 experts unpack the complexities

Twelve people in Boulder, Colorado, were injured by a man wielding a makeshift flamethrower and Molotov cocktails on June 1, 2025. Those burned in the attack were taking part in a peaceful, silent walk on Pearl Street, a pedestrian mall, with the aim of raising awareness about Israeli hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. The suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, yelled, 'Free Palestine,' according to local news reports. Soliman is an Egyptian immigrant who was living in the U.S. illegally after his tourist visa and work authorization both expired. On June 3, Soliman's family, who lived with him in Colorado Springs, were detained by federal immigration authorities. Soliman's wife and five children were placed in expedited removal proceedings. The FBI and local authorities initially said they were investigating a 'targeted terror attack'. But Soliman was later charged with hate crimes in federal court. He also faces attempted murder and other charges in state court. We study terrorism and hate crimes. Whether an attack like the one in Boulder is considered an act of terrorism or a hate crime changes the way a suspect is charged and sentenced. Let's look at how these two terms differ. Hate crimes are crimes motivated by bias on the basis of race, religion, sexual orientation or ethnicity. In some states, gender, age and gender identity are also included. Hate crime laws have been passed by 47 states and the federal government since the 1980s, when activists first began to press state legislatures to recognize the role of bias in violence against minority groups. Today, only Arkansas, South Carolina and Wyoming do not have hate crime laws. Colorado's 2024 statute prohibits bias-motivated attacks based on a wide variety of categories, from ancestry to gender identity. In order to be charged as a hate crime, attacks – whether vandalism, assault or killings – must be directed at individuals because of the prohibited biases. Hate crimes, in other words, punish motive; the prosecutor must convince the judge or jury that the victim was targeted because of their race, religion, sexual orientation or other protected characteristic. If the defendant is found to have acted with bias motivation, hate crimes often add an additional penalty to the underlying charge. Charging people with a hate crime, then, presents additional layers of complexity to what may otherwise be a straightforward case for prosecutors. Bias motivation can be hard to prove, and prosecutors can be reluctant to take cases that they may not win in court. Terrorism is a violent tactic – a strategy used to achieve a specific end. This strategy is often used in asymmetric power struggles when a weaker person, or group, is fighting against a powerful nation-state. The violence is aimed at creating fear in the targeted population. Terrorists often justify their bloody acts on the basis of perceived social, economic and political unfairness. Or they take inspiration from religious beliefs or spiritual principles. Many forms of terrorism were inspired by struggle between races, the rich and poor, or political outcasts and elites. How different terrorist groups act is informed by what they are trying to achieve. Some adopt a reactionary perspective aimed at stopping or resisting social, economic and political changes. Others adopt a revolutionary doctrine and want to provoke change. In the United States, terrorism attacks were in sharp decline from 1970 to 2011, decreasing from approximately 475 incidents a year to fewer than 20. The U.S. government began to take more note of domestic terrorism after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. And the number of domestic terrorism incidents began to rise after 2011, with notable increases in the mid-to-late 2010s and early 2020s. Data compiled by the Center for Strategic and International Studies shows right-wing terrorist attacks and plots grew substantially during the past decade, with right-wing extremists being responsible for the majority of attacks and plots each year since 2011, except for 2013. There were 44 incidents in 2019 alone. The Department of Homeland Security's 2025 Homeland Threat Assessment indicates that the terrorism threat environment in the United States remains high, driven largely by domestic violent extremists motivated by a mix of racial, religious and anti-government grievances. Terrorism is not a successful tactic. American University professor Audrey Cronin studied 457 terrorist groups worldwide going back to 1968. The groups lasted an average of eight years before they lost support or were dismantled. No terrorist organizations that she studied were able to conquer a state, and 94% were unable to achieve even one of their strategic goals. Portions of this article originally appeared in articles published on March 19, 2021, and May 23, 2017. Read more of our stories about Colorado. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Frederic Lemieux, Georgetown University and Jeannine Bell, Loyola University Chicago Read more: Reducing American antisemitism requires more than condemning opposition to Israel and targeting elite universities For many American Jews protesting for Palestinians, activism is a journey rooted in their Jewish values When is criticism of Israel antisemitic? A scholar of modern Jewish history explains The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

That Time the FBI Conspired To Get George Foreman an Award for Boxing
That Time the FBI Conspired To Get George Foreman an Award for Boxing

