I am reading Douglas Murray. Should I expect the police to come knocking?
I have a confession to make, and I do hope Police Scotland are taking notes. I am currently reading Douglas Murray's new book: On Democracies and Death Cults. There, I've said it. My God, it feels good to get that out there after so many days of trying to hide it! It feels like a great weight has been lifted from my shoulders.
So all I have to do now is await the knock at the door. Will they send two police officers or more than that? What will the neighbours think as I'm cuffed and put in the back of the police car, its blue lights illuminating the neighbourhood, almost as a warning to others not to go down the same dark path down which I've trod?
It's the same path taken by retired special constable in the Kent constabulary, Julian Foulkes, who was arrested in 2023 for a tweet (what else?). Such an arrest, in a country where young people are detained for speculating about the sexuality of police horses, would not in itself be headline news. Who hasn't been arrested and detained for a tweet?
What made Mr Foulkes's experience even more bizarre was the search of his home by six police officers (obviously the physical threat this 71-year-old posed to others was thought to be considerable) during which one officer, rifling through his book case, was heard to mutter in astonishment that Mr Foulkes's reading material was 'a bit Brexity'.
The other surprising thing about this incident is that Mr Foulkes has now received a personal apology from Kent's chief constable. A British police force accepting it made a mistake? We live in strange times indeed.
So it occurs to me that, once in the dock and formally charged with possessing, reading – and I might as well admit this now and get it over with – enjoying Murray's latest work, I might have to ask for other offences to be taken into account.
There's a scene in the classic Hollywood comedy, Robin and the Seven Hoods, a Rat Pack vehicle full of memorable tunes and funny one-liners, where a sleazy speakeasy is instantly transformed into a gospel hall whenever the police arrive to raid it: bottles of wine and whisky are replaced by Bibles and prayer books, the patrons' tables and chairs become pews, and the strippers and burlesque dancers are replaced on stage by a pulpit, complete with Bing Crosby delivering a sermon on the evils of 'Mr Booze'. In our new, puritanical times, I have started to yearn for a similar device that will instantly transform my own home library.
With a pull of a single lever, my copy of Jordan Peterson's 12 Rules for Life would be whisked away, to be replaced by Greta Thunberg's The Climate Book, while my library of the very un-PC Flashman books by George Macdonald Fraser could be instantaneously placed on a chute leading to the recycling bin outside while their vacant space on my shelves could be filled instead by the collected works of Oprah Winfrey.
May the court have mercy on my soul if its Diversity, Equity and Inclusion officer (who is bound to be a trans ally) discovered either of my copies (hardback and paperback) of The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht or the autobiography of gender-critical comedy writer Graham Linehan. Better surely to at least wrap them in the dust jackets of a George Monbiot book or, in extremis, an Owen Jones one.
And should I voluntarily divulge my greatest crime – leading the Scottish Vote Leave campaign back in 2016? You can't get more 'Brexity' than that. True, some of my Labour Party friends still haven't forgiven me for that act of political apostasy, but even they would draw the line at a prison sentence. Most of them, anyway.
If Mr Foulkes was handcuffed and interrogated for hours at his local nick for the 'crime' of publishing a tweet with the word 'Jews' in it, then what treatment can I expect from Police Scotland, now operating under Humza Yousaf's infamous hate speech law?
Claims of restrictions on free speech, not least by America's vice-president, JD Vance (I've got his book too!) are often overblown. But for six police officers to conduct a search of someone's home, to comment disparagingly about a citizen's taste in literature and to describe it pejoratively as 'a bit Brexity' – Brexit, let's remember, having been the choice of a majority of those officers' fellow citizens nine years ago – only serves to give ammunition to those who compare the UK in 2025 to Orwell's dystopia of 1984.
Maybe it was plain stupidity on the part of the officers and their chief constable, in which case, why do they still have jobs? That is doubly so if their motivation was political spite. If even police officers haven't got a clue about the law, shouldn't we all be scared?
Anyway, I've prepared my defence and informed my wife of the visiting hours at the local prison. I just hope my cell has Wi-Fi otherwise this column will be a bit sporadic in the months ahead. And now I've just realised that I also have Charles Moore's three-volume biography of Margaret Thatcher. Signed by the author! They're going to throw away the key, aren't they?
