logo
NCAA baseball tournament bracket: Super regional matchups, pairings for region winners

NCAA baseball tournament bracket: Super regional matchups, pairings for region winners

Yahoo2 days ago

There are still six regionals in action on Monday, as 12 teams are fighting in win-or-go-home scenarios to move on in the NCAA baseball tournament.
Only five national seeds have already won their regional, with six more hoping to move onto the super regionals in if-necessary games on Monday. No. 1 Vanderbilt, No. 2 Texas, No. 7 Georgia and No. 11 Clemson were upset in their home regionals, as Louisville, UTSA, Duke and West Virginia have already moved onto the next round.
Advertisement
REQUIRED READING: UTSA shock Texas baseball, beats No. 2 seed to advance from NCAA Austin Regional
No. 5 North Carolina, No. 6 LSU, No. 10 Ole Miss, No. 8 Oregon State and No. 14 Tennessee are all fighting for their season on Monday, against a slew of teams hoping to play spoiler to some of the top national championship contenders this season.
Here's a look at the NCAA baseball tournament bracket, along with super regional matchups and which teams line up for a spot in the College World Series:
NCAA baseball bracket, schedule
Times and dates for super regionals have yet to be announced.
Louisville vs. winner of No. 16 Southern Miss/Miami (No. 1 region vs No. 16 region)
vs. No. 9 Florida State vs. No. 8 Oregon State/USC (No. 8 region vs No. 9 region)
No. 5 North Carolina/Oklahoma vs. Arizona (No. 5 region vs No. 12 region)
No. 13 Coastal Carolina vs. No. 4 Auburn (No. 4 region vs No. 13 region)
No. 3 Arkansas vs. No. 14 Tennessee/Wake Forest (No. 3 region vs No. 14 region)
No. 6 LSU/Arkansas-Little Rock vs. West Virginia (No. 6 region vs No. 11 region)
No. 10 Ole Miss/Murray State vs. Duke No. 7 region vs No. 10 region)
No. 15 UCLA vs. UTSA (No. 2 region vs No. 15 region)
Does the NCAA Men's Baseball Tournament re-seed?
The NCAA tournament does not re-seed to pair lower matchups with higher ones.
Advertisement
This means that Louisville, which came out of the No. 1 Nashville Regional, still finds itself playing the winner of the No. 16 Hattiesburg Regional.
Who gets home field advantage in super regionals?
While teams do not re-seed for matchup purposes, the higher seed will still get home-field advantage.
With this in mind, despite representing the No. 1 bracket, Louisville could still end up playing in Hattiesburg for super regionals if Southern Miss wins Monday.
Who's in the NCAA baseball super regionals?
Louisville
No. 9 Florida State
Arizona
No. 13 Coastal Carolina
No. 4 Auburn
No. 3 Arkansas
West Virginia
Duke
No. 15 UCLA
UTSA
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NCAA baseball tournament bracket: Super regional matchups, pairings

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Sports Bra scores a win for women's sports with five new locations opening in America
The Sports Bra scores a win for women's sports with five new locations opening in America

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Sports Bra scores a win for women's sports with five new locations opening in America

As women's sports are finally starting to get the recognition they've always deserved, a popular Portland, Oregon-based bar dedicated to women's athletics is expanding to cities across the country. The Sports Bra, the first bar in the U.S. dedicated to women's sports, was the brainchild of queer chef Jenny Nguyen. After opening in 2022, it quickly became a Portland staple due to its inclusive atmosphere where all the screens play women's sports, and its extensive food and drink menu. Advertisement Now, based on the success of The Sports Bra, the bar is opening four new franchise locations in Boston, Las Vegas, Indianapolis, and St. Louis. "The addition of these new locations will help fuel the movement for gender equity in sports and provide even more opportunities for fans to watch, cheer, and connect over their favorite women's teams and athletes," The Sports Bra said in its announcement. Since the bar first opened in 2022 after Nguyen realized there was nowhere for her to watch the women's NCAA basketball championship game with her friends, it has received financial backing from investors like Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian, who is married to tennis legend Serena Williams, CBS News reports. Advertisement "Each new location will carry the same heart and mission as our original one in Portland-uplifting women-owned businesses, serving delicious food, and creating a welcoming space for everyone who wants to belong to a community and be part of the movement," Nguyen said in a statement. The Sports Bra started teasing an expansion with social media posts asking fans to suggest cities where they should open up bars, before announcing the new locations on Instagram on June 3. US women's soccer icon Becky Sauerbrunn, Team USA hockey legend Hilary Knight, CEO of the Women's National Football Conference Odessa Jenkins, and Portland WNBA president Inky Son all helped make the announcement in an Instagram video listing the new locations. 'Visibility matters. Representation matters. And celebrating women in sports—loudly and proudly—matters,' the post read.

