
SC inmate to die by firing squad. Is the 'barbaric' method making a comeback?
SC inmate to die by firing squad. Is the 'barbaric' method making a comeback?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Inmate chooses death by firing squad for execution
Death row inmate Brad Sigmon has chosen to die by firing squad after being convicted for the deaths of his ex-girlfriend's parents.
A South Carolina inmate is set to die by firing squad Friday, a rare execution method in the United States that experts say may be making a comeback in more states as lethal injection drugs become harder to obtain.
Brad Keith Sigmon, 67, will be executed for the 2001 beating deaths of his ex-girlfriend's parents, David and Gladys Larke.
Death row inmates in the state can choose how they die or be given the default option, the state's over 100-year-old electric chair. Sigmon's attorney, Gerald 'Bo' King, said in a statement his client made the best choice he could given the "monstrous" alternatives.
Death by firing squad has been used as an execution method for nearly as long as firearms have existed, and it is still used by countries around the world, Deborah Denno, a Fordham University law professor, told USA TODAY. But in the U.S., firing squads have not been widely used since they were supplanted in popularity by another archaic method, hanging, in the mid-19th century, Denno said.
In recent years, South Carolina became one of five states that have legalized firing squads as an execution method, most recently Idaho in 2023.
"It's safe to say since 1858 we've never had this many states adopting firing squad as a method of execution, and that's a pretty astonishing statistic," Denno said.
Who is Brad Keith Sigmon? More about the inmate who chose the firing squad
Firing squads weren't common, even at the height of their popularity
It is believed the first execution carried out in colonial America was done by firing squad, Denno said. From 1608, when Captain George Kendall was killed, to 2002, at least 143 civilians have been executed by shooting, according to a database known as the Espy File.
Firing squads may also have been used by the military during the American Revolution and the War of 1812, but the bulk of these executions were largely confined to the Civil War, according to Mark Smith, director of the Institute for Southern Studies.
"It wasn't terribly common during the Civil War itself, even when it was used, and it was used primarily as a public deterrent against desertion for both Union and Confederate soldiers," said Smith, who submitted an affidavit on the history of firing squad executions in a case heard by the South Carolina Supreme Court.
Smith said less than 5% of the 26,000 Union soldiers tried for desertion were sentenced to death by firing squad, citing a 2009 book called "Confederate Death Sentences: A Reference Guide." It's not clear how many Confederates received the same sentence, but Smith said about 12% of the Army of Northern Virginia soldiers tried for desertion were sentenced to die by this method.
The Death Penalty Information Center says none of executions by firing squad since 1890 were botched, citing the 2014 book "Gruesome Spectacles: Botched Executions and America's Death Penalty." But the center notes that the Salt Lake City Tribune has reported that the executions of Wallace Wilkerson in 1879 and Eliseo J. Mares in 1951 were botched, adding that Mares was shot in the hip and abdomen and wasn't declared dead for 'several minutes."
Firing squads remain rare, but more states could follow
In modern U.S. history, there have only been three executions by firing squad all of which took place in Utah. The state used this method to kill Ronnie Lee Gardner in 2010, John Albert Taylor in 1996 and Gary Mark Gilmore in 1977.
As lethal injection drugs have become harder to obtain, states with the death penalty have looked to expand their execution methods to firing squads and nitrogen gas, which was first used in the U.S. in January 2024 in Alabama for the execution of Kenneth Eugene Smith.
Many pharmaceutical companies do not want to publicly provide drugs used for lethal injections, former Death Penalty Information Center Deputy Director Ngozi Ndulue previously told the Mississippi Clarion Ledger, part of the USA TODAY Network. In order to resume executions in South Carolina after more than a decade, lawmakers passed a shield law to conceal the identities of those involved in executions, and the state Department of Corrections made over 1,300 inquiries to drug manufacturers, suppliers and compounding pharmacies in search of lethal drugs.
Idaho, Mississippi and Oklahoma also allow death by firing squad, though lethal injection remains the primary method, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. But a bill working its way through the Idaho Legislature following the failed lethal injection of Thomas Creech could make firing squads the state's primary form of capital punishment and others may follow suit, Denno said.
How do firing squad executions work?