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Commuters who appeal penalty fares risk criminal record
SCHEDULE FOR 6.30AM LIVE PRIORITY TAG Commuters who challenge train ticket inspectors now risk getting a criminal record, The Telegraph can reveal. Passengers who are handed penalty fares for making mistakes when buying their tickets can now be prosecuted as criminals if their appeals against those penalties are rejected. Rules have changed thanks to a judgment made by the Chief Magistrate earlier this year, the existence of which The Telegraph is revealing now. Penalty fares are given to train passengers who cannot produce a valid ticket when asked by an inspector. The rule change, likely to affect tens of millions of journeys per year, comes after the Office of Rail and Road warned train companies last week to stop punishing people who make 'seemingly unintentional or minor transgressions of fares and ticketing rules'. Public concern about fare-dodging has reached a high point after Robert Jenrick, the Conservative shadow justice secretary, was filmed challenging miscreants in London. Credit: X/@RobertJenrick Yet those who formally dispute an inspector's view of the notoriously complex web of British train ticketing rules could now find themselves with a criminal record if they stand up for what they believe is right. Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring said in a written ruling dated February 21, which has not previously been published: 'I rule that criminal prosecutions can be brought following a penalty fare appeal being dismissed…' The judge said he had been given 'an undertaking that all [Department for Transport Train Operating Companies] will follow the guidance given by the court'. Fines of up to £1,000 and, for repeat offenders, prison sentences of up to three months can result from a conviction for failing to produce a ticket or travelling with intent to avoid payment. A conviction under the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 will appear on DBS background checks, potentially affecting someone's job prospects. Campaigners fear that Judge Goldspring's ruling has given train companies a green light to threaten honest but mistaken commuters with a criminal record as the price of challenging ticket inspectors. Christian Waters, 47, of Leeds, who was targeted for prosecution in 2022 after having his penalty fare appeal rejected, said: 'Why was this ruling not published, given it affects the protection that hundreds of thousands of passengers would assume they had from the regulations? Mr Waters, whose case was dropped after he realised that Government-owned rail company Northern had broken the rules by trying to haul him in front of a judge, said: 'I do feel like they are saying I got off on a technicality now. I still dispute that I did anything wrong; their machine was not working!' 'No one has any protection at all, a sham of an appeal system and then money [is] demanded backed up by criminal law,' he continued. Westminster magistrates' court's unpublicised ruling came about after another Government-owned train company, Southeastern, asked the court if a number of previous prosecutions it brought were lawful. The exact number was not revealed in the judgment. 'It is clearly irrational that a person who brought an unmeritorious appeal could not be prosecuted, whereas someone who did not appeal could be,' ruled Judge Goldspring. While an out-of-court appeals process exists for penalty fares, Parliament never intended for commuters to be criminalised when it created the scheme some 35 years ago. Introducing the 1988 law that created penalty fares, Tory peer Lord Marshall of Leeds told Parliament: 'If, however, a passenger on a train is not in possession of a ticket, he is not to be treated as a criminal under this Bill. He is simply asked to pay a penalty fare, which is a civil penalty and not a criminal one.' Today, Regulation 11(3) of the Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018 says that prosecution is only allowed where the penalty has been cancelled by the train company before the appeal panel has decided the outcome. Yet in his February 2025 ruling, Judge Goldspring said: 'The prosecutor obviously should not bring a prosecution if it is excluded,' but added: 'There is no obligation on the court to investigate whether the defendant has a defence.' Penalty fare appeals are decided on by a private company called Appeal Services, which is a contractor paid by train companies to decide penalty fare appeals. According to Appeal Services' website, in the last 28 days, its assessors rejected 80 per cent of first-stage appeals. Southeastern and the Department for Transport were contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


USA Today
19 minutes ago
- USA Today
Israeli forces seize Gaza aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg, officials say
