
Two Grand Canyon-size valleys on the far side of the moon formed within 10 minutes, scientists say
About 3.8 billion years ago, two massive canyons likely formed on the moon in a span of less than 10 minutes, according to new research.
The extraordinary formations, each comparable in size to Earth's Grand Canyon, are hidden on the far side of the moon — the side that always faces away from Earth — near the lunar south pole, where NASA's Artemis III mission aims to land humans in late 2026.
The lunar canyons are both part of the larger Schrödinger impact basin, where an object yet to be identified slammed into the moon billions of years ago. The colossal impact likely also led to the creation of the canyons as well, according to a new study published Tuesday in the journal Nature Communications.
The energy unleashed that created the canyons was 1,200 to 2,200 times more powerful than the nuclear explosion energy once planned to excavate a second Panama Canal, the study authors estimate.
Future missions could visit the basin and take rock samples to help scientists better understand the murky origins and history of the moon. Studying the moon also could reveal what conditions were like early on in the solar system as asteroids and other rocky debris collided with planets and moons.
'The record of early Solar System bombardment has been erased from the Earth,' said lead study author Dr. David Kring, principal scientist at the Lunar and Planetary Institute, an institute of the Universities Space Research Association, in an email. 'It was destroyed by erosion, plate tectonics, and other geologic processes. If we want (to) understand how impact events affected the early Earth, we have to collect samples from places on the Moon like the Schrödinger basin and its canyons.'
Piecing together an ancient impact
Canyons and ravines created by streaks of rocky debris radiate from Schrödinger basin.
Lunar geologists have always known that the two canyons featured in the new study, called Vallis Schrödinger and Vallis Planck, were particularly large. The research team behind the latest report, however, was able to analyze images of the massive geological features using photos and elevation data captured by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, which has been circling the moon since 2009. The data allowed the team to construct maps of the region, including the basin and its surroundings.
The measurements showed these two canyons were similar in width and length to the Grand Canyon. Vallis Schrödinger is 168 miles (270 kilometers) long and 1.7 miles (2.7 kilometers) deep, and Vallis Planck is 174 miles (280 kilometers) long and 2.2 miles (3.5 kilometers) deep.
'I have trained students and astronauts in the vicinity of the Grand Canyon, and taken several river trips through the Grand Canyon, so I realized the Grand Canyon was an important way to help people understand the dramatic scale of the lunar landscape,' Kring said.
The spacecraft data also helped the researchers determine the distances along each canyon from the point of impact. The team used the distances in impact cratering calculations to figure out the velocities of the rocks that produced the canyons and the sizes of the material in those rock streams, Kring said.
The calculations enabled the researchers to fit together what they think happened 3.8 billion years ago during a time when asteroid and comets were bombarding Earth and the moon.
'Nearly four billion years ago, an asteroid or comet flew over the lunar south pole, brushed by the mountain summits of Malapert and Mouton, and hit the lunar surface,' Kring said. 'The impact ejected high-energy streams of rock that carved two canyons … in less than 10 minutes.'
For comparison, it took 5 million to 6 million years for water to erode the landscape of Arizona to create the Grand Canyon.
The celestial object that plowed into the moon likely hit with a speed of more than 34,000 miles per hour (nearly 55,000 kilometers per hour). The impactor created the Schrödinger basin, which is nearly 200 miles (320 kilometers) wide, while also propelling debris that carved deep grooves leading away from the basin.
Then, the ejected debris that created the canyons likely soared over the lunar surface and then collided with it at speeds of about 2,237 miles per hour (3,600 kilometers per hour). These secondary impact craters formed the canyons, according to the study.
Investigating lunar history
The energy of the impacts that created the canyons was on a gargantuan scale. The study authors estimate it was more than 700 times greater than the total yield of nuclear explosion tests conducted by the United States, the former Soviet Union and China. The energy of the blasts was also about 130 times more destructive than the energy in the worldwide stockpile of nuclear weapons, according to the study.
While many impact craters on Earth have long disappeared due to erosion and other natural factors, the moon's craters can help researchers better understand what happened on Earth billions of years ago.
'The Schrödinger crater is similar in many regards to the dino-killing Chicxulub crater on Earth,' said study coauthor Gareth Collins, professor of planetary science at Imperial College London, in a statement. 'By showing how Schrödinger's (kilometers)-deep canyons were carved, this work has helped to illuminate how energetic the ejecta from these impacts can be.'
Noah Petro, NASA project scientist for both the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and Artemis III, which aims to land humans on the moon for the first time since 1972, believes the paper presents a nice hypothesis for how the canyons were formed. Petro was not involved in the study.
