Reform revolution that could change Britain: Labour in shock, Tories lose every council they defended - and Farage in control of some of England's biggest authorities
Nigel Farage sent shockwaves through the political establishment yesterday.
In a stunning breakthrough, Reform seized control of a string of major councils across the country – and inflicted a humiliating defeat on Labour in a by-election in the previously safe seat of Runcorn and Helsby.
Mr Farage last night hailed his party's performance as a 'Reform-quake' and claimed it signalled 'the end of two-party politics'.
He said Reform had had 'the Labour Party for lunch' and 'wiped out' the Conservatives in parts of England.
Mr Farage said the results marked 'the beginning of the end' for the Conservative Party, with Reform now 'the main opposition party' despite having just five MPs.
Projections suggested the results would put Mr Farage on course to be Prime Minister if they were repeated at a General Election.
Polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice said: 'The big question we were asking ourselves was: Are Reform posing a major challenge to the traditional dominance of British politics by Conservatives and Labour?
'Is that challenge really there? And I think we now know that the answer to that question is yes.'
Labour and the Tories were both on track last night to lose around two-thirds of the seats they were defending.
From a standing start, Reform won more than 650 seats – similar to the number lost by the Conservatives.
Labour, which was defending far fewer seats, looked set to lose around 200.
The Tories lost control of every council they were defending including some in heartland areas such as Kent.
In Durham, which Labour held for more than a century until recently, the party was left with just four seats out of 98 as Reform swept to power.
The results leave Reform in control of some of England's biggest authorities, putting the party's novice councillors in charge of budgets totalling billions.
Sir Keir Starmer said he was 'disappointed' by the results, but insisted he understood the reasons for voters' disaffection and would respond. 'I get it,' he said. 'We must deliver that change even more quickly. We must go even further.'
Kemi Badenoch apologised to hundreds of Tory councillors who lost their seats. She said 'protest is in the air' against both main parties and acknowledged she faced 'a big job to do to rebuild trust with the public'.
However, writing in this newspaper, Boris Johnson said the results were 'no earthquake' and insisted the Tories under Mrs Badenoch have a 'good and growing' chance of winning the next election because the Labour Government is 'so bad'.
On a dramatic day:
Mr Farage said Reform-led councils would ban working from home, slash waste and resist Government efforts to house Channel migrants in local hotels.
Sir Keir faced a Labour backlash as even those who were victorious blamed public anger over cuts to winter fuel payments and benefits for the disastrous results across the board.
Labour sources said the PM was drawing up plans for a crackdown on illegal migration in a bid to neuter Reform's appeal.
Sir Ed Davey said the Lib Dems were now 'the party of Middle England' after taking control of Oxfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Shropshire and gaining more than 140 seats.
Senior Tories rallied round Mrs Badenoch, with former rival Robert Jenrick saying it was 'complete nonsense' to suggest he would be doing a better job.
Reform's newly elected Lincolnshire mayor Dame Andrea Jenkyns used her victory speech to call for asylum seekers living in hotels to be rehoused in tents.
The Greens hailed a new era of 'five-party politics' after gaining more than 40 seats and taking 11 per cent of the projected vote.
Mr Farage hit out at Labour's 'lunatic Net Zero policies' as Reform took control of Doncaster Council in Ed Miliband's political backyard.
The Reform surge began at 6am when Sarah Pochin won the Runcorn and Helsby by-election by just six votes.
Mr Farage branded Sir Keir a 'coward' for failing to campaign in what had been one of Labour's 50 safest seats until MP Mike Amesbury was forced to quit after assaulting a constituent on a drunken night out.
Addressing activists in Newton Aycliffe, County Durham, Mr Farage said council staff 'working on climate change, diversity initiatives or.... who think that you go on working from home, I think you all better be seeking alternative careers very, very quickly.'
He said Reform councils would also 'resist' asylum seekers being 'dumped into the north of England, getting everything for free'.