Israeli forces seize Gaza aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg, officials say Show Caption Hide Caption Climate activist Greta Thunberg sets sail for Gaza to deliver aid "We have to keep trying." Climate activist Greta Thunberg set sail to deliver aid to Gaza just weeks after a similar mission was thwarted by bombs. JERUSALEM, June 9 (Reuters) - Israeli forces have taken command of a charity vessel that had tried to break a naval blockade of the Gaza Strip and the boat with its crew of 12 including activist Greta Thunberg is now heading to a port in Israel, officials said on Sunday. The British-flagged yacht Madleen, which is operated by the pro-Palestinian Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC), was aiming to deliver a symbolic amount of aid to Gaza later on Monday and raise international awareness of the humanitarian crisis there. However, the boat was boarded during the night before it could reach shore, the FFC said on its Telegram account. The Israeli Foreign Ministry later confirmed that it was under Israeli control. More: US vetoes UN Security Council demand for Gaza ceasefire "The 'selfie yacht' of the 'celebrities' is safely making its way to the shores of Israel. The passengers are expected to return to their home countries," the ministry wrote on X. All passengers were safe and unharmed, the ministry later added. "They were provided with sandwiches and water. The show is over." Among the 12-strong crew are Swedish climate campaigner Thunberg and Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament. "The crew of the Freedom Flotilla was arrested by the Israeli army in international waters around 2 a.m.," Hassan posted on X. A photograph showed the crew seated on the boat, all wearing life jackets, with their hands in the air. More: Greta Thunberg sailing to Gaza on aid ship after drone attack setback The yacht is carrying a small shipment of humanitarian aid, including rice and baby formula. The Foreign Ministry said it would be taken to Gaza. "The tiny amount of aid that was on the yacht and not consumed by the 'celebrities' will be transferred to Gaza through real humanitarian channels," it wrote. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz ordered the military on Sunday to prevent the Madleen from reaching Gaza, calling the mission a propaganda effort in support of Hamas. Israel imposed a naval blockade on the coastal enclave after Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007. The blockade has remained in place through multiple conflicts, including the current war, which began after a Hamas-led assault on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, that killed more than 1,200 people, according to an Israeli tally. Gaza's health ministry says over 54,000 Palestinians have been killed since the start of Israel's military campaign. The United Nations has warned that most of Gaza's more than 2 million residents are facing famine. The Israeli government says the blockade is essential to prevent weapons from reaching Hamas. The United Nations' special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, Francesca Albanese, has supported the FFC operation and on Sunday, urged other boats to challenge the Gaza blockade. "Madleen's journey may have ended, but the mission isn't over. Every Mediterranean port must send boats with aid & solidarity to Gaza," she wrote on X. (Reporting by Crispian Balmer, Yomna Ehab and Enas Alashray; Editing by Richard Chang and Lincoln Feast.)
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Australian Reporter Lauren Tomasi Hit By Rubber Bullet In Dramatic Footage From L.A. Protests
Lauren Tomasi, the U.S. correspondent for Australia's 9News, appeared to be shot by a rubber bullet while reporting on the immigration protests in Los Angeles. 9News published footage of the incident, claiming that Tomasi was deliberately targeted by a police officer in the downtown district during the third day of clashes over Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. More from Deadline Trump Deploys 2,000 Troops To L.A. As Backlash & Protests To ICE Raids Surge; POTUS Action "Purposefully Inflammatory," Newsom Warns Los Angeles Q1 Shoot Days Continue To Plummet, Down By 22% Amid Wildfires L.A. Wildfires: Property Damage Estimated At Between $28B-$53.8B; Full Recovery Will Take At Least Until 2029 The video captures her wrapping up a live broadcast from the protests, telling viewers that the 'situation has now rapidly deteriorated, the LAPD moving in on horseback, firing rubber bullets at protesters, moving them on through the heart of L.A.' A police officer then appears to raise their gun in Tomasi's direction and fire. A projectile appears to hit her leg, and Tomasi cries out in pain. The reporter and her cameraperson then retreat, with a bystander shouting: 'You just f*****g shot the reporter!' She is asked if she is ok, to which Tomasi replies: 'I'm good, I'm good.' U.S. Correspondent Lauren Tomasi has been caught in the crossfire as the LAPD fired rubber bullets at protesters in the heart of Los Angeles. #9NewsLATEST: — 9News Australia (@9NewsAUS) June 9, 2025 In a statement shared with The Guardian, 9News said: 'Lauren Tomasi was struck by a rubber bullet. Lauren and her camera operator are safe and will continue their essential work covering these events.' 'This incident serves as a stark reminder of the inherent dangers journalists can face while reporting from the frontlines of protests, underscoring the importance of their role in providing vital information,' the network said on Monday.' Australian lawmaker Sarah Hanson-Young urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to raise the incident with U.S. President Donald Trump, describing it as 'shocking' and 'completely unacceptable.' Tomasi is not the only journalist to be caught up in the protests. Nick Stern, a British news photographer, reportedly needed emergency surgery after sustaining a leg wound during the clashes. There were also reports of journalists being harassed by protestors. Best of Deadline Tony Awards: Every Best Musical Winner Since 1949 Tony Awards: Every Best Play Winner Since 1947 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More