'What's presented in the paper is one hypothesis tying back to secondary cratering and these gouges that radiate far and wide away from them,' Petro said. 'I think that the interesting thing the paper does is this connection back to a single point, and then hypothesizing what that means for the formation and the geometry of the formation of the basin. They're using modern observations from a spacecraft that's been orbiting the moon now for over 15 years to reconstruct an event that happened 3.8 billion years ago.That's always exciting because we're peeling back the layers of time which are preserved so well for us on the moon.'
Future exploration of the moon
The south pole of the moon is filled with geologic mysteries that scientists are eager to explore, Petro said.
The Schrödinger impact basin, one of the younger, large impact craters on the moon, is within a few hundred kilometers of the moon's oldest and largest impact basin, Petro said.
Schrödinger is located in the outer reaches of the South Pole–Aitken basin, which future crewed Artemis missions are planning to explore.
The South Pole–Aitken basin is estimated to be about 4.3 billion years old, but only rock samples will be able to prove whether that's the case, Petro said.
'The first astronauts to walk at the south pole will potentially be walking on the oldest rocks that humans have ever explored,' he said.
The new study shows that the lunar debris excavated by the impacts that created the Schrödinger basin and its canyons radiated out asymmetrically, distributing it away from the lunar south pole, rather than burying the region. This means that any rocks collected by Artemis astronauts will provide glimpses of the earliest lunar history, Kring said.
Kring and his team plan to continue studying sites that could potentially be explored by future missions.
Team Draper's lunar lander will aim to land in the Schrödinger Basin in 2026 under NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services initiative, which is part of the Artemis program. The robotic mission will deliver seismometers to study tectonic activity within the lunar interior, among other scientific objectives.
'The far side of the moon is the realm of the explorer,' Petro said. 'Whether it's a robotic mission or an astronaut mission that goes to the moon, Schrödinger basin has never been seen or visited by a mission. We are deep in the exploration of these large craters because they are so unique. They're giant backhoes that have dug up the lunar surface and exposed material from underneath, so they become very compelling targets.'
Kring sees value in collecting samples from the basin and canyons to help determine whether the estimated age of both is correct, as well as studying the ancient lunar material they helped bring to the surface.
'If an astronaut was able to collect samples from the rims of the canyons, they would collect samples from up to 3 kilometers (1.9 miles) beneath the surface,' he said.
And the astronauts would be able to see incredible views.
'The splendor of the canyons is so dramatic that if exposed on Earth, they would be national or international parks,' Kring said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick
The White House has withdrawn as its nominee for Nasa administrator, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head Nasa,' the US president posted online. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America first in space.' Related: Drugs, marital advice and that black eye: key takeaways from Trump's Oval Office send-off for Elon Musk Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead Nasa, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. Isaacman, whose removal was earlier reported by Semafor, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump 'and all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Isaacman's removal comes just days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge) created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Musk, according to a person familiar with his reaction, was disappointed by Isaacman's removal. 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X, responding to the news of the White House's decision. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear whom the administration might tap to replace Isaacman. One name being floated is the retired US air force Lt Gen Steven Kwast, an early advocate for the creation of the US space force and a Trump supporter, according to three people familiar with the discussions. Isaacman, the former CEO of the payment processor company Shift4, had broad space industry support but drew concerns from lawmakers over his ties to Musk and SpaceX, where he spent hundreds of millions of dollars as an early private spaceflight customer. The former nominee had donated to Democrats in prior elections. In his confirmation hearing in April, he sought to balance Nasa's existing moon-aligned space exploration strategy with pressure to shift the agency's focus on Mars, saying the US can plan for travel to both destinations. As a potential leader of Nasa's 18,000 employees, Isaacman faced a daunting task of implementing that decision to prioritize Mars, given that Nasa has spent years and billions of dollars trying to return its astronauts to the moon. On Friday, the space agency released new details of the Trump administration's 2026 budget plan that proposed killing dozens of space science programs and laying off thousands of employees, a controversial overhaul that space advocates and lawmakers described as devastating for the agency. The Montana Republican Tim Sheehy, a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee, posted that Isaacman had been 'a strong choice by President Trump to lead Nasa'. Related: Universe's mysteries may never be solved because of Trump's Nasa cuts, experts say 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' Sheehy said. Some scientists saw the nominee change as further destabilizing to Nasa as it faces dramatic budget cuts without a confirmed leader in place to navigate political turbulence between Congress, the White House and the space agency's workforce. 'So not having [Isaacman] as boss of Nasa is bad news for the agency,' Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer Jonathan McDowell posted. 'Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being Nasa head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario,' McDowell added, referring to an exercise in the science fiction franchise Star Trek where cadets are placed in a no-win scenario. With Reuters
