
Why are so many planes crashing? This is what the data says
The last few months have seen a clutch of extraordinary plane crashes. This week, a Delta Airlines plane flipped upside down after a heavy landing at Toronto Airport. All passengers and crew survived the accident.
The Toronto disaster came after a series of dramatic incidents in North America, including the terrible case of American Airlines Flight 5342 which collided with an army helicopter when coming into land at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. There were no survivors.
Days later, a small aircraft fell from the sky above Philadelphia carrying a child who was recovering from life-saving treatment. And a week later, a small plane disappeared in Alaska sparking a widespread search effort. The bodies of the 10 passengers were later discovered.
These events followed a particularly tumultuous Christmas period for aviation. On December 25, an Azerbaijan Airlines plane was allegedly struck by missiles in Russian airspace, forcing a crash-landing in Kazakhstan, killing 38 of the 67 on board. Days later a Jeju Air commuter jet collided with a wall at the end of the runway at Muan International Airport, killing all but two of the 181 people on board.
As the cases stack up, we cannot avoid the question: is flying becoming more dangerous? The hard data suggests that the simple answer to this question is 'yes', but when we dig into the statistics we can see that the truth is more nuanced.
How many planes crash a year?
Air accident records show that 2024 was the deadliest year for air disasters since 2018. There were 16 fatal accidents resulting in the deaths of 333 passengers and crew. This came after 2023, which was one of the safest years for air traffic accidents with just six fatal accidents resulting in the deaths of 115 passengers.
However, it is worth noting that the 2024 fatality figures were looking similar to the year before until the very end of December. The two air disasters in Kazakhstan and South Korea almost tripled the annual fatality count, from 116 to 333. These two disasters turned 2024 from looking like a positive year for aviation safety to one of the worst in a decade.
Last year we did see a higher-than-usual number of accidents involving scheduled passenger services. Sometimes, an entire year will pass with zero fatalities on commercial planes. But in addition to the disasters mentioned above, last year a passenger died on board Singapore Airlines 777-300ER due to turbulence, and a member of cabin crew died during a smoke and fumes incident on board a Swiss Airbus A220-300.
The perception of things getting worse
There has been greater scrutiny around the safety of aviation after a string of high-profile incidents in recent years, particularly on Boeing planes.
Last April, passengers watched on in horror as the engine cowling of a Boeing 737 flapped in the wind and dislodged from the aircraft during take-off. The plane returned safely to Denver International Airport with all passengers unharmed.
This came after a door plug came off an Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 Max 9 at 1,600ft, creating a large hole in the side of the plane and ripping the shirt off a child's back. One flight attendant reportedly sustained minor injuries in the incident.
The reason that Boeing faces greater scrutiny is that in 2018 and 2019 two Boeing 737 Max 8 aircraft crashed – one a Lion Air flight in Indonesia, the other an Ethiopian Airlines flight – killing a total of 346 people. Investigators later discovered the crashes were linked to the activation of a new flight stabilisation feature. After software updates and intensive safety checks, the 737 Max 8 returned to service at the end of 2020.
It is worth considering that incidents have always occurred at 35,000ft, but we have greater awareness of these with the proliferation of smart phones and social media. If every incident, however minor, is captured on video and posted online, the upshot is a skewed sense of flying becoming less safe. But the opposite is in fact true.
What the experts say
Despite the fact that 2024 was the deadliest year for aviation since 2018, the past decade has been by far the safest on record. British and Irish airlines have the best safety records in the world, with both Ryanair and easyJet having never suffered a fatal accident.
John Grant of flight database and statistics company OAG, says: 'In 2024 there were over 37 million scheduled flights operated by airlines around the world and the number of major incidents could be counted on two hands.
'Such a level of safe flight completion highlights and confirms that air travel is one of the safest forms of transport available and that the professionalism and technical expertise of the industry continues to ensure that safety remains at the very heart of all flights operated.'
Brian Smith, a pilot who has flown for many decades for commercial and cargo airlines, says: 'There have been several recent fatal accidents that understandably raise questions about the overall safety of air travel. Accident trends have followed a positive trajectory over the last 70 years when viewed against the volume of departures. For example, in 1959, there were 40 fatal accidents per one million aircraft departures in the US. Within 10 years this had improved to less than two in every million departures, falling to around 0.1 per million in 2014.