The South Carolina Department of Corrections previously told USA TODAY the inmate will be restrained in a metal chair in the corner of a room shared by the state's electric chair, according to the state's protocols. The firing squad will include three volunteers from the corrections staff who will stand behind a wall with loaded rifles 15 feet from the inmate.
The wall will have an opening that won't be visible from the witness room, and bullet-resistant glass has been installed between the death chamber and the witness room. Witnesses typically include family of both the inmate and victim, news media, attorneys and prison staff."The inmate will be strapped into the chair, and a hood will be placed over his head," the department said. "A small aim point will be placed over his heart by a member of the execution team. After the warden reads the execution order, the team will fire. After the shots, a doctor will examine the inmate. After the inmate is declared dead, the curtain will be drawn and witnesses escorted out."
Reporters who witnessed Gardner's execution in 2010 said five volunteer prison staff members fired at him from about 25 feet away with .30-caliber rifles, aiming at a target pinned over his chest as he sat in a chair, ABC News reported. One of the rifles had a blank so none of the volunteers knew whether they fired a fatal bullet, according to ABC. Gardner was pronounced dead within two minutes after the shots were fired.
Denno said at least one execution, which took place in Nevada in 1913, used a machine to pull the trigger instead of human executioners. Idaho Department of Correction spokesperson Sanda Kuzeta-Cerimagic said the agency is considering using 'a remote-operated weapons system alongside traditional firing squad methods.'
Should firing squads still be legal?
The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled last year that the state could execute death row inmates by firing squad, the electric chair or lethal injection, but two of the justices said they felt a firing squad was not legal, the New York Times reported.
Denno said death by firing squads meet the criteria for a constitutional method of execution set by the United States Supreme Court: It's a well-known method, unlike nitrogen hypoxia. It's readily available, unlike some drugs used for lethal injection. And it's effective, meaning that no one has survived a botched execution by firing squad.
While Americans may not like it, particularly given the country's public health crisis of gun violence, Denno believes it is "the least inhumane" and "most honest" form of capital punishment.
"If I were going to have to choose, I would choose firing squad. There's no question about that," Denno said. But at the same time, she added: "It is a barbaric method. It's associated with war time, it's associated with on the street killings, and it's associated with how they kill in countries that we would not want to share an association with, and it is associated with interpersonal violence in this country."
Smith said that he can understand why an inmate would choose the firing squad believing it to be more effective and immediate than the alternatives. But he said Americans who witnessed such executions during the Civil War often described them as ghoulish, and shots sometimes had to be fired more than once to ensure the person was dead.
Though modern firing squad executions will look very different than their 19th century counterparts, Smith said "what we're doing today is a throwback to something that was considered unusual and cruel during the hardest part of American history, and I'm not sure where that really places us today."
Contributing: Amanda Lee Myers, USA TODAY
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
6 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump, pushing bounds of his office with L.A. deployment, faces test in court
WASHINGTON — The mission of President Trump's extraordinary deployment of U.S. Marines and National Guardsmen to Los Angeles depends on whom you ask — and that may be a problem for the White House as it defends its actions in court on Thursday. The hearing, set before U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco, will set off a rare test over the legality of a military deployment on American soil. While California has asked for a temporary restraining order against the government, a judicial decree ordering a full withdrawal would be extraordinary, scholars said. But so, too, was the deployment itself, raising the stakes for the judge entering Thursday's hearing. Breyer, a veteran of the bench appointed by President Clinton and the younger brother of Stephen Breyer, the former Supreme Court justice, could instead define the parameters of acceptable troop activity in a mission that has been murky from its start over the weekend. In an interview, California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta told The Times that he was told that Trump's mission set for both the Marines and the National Guard in Los Angeles 'is to protect federal property, functions and personnel.' 'The property part may well be compliant with the Posse Comitatus Act,' Bonta said, referring to a landmark law passed after the Civil War prohibiting the use of U.S. troops to engage in local law enforcement. 'If all the Marines do is protect buildings, that might be compliant,' he added. 