Speaking later to newly elected councillors in Staffordshire, Mr Farage said: 'It is a seismic change in British politics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Pembrokeshire activists join 4,000 strong March to Gaza
Jim Scott, a tree surgeon and activist from Mathry, and Tamsin Nash, a Pembrokeshire art curator and mother of four are joining the Global March to Gaza. The march involves more than four thousand people from 54 different countries walking on foot on a three-day, 30-mile hike through the Sinai desert to the border crossing at Gaza. They aim to demand a stop to the genocide and demanding that Israel re-opens the border to allow a humanitarian corridor to be established. (Image: Jim Scott) The campaigners set off on Friday, June 13, aiming to reach Rafah by Sunday, June 15. Pembrokeshire campaigner Jim Scott joins the march as part of the official delegation from CND Cymru. 'I am aware that by marching 30 miles on foot through the Sinai desert to the Rafah border we may face arrest, detention, deportation or imprisonment,' said Jim. 'A worse outcome might be that if we do reach Rafah which is a militarised zone, we may face military aggression and could even be killed ourselves by the Israeli army.' Upon his arrival in Egypt Jim published an open letter sent to Pembrokeshire's Labour MP, Henry Tufnell, Eluned Morgan MS and other elected representatives in Wales including secretary of state for Wales Jo Stevens heavily criticising them for inaction over the Gaza genocide. 'As one of your constituents and as a citizen of the United Kingdom, I feel I must act where you have not acted and take steps to prevent the further genocide in Gaza where your government has failed to do so,' the letter begins. 'As the British government and yourself have failed in your international duty and legal obligation to effectively oppose and prevent war crimes, ethnic cleansing and genocide in occupied Palestine over the last 19 months, I feel I have no choice but to take action myself. 'Only those of us who resist, oppose and fight back against Israel's crimes now will be on the right side of history.' (Image: Jim Scott) The letter concludes by imploring politicians to demand that a humanitarian corridor to be opened via Rafah and criticised the UK Government for not taking meaningful steps such as ending arms sales and proper economic sanctions on the entire Israeli state. Pembrokeshire mother of four, Tasmin, described herself as an 'empathetic human', when asked why she'd travelled to Egypt to join the delegation. 'Yesterday I saw four bewildered children bleeding on a hospital bed, from another bomb attack. How can I carry on as normal?' she said. 'With tens of thousands murdered as Israel continues to destroy and burn people alive, I cannot rest. I cannot stay silent. 'We have witnessed atrocities enacted with impunity for 20 months. Poets killed, journalists assassinated, children snipered, fathers murdered for being hungry, newborns denied critical care and left to die, children orphaned, women shot - the crimes are colossal. I have protested, lobbied, fundraised, talked, disrupted." "Now is the time to mobilise our passion and humanity. Alongside the 12 hearts aboard the Freedom Flotilla I endeavour to do what our governments have failed - rise and move to show it's the people who will make the difference. "We are united for justice and solidarity for Palestine." (Image: Jim Scott) The members of the delegation said they were moved by the high levels of support offered from many people who have pledged to donate to a crowdfunder to help with the costs of attending the march. A spokesperson for CND Cymru said: 'We are proud to support this important march by sending a delegation. 'In the face of the genocide of the Palestinian people, western governments have been silent. In being part of this march, we are telling the Palestinian people we bear witness. And we will not forgive those who have committed these acts of brutality. 'As the Madleen and Conscience carried both material aid and the hope and goodwill of the people of the world, so too does this international march.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
How Labour's winter fuel fiasco paves the way for means-testing the state pension
As Rachel Reeves announced an about-turn on her winter fuel policy this week, she opened a whole new can of worms for pensioners. The Chancellor's decision to return the payments to those with an income of under £35,000 has created a complicated means-test and reignited calls from some commentators to claw back other benefits, such as the state pension, from those deemed 'wealthy'. Means-testing the state pension system would be a radical move that no British chancellor has dared attempt before. But Labour is desperate for cash and has shown it is not afraid to anger older voters. Could Ms Reeves possibly get away with it? Introduced in 1909 and originally worth five shillings a week, the state pension is a cornerstone of the welfare state. Today, workers pay National Insurance contributions for 35 years to receive its full benefit. The full new state pension is £230.25 a week, while the old 'basic' pension – for those who reached state pension age before April 2016 – is £176.45 a week. However, the benefit has become increasingly unaffordable to administer. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) predicts the country's spending on pensioners will reach £180bn by 2029. The idea of reserving the payment for those who need it most has therefore become increasingly attractive. Both Labour and the Tories pledged to keep the 'triple lock' that means pensions are increased each April by the highest of wage growth, inflation or 2.5pc. Means-testing could be one way to dramatically cut costs, without breaking that pledge. In January, Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, caused uproar when she said her party would 'look at means-testing' the state pension. Key Labour advisers, think tanks and academics have also voiced support for the plan. Means-testing would completely upend the system. But this week's winter fuel policy reversal could make it slightly easier. Under the latest changes, all pensioners will receive the winter fuel payment, worth up to £300 a year. However, those who earn more than £35,000 will be expected to return it to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). To administer the new system, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will tell HMRC who they've paid the winter fuel payment to. HMRC will then apply the income test to determine who will need to repay the money. Government departments have long shared data about taxpayers, including doing so specifically to pay or not pay a pensioner benefit, such as free TV licences. But is this Whitehall bureaucracy really a slow slide towards a means-tested state pension? Telegraph Money reader Jim Humphrey fears so. The 69-year-old, a part-time financial adviser from St Albans, is one of the estimated two million pensioners who will still not receive the winter fuel payment. This is because his income exceeds the £35,000 threshold. He is worried Labour is on a 'slippery slope' to means-testing the state pension. He said: 'I don't need the money, but it is a question of principle... I have paid tax for many, many years.' Other state benefits have been means-tested in recent years. Free TV licences for all over-75s were scrapped in August 2020 and restricted to those who qualify for pension credit. Last year's restriction of the winter fuel payment to those on pension credit was also a form of means-testing – as is the payment of pension credit to those on the lowest incomes. Campaigners and economists have also pushed for free prescriptions for the over-60s to be similarly restricted. Last October, Dr Kristian Niemietz, of the Institute for Economic Affairs think tank, said: 'Means-testing old-age benefits is a way to make fiscal savings while insulating the poorest from cuts.' Labour is also gearing up to ban over-60s from taking student loans from 2027, as it introduces a 'Lifetime Learning Entitlement'. Ben Ramanauskas, of think tank Policy Exchange, said: 'The Government's approach to cutting spending through means-testing is the right one. 'However, this alone will not significantly lower the cost of the UK's unsustainable welfare bill, improve public finances, or give younger taxpayers a fair deal.' Other countries already operate means-testing on their state pension payouts. In Canada, which operates a flat-rate benefit system, a maximum of $1,433 (£773.30) is paid each month, and is topped up for those on low incomes. In Chile, a pension is paid to those over 65, unless your family's wealth is deemed to be in the top 10pc of the population. Those with an income of less than $1,210,828 (£955.30) a month are eligible, whether they are still working or not. In Australia, the state pension – or 'age pension' – has no reference to how long a person has worked. Instead, it is granted as an age-based means-tested benefit. About a third of pensioners have their pension cut because they have other sources of income. Moving to an Australian-style system would be highly controversial, angering those who say if you have 'paid in' you should get the full amount irrespective of your income. Mike Ambery, of pension provider Standard Life, said: 'There would need to be a change in applying for state pension as well as the detail to replicate means-testing in other countries. The practicality and change to a universal system now would be operationally significant.' There would be other barriers to overcome. The Government could only make significant savings if people are able to generate big enough private pension savings. But despite the 'automatic enrolment' reforms that made workplace pensions compulsory, millions of people are on course for meagre retirement incomes. Research by the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) found that the cost of all but the most basic retirement has increased over the past year. Two retirees running one small car, eating out weekly and taking a four-star foreign holiday each year would now need an income of almost £35,000 each before tax to retire comfortably, rising to £52,000 if they live alone. Meanwhile, anyone living alone on the state pension would even fall short of a basic retirement, which now requires an income of £13,400 a year, the PLSA said.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's latest freebie: British sovereignty in exchange for nothing
While we can't rely on the French to help police the Channel – despite paying them £500 million for the privilege – we can always trust our Gallic cousins to bear a grudge. We already knew that the Prime Minister's great EU 'reset ' was a sham; that much was clear when all we got in return was the use of e-gates that were already operational in many European countries. Now, we learn that we may not even be granted access to the bloc's industrial defence programme, despite Sir Keir Starmer's insistence that defence and security was a central tenet of the deal. As he boasted last month after selling us out to Brussels: 'We've also struck a new defence and security partnership to strengthen our cooperation and strengthen our security – which is vital in this dangerous new era. 'And it will open the door to working with the EU's new defence fund – providing new opportunities for our defence industry, supporting British jobs and livelihoods.' Except, of course, the French have other ideas. In yet another example of just how bad Labour is at negotiating anything (see also the Chagos surrender and, more recently, the 'deal' to allow Spanish border guards to check passports on Gibraltar) we now learn that Emmanuel Macron is trying to shut out British arms firms from the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP). While different to the defence fund, which is known as SAFE (Security Action for Europe), EDIP will see cash pumped into joint procurement projects and the production of weapons, ammunition and other military hardware. It was created for the benefit of the EU and 'allies' but French diplomats have insisted the tool should be solely used to boost firms based inside the EU, as well as Norway and Ukraine – shutting out the UK. So much for Starmer's boast that the reset deal would put Britain 'back on the world stage' and give us 'unprecedented access to the EU market, the best of any country.' Labour is yet to reveal how many billions is being squandered on a reset that has already prompted another big fat 'non' from Paris.