'Giant strides in technology, in particular reliability of the jet engine, sea change improvements in aircraft control systems and in air traffic control, have made air travel the clear winner in terms of safety. So improved has been technology, that human factors like pilot error have overtaken mechanical or system failure as the main cause of accidents.
'The industry, and the organisations that regulate it, have brought about manifest improvements in human factors and pilot interaction with automation, through the introduction of Evidence Based Training (EBT). Pilot training encompasses the study of recent significant events to raise awareness of negative trends and develop strategies to mitigate them.
'There will always be statistical blips, but overall, I believe aviation is still the safest form of travel, and passengers should continue to have confidence in the industry.'
John Strickland, an aviation expert at JLS Consultancy, says: 'Flying remains an incredibly safe form of transport. Whilst every accident, especially where there are fatalities, is regrettable, they have to be viewed in the context of millions of flights operated and millions of passengers flown safely annually. For airlines safety is paramount, as is safety oversight by many global regulators.'
Damien Devlin, a lecturer in aviation management at the University of East London, says: 'Recent incidents will inevitably attract attention and focus on the aviation sector. However, occurrences like this remain almost incalculably rare.
'According to IATA, there is, on average, just one accident for every 1.26 million flights. Though challenges persist during the take-off and landing phases, where half of the accidents occur. The industry must continue identifying how training, technology and flight decision-making can further enhance safety and its safety culture.
'Nevertheless, for perspective, a person would need to travel by air daily for 103,239 years to encounter a fatal accident.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Crazy plane lady' Tiffany Gomas announces new career move two years after viral plane rant
The 'crazy plane lady' who went viral for her meltdown on an American Airlines flight has launched a new career move nearly two years after her infamous plane rant. Tiffany Gomas, 40, went viral for screaming 'that motherf***er back there is not real' before being escorted off the flight from Fort Worth to Orlando, Florida, in July 2023. She previously explained the background to the incident and said she became embroiled in a 'little bit of an altercation' with another passenger and 'it spiraled out of control.' On Tuesday, Gomas announced on X that she is relaunching her Passes account - a platform where creators can build a community and directly connect with their fans, offering them things like live streams, one-on-one messaging, and exclusive podcasts. 'I told y'all that mf wasn't real… but this is…,' she said. 'Come chat with me here and I'll answer all your questions!!' She offers three tiers of memberships and customers can purchase the 'Passport to Tiff' for $9.99 per month, the 'Private Flight' for $20 and 'First Class' for $69.99. Her profile description states, '[Behind the scenes] of my chaos: work, workouts, pups, sports, shoes, & fits. Thanks for flying with me.' In her viral moment, Gomas was flying to join her family on a vacation when she lost it on the flight due to an 'altercation,' which she described as 'the worst moment' of her entire life. Gomas was filmed pointing to the back of the cabin and shouting: 'I'm getting the f*** off and there's a reason why I'm getting the f*** off and everyone can either believe it or they can not believe it. 'I don't give two f***s, but I am telling you right now – that motherf***er back there is not real,' she continued. 'You can sit on this plane and you can die with them or not. I'm not going to.' But in a later interview with Inside Edition, she revealed that when she said the other passenger was 'not real' - she meant it as a figure of speech, meaning 'he's not being real'. 'It was not my best moment … it was actually a horrible moment. Absolutely mortifying. How horribly mortifying,' she told the Pardon My Take podcast. Explaining her unwillingness to talk about the issue previously she said: 'The reason I probably haven't come out yet is that it's so cringe.' When asked why she uttered the now-infamous words, which viewers took to suggest she had seen a ghost or an alien, she said, simply: 'I literally did not see anything … It was an expression of speech.' Instead the comment was aimed at the man with whom she was arguing with. In December, she posted wearing the same outfit from the the plane meltdown and joked about an impending alien invasion. Gomas posted on X, 'Sooo, who's ready for the alien invasion that's supposed to go down today?' She then changed back into the same ripped jeans and black tank top that she wore aboard the infamous United Airlines flight and posed for a mirror selfie. 'Officially ready for the invasion. Bring it on mf'ers,' she captioned the image.