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk backs down on threat to retire SpaceX Dragon spacecraft amid Trump dispute
Elon Musk, the world's richest person, on Thursday said his company SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft after he engaged in an extraordinary public fallout with Donald Trump who had threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's businesses. He later appeared to back down. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk posted on the social media platform X, which he owns. A few minutes earlier Trump had posted on Truth Social – the media platform that he owns – that he might cancel huge lucrative contracts with Musk's businesses, which include the SpaceX company that is building a fleet of rockets. Related: Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump said. Nasa relies on SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). Hours after issuing his threat, Musk appeared to take pleas from users on his social media platform X to 'cool down' and he posted: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Since 2008, SpaceX has received more than $20bn in government contracts, largely from Nasa and the Department of Defense. In March, two Nasa astronauts returned to Earth in a Dragon capsule after being stranded on the ISS for nearly nine months, after their Boeing Starliner capsule faced technical issues and returned to Earth without them. The next SpaceX Dragon launch is scheduled to take place on 10 June. The Dragon is expected to carry four people to and from the ISS on Axiom Mission 4. Nasa's press secretary, Bethany Stevens, in a statement on X after Musk's announcement, said the agency 'will continue to execute upon the president's vision for the future of space'. Related: Trump v Musk: 10 ways they can further hurt each other 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met,' she added. Musk's announcement came amid an escalating dispute with Trump that began after he denounced the president's tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk later accused Trump of 'ingratitude' for the millions he spent to get him elected. Trump, in turn, said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. The president wrote earlier on Thursday that Musk was 'wearing thin' and that the tech billionaire 'went crazy' after he was asked to depart the White House last week as head of Trump's 'department of government efficiency' .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
This Week In Space podcast: Episode 164 — Goodbye NASA?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. On Episode 164 of This Week In Space, Rod Pyle and Tariq Malik discuss these concerning times for NASA with Casey Dreier, the Chief of Space Policy for The Planetary a wild week it's been for NASA. With drastic budget cuts looming — pending any action by Congress — then comes the sudden and unexpected pulling of Jared Isaacman for the role of NASA Administrator, with no replacement named. Then came the very public split between President Trump and Elon Musk, and a flurry of furious Twitter/X and Truth Social postings, aimed at each other with razor-sharp edges. And finally, the proposed and drastic cuts to NASA outreach and education budgets, slimming them to nearly nothing. These are strange and concerning times for America's space agency, a premier global brand and icon of peaceful American prowess. We turned to Dreier, who has been quite vocal in his concern, for context. These are critical times for spaceflight, so you won't want to miss this episode! Download or subscribe to this show at: episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at Musk vs Trump--THE BROMANCE HAS EXPERIENCED A R-U-D ispace strikes out 60th Anniversary First US Spacewalk Marc Garneau, First Canadian in Space, Dies at 76 Joined by Casey Dreier of the Planetary Society Smallest budget since 1961 NASA Workforce Changes Chart The Planetary Society reissues urgent call to reject disastrous budget proposal for NASA These Are All The NASA Missions That Trump Wants To Cancel Proposed NASA cuts to space science: 'Staggering' NASA FY 2026 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET REQUEST SUMMARY Proposed NASA cuts to space science: 'Staggering' Senate response to White House budget for NASA: Keep SLS, nix science After Trump pulled NASA nomination, Musk ally Jared Isaacman says stint in politics was 'thrilling' Pulled NASA nomination blindsides space community: 'Major blunder' Lieutenant General STEVEN L. KWAST SAY NO TO A DARK AGE OF NASA SCIENCE Advocacy Action Center TOP TELESCOPE PICK: Looking for a telescope to see planets and comets? We recommend the Celestron Astro Fi 102 as the top pick in our best beginner's telescope guide. Finally, did you know you can launch your own SpaceX rocket? Model rocket maker Estes' stunning scale model of a Falcon 9 rocket that you can pick up now. The launchable model is a detailed recreation of the Falcon 9 and retails for $149.99. You can save 10% by using the code IN-COLLECTSPACE at checkout, courtesy of our partners This Week in Space covers the new space age. Every Friday we take a deep dive into a fascinating topic. What's happening with the new race to the moon and other planets? When will SpaceX really send people to Mars? Join Rod Pyle and Tariq Malik from as they tackle those questions and more each week on Friday afternoons. You can subscribe today on your favorite podcatcher.