Proposed lawsuit alleges Toronto violated refugees' rights by denying shelter beds
A proposed class-action lawsuit against the City of Toronto alleges the city violated refugee claimants' Charter rights by denying them access to shelter beds for nearly a year.
The proposed suit was filed on behalf of refugees, refugee claimants and asylum seekers who sought shelter in Toronto and were unable to get a bed between Nov. 7, 2022 and Oct. 1, 2023, when it says the city stopped allowing claimants to access its base shelter system.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
It also includes shelter seekers who were told to contact either Service Canada or Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, which the suit says were unable to provide housing assistance.
The lawsuit requires certification from a judge to proceed.
It also alleges the city's practice disproportionately impacted members of the Black community, as many of the refugee claimants had arrived from countries with predominantly Black populations.
Story continues below advertisement
City spokesperson Elise von Scheel says the city will respond 'in due course' and has no further comment as the case is before the court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Trump's trade war exacerbates cost-of-living woes for Ontario worker
Adam Bingle has a lot of worry as the U.S.-Canada trade war drags on. Following the relaunch of Global News' On the Brink series, the 51-year-old Cambridge, Ont., resident was one of many people who contacted Global News with feedback, saying he is in a similar situation to those profiled who are struggling with the cost of living. A welder by trade, Bingle said when he first started his career, he could afford a house, two cars and a kid — but not anymore. With U.S. President Donald Trump's recent doubling of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50 per cent, Bingle said he is concerned about the impact it will have on his job, which has already resulted in some cuts. The company Bingle works for manufactures parts for forestry equipment that are sent to the U.S., where they're assembled and sold. Story continues below advertisement Bingle said he had been making $30 an hour at a different job, but when Trump came into power the first time and imposed tariffs in 2016, he, along with 300 other employees, lost their jobs when the company lost a major contract in the U.S. He fears the same thing will happen again if things don't change. 0:41 Carney says record trade deficit shows his plan is the 'right strategy' To avoid layoffs, Bingle said his employer has been moving people to different locations, but even that comes with added costs. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Unfortunately, now a lot of them have to commute to Guelph or Stratford … which in itself is a serious cost, especially with gas and whatnot. But at least they still have a job,' Bingle said. Now, making $27 an hour as a single dad with two teenagers who live with him half the time, every little bit helps, Bingle said. Story continues below advertisement A frugal shopper, Bingle said he used to make $100 stretch an entire month for food for the three of them, but now that only lasts a week. His financial struggles were further exacerbated when he bought a house during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in Cambridge for $75,000 over asking. 'I found a house only a few blocks from my ex's house, so that would work for the schooling and whatnot,' Bingle said. 'I had no idea what I was getting into.' 1:55 Could 10-year mortgage terms help ease Canadians' 'payment shock' at renewal? He had hoped to turn it back into a duplex to earn extra income and help cover costs, but said he ran into issue after issue. He took out a second mortgage with a 10 per cent interest rate to help pay for the renovation. Story continues below advertisement Three years later, he said he is only now reaching a point where he can list the apartment, but it has cost thousands more than he thought and almost resulted in him being homeless. 'Boy, did I learn a lesson about first lenders, second lenders and third lenders. When you hit the third type of lender, that got really bad,' he said. 'They ended up lending me $27,000. And within six months, they wanted $46,000 back.' Bingle added he he was able to renegotiate his mortgage to include the other loan, but says it cost $20,000 in legal fees to fight the third-party lender trying to foreclose on his house. As Trump's trade war continues to unfold, Bingle said he worries about what lies ahead — especially at work. 'The next round of layoffs won't be so lucky,' he said. 'I'm hoping that (with) my experience… I'm not one of them.'
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
What you need to know after Trump banned citizens of 12 countries from entering the U.S.
