
Fear at isolated Antarctica base as a man is accused of attacking a colleague and making threats
A member of a South African research team that is confined for more than a year at an isolated Antarctica base was put under psychological evaluation there after he allegedly assaulted and sexually harassed colleagues, government officials said.
The problems at the SANAE IV base were first reported by South Africa's Sunday Times newspaper, which said it had seen an email from a team member to authorities last month claiming the man had attacked the base leader and made threats.
The email pleaded for help.
'His behavior has escalated to a point that is deeply disturbing,' the email said, according to The Sunday Times. 'I remain deeply concerned about my own safety, constantly wondering if I might become the next victim.' The report said the man allegedly made a death threat.
South Africa's Ministry of Environment, which oversees the research missions, said in a statement Monday night that the alleged assault on the base leader was reported on Feb. 27, and officials and counselors intervened remotely 'to mediate and restore relationships at the base.' They were speaking with team members almost daily, it said.
'The alleged perpetrator has willingly participated in further psychological evaluation, has shown remorse and is willingly cooperative,' the ministry said, adding that he had written a formal apology to the victim of the alleged assault. It said the allegations were being investigated. No one was identified.
The nine-member team, which includes scientists, a doctor and engineers, is expected to stay at the base for about 13 months until next year, authorities said, living in close quarters through the hostile Antarctic winter, whose six months of darkness begin in June.
The base is on a cliff in Queen Maud Land and is surrounded by a glacial ice sheet, more than 4,000 kilometers (2,485 miles) from South Africa.
The next planned visit by a supply ship is in December, according to the South African National Antarctic Program. It takes the ship around 10 days to travel from Cape Town.
Authorities said they had decided not to evacuate anyone from SANAE IV, where the onset of unpredictable weather conditions meant the team was now confined to the base.
The ministry said all team members had undergone evaluations ahead of the trip to ensure they are able to cope with the 'extreme nature of the environment in Antarctica' and the isolation and confinement, and no problems were identified.
'It is not uncommon that once individuals arrive at the extremely remote areas where the scientific bases are located, an initial adjustment to the environment is required,' it said.
Previous problems have been reported at another of South Africa's remote research bases on Marion Island, a South African territory near Antarctica.
In 2017, a member of a research team there smashed a colleague's room with an ax over an apparent love triangle, according to a report to South Africa's Parliament. Lawmakers said it appeared the researchers were living in highly stressful conditions.
The National Science Foundation, the federal agency that oversees the U.S. Antarctic Program, published a report in 2022 in which 59% of women in the U.S. program said they'd experienced harassment or assault while on research trips in Antarctica.
___
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
3 hours ago
- ITV News
Constructing in the cold: Inside the bold build at the bottom of the world
If the producers of Grand Designs were looking for the most extreme building project ever, I think I've found it. 67 degrees south, deep in the Antarctic Circle. On Ryder Bay, 1,000 miles from the nearest city, is the British Antarctic Survey's Rothera Research Station. For 50 years, scientists, engineers, and adventurers have been based here, braving conditions as cold as -20°C and permanent darkness during the polar winter. For the past six years, builders have been here too, constructing the Discovery Building. It's a 90-meter-long, 4,500 m² facility that serves as an office, storeroom, power plant, hospital, control tower, and nerve centre of Britain's Antarctic operations. There isn't a Screwfix or B&Q nearby, so every single tool, tile, and tin of paint has had to be shipped in – 400 containers in total. Surprisingly, fire is a huge risk here. Antarctica is so dry that it's technically a desert. With no prospect of a quick rescue during the winter, they can't take any risks. A massive 40,000-litre tank of water can be emptied onto flames in just 30 minutes. All water is desalinated from the sea. 'Why don't you just melt the snow?', I asked plumber Tobias. 'Back in the day, about 30 or 40 years ago, they did, but they only had one shower per week. Today, with these systems, we can produce 10,000 litres of water a day.' The colour scheme has raised a few eyebrows. Stairwells and offices are painted in bold floor-to-ceiling blue, green, red, or yellow. It's the architect's attempt to counteract the dull, dark winter nights, but I get the sense that some of the scientists might prefer a more muted magnolia. The project has cost £100 million of taxpayers' money. It's a symbol of the UK's commitment to polar science—not to mention the geopolitical importance of maintaining a physical presence on the continent. There's plenty of snagging to do over winter. Then the not insignificant challenge of dismantling the old buildings it has replaced. Strict environmental rules in Antarctica mean every scrap of rubbish and rubble must be shipped back home. At least they have a use for those 400 empty shipping containers!


ITV News
a day ago
- ITV News
Whales making remarkable comeback in Antarctica's waters – but dangers lie ahead
ITV News Science Correspondent Martin Stew reports from Antarctica on how human action has had a significant impact on the region's rising whale population Words by Senior Producer Rhiannon Hopley In Antarctica, there is a remarkable comeback taking place. Whales are returning in numbers to its waters. It is thought by scientists that that 2.9 million whales were killed for commercial purposes in the 20th century, driving many species to near whaling was banned in 1986 and since then populations around the world have slowly been creeping back whales have been the fastest to recover - they are nearly at pre-whaling levels. The iconic blue whale, the biggest mammal to ever have lived, are having a slower recovery. They were hunted so prolifically during the last century that the population of 42,000 in Antarctic waters was decimated to just 3,000. But researchers are now sighting them more often - a sign of a positive comeback. The next challenge is to ensure their recovery continues - but new threats wait around the corner. Antarctic krill fishing has increased dramatically over the past two decades by 400 percent, according to a report from the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living vessels often fish in areas frequented by whales and can catch more than 450,000 tonnes a year. Demand is being driven by the use of krill as food for farmed fish and in supplements like Omega-3 is creating competition with whales who travel thousands of miles to feast in Antarctica. It is also creating a danger, where whales and fishing come into close contact with one another putting the animals in danger of being caught up. One Chilean flagged vessel has had a criminal complaint filed against it after a humpback whale was killed after being caught up in its krill nets. The danger also lies within the food have discovered microplastics in the stomachs of krill - a worrying development as they are the foundation of the Antarctic food chain. It is not yet known what effect this could have but evidence that the consequences of human behaviour are felt even at the furthest reaches of our planet's wilderness.


ITV News
2 days ago
- ITV News
Could Trump's axing of climate aid funding see the end of a golden age of science?
For years the US has been the best funded player in the Antarctic. Now their budget is being slashed in half; made to remove climate change references from work