'But it needs to be made clear that they cannot go out into the community to protect federal functions or personnel, if that means the 'functions' of civil immigration enforcement conducted by the 'personnel,' ICE. That means they'll be going to Home Depots, and work sites, and maybe knocking on doors.' Trump told reporters Tuesday that without federal involvement, 'Los Angeles would be burning down right now,' suggesting their role was to confront violent rioters throughout the city. But that same day, Air Force Gen. Gregory Guillot told The Times that Marines sent to L.A. County were limited in their authority and without arrest power, deployed only to defend federal property and personnel. The Los Angeles Police Department continues to lead the response to the protests. Still a third potential mission set emerged within 24 hours, when Immigration and Customs Enforcement posted a photo on Facebook indicating that National Guardsmen were accompanying its agents on the very immigration raids that generated protests in the first place. And White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told The Times that the president's primary motivation behind the federal show of force was to send a message to protesters — an effort to deter agitators in the crowd from resorting to violence. Clarifying the true nature and purpose of the deployment — whether to protect federal property, to supplement ICE raids, to quell unrest, or all of the above — will prove critical to the administration's success on Thursday. Breyer denied California's request for an emergency restraining order on Tuesday, instead giving both sides 48 hours to prepare their case for the hearing. 'He's the most well-regarded district judge in the United States,' said Robert Weisberg, a professor at Stanford Law School. 'He will be very meticulous in asking all of these questions.' Unprecedented though Trump's actions may be, signs of caution or restraint in his decision to refrain from invoking the Insurrection Act could ultimately salvage his mission in court, experts said. The Insurrection Act is the only tool at a president's disposal to suspend Posse Comitatus and deploy active-duty Marines on U.S. soil. While Trump and his aides have made a coordinated public effort to reference the L.A. protesters as insurrectionists, he has, so far, stopped short of invoking the act. The president instead invoked Title 10 of the U.S. Code, which grants him the authority to federalize the National Guard. Even still, California argues that Trump has overstepped the law, which still requires directives to the Guard 'be issued through the governors of the States.' And the White House has suggested that Title 10 authority also justifies the Marine deployment. 'We expect an order from the court making clear what's lawful and what's unlawful, and part of that is making clear that the deployment of the National Guard by Trump is unlawful,' Bonta said. 'And so he might just strike down that deployment,' he added, 'returning the National Guard to the command of its appropriate commander-in-chief, the governor.' Ahilan Arulanantham, co-director of the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA School of Law, said that Title 10 'requires a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion,' and inability of regular law enforcement authorities to execute the laws.' 'I would be shocked if a court determined that those conditions were met by what is actually happening in L.A. at the moment, as those of us living here know,' Arulanantham added. Yet, by relying on Title 10 authorities and by refraining from invoking the Insurrection Act, Trump could save himself from a definitive loss in court that would probably be upheld by the Supreme Court, Weisberg said. 'I do think that Trump is trying to take just one step at a time,' Weisberg said, 'and that he contemplates the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act, but it's premature.' 'There's always the possibility he's being rational,' he added. For Bonta, the case before Breyer is just the latest in a series of legal battles California has brought against the Trump administration — cases that have compelled the White House to lay out evidence, based on truth and facts, before seasoned judges. Moments before Bonta spoke with The Times, Leavitt told reporters in a briefing that 'the majority of the behavior that we have seen taking place in Los Angeles' has been perpetrated by 'mobs of violent rioters and agitators.' 'It's completely untrue and completely unsurprising,' Bonta responded. 'It's what the Trump administration — the press secretary, the secretary of Defense and the secretary of Homeland Security — it's what they've been on a full 24-hour campaign to try to do, to manufacture and construct a reality that's not actually true.' The LAPD and L.A. County Sheriff's Department, Bonta noted, have dealt with worse in the past, not just during major historic events such as the Rodney King riots of 1992 or the George Floyd protests of 2020, but after relatively routine annual events, such as the NBA Finals or the Super Bowl. 'There is absolutely no doubt that the National Guard was unnecessary here,' Bonta said, adding, 'They're using words like insurrection and emergency and rebellion and invasion, because those are the words in the statutes that would trigger what they really want. They want the president to be able to seize more power.' The must-read: 9-year-old Torrance Elementary student deported with father to HondurasThe deep dive: Newsom, in California address, says Trump purposely 'fanned the flames' of L.A. protestsThe L.A. Times Special: Brian Wilson, musical genius behind the Beach Boys, dies at 82 More to come,Michael Wilner —Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman and family members kill her husband in self-defense at Buckhead apartment complex, police say