South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
New service will fly you directly to Zurich from Bristol Airport
The first flight from Switzerland landed at the busy South West airport bringing visitors to the region for business and pleasure. The new route with Edelweiss gives travellers the opportunity to fly directly to Switzerland and allows for easy onward travel with its sister company SWISS, to other European cities including Munich and Vienna. The twice-weekly service will operate on Mondays and Fridays. The flight took less than two hours and customers were welcomed at Bristol Rupert Lawrie, commercial director of Bristol Airport, said: "The new route marks a significant milestone in regional tourism, offering Swiss visitors a direct gateway to the South West. 'Zurich is a highly sought-after destination with Edelweiss providing customers in the South West and Wales with a direct connection.'


North Wales Chronicle
5 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Zelensky condemns ‘brutal' rocket attack after four killed in Ukrainian city
According to authorities, a barrage of multiple rockets struck apartment buildings and a medical facility in the centre of the north-eastern city a day after direct peace talks made no progress on ending the three-year war. Mr Zelensky said one of the rockets fired at Sumy pierced the wall of an apartment building but failed to detonate. 'That's all you need to know about Russia's 'desire' to end this war,' Mr Zelensky wrote in a post on Telegram. 'It is clear that without global pressure, without decisive action from the United States, Europe, and everyone in the world who holds power, (Russian president Vladimir) Putin will not agree even to a ceasefire.' At talks in Istanbul on Monday, delegations from the warring countries agreed to swap dead and wounded troops. But their terms for ending the war remained far apart. The war has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations, as well as tens of thousands of soldiers on both sides along the roughly 620-mile front line where the war of attrition is grinding on despite US-led efforts to broker a peace deal. Though Russia has a bigger army and more economic resources than Ukraine, a spectacular Ukrainian drone attack that Ukrainian officials said damaged or destroyed more than 40 warplanes at air bases deep inside Russia was a serious blow to the Kremlin's strategic arsenal and its military prestige. Both Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin have been eager to show US president Donald Trump that they share his ambition to end the fighting, thereby aiming to avoid possible punitive measures from Washington. Ukraine has accepted a US-proposed ceasefire, but the Kremlin effectively rejected it. Mr Putin has made it clear that any peace settlement has to be on his terms. A senior Ukrainian delegation led by first deputy prime minister and economy minister Yuliia Svyrydenko has travelled to Washington for talks about defence, sanctions and post-war recovery, Andrii Yermak, the head of Ukraine's presidential office, said. The delegation will meet with representatives from both major US political parties, as well as with advisers to Mr Trump, Mr Yermak added. Dmitry Medvedev, a former Russian president who now serves as deputy head of the country's Security Council chaired by Mr Putin, indicated there would be no let-up in Russia's invasion of its neighbour. 'The Istanbul talks are not for striking a compromise peace on someone else's delusional terms but for ensuring our swift victory and the complete destruction of (Ukraine's government),' he said. In an apparent comment on the latest Ukrainian strikes, he declared that 'retribution is inevitable'. 'Our army is pushing forward and will continue to advance,' Mr Medvedev said, adding that 'everything that needs to be blown up will be blown up, and those who must be eliminated will be'. Ukrainians on the streets of Kyiv welcomed their country's stunning drone strike on Russian air bases but were gloomy about the chances for a peace agreement. The Russians 'won't negotiate peace with anyone,' said 43-year-old Ukrainian serviceman Oleh Nikolenko. 'Russia has invested too many resources in this war to just … stop for nothing.' Anastasia Nikolenko, a 38-year-old designer, said diplomacy cannot stop the fighting. 'We need to show by force, by physical force, that we cannot be defeated,' she said. Russia has recently expanded its attacks on Sumy and in the Kharkiv region following Mr Putin's promise to create a buffer zone along the border that might prevent long-range Ukrainian attacks hitting Russian soil. Sumy is about 15 miles from the Russian border. It had a prewar population of around 250,000.