NCAA argues Zeigler would be first to play 5 DI seasons in 5 years
NCAA argues Zeigler would be first to play 5 DI seasons in 5 years

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

NCAA argues Zeigler would be first to play 5 DI seasons in 5 years

Attorneys for two-time Southeastern Conference defensive player of the year Zakai Zeigler accuse the NCAA of trying to dodge facts and law by asking a federal judge to deny the Tennessee point guard's preliminary injunction seeking to play a fifth season in as many years. Zeigler's attorneys compared the NCAA's motion filed Monday to misdirection and said it used 'cherry-picked' or 'fundamentally flawed' data ahead of Friday's hearing on the preliminary injunction request before U.S. District Judge Katherine A. Crytzer in Knoxville. 'Rather than recognize the evolution of antitrust law's application to its business model, the NCAA relies on outdated legal arguments. And rather than address the law as it is, the NCAA mischaracterizes it to defend its illegal actions,' Zeigler's attorneys wrote in a response filed Tuesday. Zeigler sued the NCAA on May 20 over its rules limiting him to four seasons in a five-year window as an unlawful restraint of trade under both federal and Tennessee laws. His lawsuit argues he could earn between $2 million and as much as $4 million with another season. The NCAA argued Monday that Zeigler's injunction request should be denied because he is asking the court to make him the first athlete in history to play a fifth season in Division I 'as a matter of right.' The NCAA also said using the case of Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia doesn't help because that case was 'decided in error.' Pavia, who started his career at a junior college, was granted another year to play a fifth season, a ruling the NCAA is appealing. Zeigler played four seasons at Tennessee and already has graduated. The NCAA's motion said the life of a collegiate athlete is enabled by the Four-Seasons Rule, which creates a stream of opportunities for rising high school athletes. The NCAA argued the Four-Seasons Rule is necessary for DI athletics to exist separately from 'purely professional athletics.' Zeigler is asking the court to eliminate lines between the NCAA's compensation rules subject to the Sherman Act and eligibility rules that don't involve compensation. The NCAA said nothing would stop Zeigler from asking for a sixth or seventh season while pursuing a doctorate degree if he wins. 'College athletics is a means to a better end for student-athletes — not the end itself,' the NCAA motion said. Zeigler also has known since stepping on the Tennessee campus that he had five years to complete four seasons of basketball and could have challenged the Four-Seasons Rule at any time, the NCAA said. 'Whatever emergency underlies Plaintiff's request for relief is of his own making,' the motion said. It noted Zeigler can keep playing basketball with foreign leagues or the NBA's G League since 'if he had a viable path to the NBA, given his resume, he would already be a viable prospect.' The U.S. Department of Justice also filed a brief Tuesday encouraging the judge to apply Alston's 'flexible' rule of reason approach to Zeigler's injunction request and 'consider how the rule may benefit competition in the relevant labor market' and potentially enhance the athlete experience. Alston was the 9-0 Supreme Court case ruling in June 2021 that opened the door for compensation. The high court agreed with a lower court's determination that NCAA limits on education-related benefits that colleges offer athletes who play Division I basketball and football violate antitrust laws. ___ AP college basketball: and

NCAA argues Zeigler would be first to play 5 DI seasons in 5 years
NCAA argues Zeigler would be first to play 5 DI seasons in 5 years

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

NCAA argues Zeigler would be first to play 5 DI seasons in 5 years

Attorneys for two-time Southeastern Conference defensive player of the year Zakai Zeigler accuse the NCAA of trying to dodge facts and law by asking a federal judge to deny the Tennessee point guard's preliminary injunction seeking to play a fifth season in as many years. Zeigler's attorneys compared the NCAA's motion filed Monday to misdirection and said it used 'cherry-picked" or 'fundamentally flawed' data ahead of Friday's hearing on the preliminary injunction request before U.S. District Judge Katherine A. Crytzer in Knoxville. 'Rather than recognize the evolution of antitrust law's application to its business model, the NCAA relies on outdated legal arguments. And rather than address the law as it is, the NCAA mischaracterizes it to defend its illegal actions,' Zeigler's attorneys wrote in a response filed Tuesday. Zeigler sued the NCAA on May 20 over its rules limiting him to four seasons in a five-year window as an unlawful restraint of trade under both federal and Tennessee laws. His lawsuit argues he could earn between $2 million and as much as $4 million with another season. The NCAA argued Monday that Zeigler's injunction request should be denied because he is asking the court to make him the first athlete in history to play a fifth season in Division I 'as a matter of right.' The NCAA also said using the case of Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia doesn't help because that case was 'decided in error.' Pavia, who started his career at a junior college, was granted another year to play a fifth season, a ruling the NCAA is appealing. Zeigler played four seasons at Tennessee and already has graduated. The NCAA's motion said the life of a collegiate athlete is enabled by the Four-Seasons Rule, which creates a stream of opportunities for rising high school athletes. The NCAA argued the Four-Seasons Rule is necessary for DI athletics to exist separately from 'purely professional athletics.' Zeigler is asking the court to eliminate lines between the NCAA's compensation rules subject to the Sherman Act and eligibility rules that don't involve compensation. The NCAA said nothing would stop Zeigler from asking for a sixth or seventh season while pursuing a doctorate degree if he wins. "College athletics is a means to a better end for student-athletes — not the end itself,' the NCAA motion said. Zeigler also has known since stepping on the Tennessee campus that he had five years to complete four seasons of basketball and could have challenged the Four-Seasons Rule at any time, the NCAA said. 'Whatever emergency underlies Plaintiff's request for relief is of his own making,' the motion said. It noted Zeigler can keep playing basketball with foreign leagues or the NBA's G League since 'if he had a viable path to the NBA, given his resume, he would already be a viable prospect.' The U.S. Department of Justice also filed a brief Tuesday encouraging the judge to apply Alston's 'flexible' rule of reason approach to Zeigler's injunction request and 'consider how the rule may benefit competition in the relevant labor market' and potentially enhance the athlete experience. Alston was the 9-0 Supreme Court case ruling in June 2021 that opened the door for compensation. The high court agreed with a lower court's determination that NCAA limits on education-related benefits that colleges offer athletes who play Division I basketball and football violate antitrust laws. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store