Atlanta police are investigating a fight between a husband and wife that turned deadly in Buckhead. At about 11:30 p.m. Wednesday, police responded to the Cortland Peachtree Battle apartment complex at 2420 Peachtree Road in Atlanta to reports of shots fired. When they arrived, they found a man dead in a hallway. Atlanta Police Homicide Commander Andrew Smith said a man in his mid-30s entered the apartment building, approached the apartment of his wife, also in her mid-30s, and fired two shots. Smith said the man and woman were in the process of getting a divorce. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] After the man began firing the shots, the woman and two of her family members attacked the man in self-defense and killed him. Police aren't sure at this time how he was able to enter the building and have not revealed how the woman and her family members killed the man. Investigators are collecting evidence and interviewing witnesses. It is unclear if charges will be filed. Police urge anyone with information about this shooting to call Atlanta Crime Stoppers at 404-577-TIPS (8477). Tipsters can remain anonymous. TRENDING STORIES: Manhunt underway for GA man accused of ramming truck into patrol vehicle, leaving deputy injured PHOTOS: These people vanished in Georgia. Now, the GBI is searching for them 'Senseless': Brothers, ages 13 and 14, accused of Clayton party shooting, posting it to social media [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lawsuit filed in fatal police shooting of man cuffed in Albuquerque officer's vehicle
Jun. 11—The fatal shooting by Albuquerque police of Matthew "Solo" Garcia while he was handcuffed in the backseat of an officer's SUV in October prompted a tense protest outside the Central Avenue motel in the hours after the killing. Garcia's family on June 2 filed a lawsuit alleging that the Albuquerque Police Department and city officials failed to follow the law and their own policies throughout the encounter on Oct. 18, 2024. "We want our officers and our department — specifically APD — to comply with our constitution," said Taylor Smith, an attorney who filed the suit. "Had that been the case from the outset, I think we would have a drastically different situation, and probably not a wrongful death lawsuit," he said. The shooting occurred after APD and city officials arrived at the Tewa Lodge to enter apartments and evict tenants, the suit alleges. The action violated the state's Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act and city policies that regulate tenant evictions, it alleges. The lawsuit contends that officers had no right to enter Garcia's room at the Tewa Lodge on Central, just east of San Mateo, without a search warrant or to detain him without cause. It also alleges officers had ample time to search Garcia for a weapon after they cuffed him and placed him in a police vehicle. The 37-page lawsuit, filed last week in 2nd Judicial District Court, seeks undisclosed compensatory and punitive damages and costs. It names the city, APD Chief Harold Medina and three officers and others as defendants. Spokespersons for the city and APD declined Wednesday to respond to the lawsuit. "On APD's side, we will be prepared to respond to the allegations in court," APD spokesman Gilbert Gallegos said in a statement. Garcia had a loaded handgun on his person at the time he was placed into the police SUV. APD officials shared lapel video showing officers Precious Cadena and Zachary Earles firing 11 bullets through the open doors of the vehicle as a third officer wrested the gun from Garcia. "Another important aspect of this case is the fact that the officers were able to get the firearm from Mr. Garcia before they began to shoot him," Smith said. "And there was no communication between the officers when they removed the firearm." APD Chief Medina acknowledged at a news conference that Garcia was placed into the SUV without a pat-down search. An officer had put on gloves to perform a search when Garcia began banging his head against the vehicle, lapel video showed. Officers placed Garcia in the car "in an attempt to calm the situation down," Medina said. The lawsuit alleges that police had ample time to complete the pat-down search in the 40 minutes after Garcia was handcuffed but failed to do so. "It's a good amount of time in which they could have (searched Garcia) while he was being cooperative with officers," Smith said. The lawsuit also contends that the code enforcement operation police and city officials conducted violated city laws and policies and Garcia's constitutional rights. City officials intended to evict all the residents of the Tewa Lodge when they entered the property and began removing tenants from the units without warrants, it alleges. Throughout the interaction, officers "made clear that Mr. Garcia was not free to terminate the encounter and was not free to leave constituting a de facto arrest without reasonable suspicion or probable cause," the suit alleges. Smith said residents in hotel rooms have constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure. "You can't just summarily evict somebody because you believe there may be drugs on the property," he said. "You still have to go through the criminal process."