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

That Time the FBI Conspired To Get George Foreman an Award for Boxing

The FBI is concerned with a great many things today. Incels. Orgasm cults. Facebook posts. Safe-deposit boxes. Encryption. But in October 1968, the Bureau was concerned with whether George Foreman got the proper recognition as a boxer. Files released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) show that the Racial Intelligence Section of the FBI's Counterintelligence Division intervened to get Foreman an additional award for his patriotism after winning an Olympic gold medal. Foreman "gave every American an emotional lift when immediately after defeating Inoas Chepulis [Jonas Čepulis] of the Soviet Union…he showed the world that he was proud to be an American by waving a small American flag," Associate Director G.C. Moore wrote in a memo to Assistant Director William Sullivan. The Bureau also saw Foreman as a useful cudgel against domestic opponents. Foreman's patriotic victory display, Moore wrote, "was in sharp contrast with the earlier despicable black power-black gloved demonstration of Tommie Smith and John Carlos on the Olympic victory stand and the anti-Vietnam stand of Cassius Clay." Smith and Carlos were kicked off the American team for making a black power salute after winning a 200-meter race. Clay, who changed his name to Muhammad Ali, had won an Olympic gold medal for boxing in 1960. He was convicted of defying the military draft in 1967—Ali opposed the Vietnam War on religious grounds—a conviction that was overturned in 1971. Back in 1968, Moore suggested helping get Foreman his "justly deserved award," on the recommendation of two special agents who belonged to the American Legion. With the approval of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, the Bureau eventually settled on trying to get Foreman the Americanism Award from the Freedoms Foundation. Although he was nominated for the award, Foreman didn't win that year. He did win a George Washington Honor Medal from the Freedoms Foundation in 1974. Foreman, who died in March 2025, had a long career after his Olympic victory. He remained undefeated until his famous "Rumble in the Jungle" with Ali. He retired in 1977, became a Christian minister in the 1980s, returned to boxing in 1994, and began marketing the famous George Foreman Grill that same year. Reason requested Foreman's FBI file after he passed away, and the Bureau released the memos on his Olympic victory earlier this week. The FBI's interest in Foreman came amidst COINTELPRO, a paranoid Cold War counterintelligence program that treated everyone from draft resisters and Martin Luther King, Jr. to the Ku Klux Klan as vectors for foreign subversion. In addition to trying to get Foreman an award, the Bureau heavily spied on Ali and Carlos. Ali ultimately got the last laugh. During his 1971 match with Joe Frazier, a group of dissidents known as the Citizens Committee to Investigate the FBI used the boxing match as a distraction to break into an FBI office in Pennsylvania and steal the COINTELPRO files. The burglary led to Congress reining in the FBI's power. Fortunately, America has learned from those dark days. Surely, the FBI no longer uses fantasies about foreign conspiracies as an excuse to spy on Americans and interfere with domestic politics. Right? The post That Time the FBI Conspired To Get George Foreman an Award for Boxing appeared first on

FBI warns of 'elevated threat' to Jewish community
FBI warns of 'elevated threat' to Jewish community

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

FBI warns of 'elevated threat' to Jewish community

The FBI and Department of Homeland Security are warning of an "elevated threat" facing the Jewish community in the wake of two attacks: Sunday's Molotov cocktail assault in Boulder, Colorado, and last month's killing of two Israeli Embassy staff members in Washington, D.C. The Israel-Hamas conflict "may motivate other violent extremists and hate crime perpetrators with similar grievances to conduct violence against Jewish and Israeli communities and their supporters," the FBI and DHS said in a public service announcement issued Thursday night. "Foreign terrorist organizations also may try to exploit narratives related to the conflict to inspire attacks in the United States." The public should "remain vigilant" and "report any threats of violence or suspicious activity to law enforcement," the agencies said. MORE: Suspect in Boulder attack charged with 118 counts, including attempted murder, assault charges The PSA references Sunday's attack in Boulder when Mohamed Soliman allegedly threw Molotov cocktails at a group of marchers advocating for the release of Israeli hostages, according to prosecutors. Fifteen people, including a Holocaust survivor, were injured, officials said. Soliman, who was arrested at the scene, allegedly yelled "Free Palestine" during the attack, the FBI said. MORE: Boulder attack survivor recounts desperation trying to help woman on fire Soliman later told police "he wanted to kill all Zionist people," court documents said. He "said this had nothing to do with the Jewish community and was specific in the Zionist group supporting the killings of people on his land (Palestine)," documents said. Soliman has been charged with a federal hate crime as well as 118 state charges, including attempted murder, assault and explosives charges. He has not entered a plea in either case. MORE: Colorado attack comes amid record incidents of antisemitic and Islamophobic hate crimes The PSA also mentions the May 21 killings of two Israeli Embassy staff members. Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Lynn Milgrim were fatally shot as they left an event at the Capital Jewish Museum in D.C. When the suspect was arrested, he began to chant, "free, free Palestine," according to police. The Anti-Defamation League has documented a dramatic rise in acts of hate targeting Jewish people in the U.S. since the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack in Israel. In 2024, the ADL said it recorded a record high of 9,354 antisemitic incidents in the U.S., marking a 344% increase over the past five years and a 893% increase over the past 10 years. "I am angry," ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said a news conference in Boulder on Wednesday. 'It's way past time for our political leaders, community groups, media outlets, tech platforms, faith leaders to take action before more Jewish blood is spilled. And it's way past time to stop excusing antisemitic rhetoric," he said. Greenblatt urged the public to speak out against hate and shared small, specific actions people can take. "Flag a hateful post, sign a petition, attend a service, make a comment in city council," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store