An Afghan person passes in front of an air travel agency in Kabul, Afghanistan, Thursday, June 5, 2025. (AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi) DAKAR, Senegal -- U.S. President Donald Trump has banned citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States and restricted access for those from seven others, citing national security concerns in resurrecting and expanding a hallmark policy of his first term that will mostly affect people from Africa and the Middle East. The ban announced Wednesday applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The heightened restrictions apply to people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The policy takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m. and does not have an end date. Here's what to know about the new rules: How Trump justified the ban Since returning to the White House, Trump has launched an unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement that has pushed the limits of executive power and clashed with federal judges trying to restrain him. The travel ban stems from a Jan. 20 executive order Trump issued requiring the Department of State, Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the U.S. The aim is to 'protect its citizens from aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes,' the administration said. In a video posted on social media, Trump tied the new ban to a terrorist attack Sunday in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. Who is exempt from the ban Green card holders Dual citizens, including U.S. citizens who also have citizenship of one of the banned countries Some athletes: athletes and their coaches travelling to the U.S. for the World Cup, Olympics or other major sporting event as determined by the U.S. secretary of state Afghans who worked for the U.S. government or its allies in Afghanistan and are holders of Afghan special immigrant visas Iranians belonging to an ethnic or religious minority who are fleeing prosecution Certain foreign national employees of the U.S. government who have served abroad for at least 15 years, and their spouses and children People who were granted asylum or admitted to the U.S. as refugees before the ban took effect People with U.S. family members who apply for visas in connection to their spouses, children or parents Diplomats and foreign government officials on official visits Those travelling to UN headquarters in New York solely on official UN business Representatives of international organizations and NATO on official visits in the U.S. Children adopted by U.S. citizens. Which countries are affected Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. 'We don't want them,' Trump said. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban makes exceptions for Afghans on special immigrant visas, who were generally the people who worked most closely with the U.S. government during the two-decade war there. The list can be changed, the administration said in a document, if authorities in the designated countries make 'material improvements' to their own rules and procedures. New countries can be added 'as threats emerge around the world.' Reactions to Trump's order Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans, who have been targeted by the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Chad President Mahamat Deby Itno said his country would suspend visas for U.S. citizens in response to the ban. Aid and refugee resettlement groups also denounced it. 'This policy is not about national security -- it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America. The Council on American-Islamic Relations, the nation's largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, called the order 'unnecessary, overbroad and ideologically motivated.' And the National Immigration Law Center said it was 'outraged' and that the ban is 'laced with unsubstantiated legal justifications.' 'The impact of this new ban will be deeply racialized, as it will effectively bar hundreds of millions of Black and Brown people from entering the United States,' the group said in a statement. But reactions to the ban ran the gamut from anger to guarded relief and support. In Haiti, radio stations received a flurry of calls Thursday from angry listeners, including many who said they were Haitians living in the U.S. and who accused Trump of being racist, noting that the people of many of the targeted countries are Black. In Miami, restaurant owner Wilkinson Sejour said most of his employees and customers are from Haiti and that the ban will hurt his business in a 'domino effect.' He suggested that Haiti was targeted because most Haitians vote Democrat. Jaylani Hussein, who heads CAIR's Minnesota chapter, said his compatriots in the Twin Cities' large Somali American community had been expecting Trump's order, but didn't know the details until its release. 'It's a lot better than maybe some of the worst fears of what we initially thought could come out. But it significantly impacts the Somali community, there's no way around it,' he said. William Lopez, a 75-year-old property investor who arrived from Cuba in 1967, supports the travel ban. 'These are people that come but don't want to work, they support the Cuban government, they support communism,' Lopez said at a restaurant near Little Havana in Miami. 'What the Trump administration is doing is perfectly good.' How the ban is different from 2017 Early in Trump's first term, he issued an executive order banning travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries, including Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travelers from those nations were either barred from getting on flights to the U.S. or detained at U.S. airports after they landed. They included students and faculty, as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban,' was retooled amid legal challenges until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban affected various categories of travelers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. ------ By Monika Pronczuk Associated Press reporters Evens Sanon in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, and Danica Coto in San Juan, Puerto Rico, contributed.
Global News
8 hours ago
- Global News
BC Conservatives question $1M contract for B.C. drug and mental illness adviser
The BC Conservative opposition is raising concerns about the contract the NDP government has awarded to its top adviser on mental health and the drug crisis. It has been one year since the B.C. government appointed Dr. Daniel Vigo as its chief scientific adviser for psychiatry, toxic drugs and concurrent disorders. Vigo has been responsible for developing solutions for people suffering from mental health, addictions and brain injuries due to toxic drugs. According to his contract, Vigo is eligible to receive $250,000 each quarter he works, up to $1 million for the year. In addition, he is eligible to receive 12 per cent of his salary as administrative fees or expenses. 2:07 B.C. government opens more involuntary care beds 'It was very clear during the election that involuntary care was one of the pieces that was needed in this system. I think the government was already aware of that, and I think that because they knew they were facing some pushback from some of their more ideological supporters, they decided to spend a million dollars hiring a doctor as a consultant to tell us what we already knew so that they could fall back on, 'Well, this is the science behind it,'' said Claire Rattée, BC Conservative MLA for Skeena. Story continues below advertisement 'At the end of the day, it's a million dollars that could have been spent on treatment.' Rattée added she was concerned about a 'lack of deliverables' in the contract. Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy She said that according to the document, Vigo should have already submitted three quarterly reports, none of which have been made public. 'We're talking about a government that has spent well over $1 billion on addictions and the overdose emergency that we have here, but where are the measurable outcomes? What are the outcomes of any of the things that they have done?' added BC Conservative public safety critic Elenore Sturko. 'We have seen some announcements, we've seen some piecemeal work, even the stuff that's been announced by Dr. Vigo over the last couple of months here — It looks like something is happening, but what's the outcome and where have we gone and what should British Columbians expect from this huge expenditure?' B.C.'s health minister says the BC Conservatives aren't telling the whole story. The $1 million is earmarked for Vigo to build out a team of four people and to cover the cost of data collection and legal advice, Health Minister Josie Osborne told Global News. 1:52 New involuntary care beds are opening in Maple Ridge She said Vigo was retained because the toxic drug crisis and the intersection of addicitons medicine and psychiatry are evolving quickly, and the province wants to be on the cutting edge. Story continues below advertisement 'This is a fresh, innovative look using the professional experience that they have to help us identify the people who need help the most to help us identify the solutions,' Osborne said. 'It is a very challenging situation to see people that are suffering, to see and know that people need treatment and care and that we need the very best clinical expertise, the very medical advice that we can and the appropriate settings and care and therapies for these people — we don't have experts in that inside the ministry.' In his year on the job, Vigo has provided significant advice to the province, including a determination that the B.C. Mental Health Act does not need to be amended to allow for involuntary treatment. He led the development of new guidance to B.C. doctors, laying out the scenarios under which someone can be treated involuntarily under the Mental Health Act, all of them involving mental impairment. 1:54 Success of forced addictions treatment lacks evidence, minister says And he has been involved in the rollout of B.C.'s first two involuntary treatment facilities, one in the South Fraser Pretrial Centre and one in the Alouette Homes in Maple Ridge for people who aren't in contact with the justice system. Story continues below advertisement He has also been made available to media to answer questions about the province's involuntary treatment policy. Rattée said the progress for the price tag simply isn't good value. 'So far, they've only moved on. You know, 18 beds at Alouette, I believe it is, and 10 at Surrey pre-trial, and nothing to do with voluntary treatment services,' she said. 'This is a drop in the bucket when it comes to actually addressing the issue that we are facing right now.' Last month, the province terminated the contract of another adviser halfway through the planned six-month term. Michael Bryant had been hired on a $150,000 contract to consult on the province's policies and service delivery in the Downtown Eastside.
